Cited by 32COVID-19 and Mental HealthChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional DevelopmentCommunication and COVID-19 Impact

Don't Think That Kids Aren't Noticing: Indirect Pathways to Children's Fear of COVID-19

Open access
Radanović, Ana, Micić, Isidora, Pavlović, Svetlana, Krstić, Ksenija·2021·Frontiers in Psychology

Abstract

The present study is couched within Rachman's three-pathway theory of fear acquisition (Rachman, 1977, 1991). Besides the direct contact with the objects of fear, this model also includes two indirect pathways to fear acquisition: negative information transmission and modeling. The study aims to explore the contribution of these three factors to the level of children's fear of COVID-19. The sample consisted of 376 children (59.6% girls), aged 7–19 (Mage = 12.77, SD age = 3.57), and one of their parents (Mage = 42.88, SD age = 6.00). The survey was conducted online during the COVID-19 national state of emergency in the Republic of Serbia. The children assessed their fear of COVID-19, general fearfulness, negative information transmission, and modeling by their parents, as well as the level of exposure to negative information outside their home. The parents assessed their own fear of COVID-19 and trait anxiety. Parents' anxiety, children's age, and children's general fearfulness were used as covariates. The results of our path analysis provide support for Rachman's notion of indirect pathways. The more the parents were afraid of COVID-19, the more they expressed this (either verbally or through their behavior), which in turn led to an increase in the children's fear of COVID-19. Furthermore, children's exposure to negative information related to COVID-19, provided by their teachers and peers or stemming from the media, directly contributed to the level of children's fear. The results of the study emphasize the importance of caregivers' behavior during global health crises and provide some clues as to what caregivers may do to protect their children's mental health in such circumstances.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.635952

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Psychoeducational strategies are especially valuable for treating youth with pandemic-related worries because they empower pediatric patients and initially modify IU.

    “Consequently, psychoeducational strategies are especially valuable for treating youth with pandemic-related worries because they empower pediatric patients and serve to initially modify IU (Radanovic et al, 2021).”

    From Intolerance of Uncertainty and Health-Related Anxiety in Youth amid the COVID-19 Pandemic: Understanding and Weathering the Continuing Storm (2022) · cites this paper as Radanovic et al, 2021

    The Discussion > Implications recommends talking with children about the pandemic in ways that help them understand it and reduce their worries. It does not describe psychoeducation as a treatment for pediatric patients, claim that it empowers them, or discuss initially modifying intolerance of uncertainty (IU). (LLM, conf=0.83)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Radanovic et al. (2021) found that children's worries increased with greater exposure to threat messages from parents and outside sources.

    “Further, Radanovic et al. (2021) found that children’s worries increased with greater exposure to threat messages originating from parents as well as from outside sources (e.g., peers, news reports, internet, social media, etc.).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Radanović, A., Micić, I., Pavlović, S., & Krstić, K.
Affiliations
University of Belgrade (RS)
Corresponding author
Radanović, Ana
Venue
Frontiers in Psychology
Published
2021-03-11
Volume
12
Pages
635952-635952
ISSN
1664-1078 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3135228172
Cited by
32
References
38
Citations by year
2025: 4 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 3
FWCI
4.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Frontiers in Psychology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • IPIR – Repository of the Institute for Educational Research (Institute for Educational Research, Belgrade, Serbia) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Faculty of Philosophy (University of Belgrade) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
Ministarstvo Prosvete, Nauke i Tehnološkog Razvoja (No. 451-03-9/2021-14/200018, 451-03-9/2021-14, 451-03-9/2021-14/200018, 451-03-9/)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › COVID-19 and Mental Health
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Social Sciences › Communication › Communication and COVID-19 Impact
Keywords
COVID-19 pandemic, children's fears, fear acquisition, parental role modeling, parental anxiety, media exposure, global health crisis, child mental health

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review