COVID-19 protective behaviors are forms of prosocial and unselfish behaviors
Open accessAbstract
The aim of this study was to explore the effects of prosocial and antisocial personality tendencies and context-related state factors on compliance with protective behaviors to prevent the spread of coronavirus infections. Six types of prosocial tendencies (altruism, dire, compliant, emotional, public, and anonymous) and selfishness as the antisocial tendency were included as personality factors, while fear related to the pandemic and empathy toward vulnerable groups (i.e., those in forced isolation) were context-related factors. Furthermore, mediation effect of empathy and moderation effect of fear were explored in relations between personality factors and protective behaviors. The sample included 581 participants (78.3% females). The data were collected from March 28 to April 6, 2020, during the emergency state and curfew in Serbia. The results showed that tendency to help anonymously had a positive effect and selfishness had a negative effect on protective behaviors, over and above demographic characteristics and context-related factors. Among context-related factors, only fear related to the pandemic had a significant unique positive effect on protective behaviors, but it had no moderator effect in the relationship between personality traits and protective behaviors. However, empathy acted as a mediator and partly accounted for the negative effect of selfishness and positive effect of tendency to help anonymously on protective behaviors. The results revealed that compliance with protective measures could be seen as prosocial and unselfish form of behavior. Furthermore, these findings have practical implications for shaping public messages and they can help effectively promote health-responsible behaviors.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Achieving the five pillars of a successful fight against emerging infectious diseases requires an ethical framework of prosociality, meaning that individuals and government regulations prioritise societal needs over narrow individual interests.
“To accomplish these five pillars requires an ethical framework of prosociality—the orientation of individuals and government regulations to the needs of society as a whole, rather than to narrow individual interests.”
From The Lancet Commission on lessons for the future from the COVID-19 pandemic (2022) · cites this paper as [6]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
(2013) · Cited by 44,563 · see citing works
Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales.
Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A. (1988) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.54.6.1063 · Cited by 32,433 · see citing works
Functional Fear Predicts Public Health Compliance in the COVID-19 Pandemic
Harper, C. A., Satchell, L. P., Fido, D., & Latzman, R. D. (2021) · International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction · doi:10.1007/s11469-020-00281-5 · Cited by 1,564 · see citing works
The Development of a Measure of Prosocial Behaviors for Late Adolescents
Carlo, G., & Randall, B. A. (2002) · Journal of Youth and Adolescence · doi:10.1023/a:1014033032440 · Cited by 1,004 · see citing works
The HEXACO Honesty-Humility, Agreeableness, and Emotionality Factors
Ashton, M., Lee, K., & de Vries, R. D. (2014) · Personality and Social Psychology Review · doi:10.1177/1088868314523838 · Cited by 869 · see citing works
Agreeableness, empathy, and helping: A person × situation perspective.
Graziano, W. G., Habashi, M. M., Sheese, B. E., & Tobin, R. M. (2007) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.93.4.583 · Cited by 703 · see citing works
Personality and prosocial behavior: A theoretical framework and meta-analysis.
Thielmann, I., Spadaro, G., & Balliet, D. P. (2019) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/bul0000217 · Cited by 689 · see citing works
Pfattheicher, S., Nockur, L., BOHM, R. M., Sassenrath, C., & Petersen, M. B. (2020) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0956797620964422 · Cited by 576 · see citing works
Moshagen, M., Hilbig, B. E., & Zettler, I. (2018) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/rev0000111 · Cited by 519 · see citing works
Sociocognitive and Behavioral Correlates of a Measure of Prosocial Tendencies for Adolescents
Carlo, G., Hausmann, A., Christiansen, S., & Randall, B. A. (2003) · The Journal of Early Adolescence · doi:10.1177/0272431602239132 · Cited by 499 · see citing works
Zajenkowski, M., Jonason, P. K., Leniarska, M., & Kozakiewicz, Z. (2020) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.paid.2020.110199 · Cited by 353 · see citing works
Jordan, J. J., Yoeli, E., & Rand, D. G. (2021) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-021-97617-5 · Cited by 350 · see citing works
Jordan, J., Yoeli, E., & Rand, D. G. (2020) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/yuq7x · Cited by 348 · see citing works
Krueger, R. F., Hicks, B. M., & McGue, M. K. (2001) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/1467-9280.00373 · Cited by 319 · see citing works
Buss, D. M. (2019) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780429061417 · Cited by 305 · see citing works
Abdelrahman, M. (2020) · International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction · doi:10.1007/s11469-020-00352-7 · Cited by 290 · see citing works
Psychological and behavioural responses to Coronavirus disease 2019: The role of personality
Aschwanden, D., Strickhouser, J. E., Sesker, A. A., Lee, J. H., Luchetti, M., Stéphan, Y., Sutin, A. R., & Terracciano, A. (2020) · European Journal of Personality · doi:10.1002/per.2281 · Cited by 260 · see citing works
On the Nature of Fear and Anxiety Triggered by COVID-19
Coelho, C., Suttiwan, P., Arató, N., & Zsidó, A. (2020) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2020.581314 · Cited by 228 · see citing works
Blagov, P. S. (2020) · Social Psychological and Personality Science · doi:10.1177/1948550620936439 · Cited by 219 · see citing works
Nowak, B., Brzóska, P., Piotrowski, J. P., Sedikides, C., Żemojtel-Piotrowska, M. A., & Jonason, P. K. (2020) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.paid.2020.110232 · Cited by 215 · see citing works
Paciello, M., Fida, R., Cerniglia, L., Tramontano, C., & Cole, E. (2013) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.paid.2012.11.004 · Cited by 214 · see citing works
Shook, N. J., Sevi, B., Lee, J., Oosterhoff, B., & Fitzgerald, H. N. (2020) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0238015 · Cited by 163 · see citing works
Nakayachi, K., Ozaki, T., Shibata, Y., & Yokoi, R. (2020) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01918 · Cited by 145 · see citing works
Bogg, T., & Milad, E. (2020) · Health Psychology · doi:10.1037/hea0000891 · Cited by 144 · see citing works
Akdeniz, G., Kavakcı, M., Gozugok, M., Yalcinkaya, S., Küçükay, A., & Şahutoğulları, B. (2020) · Frontiers in Psychiatry · doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2020.00695 · Cited by 110 · see citing works
Protective Behavior in Course of the COVID-19 Outbreak—Survey Results From Germany
Lüdecke, D., & Knesebeck, O. V. D. (2020) · Frontiers in Public Health · doi:10.3389/fpubh.2020.572561 · Cited by 110 · see citing works
The pandemic exposes human nature: 10 evolutionary insights
Seitz, B. M., Aktipis, A., Buss, D. M., Alcock, J., Bloom, P. A., Gelfand, M. J., Harris, S., Lieberman, D., Natterson-Horowitz, B., Pinker, S. A., et al. (2020) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2009787117 · Cited by 98 · see citing works
Böhm, M., Frey, N., Giannitsis, E., Sliwa, K. S., & Zeiher, A. M. (2020) · Clinical Research in Cardiology · doi:10.1007/s00392-020-01656-3 · Cited by 79 · see citing works
The Selfishness Questionnaire: Egocentric, Adaptive, and Pathological Forms of Selfishness
Raine, A., & Uh, S. (2019) · Journal of Personality Assessment · doi:10.1080/00223891.2018.1455692 · Cited by 73 · see citing works
Zettler, I., Schild, C., Lilleholt, L., Kroencke, L., Utesch, T., Moshagen, M., BOHM, R. M., Back, M. D., & Utesch, K. (2020) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/pkm2a · Cited by 71 · see citing works
Triberti, S., Durosini, I., & Pravettoni, G. (2020) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.paid.2020.110453 · Cited by 67 · see citing works
Mihić, L., Novović, Z., Čolović, P., & Smederevac, S. (2014) · Psihologija · doi:10.2298/psi1404393m · Cited by 60 · see citing works
Gilbert, P., & Basran, J. K. (2019) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00610 · Cited by 60 · see citing works
Rodrigues, J., Ulrich, N., Mussel, P., Carlo, G., & Hewig, J. S. (2017) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2017.02119 · Cited by 59 · see citing works
Centrality and redundancy of the Dark Tetrad traits
Dinić, B. M., Wertag, A., Tomašević, A., & Sokolovska, V. (2019) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.paid.2019.109621 · Cited by 53 · see citing works
Self-citationDiebels, K. J., Leary, M. R., & Chon, D. (2018) · Review of General Psychology · doi:10.1037/gpr0000155 · Cited by 49 · see citing works
The usual suspects: do risk tolerance, altruism, and health predict the response to COVID-19?
Sheth, K., & Wright, G. (2020) · Review of Economics of the Household · doi:10.1007/s11150-020-09515-w · Cited by 32 · see citing works
Acute anxiety during the COVID-19 pandemic was associated with higher levels of everyday altruismPreprint
Vieira, J. B., Pierzchajlo, S., Jangard, S., et al. (2020) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/n3t5c · Cited by 19 · see citing works
Dinić, B. M., & Bodroža, B. (1970) · Primenjena psihologija · doi:10.19090/pp.20.4.489-504 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Self-citationJørgensen, F. J., Bor, A., Lindholt, M. F., et al. (2020) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/4ske2 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Emerging Infectious Outbreak Inhibits Pain Empathy Mediated Prosocial WillingnessPreprint
Cao, S., Qi, Y., Huang, Q., Wang, Y., Han, X., Liu, X., & Wu, H. (2021) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3793565 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The Lancet Commission on lessons for the future from the COVID-19 pandemic
Sachs, J. D., Karim, S. S. A., Aknin, L., Allen, J., Brosbøl, K., Colombo, F., Barron, G. C., Espinosa, M. F., Gaspar, V., Gaviria, A., et al. (2022) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(22)01585-9 · Cited by 842 · see citing works
The price of prosociality in pandemic times
Santamaría-García, H., Burgaleta, M., Legaz, A., Flichtentrei, D., Córdoba-Delgado, M., Molina-Paredes, J., Linares-Puerta, J., Montealegre-Gómez, J., Castelblanco, S., Schulte, M., et al. (2022) · Humanities and Social Sciences Communications · doi:10.1057/s41599-021-01022-2 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
- Authors
- Dinić, B. M., & Bodroža, B.
- Affiliations
- University of Novi Sad (RS)
- Corresponding author
- Dinić, Bojana M.
- Venue
- Frontiers in Psychology
- Publisher
- Frontiers Media SA
- Published
- 2021-04-09
- Volume
- 12
- Pages
- 647710-647710
- ISSN
- 1664-1078 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC8062771
- OpenAlex
- W3156089762
- Cited by
- 61
- References
- 41
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 8
- FWCI
- 18.02
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Frontiers in Psychology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › COVID-19 Prevention and Impact
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
- Social Sciences › Communication › Communication and COVID-19 Impact
- Keywords
- COVID-19 pandemic, protective behavior, prosocial behavior, antisocial personality, selfishness, altruism, empathy, mediation, moderation, public messaging
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review