From tools to threats: a reflection on the impact of artificial-intelligence chatbots on cognitive health
Open accessAbstract
From tools to threats: a reflection on the impact of artificial-intelligence chatbots on cognitive health
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
This opinion article introduces “AI-chatbot-induced cognitive atrophy” (AICICA), arguing that overreliance on AI chatbots may reduce critical thinking, analytical acumen, creativity, and other core cognitive skills. It frames AICICA through the extended mind theory and parallels with problematic Internet use, then proposes future research and interventions.
Key findings
- The authors define AICICA as potential deterioration of essential cognitive abilities from overreliance on AI chatbots, especially critical thinking, analytical acumen, and creativity, drawing on the “use it or lose it” principle.
- They propose four mechanisms by which AI chatbots may contribute to cognitive atrophy: personalized interaction, dynamic nature of conversations, range of functionalities, and simulation of human interaction.
- They argue AICICA differs from problematic Internet use because AI chatbots simulate human conversation, adapt to user inputs, and provide personalized responses, potentially creating deeper cognitive reliance.
- They present hypothetical scenarios (e.g., Hana, Meriem/HIK, Molk/BSDC) to illustrate possible long-term cognitive changes, and propose cross-sectional, longitudinal, and experimental research to assess prevalence, causality, and interventions.
Methods
- Design: opinion article, not an empirical study; the authors state it lacks direct empirical evidence supporting AICICA.
- Data/sample: no primary data or sample; the paper reviews selected literature and uses hypothetical examples and tables to develop the AICICA concept.
- Main analysis: conceptual synthesis linking AICICA to extended mind theory, cognitive offloading, problematic Internet use, and the “Google effect,” with proposed future research framework.
Limitations
- Stated: as an opinion piece, it lacks direct empirical evidence supporting AICICA.
- Stated: the hypotheses about AICICA effects are predominantly speculative and require empirical validation.
- Stated: applicability across various demographics and cultural contexts may be limited; the text also makes evident that no prevalence, causal, or intervention data are reported.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
0 of 16 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged
- Interpretationcitation
The immediacy and conversational nature of AICs can foster a deeper sense of trust and reliance in users, potentially influencing cognitive processes differently than traditional search engines.
“Furthermore, the immediacy and conversational nature of AICs can foster a deeper sense of trust and reliance in users, potentially influencing cognitive processes differently than traditional search engines (Adamopoulou and Moussiades, 2020).”
- Also stated in: § Mapping the path to AICICA: insights from PIU · plain
“Furthermore, the immediacy and conversational nature of AICs can foster a deeper sense of trust and reliance in users, potentially influencing cognitive processes differently than does traditional search engines.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Adamopoulou and Moussiades, 2020 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Also stated in: § Mapping the path to AICICA: insights from PIU · plain
- Interpretationcitation
Excessive dependence on AICs without concurrent cultivation of fundamental cognitive skills may lead to underutilization and subsequent loss of cognitive abilities.
“The concept draws parallels with the 'use it or lose it' brain development principle (Shors et al., 2012), positing that excessive dependence on AICs without concurrent cultivation of fundamental cognitive skills may lead to underutilization and subsequent loss of cognitive abilities.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Shors et al., 2012 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
AICs simulate human conversation.
“AICs are not just repositories of information; they simulate human conversation, adapt to user inputs, and can provide personalized responses, not mentioning false information (UW, 2023).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites UW, 2023
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning
AICs facilitate cognitive offloading by enabling individuals to delegate complicated cognitive tasks.
“AICs facilitate this process; enabling individuals to delegate complicated cognitive tasks, supporting them navigate the complexities of modern life.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
AICs adapt to user inputs.
“AICs are not just repositories of information; they simulate human conversation, adapt to user inputs, and can provide personalized responses, not mentioning false information (UW, 2023).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites UW, 2023
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationcitation
Heavy dependence on AICs, without commensurate cultivation of core cognitive skills, may result in unintended outcomes.
“Heavy dependence on AICs, without commensurate cultivation of core cognitive skills, may results in unintended outcomes (Sparrow et al., 2011).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Sparrow et al., 2011 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Among social media users, there is a significant relationship between fear of missing out and cognitive failures.
“Thirdly, Montag and Markett (2023) investigating a group of social media users, observed a significant relationship between fear of missing out and cognitive failures.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Montag and Markett, 2023
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Research on problematic Internet use has exposed compelling evidence regarding its detrimental effects on critical cognitive faculties such as working memory and decision-making.
“Research on PIU has exposed compelling evidence regarding its detrimental effects on critical cognitive faculties such as working memory and decision-making (Ioannidis et al., 2019).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Ioannidis et al., 2019 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Frequent use of digital technology appears to have a substantial impact (both negative and positive) on brain function and behavior.
“Firstly, frequent use of digital technology appears to have a substantial impact (both negative and positive) on brain function and behavior (Small et al., 2020).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Small et al., 2020 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Any skill or ability is mastered through progressive learning followed by experience that induce changes in brain circuitry.
“Indeed, any skill or ability is mastered through progressive learning followed by experience that induce changes in brain circuitry as reflected through Donald Hebb's statement “Neurons that fire together, wire together” (Hebb, 1949).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Hebb, 1949
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
AICs can provide personalized responses.
“AICs are not just repositories of information; they simulate human conversation, adapt to user inputs, and can provide personalized responses, not mentioning false information (UW, 2023).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites UW, 2023
Not checked in the free run.
- Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 52
- May combine two claims. 17
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenAICICA is specifically induced by AICs through their unique interactive and personalized characteristics, which distinguish them from traditional information sources.
“AICICA is specifically induced by AICs through their unique interactive and personalized characteristics, which distinguish them from traditional information sources.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningAICs, unlike search engines, provide information in a manner that can mimic human interaction, leading to unique cognitive implications.
“While both search engines and AICs provide information, the latter does so in a manner that can mimic human interaction, leading to unique cognitive implications.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).
InterpretationreasoningThe potential for AICs to shape human cognition extends beyond mere information retrieval, encompassing human-computer interaction, decision-making processes, and emotional responses.
“The potential for AICs to shape human cognition extends beyond mere information retrieval.”
- Also stated in: § Introduction · hedged
“It could encompass the very nature of human-computer interaction, decision-making processes, and even emotional responses.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Also stated in: § Introduction · hedged
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).
InterpretationreasoningOver time, a disproportionate reliance on AICs without concurrent cultivation of core cognitive skills may contribute to cognitive atrophy.
“Over time, a disproportionate reliance on AI-chatbots without concurrent cultivation of core cognitive skills may contribute to cognitive atrophy.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).
InterpretationreasoningThe ability of AICs to mimic human conversation may divert users from traditional cognitive processes, as simulated conversation may bypass essential cognitive steps involved in critical thinking and analytical acumen.
“By emulating human interaction, chatbots create an environment that may divert users from traditional cognitive processes, as the simulated conversation may bypass essential cognitive steps involved in critical thinking and analytical acumen.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationAccording to the extended mind theory, cognition extends beyond neural architecture and into the tools we employ.
“According to the EMT, cognition extends beyond neural architecture and infiltrates into the tools we employ.”
- Also stated in: § Understanding the foundations of AICICA through the EMT and cognitive offloading · plain
“The EMT, proposed by Clark and Chalmers (1998), challenges the traditional boundaries of cognitive processes being confined within the human brain.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Clark and Chalmers (1998) source
Not checked in the free run.
- Also stated in: § Understanding the foundations of AICICA through the EMT and cognitive offloading · plain
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
InterpretationreasoningOverreliance on AICs could potentially lead to cognitive decline (cognitive atrophy), labeled AICICA.
“This opinion article investigates the concept that an overreliance on AICs could potentially lead to cognitive decline [i.e., cognitive atrophy (CA)], which we labeled here as “AICs induced cognitive atrophy, AICICA.””
- Also stated in: § Mapping the path to AICICA: insights from PIU · hedged
“Through this lens, we hypothesize that an overreliance on AICs may lead to broader cognitive decline, thus introducing the concept of AICICA.”
- Also stated in: § Mapping the path to AICICA: insights from PIU · hedged
“Analogous to this principle, we contend that any excessive reliance on AICs may result in the underuse and subsequent loss of cognitive abilities.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Also stated in: § Mapping the path to AICICA: insights from PIU · hedged
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).
InterpretationreasoningThe dynamic nature of conversations with AICs may influence cognitive processes differently than traditional search engines, as users may become more dependent on the chatbots for a multitude of cognitive tasks.
“This dynamic nature of conversations may influence cognitive processes differently than interactions with traditional search engines, as users may become more dependent on the chatbots for a multitude of cognitive tasks.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable). May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningAICs assume a pivotal role in cognitive functioning, transforming from a mere artifact into an active contributor to our cognitive functioning.
“Within this complex interplay, AICs assume a pivotal role, transforming from a mere artifact into an active contributor to our cognitive functioning.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).
InterpretationreasoningThe dynamic interaction with AICs could lead to a different kind of cognitive reliance compared to static information sources.
“This dynamic interaction could lead to a different kind of cognitive reliance compared to static information sources.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).
InterpretationreasoningAICICA is induced by the multifaceted and dynamic nature of AICs interactions, which may inadvertently lead to an overreliance on the chatbots for cognitive tasks.
“In essence, AICICA is induced by the multifaceted and dynamic nature of AICs interactions, which, while offering numerous benefits, may inadvertently lead to an overreliance on the chatbots for cognitive tasks.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).
InterpretationreasoningPersonalized interaction with AICs may lead to a deeper cognitive reliance on the chatbots, potentially diminishing the user's inclination to independently engage in critical cognitive processes.
“This heightened personalization, while enhancing user experience, may lead to a deeper cognitive reliance on the chatbots, potentially diminishing the user's inclination to independently engage in critical cognitive processes.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
InterpretationreasoningAICICA is particularly relevant in educational settings and/or among younger individuals who may prioritize convenient access to information over in-depth comprehension, potentially hindering the development of critical cognitive faculties.
“AICICA is particularly relevant in educational settings and/or among younger individuals who may prioritize convenient access to information over in-depth comprehension, potentially hindering the development of critical cognitive faculties.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
InterpretationreasoningThe symbiotic relationship between humans and AICs could promote cognitive offloading, a mechanism through which individuals utilize external aids to alleviate cognitive burdens.
“This symbiotic relationship between humans and AICs could promote cognitive offloading, a mechanism through which individuals utilize external aids to alleviate cognitive burdens.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningAICICA goes beyond general Internet use, as AI-chatbots simulate human interaction, potentially influencing cognitive processes in a manner distinct from static information sources.
“AICICA goes beyond general Internet use, as AI-chatbots simulate human interaction, potentially influencing cognitive processes in a manner distinct from static information sources.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
InterpretationreasoningThe lack of active cognitive participation can lead to a decline in critical thinking, problem-solving skills, and creativity.
“The lack of active cognitive participation can lead to a decline in critical thinking, problem-solving skills, and creativity.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenWhile both search engines and chatbots provide information, chatbots do so in a manner that can mimic human interaction, leading to unique cognitive implications.
“While both search engines and chatbots provide information, the latter does so in a manner that can mimic human interaction, leading to unique cognitive implications.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).
InterpretationreasoningThe concept of AICICA raises the potential cognitive consequences of excessive reliance on AICs.
“The concept of AICICA raises the potential cognitive consequences of excessive reliance on AICs.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
InterpretationreasoningRelying on external systems for memory recall may weaken the neural pathways associated with memory encoding and retrieval.
“Relying on external systems for memory recall may weaken the neural pathways associated with memory encoding and retrieval.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).
InterpretationreasoningUnwarranted reliance on AICs for information retrieval and problem solving may cause individuals to bypass cognitive processes contributing to critical thinking, analytical acumen, and creativity.
“Indeed, by placing unwarranted reliance on AICs for information retrieval and problem solving, individuals may inadvertently bypass the essential cognitive processes contributing to critical thinking, analytical acumen, and the cultivation of creativity.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
InterpretationreasoningThe use of AI systems for memory-related tasks can lead to a decline in an individual's own memory capacity.
“The use of AI systems for memory-related tasks, such as note-taking or reminders, can lead to a decline in an individual's own memory capacity.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).
InterpretationreasoningThe specific nature of AICs interactions, characterized by advanced conversational capabilities and tailored responses, could substantially influence cognitive processes.
“The specific nature of AICs interactions, characterized by their advanced conversational capabilities and tailored responses, could substantially influence cognitive processes.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).
InterpretationreasoningAICICA may disproportionately affect the younger generation, particularly those prioritizing convenient access to information over deep reflection and comprehension, given their continuously developing brains.
“It is crucial to recognize that AICICA may disproportionately affect the younger generation, particularly those prioritizing convenient access to information over deep reflection and comprehension, given their continuously developing brains.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductreasoningThe current opinion article lacks direct empirical evidence supporting the AICICA concept.
“Firstly, being an opinion piece, our paper lacks direct empirical evidence supporting the AICICA concept.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Study design and conductnone givenThe applicability of the paper's findings and implications across various demographics and cultural contexts may be limited.
“Thirdly, the applicability of our findings and implications across various demographics and cultural contexts may be limited.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
InterpretationreasoningThis trend raises concerns about the new generation's grasp of the methodologies and processes that guide how information is generated, assessed, and validated.
“This trend raises concerns about their grasp of the methodologies and processes that guide how information is generated, assessed, and validated; highlighting a shift in the way knowledge is approached and valued.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The new generation values easy access to information over a deep understanding of the principles underlying information creation.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenWhen AI systems take over cognitive tasks, individuals may experience a decrease in mental engagement and stimulation.
“When AI systems take over cognitive tasks, individuals may experience a decrease in mental engagement and stimulation.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).
InterpretationreasoningThese psychological factors may further exacerbate cognitive decline.
“These psychological factors may further exacerbate cognitive decline.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationPotential harmful effects of extensive screen time and technology use include heightened attention-deficit symptoms, impaired emotional and social intelligence, technology addiction, social isolation, impaired brain development, and disrupted sleep.
“Potential harmful effects of extensive screen time and technology use include heightened attention-deficit symptoms, impaired emotional and social intelligence, technology addiction, social isolation, impaired brain development, and disrupted sleep (Small et al., 2020).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Small et al., 2020 source
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationThe "Google effect" highlights negative outcomes associated with an overreliance on Internet search engines.
“Drawing upon the widely recognized “Google effect,” which highlights the negative outcomes associated with an overreliance on Internet search engines (Loh and Kanai, 2016), we propose a parallel trajectory in the realm of AICs.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Loh and Kanai, 2016 source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
InterpretationreasoningThe impact of AICs, based on their output and nature of interaction, may pose a substantially negative effect on cognitive health.
“However, the impact of AICs, based on their output and nature of interaction, may pose a substantially negative effect on cognitive health.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenAI systems may lack the ability to generalize knowledge and transfer it to new or unknown situations.
“AI systems are typically designed to efficiently perform specific tasks, but they may lack the ability to generalize knowledge and transfer it to new/unknown situations.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningAICs have a broader scope than calculators, encompassing general knowledge, problem-solving, emotional support, and creative tasks, so their potential cognitive implications are vast and multifaceted.
“In contrast, AICs have a broader scope, encompassing various domains from general knowledge, problem-solving, emotional support, up to creative tasks.”
- Also stated in: § Understanding the foundations of AICICA through the EMT and cognitive offloading · plain
“The potential cognitive implications of such wide-ranging interactions are vast and multifaceted.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Also stated in: § Understanding the foundations of AICICA through the EMT and cognitive offloading · plain
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenFrequent use of AI systems that provide instant answers or solutions could contribute to shorter attention spans and reduced ability to concentrate for extended periods.
“Frequent use of AI systems that provide instant answers or solutions could contribute to shorter attention spans and reduced ability to concentrate for extended periods.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenAs individuals become accustomed to using AI systems for various tasks, they may neglect the development and maintenance of their own cognitive skills.
“As individuals become accustomed to using AI systems for various tasks, they may neglect the development and maintenance of their own cognitive skills.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Premisenone givenAICs can provide false information.
“AICs are not just repositories of information; they simulate human conversation, adapt to user inputs, and can provide personalized responses, not mentioning false information (UW, 2023).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites UW, 2023
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationThe "use it or lose it" brain development principle stipulates that neural circuits begin to degrade if not actively engaged in performing cognitive tasks for an extended period of time.
“The “use it or lose it” brain development principle stipulates that neural circuits begin to degrade if not actively engaged in performing cognitive tasks for an extended period of time (Shors et al., 2012).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Shors et al., 2012
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningUnlike general Internet use, AICs engage users in a more personalized, interactive manner, potentially leading to a deeper cognitive reliance.
“Unlike general Internet use, AICs engage users in a more personalized, interactive manner, potentially leading to a deeper cognitive reliance.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).
InterpretationreasoningThe potential for AICs to shape human cognition extends beyond information retrieval to human-computer interaction, decision-making, and emotional responses.
“The potential for AICs to shape human cognition extends beyond mere information retrieval; it encompasses the very nature of human-computer interaction, decision-making processes, and even emotional responses.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Premisenone givenBoth AICICA and PIU involve an overreliance on digital technologies.
“Both concepts involve an overreliance on digital technologies.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningUnlike calculators, which impact specific cognitive areas like arithmetical computation, AICs exhibit versatile applications, potentially influencing a broader range of cognitive abilities.
“Unlike calculators, which impact specific cognitive areas like arithmetical computation, AICs exhibit versatile applications, potentially influencing a broader range of cognitive abilities.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenAICs are good at problem-solving, emotional support, and creative tasks, extending their impact across diverse cognitive domains.
“Beyond information provision, AICs are good at problem-solving, emotional support, and creative tasks, extending their impact across diverse cognitive domains.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenExcessive reliance on AI can have societal implications, such as a decrease in human-to-human interaction, increased social isolation, and/or potential loss of empathy or interpersonal skills.
“An excessive reliance on AI can have societal implications.”
- Also stated in: § Understanding the foundations of AICICA through the EMT and cognitive offloading · hedged
“For instance, it may lead to a decrease in human-to-human interaction, increased social isolation, and/or potential loss of empathy or interpersonal skills.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Also stated in: § Understanding the foundations of AICICA through the EMT and cognitive offloading · hedged
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningAICs, unlike static information sources, emulate human conversation, adapting to user inputs for personalized responses, creating a distinctive cognitive reliance compared to other technologies.
“The latter, unlike static information sources, emulate human conversation, adapting to user inputs for personalized responses.”
- Also stated in: § Mapping the path to AICICA: insights from PIU · plain
“This dynamic interaction creates a distinctive cognitive reliance compared to other technologies, contrasting with passive information consumption on platforms like Wikipedia.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Also stated in: § Mapping the path to AICICA: insights from PIU · plain
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThe immediacy and conversational nature of AICs could cultivate deeper user trust, potentially influencing cognitive processes in a unique and novel way.
“The immediacy and conversational nature of AICs could cultivate deeper user trust, potentially influencing cognitive processes in a unique and novel way.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
InterpretationreasoningIndividuals who rely solely on AI systems may experience a decline in their ability to apply knowledge in novel or unexpected contexts.
“Over time, individuals who rely solely on AI systems may experience a decline in their ability to apply knowledge in novel/unexpected contexts.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductnone givenThe authors' hypotheses regarding the effects of AICICA are predominantly speculative and require empirical validation.
“Secondly, our hypotheses regarding the effects of AICICA are predominantly speculative and require empirical validation.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenThe erosion of cognitive abilities and increased dependency on AI systems could potentially contribute to feelings of inadequacy, reduced self-confidence, and/or a sense of helplessness.
“The erosion of cognitive abilities and increased dependency on AI systems could potentially contribute to feelings of inadequacy, reduced self-confidence, and/or a sense of helplessness.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).
InterpretationreasoningThis dynamic interaction can lead to a different kind of cognitive reliance compared to static information sources.
“This dynamic interaction can lead to a different kind of cognitive reliance compared to static information sources.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningUnlike generalized Internet use, AICs offer personalized, interactive experiences, which might have distinct cognitive implications.
“Unlike generalized Internet use, AICs offer personalized, interactive experiences, which might have distinct cognitive implications.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
InterpretationreasoningThe constant availability of AI-generated information may diminish an individual's capacity to engage in deep, focused thinking.
“The constant availability of AI-generated information may diminish an individual's capacity to engage in deep, focused thinking.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
InterpretationreasoningHeavily relying on AI for calculations or information retrieval may result in a deterioration of mathematical or memorization abilities.
“For example, heavily relying on AI for calculations or information retrieval may result in a deterioration of mathematical or memorization abilities.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
InterpretationreasoningAICICA may disproportionately affect individuals who have not attained mastery within their respective fields of study or work, such as children and adolescents.
“It is vital to acknowledge that AICICA may disproportionately affect individuals, with those who have not attained mastery within their respective fields of study or work being more likely to be affected (e.g., children and adolescents).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationChauncey and McKenna (2023) formulated a conceptual framework for responsible use of AICs in education supporting cognitive flexibility in AI-rich learning environments.
“Based on a review of the research literature, Chauncey and McKenna (2023) formulated a conceptual framework for responsible use of AICs in education supporting cognitive flexibility in AI-rich learning environments.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Chauncey and McKenna, 2023 source
Not checked in the free run.
The paper relies on this without support.
The long-term effects of AICs on cognition are not yet fully understood.
“Moreover, while calculators have been integrated into educational systems with clear guidelines on their use, AICs are still relatively new, with their long-term effects on cognition not yet fully understood and appraised.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Findings from problematic Internet use and Internet search engine reliance can be extrapolated to AICs.
“By extrapolating from this line of inquiry, we can gain insights into the potential cognitive consequences engendered by the misuse of, or excessive reliance on AICs.”
“Drawing upon the widely recognized “Google effect,” which highlights the negative outcomes associated with an overreliance on Internet search engines (Loh and Kanai, 2016), we propose a parallel trajectory in the realm of AICs.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The new generation values easy access to information over a deep understanding of the principles underlying information creation.
“This concept has significant implications, especially for the new generation that values easy access to information over a deep understanding of the principles underlying information creation.”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Chatbots and LLMs are capable of mimicking warmth, understanding, and reciprocity but lack the meta-cognitive and ethical oversight necessary to discern when validation may be counter-therapeutic.
“Chatbots and LLMs are capable of mimicking warmth, understanding, and reciprocity (qualities central to human alliance) but they lack the meta-cognitive and ethical oversight necessary to discern when validation may be counter-therapeutic [33,34].”
From Delusional Experiences Emerging From AI Chatbot Interactions or “AI Psychosis” (2025) · cites this paper as [34]
The Introduction says AI chatbots simulate human conversation, and the Real-world and hypothetical examples and scenarios section depicts a chatbot offering emotional engagement and companionship. These passages support the claim that chatbots can mimic aspects of human connection, but the paper does not address whether they lack the oversight to recognize when validation is counter-therapeutic. Page numbers were not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredAI overuse can degrade critical thinking abilities and create learned helplessness.
“A growing body of psychiatric and psychological studies on cognitive dependency has further argued that AI overuse can degrade critical thinking abilities and create learned helplessness, with several adopting the term 'AI psychosis' to describe severe cognitive disruption resulting from over-reliance on AI validation in the absence of productive intellectual friction.”
From The hidden functions of sycophancy in AI systems: steering, consistency, and cognitive dependency (2026) · cites this paper as [7]
The paper’s definition of AI-chatbot-induced cognitive atrophy says excessive dependence may diminish critical thinking. Its table on potential consequences says increased AI dependency could contribute to a sense of helplessness, but it does not identify this as learned helplessness. The paper presents these effects as potential, not established outcomes. (LLM, conf=0.87)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Cites
Clark, A., & Chalmers, D. (1998) · Analysis · doi:10.1093/analys/58.1.7 · Cited by 5,457 · cited 1× · see citing works
“The EMT, proposed by Clark and Chalmers (1998), challenges the traditional boundaries of cognitive processes being confined within the human brain.”
BackgroundThe Organization of Behavior: A Neuropsychological Theory
(1950) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.1950.02910470083028 · Cited by 4,271 · see citing works
Google Effects on Memory: Cognitive Consequences of Having Information at Our Fingertips
Sparrow, B., Liu, J., & Wegner, D. M. (2011) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1207745 · Cited by 1,762 · see citing works
Chatbots: History, technology, and applications
Adamopoulou, E., & Moussiades, L. (2020) · Machine Learning with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.mlwa.2020.100006 · Cited by 1,090 · see citing works
Dergaa, I., Chamari, K., Zmijewski, P., & Ben Saad, H. (2023) · Biology of Sport · doi:10.5114/biolsport.2023.125623 · Cited by 796 · see citing works
Self-citationBrain health consequences of digital technology use
Small, G. W., Lee, J., Kaufman, A., Jalil, J., Siddarth, P., Gaddipati, H., Moody, T. D., & Bookheimer, S. Y. (2020) · Dialogues in Clinical Neuroscience · doi:10.31887/dcns.2020.22.2/gsmall · Cited by 396 · see citing works
Shanmugasundaram, M., & Tamilarasu, A. (2023) · Frontiers in Cognition · doi:10.3389/fcogn.2023.1203077 · Cited by 291 · see citing works
How Has the Internet Reshaped Human Cognition?
Loh, K. K., & Kanai, R. (2016) · The Neuroscientist · doi:10.1177/1073858415595005 · Cited by 272 · see citing works
Cognitive deficits in problematic internet use: meta-analysis of 40 studies
Ioannidis, K., Hook, R., Goudriaan, A. E., Vlies, S., Fineberg, N. A., Grant, J. E., & Chamberlain, S. R. (2019) · British Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1192/bjp.2019.3 · Cited by 246 · see citing works
Use it or lose it: how neurogenesis keeps the brain fit for learning
Shors, T. J., Anderson, M. L., Curlik, D. M., & Nokia, M. S. (2012) · Behavioural Brain Research · doi:10.1016/j.bbr.2011.04.023 · Cited by 190 · see citing works
ChatGPT: The cognitive effects on learning and memory
Bai, L., Liu, X., & Su, J. (2023) · Brain‐X · doi:10.1002/brx2.30 · Cited by 182 · see citing works
Dergaa, I., Saad, H. B., Omri, A. E., Glenn, J. M., Clark, C. C. T., Washif, J. A., Guelmami, N., Hammouda, O., Al-Horani, R., Reynoso-Sánchez, L. F., et al. (2023) · Biology of Sport · doi:10.5114/biolsport.2024.133661 · Cited by 133 · see citing works
Self-citationChauncey, S. A., & McKenna, H. P. (2023) · Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.caeai.2023.100182 · Cited by 91 · see citing works
Wei, W., & Li, L. (2022) · Frontiers in Public Health · doi:10.3389/fpubh.2022.862407 · Cited by 68 · see citing works
UNDERSTANDING HUMAN OVER-RELIANCE ON TECHNOLOGY.
Grissinger, M. C. (2017) · PubMed Central · Cited by 42 · see citing works
Artificial Intelligence and Promoting Open Access in Academic Publishing.
Dergaa, I., & Saad, H. B. (2023) · PubMed · Cited by 39 · see citing works
Self-citationMontag, C., & Markett, S. A. (2023) · BMC Psychiatry · doi:10.1186/s12888-023-05371-x · Cited by 38 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Ezzdine, L. B., Dhahbi, W., Dergaa, I., Ceylan, H. İ., Guelmami, N., Saad, H. B., Chamari, K., Ștefănică, V., & Omri, A. E. (2025) · Frontiers in Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnins.2025.1502417 · Cited by 105 · see citing works
Self-citationYankouskaya, A., Liebherr, M., & Ali, R. (2025) · Human-Centric Intelligent Systems · doi:10.1007/s44230-025-00090-w · Cited by 100 · see citing works
Delusional Experiences Emerging From AI Chatbot Interactions or “AI Psychosis”
Hudon, A., & Stip, E. (2025) · JMIR Mental Health · doi:10.2196/85799 · Cited by 88 · see citing works
“Chatbots and LLMs are capable of mimicking warmth, understanding, and reciprocity (qualities central to human alliance) but they lack the meta-cognitive and ethical oversight necessary to discern when validation may be counter-therapeutic [33,34].”
Chen, Y., Wang, Y., Wüstenberg, T., Kizilcec, R. F., Fan, Y., Li, Y., Lu, B., Yuan, M., Zhang, J., Zhang, Z., et al. (2025) · Trials · doi:10.1186/s13063-025-08950-3 · Cited by 58 · see citing works
The Role of AI-Based Chatbots in Public Health Emergencies: A Narrative Review
Branda, F., Stella, M., Ceccarelli, C., Cabitza, F., Ceccarelli, G., Maruotti, A., Ciccozzi, M., & Scarpa, F. (2025) · Future Internet · doi:10.3390/fi17040145 · Cited by 39 · see citing works
Artificial intelligence addiction: exploring the emerging phenomenon of addiction in the AI age
Al-Obaydi, L. H., & Pikhart, M. (2025) · AI & Society · doi:10.1007/s00146-025-02535-z · Cited by 36 · see citing works
Tao, S., Lan, M., Wang, M., & Li, H. (2026) · Computers and Education Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.caeai.2026.100561 · Cited by 31 · see citing works
Elshall, A. S., & Badir, A. (2025) · Frontiers in Education · doi:10.3389/feduc.2025.1596462 · Cited by 28 · see citing works
The extended hollowed mind: why foundational knowledge is indispensable in the age of AI
Klein, C. R., & Klein, R. (2025) · Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.3389/frai.2025.1719019 · Cited by 27 · see citing works
Taiwo, O., & Al‐Bander, B. (2025) · Cognitive Computation and Systems · doi:10.1049/ccs2.12116 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
Qin, P., Yang, C.-L., Li, J., Wen, J., & Lee, Y. (2025) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3706598.3713146 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
Karamuk, E. (2025) · Advances in computational intelligence and robotics book series · doi:10.4018/979-8-3373-0122-8.ch007 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
Understanding Teen Overreliance on AI Companion Chatbots Through Self-Reported Reddit Narratives
Namvarpour, M. (., Brofsky, B., Medina, J. Y., Akter, M., & Razi, A. (2026) · Proceedings of the 2026 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3772318.3790597 · Cited by 24 · see citing works
Kong, H., Lowy, R., Choi, Y., & Kim, J. G. (2025) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3706598.3713344 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
Budiyono, H. (2025) · International Journal of Information and Education Technology · doi:10.18178/ijiet.2025.15.5.2306 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
Erosion of Critical Academic Skills Due to AI Dependency Among Tertiary Students
Miranda, J. P. P., Cruz, M. A. D., Fernandez, A. B., Balahadia, F. F., Aviles, J. S., Caro, C. A., Liwanag, I. G., & Gaña, E. P. (2025) · Advances in computational intelligence and robotics book series · doi:10.4018/979-8-3373-0122-8.ch002 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
The Epistemic Downside of Using LLM-Based Generative AI in Academic Writing
Tang, B. L. (2025) · Publications · doi:10.3390/publications13040063 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Homo Promptus: Predicting the impact of generative AI on human memory and creativity
Linden, K., Hachem, H.-H., & Kondyli, V. (2025) · Memory Mind & Media · doi:10.1017/mem.2025.10012 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
AI-overdependence and human cognitive decline: Hazards, evidence, and mitigation strategies
Noorbehbahani, F., & Oyibo, K. (2026) · Computers in Human Behavior Reports · doi:10.1016/j.chbr.2026.101102 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Troussas, C., Krouska, A., Phivos Mylonas, B., Sgouropoulou, C., & Voyiatzis, I. (2025) · Computers · doi:10.3390/computers14030089 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
The impact of artificial intelligence: from cognitive costs to global inequality
Paić, G., & Serkin, L. (2025) · The European Physical Journal Special Topics · doi:10.1140/epjs/s11734-025-01561-8 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Tao, S. (2025) · AI Brain and Child · doi:10.1007/s44436-025-00024-0 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Enhancement and assessment in the AI age: An extended mind perspective
Hernández‐Orallo, J. (2025) · Journal of Pacific Rim Psychology · doi:10.1177/18344909241309376 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Liu, B. (2026) · SAGE Open · doi:10.1177/21582440261420068 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Jain, P., Shajit, D., Maini, A., Shahin, Y., & Panda, A. (2026) · Cognitive Processing · doi:10.1007/s10339-026-01375-z · Cited by 10 · see citing works
The impact of chatbots on emotional intelligence in AI-assisted EFL writing
Kazazoğlu, S., & Özel, G. T. (2025) · Frontiers in Education · doi:10.3389/feduc.2025.1624272 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
The Impact of Chatbots on Adolescent Mental Health Development: A Comprehensive Literature Review
Wu, Y., Wu, T., Zhu, K., Liu, X., Liu, J., Wang, Y., Shi, R., Xiong, J., Xing, X., Lv, Y., et al. (2026) · Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare · doi:10.2147/jmdh.s579872 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Wu, L., & Chen, H. (2025) · Neuroethics · doi:10.1007/s12152-025-09602-8 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Fan, W., Cheng, L., Wang, Y., Zhao, Q., & Li, Y. (2026) · Behavioral Sciences · doi:10.3390/bs16061014 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Perspective on the Role of AI in Shaping Human Cognitive Development
Abbosh, A. M., Al‐Anbuky, A., Xue, F., & Mahmoud, S. S. (2025) · Information · doi:10.3390/info16111011 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Li, L., Wang, T., Wang, Y., Wang, Y., & Zeng, X. (2026) · International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1080/10447318.2026.2618563 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
The seven roles of generative AI: Potential & pitfalls in combatting misinformation
Nygren, T., Spearing, E. R., Fay, N., Vega, D., Hardwick, I. I., Roozenbeek, J., & Ecker, U. K. H. (2026) · Behavioral Science & Policy · doi:10.1177/23794607261417815 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Understanding the mechanism of human–AI interaction: a distributed cognition perspective
Zhao, H., & Han, Z. (2026) · Journal of Documentation · doi:10.1108/jd-01-2026-0003 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Zhang, Y. (2025) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1549755 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
A scoping review of the negative effects of digital technology on cognition
Žnidarič, U., Štrumbelj, E., & Machidon, O. M. (2026) · Computers in Human Behavior Reports · doi:10.1016/j.chbr.2026.101326 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Li, A., Sheehan, A. H., Giuliano, C. A., Dobry, P., Walker, P., Philips, J., & Jordan, J. K. (2025) · JMIR Medical Education · doi:10.2196/71767 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
The hidden functions of sycophancy in AI systems: steering, consistency, and cognitive dependency
Jacobowitz, S. (2026) · AI & SOCIETY · doi:10.1007/s00146-026-02993-z · Cited by 4 · see citing works
“A study by Dergaa et al. (2024) argues that over-reliance on AI systems can reduce critical thinking abilities and independent thought development.”
Kochis, M. A., Parsons, M. Q., Rothman, D., PETRUSA, E. R., & Phitayakorn, R. (2024) · Global Surgical Education - Journal of the Association for Surgical Education · doi:10.1007/s44186-024-00292-z · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Generative chatbots in headache education and research: A narrative review
Romozzi, M., García‐Azorín, D., Rubio‐Beltrán, E., & Labastida‐Ramírez, A. (2025) · Cephalalgia · doi:10.1177/03331024251372117 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Kim, D. D., Zhang, J., Sagae, K., DeVon, H. A., Hoffmann, T. J., Rountree, L., & Fukuoka, Y. (2025) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/73184 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Task-Centered Analysis of Higher Education Students’ Uses of Generative Artificial Intelligence
Hershkovitz, A., Tabach, M., & Lurie, L. (2025) · Education Sciences · doi:10.3390/educsci15121676 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Dergaa, I., Dergaa, M. A., Razzak, M., Ceylan, H. İ., Ștefănică, V., Muntean, R. I., & Guelmami, N. (2026) · Frontiers in Public Health · doi:10.3389/fpubh.2026.1843535 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Self-citationThe machine in the manuscript: editorial dilemmas
Shin, D., Suchanová, A., White, J. B., Magee, L., Ho, T. M., & Chakiri, H. (2025) · AI & Society · doi:10.1007/s00146-025-02665-4 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Nagata, A., & Tsuchiya, K. J. (2025) · Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.2188/jea.je20250445 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Gu, C., He, B., & Zhang, X. (2026) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2026.1843366 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Wellmann, N., Ancusa, V. M., Marc, M. S., Trușculescu, A. A., Pescaru, C. C., Martis, F. G., Ciortea, I., Crișan, A. F., Marițescu, A., Balica, M. A., et al. (2025) · Journal of Clinical Medicine · doi:10.3390/jcm14155339 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Fano-Méndez, S., & Gutiérrez, A. F. (2025) · Revista Española de Educación Comparada · doi:10.5944/reec.48.2025.45369 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Big tech, the state, or you? Who is responsible for generative AI addiction?
Stahl, B. C., Ali, R., Hitcham, L., Liebherr, M., Murray, R., Vallejos, E. P., & Yankouskaya, A. (2026) · Behaviour and Information Technology · doi:10.1080/0144929x.2026.2663509 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Exploiting isomorphisms: Model-based moral education in an era of ubiquitous AI
White, J. B. (2026) · Journal of Moral Education · doi:10.1080/03057240.2026.2661052 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Le, T. T. T., Nguyen, H., Minh, C. L., Vo, X. M., Pham, T.-Q., Ho, T. M., & Nguyen, H. T. (2026) · Discover Education · doi:10.1007/s44217-026-01667-8 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Exploring AI scribes in Norwegian general practice: a qualitative individual interview study
Nassehi, D., Hetlevik, Ø., & Breivold, J. (2026) · Scandinavian Journal of Primary Health Care · doi:10.1080/02813432.2026.2681143 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Liebherr, M., Yankouskaya, A., Alshakhsi, S. A. A., Montag, C., & Ali, R. (2026) · Discover Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1007/s44163-026-01781-4 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Lastretti, M., Manchia, M., Fraschini, M., Faa, A., Coghe, F., Paribello, P., Pinna, M., Tiwari, E., Suri, J. S., Saba, L., et al. (2026) · Psychiatry International · doi:10.3390/psychiatryint7050194 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Lee, G., & Kim, H.-J. (2024) · The Mathematical Education · doi:10.63311/mathedu.2024.63.4.767 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Barki, C., Chouchen, M., Sediri, A., Ceylan, H. İ., Rahmouni, H. B., Muntean, R. I., El-Seedi, H. R., Bragazzi, N. L., & Dergaa, I. (2026) · Frontiers in Systems Biology · doi:10.3389/fsysb.2026.1892418 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Self-citationElshall, A. S., Badir, A. M., & Gebremedhin, M. A. (2026) · Frontiers in Education · doi:10.3389/feduc.2026.1834090 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Human-Centered Business Education in an Artificial Intelligence-Driven World
Fukami, C. V., Hamilton, A. L., Rivers, C., Holland, A., Brady, M., Fellenz, M. R., Allen, S. J., Caporarello, L., Fischbacher‐Smith, D., Fischbacher‐Smith, M., et al. (2025) · Journal of Management Inquiry · doi:10.1177/10564926251364213 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Šević, N. P., & Šević, A. (2025) · IntechOpen eBooks · doi:10.5772/intechopen.1012608 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
How AI Chatbot Response Style Affects Cognitive Load and Performance in Educational Tasks
Srinivasaprasad, A., Sepanloo, K., Jahromi, S. N., Yu, D., & Duffy, V. G. (2026) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-13012-9_14 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Sanseverino, D., & Ghislieri, C. (2026) · Advances in Public Health · doi:10.1155/adph/4408159 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Ask ChatGPT: caveats and mitigations for individual users of AI chatbots
Wang, C., & Kantarcıoğlu, M. (2026) · AI and Ethics · doi:10.1007/s43681-026-01089-0 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Levenberg, A., & Bitar, N. (2026) · Frontiers in Education · doi:10.3389/feduc.2026.1802367 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Smiles, J. P., Cheek, C., Austin, E., McIntosh, C. A., Greenwood, C., & Clay‐Williams, R. (2026) · Emergency Medicine Australasia · doi:10.1111/1742-6723.70270 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Generative AI in Higher Education: The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly
Berghel, H., Berleant, D., & Berghel, H. (2026) · Computer · doi:10.1109/mc.2026.3705552 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Haidar, R., & Tassis, A. (2025) · Research Square · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-7014667/v1 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Mahajan, P. T. (2025) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.5386814 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Generative AI in Engineering: Tool or Trouble?
McCullough, C. L., & Dalton, M. (2025) · ASEE Southeast Section Conference · doi:10.18260/1-2--54172
Può l’intelligenza artificiale produrre stupidità naturale?
Tamburlini, G. (2025) · Medico e Bambino · doi:10.53126/meb44279
The role of AI & Chatbots in enhancing cognitive skills in algerian higher education
Sadek, R. (2025) · Analele Universității din Craiova seria Psihologie-Pedagogie/Annals of the University of Craiova Series Psychology- Pedagogy · doi:10.52846/aucpp.2025.1.14
Neuroscience Needs Behavioral “Wind Tunnels” for Real-Life Translation
Shehata, M. H., Yokoyama, C. T., & Platt, M. L. (2025) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.1705-25.2025
Epilogue: Sedentary Minds in a Digital Age: The Hidden Costs of Modern Comfort
Biesalski, H. K. (2025) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-99121-9_16
KI als Assistenzsystem: Administrative und wissenschaftliche Unterstützung in der Sozialen Arbeit
Plafky, C. S., & Badertscher, H. (2025) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-658-49009-6_5
Generation Alpha – the new career generation in the age of AI
Romek, K., & Kowalczyk-Kroenke, A. (2025) · Nowoczesne Systemy Zarządzania · doi:10.37055/nsz/217074
Guhan, M., Shah, C., & Kulkarni, P. A. (2026) · Southern Medical Journal · doi:10.14423/smj.0000000000001927
Sharma, S., Manani, P., & Thakwani, M. (2026) · Annals of Indian Psychiatry · doi:10.4103/aip.aip_242_25
From Reluctance to Engagement: Aligning Institutional Policy with “Human-in-the-Loop” Pedagogy
Makarevitch, I., Kostihová, M., Hilk, C. L., & Gumiela, J. (2026) · Trends in Higher Education · doi:10.3390/higheredu5020030
La enseñanza de la escritura en la formación docente: Dilemas y propuestas
Carvajal, J. S. (2026) · Práctica Docente Revista de Investigación Educativa · doi:10.56865/pd.v15.2026.006
Artificial intelligence in physiology teaching and learning
Favero, T. G. (2026) · Current Opinion in Physiology · doi:10.1016/j.cophys.2026.100951
AI in education: new tools to navigate the AI reality
Gluck, S., & Katz, L. (2026) · Frontiers in Education · doi:10.3389/feduc.2026.1765510
Dhorne, L. (2026) · doi:10.3917/ems.marti.2026.01.0120
Reflecting on three years of Generative AI in higher education
Hong, W. C. H. (2026) · Artificial Intelligence Advances in Education · doi:10.66818/aiaie.v1i1.916
Κωστελέτος, Γ. (2026) · Παιδαγωγικός Λόγος · doi:10.12681/plogos.45324
He, X., Liu, J., Li, S., Lou, Y., Chen, L., Zhan, Y., Zhou, K., Liu, H. F., Wang, L., & Cha, R. (2026) · Research Square · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-9626863/v1
Human 2.0? AI and the Future of Well-Being, Connection, and Personal Growth: A Narrative Review
Vannoy, T. K., Cadieux, S., & Lyubomirsky, S. (2026) · Behavioral Sciences · doi:10.3390/bs16060909
McGrail, E., McGrail, J. P., Rieger, A., & Rieger, D. (2026) · Inquiry Critical Thinking Across the Disciplines · doi:10.5840/inquiryct202652146
Dhahbi, W., Briki, W., & Chamari, K. (2026) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.6956772
Self-citationYi, H., Xian, L., Zhang, Y., Zeng, J., & Zhang, Z. (2026) · ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (FAccT) · doi:10.1145/3805689.3812239
THE CONCEPT OF «CYBERPATIENT» IN THE CONTEXT OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE APPLICATION
Панченко, О., Kabantseva, A. V., & Гуменюк, В. (2026) · Public management and digital practices · doi:10.31673/2786-7412.2026.028011
Yapay Zekâ: İnsan Aklının Bir Uzantısı mı, İkamesi mi?
KAYADUMAN, A. C. (2026) · İstanbul Üniversitesi Sosyoloji Dergisi / İstanbul University Journal of Sociology · doi:10.26650/sj.2025.46.1.1119
Dergaa, I., Chalghaf, N., Razzak, M., Muntean, R. I., Ștefănică, V., & Ceylan, H. İ. (2026) · JMIR Mental Health · doi:10.2196/98200
Self-citationLu, T., & Cheng, Z. (2026) · Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.3389/frai.2026.1768178
AI Over-Reliance and Cognitive Decline: Evidence from Higher Education Students
Noorbehbahani, F., & Oyibo, K. (2026) · Lecture notes of the Institute for Computer Sciences, Social Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-33957-7_33
The Emergence of Critical AI Literacy
Duarte, T., Conrad, K., & Garcia, I. K. (2026) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-12201-8_1
Baik, S., Yoon, Y. H., Jo, S. J., Choi, H., & Kang, S. (2026) · Systems · doi:10.3390/systems14091116
Çeri, A., & Yılmaz, H. B. (2026) · Pediatric Investigation · doi:10.1002/ped4.70086
Yin, S., Wu, R., Liu, X., & Li, R. (2026) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2026.1896963
Dergaa, I., Othman, R. B., Ghouili, H., Ceylan, H. İ., Souissi, N., Bchini, S., Ștefănică, V., Muntean, R. I., & Bragazzi, N. L. (2026) · Nutrients · doi:10.3390/nu18193128
Self-citationTan, W. H. E., Yeo, M. M. L., Toh, A. L. L., & Wansing, E. S. (2026) · Pedagogies An International Journal · doi:10.1080/1554480x.2026.2733074
Kostihová, M., Makarevitch, I., & Hilk, C. L. (2026) · Digital education and learning · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-32152-7_4
- Authors
- Dergaa, I., Ben Saad, H., Glenn, J. M., Amamou, B., Ben Aissa, M., Guelmami, N., Fekih-Romdhane, F., & Chamari, K.
- Affiliations
- University of Sfax (TN)
- University of Arkansas at Fayetteville (US)
- University of Monastir (TN)
- University of Genoa (IT)
- Naufar (QA)
- Corresponding author
- Dergaa, Ismail
- Venue
- Frontiers in Psychology
- Publisher
- Frontiers Media SA
- Published
- 2024-04-02
- Volume
- 15
- Pages
- 1259845-1259845
- ISSN
- 1664-1078 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC11020077
- OpenAlex
- W4393540741
- Semantic Scholar
- 614b8e0b51d50aa94b37be9609a075db901bb538
- Cited by
- 93
- References
- 17
- Citations by year
- 2026: 49 · 2025: 41 · 2024: 3
- FWCI
- 38.54
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Frontiers in Psychology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Safety Research › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Social Robot Interaction and HRI
- Keywords
- AI chatbots, cognitive health, cognitive load, chatbots
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-09.
Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-09.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review