Cited by 28Posttraumatic Stress Disorder ResearchImpact of Technology on AdolescentsCOVID-19 and Mental Health

Facebook, Quality of Life, and Mental Health Outcomes in Post-Disaster Urban Environments: The L’Aquila Earthquake Experience

Open access
Masedu, Francesco, Mazza, Monica, Di Giovanni, Chiara, Calvarese, Anna, Tiberti, Sergio, Sconci, Vittorio, Valenti, Marco·2014·Frontiers in Public Health

Abstract

BACKGROUND: An understudied area of interest in post-disaster public health is individuals' use of social networks as a potential determinant of quality of life (QOL) and mental health outcomes. A population-based cross-sectional study was carried out to examine whether continual use of online social networking (Facebook) in an adult population following a massive earthquake was correlated with prevalence of depression and post-traumatic stress disorders (PTSD) and QOL outcomes. METHODS: Participants were a sample of 890 adults aged 25-54 who had been exposed to the L'Aquila earthquake of 2009. Definition of "user" required a daily connection to the Facebook online social network for more than 1 h per day from at least 2 years. Depression and PTSD were assessed using the Screening Questionnaire for Disaster Mental Health. QOL outcomes were measured using the World Health Organisation Quality of Life BREF (WHOQOL-BREF) instrument. Logistic regression was carried out to calculate the prevalence odds ratios (POR) for social network use and other covariates. RESULTS: Two hundred and twenty one of 423 (52.2%) men, and 195 of 383 (50.9%) women, had been using Facebook as social network for at least 2 years prior to our assessment. Social network use correlated with both depression and PTSD, after adjusting for gender. A halved risk of depression was found in users vs. non-users (POR 0.50 ± 0.16). Similarly, a halved risk of PTSD in users vs. non-users (POR 0.47 ± 0.14) was found. Both men and women using online social networks had significantly higher QOL scores in the psychological and social domains of the WHOQOL-BREF. CONCLUSION: Social network use among adults 25-54 years old has a positive impact on mental health and QOL outcomes in the years following a disaster. The use of social networks may be an important tool for coping with the mental health outcomes of disruptive natural disasters, helping to maintain, if not improve, QOL in terms of social relationships and psychological distress.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fpubh.2014.00286

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Positive correlations were found between depression and Facebook impression management, envy triggered by Facebook surveillance, accepting former partners' invitations to become Facebook friends, producing more content or engaging in greater interactive communication on Facebook, social comparison with others, and frequent negative status updates or negative comparison with others leading to rumen

    “In relation to type of online social networking behaviour, positive correlations were found between Facebook impression management, 32 envy triggered by Facebook surveillance, 31 accepting former partners' invitations to become Facebook friends, 45 producing more content or engaging in greater interactive communication on Facebook, 46 social comparison with others, 39,47 and frequent negative”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 29 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [19]The WHOQOL Group. Development of the WHOQOL-BREF quality of life assessment. Psychol Med (1998) 13: 551– 8. 9626712

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Masedu, F., Mazza, M., Di Giovanni, C., Calvarese, A., Tiberti, S., Sconci, V., & Valenti, M.
Affiliations
University of L'Aquila (IT)
Corresponding author
Valenti, Marco
Venue
Frontiers in Public Health
Published
2014-12-22
Volume
2
Pages
286-286
ISSN
2296-2565 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2090656552
Cited by
28
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1
FWCI
1.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Frontiers in Public Health (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Archivio Istituzionale della Ricerca - Università degli Studi dell Aquila (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
Università degli Studi dell'Aquila
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › COVID-19 and Mental Health
Keywords
Facebook, online social networking, social media use, disaster mental health, 2009 L'Aquila earthquake, depression, post-traumatic stress disorder, quality of life, natural disasters, coping, interpersonal relationships

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review