Cited by 10COVID-19 Digital Contact TracingData-Driven Disease SurveillanceCOVID-19 epidemiological studies

Using Digital Data to Protect and Promote the Most Vulnerable in the Fight Against COVID-19

Open access
Chunara, Rumi, Cook, Stephanie H.·2020·Frontiers in Public Health

Abstract

OPINION article Front. Public Health, 12 June 2020Sec. Digital Public Health Volume 8 - 2020 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2020.00296

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fpubh.2020.00296

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Social media provides a real-time platform where people often candidly self-disclose their concerns, opinions, and struggles during the COVID-19 pandemic.

    “Social media provides a real-time platform where people often candidly self-disclose their concerns, opinions, and struggles during this pandemic [23].”
  • Public health surveillance, including for COVID-19, can account for factors such as the population at risk in epidemiology and demographic disparities in social media use and behavioral expressions.

    “[23], public health surveillance (including that for COVID-19) can account for several factors such as the “population at risk” in epidemiology and demographic disparities in the use and behavioral expressions on social media.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [12]Buolamwini J Gebru T Gender shades: Intersectional accuracy disparities in commercial gender classification. In: Conference on fairness, accountability and transparency. (2018).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chunara, R., & Cook, S. H.
Affiliations
New York University (US)
Corresponding author
Chunara, Rumi
Venue
Frontiers in Public Health
Published
2020-06-12
Volume
8
Pages
296-296
ISSN
2296-2565 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3035026471
Cited by
10
References
17
Citations by year
2023: 4 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2
FWCI
2.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Frontiers in Public Health (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
National Science Foundation (1845487)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › COVID-19 Digital Contact Tracing
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Data-Driven Disease Surveillance
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Modeling and Simulation › COVID-19 epidemiological studies
Keywords
digital public health, COVID-19 pandemic, vulnerable populations, digital data, health equity, pandemic response
MeSH terms
COVID-19, Humans, Telemedicine, Vulnerable Populations

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review