Cited by 38Health Policy Implementation ScienceMobile Health and mHealth ApplicationsDigital Mental Health Interventions

Implementing Health Apps for Digital Public Health – An Implementation Science Approach Adopting the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research

Open access
Wienert, Julian, Zeeb, Hajo·2021·Frontiers in Public Health

Abstract

Apps are becoming an increasingly important component of modern Public Health and health care. However, successful implementation of apps does not come without challenges. The Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) provides a central typology to support the development of implementation theories and the examination of what works where and why in different contexts. The framework offers a reasonable structure for managing complex, interacting, multi-level, and transient states of constructs in the real world: It draws on constructs from other implementation theories and might be used to conduct formative evaluations or build a common body of knowledge for implementation thru various studies and settings. In a synthesis of the original English language text describing the CFIR, an attempt was made to break the constructs down into the shortest possible concise descriptions for the implementation of health care apps in a structured, selective process. The listed key constructs should help to develop successful implementation plans and models for health apps and show the complexity of a successful implementation. As a perspective article, the aim of the current piece is to present a viewpoint on using the CFIR as a potential support for implementing health apps.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fpubh.2021.610237

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The sustainability of digital health interventions, particularly with limited public health funding, remains challenging.

    “The sustainability of digital health interventions, particularly with limited public health funding, remains challenging [141,142].”

    From Development and Evaluation of a Smartphone-Based Chatbot Coach to Facilitate a Balanced Lifestyle in Individuals With Headaches (BalanceUP App): Randomized Controlled Trial (2024) · cites this paper as [142]

    The Introduction describes difficulties implementing effective health apps in routine care, and the CFIR adaptation identifies costs and resource availability as implementation factors. These passages support a general concern about sustaining digital health interventions, but the paper does not specifically say that limited public health funding makes their sustainability challenging. (LLM, conf=0.78)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [2]Institute of Medicine. Health IT and Patient Safety: Building Safer Systems for Better Care. Washington, DC: National Academies Press (2012). 24600741
  2. [4]World Health Organization. WHO Guideline: Recommendations on Digital Interventions for Health System Strengthening: Evidence and Recommendations. Geneva: World Health Organization (2019). 31162915

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wienert, J., & Zeeb, H.
Affiliations
  • Leibniz Institute for Prevention Research and Epidemiology - BIPS (DE)
  • University of Bremen (DE)
Corresponding author
Wienert, Julian
Venue
Frontiers in Public Health
Published
2021-05-07
Volume
9
Pages
610237-610237
ISSN
2296-2565 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3163467057
Cited by
38
References
19
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 1
FWCI
6.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Frontiers in Public Health (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Informationszentrum Lebenswissenschaften (ZB MED) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • Freie Hansestadt Bremen
  • Leibniz-Gemeinschaft (W4/2018)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Policy Implementation Science
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
Keywords
health apps, digital public health, Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research, implementation science, implementation theory, implementation planning, mobile health, formative assessment
MeSH terms
Implementation Science, Delivery of Health Care, Public Health

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review