Cited by 12Language and cultural evolutionMulti-Agent Systems and NegotiationBayesian Modeling and Causal Inference

Recursive Metropolis-Hastings naming game: symbol emergence in a multi-agent system based on probabilistic generative models

Open access
Inukai, Jun, Taniguchi, Tadahiro, Taniguchi, Akira, Hagiwara, Yoshinobu·2023·Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence

Abstract

In the studies on symbol emergence and emergent communication in a population of agents, a computational model was employed in which agents participate in various language games. Among these, the Metropolis-Hastings naming game (MHNG) possesses a notable mathematical property: symbol emergence through MHNG is proven to be a decentralized Bayesian inference of representations shared by the agents. However, the previously proposed MHNG is limited to a two-agent scenario. This paper extends MHNG to an N-agent scenario. The main contributions of this paper are twofold: (1) we propose the recursive Metropolis-Hastings naming game (RMHNG) as an N-agent version of MHNG and demonstrate that RMHNG is an approximate Bayesian inference method for the posterior distribution over a latent variable shared by agents, similar to MHNG; and (2) we empirically evaluate the performance of RMHNG on synthetic and real image data, i.e., YCB object dataset, enabling multiple agents to develop and share a symbol system. Furthermore, we introduce two types of approximations—one-sample and limited-length—to reduce computational complexity while maintaining the ability to explain communication in a population of agents. The experimental findings showcased the efficacy of RMHNG as a decentralized Bayesian inference for approximating the posterior distribution concerning latent variables, which are jointly shared among agents, akin to MHNG, although the improvement in ARI and κ coefficient is smaller in the real image dataset condition. Moreover, the utilization of RMHNG elucidated the agents' capacity to exchange symbols. Furthermore, the study discovered that even the computationally simplified version of RMHNG could enable symbols to emerge among the agents.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/frai.2023.1229127

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The Metropolis-Hastings Naming Game (MHNG) has been proposed as a concrete algorithmic realization of CPC, and has been extended to N-agent populations through a recursive formulation.

    “The Metropolis-Hastings Naming Game (MHNG) has been proposed as its concrete algorithmic realization (Hagiwara et al., 2019; Taniguchi et al., 2023), which has been further extended to N -agent populations through a recursive formulation (Inukai et al., 2023).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 29

  1. Barabási A.-L. Albert R. (1999). Emergence of scaling in random networks. Science 286, 509– 512. 10.1126/science.286.5439.509 10521342 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Bouchacourt D. Baroni M. (2018). “How agents see things: On visual representations in an emergent language game,” in Proceedings of the 2018 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (Brussels: Association for Computational Linguistics), 981– 985. 10.18653/v1/D18-1119 · DOI
  3. Cangelosi A. Schlesinger M. (2015). Developmental Robotics: From Babies to Robots. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. 10.7551/mitpress/9320.001.0001 · DOI
  4. Chaabouni R. Strub F. Altché F. Tarassov E. Tallec C. Davoodi E.. (2022). “Emergent communication at scale,” in International Conference on Learning Representations (virtual). Available online at: https://openreview.net/forum?id=AUGBfDIV9rL
  5. Chandler D. (2002). Semiotics the Basics. London: Routledge. 10.4324/9780203166277 · DOI
  6. Chen X. He K. (2021). “Exploring simple Siamese representation learning,” in Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (Nashville, TN: IEEE), 15750– 15758. 10.1109/CVPR46437.2021.01549 · DOI · Paper page
  7. Choi E. Lazaridou A. de Freitas N. (2018). “Compositional obverter communication learning from raw visual input,” in The International Conference on Learning Representation (Vancouver, BC). Available online at: https://iclr.cc/archive/www/doku.php%3Fid=iclr2018:main.html
  8. Cohen J. (1960). A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educ. Psychol. Meas. 20, 37– 46. 10.1177/001316446002000104 · DOI · Paper page
  9. Gupta A. Lanctot M. Lazaridou A. (2021). “Dynamic population-based meta-learning for multi-agent communication with natural language,” in Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems. Available online at: https://openreview.net/group?id=NeurIPS.cc/2021/Conference
  10. Hagiwara Y. Furukawa K. Taniguchi A. Taniguchi T. (2022). Multiagent multimodal categorization for symbol emergence: emergent communication via interpersonal cross-modal inference. Adv. Robot. 36, 239– 260. 10.1080/01691864.2022.2029721 · DOI
  11. Hagiwara Y. Kobayashi H. Taniguchi A. Taniguchi T. (2019). Symbol emergence as an interpersonal multimodal categorization. Front. Robot. AI 6, 134. 10.3389/frobt.2019.00134 33501149 PMC7805687 · DOI · Paper page
  12. Hastings W. K. (1970). Monte carlo sampling methods using markov chains and their applications. Biometrika 57, 97– 109. 10.1093/biomet/57.1.97 · DOI · Paper page
  13. Havrylov S. Titov I. (2017). “Emergence of language with multi-agent games: learning to communicate with sequences of symbols,” in Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (Toulon), 30. Available online at: https://iclr.cc/archive/www/2017.html; https://openreview.net/forum?id=SkaxnKEYg
  14. Hubert L. Arabie P. (1985). Comparing partitions. J. Classif. 2, 193– 218. 10.1007/BF01908075 · DOI · Paper page
  15. Landis J. R. Koch G. G. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 33, 159– 174. 10.2307/2529310 843571 · DOI · Paper page
  16. Lazaridou A. Hermann K. M. Tuyls K. Clark S. (2018). Emergence of linguistic communication from referential games with symbolic and pixel input. arXiv. [preprint]. 10.48550/arXiv.1804.03984 · DOI · Paper page
  17. Lazaridou A. Peysakhovich A. Baroni M. (2017). “Multi-agent cooperation and the emergence of (natural) language,” in The International Conference on Learning Representations (Toulon). Available online at: https://iclr.cc/archive/www/2017.html
  18. Lewis D. (2008). Convention: A Philosophical Study. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
  19. Lin T. Huh M. Stauffer C. Lim S-. N. Isola P. (2021). “Learning to ground multi-agent communication with autoencoders,” in Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems.
  20. Mu J. Goodman N. (2021). “Emergent communication of generalizations,” in Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (virtual). Available online at: https://nips.cc/Conferences/2021
  21. Nakamura T. Nagai T. Taniguchi T. (2018). Serket: an architecture for connecting stochastic models to realize a large-scale cognitive model. Front. Neurorobot. 12, 25. 10.3389/fnbot.2018.00025 29997493 PMC6028621 · DOI
  22. Noukhovitch M. LaCroix T. Lazaridou A. Courville A. (2021). “Emergent communication under competition,” in Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and MultiAgent Systems (Richland, SC: International Foundation for Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems), 974– 982.
  23. Okumura R. Taniguchi T. Hagiwara Y. Taniguchi A. (2023). Metropolis-hastings algorithm in joint-attention naming game: experimental semiotics study. arXiv. [preprint]. 10.48550/arXiv.2305.19936 PMC10728479 38116389 · DOI
  24. Steels L. (2015). The Talking Heads Experiment: Origins of Words and Meanings. Berlin: Language Science Press. 10.26530/OAPEN_559870 · DOI
  25. Taniguchi T. El Hafi L. Hagiwara Y. Taniguchi A. Shimada N. Nishiura T.. (2021). Semiotically adaptive cognition: toward the realization of remotely-operated service robots for the new normal symbiotic society. Adv. Robot. 35, 664– 674. 10.1080/01691864.2021.1928552 · DOI
  26. Taniguchi T. Nagai T. Nakamura T. Iwahashi N. Ogata T. Asoh H.. (2016). Symbol emergence in robotics: a survey. Adv. Robot. 30, 706– 728. 10.1080/01691864.2016.1164622 · DOI · Paper page
  27. Taniguchi T. Nakamura T. Suzuki M. Kuniyasu R. Hayashi K. Taniguchi A.. (2020). Neuro-serket: development of integrative cognitive system through the composition of deep probabilistic generative models. New Gener. Comput. 38, 23– 48. 10.1007/s00354-019-00084-w · DOI
  28. Taniguchi T. Yoshida Y. Taniguchi A. Hagiwara Y. (2023). Emergent Communication through Metropolis-Hastings Naming Game with Deep Generative Models. PMC10864618 38356917
  29. Watts D. J. Strogatz S. H. (1998). Collective dynamics of ‘small-world' networks. Nature 393, 440– 442. 10.1038/30918 9623998 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Inukai, J., Taniguchi, T., Taniguchi, A., & Hagiwara, Y.
Affiliations
Ritsumeikan University (JP)
Corresponding author
Taniguchi, Tadahiro
Venue
Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence
Published
2023-10-18
Volume
6
Pages
1229127-1229127
ISSN
2624-8212 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4387742352
Cited by
12
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3
FWCI
18.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (17H06383)
  • Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JP17H06383, 17H06383, 18K18134, 21H04904)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Cultural Studies › Language and cultural evolution
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Bayesian Modeling and Causal Inference
Keywords
symbol emergence, emergent communication, multi-agent systems, probabilistic generative models, shared representations, computational complexity reduction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review