Cited by 92Language and cultural evolutionEmbodied and Extended CognitionPsychiatry, Mental Health, Neuroscience

Symbol Emergence in Cognitive Developmental Systems: A Survey

Open access
Taniguchi, Tadahiro, Piater, Justus, Worgotter, Florentin, Ugur, Emre, Hoffmann, Matej, Jamone, Lorenzo, Nagai, Takayuki, Rosman, Benjamin +3 more·2019·IEEE Transactions on Cognitive and Developmental Systems

Abstract

Humans use signs, e.g., sentences in a spoken language, for communication and thought. Hence, symbol systems like language are crucial for our communication with other agents and adaptation to our real-world environment. The symbol systems we use in our human society adaptively and dynamically change over time. In the context of artificial intelligence (AI) and cognitive systems, the symbol grounding problem has been regarded as one of the central problems related to symbols. However, the symbol grounding problem was originally posed to connect symbolic AI and sensorimotor information and did not consider many interdisciplinary phenomena in human communication and dynamic symbol systems in our society, which semiotics considered. In this paper, we focus on the symbol emergence problem, addressing not only cognitive dynamics but also the dynamics of symbol systems in society, rather than the symbol grounding problem. We first introduce the notion of a symbol in semiotics from the humanities, to leave the very narrow idea of symbols in symbolic AI. Furthermore, over the years, it became more and more clear that symbol emergence has to be regarded as a multifaceted problem. Therefore, second, we review the history of the symbol emergence problem in different fields, including both biological and artificial systems, showing their mutual relations. We summarize the discussion and provide an integrative viewpoint and comprehensive overview of symbol emergence in cognitive systems. Additionally, we describe the challenges facing the creation of cognitive systems that can be part of symbol emergence systems.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tcds.2018.2867772

Cites

169 of 169 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Attempts to train models on multimodal sensorimotor data have yielded some success, with agents able to associate the sensory information of an object such as a cup with the signals that represent it.

    “Attempts to train models on multimodal sensorimotor data have yielded some success, with agents able to associate the sensory information of an object such as a cup with the signals that represent it [7,8,9].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 171 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 10

  1. [8]8. C. S. Peirce, Collected Writings. Cambridge, MA, USA: Harvard Univ. Press, 1958.
  2. [15]15. K. Lee, D. Ognibene, H. J. Chang, T. K. Kim, and Y. Demiris, "STARE: Spatiooral attention relocation for multiple structured activities detec- tion," IEEE Trans. Image Process., vol. 24, no. 12, pp. 5916-5927, Dec. 2015.
  3. [43]43. H. Werner and B. Kaplan, Symbol Formation. New York, NY, USA: Wiley, 1963.
  4. [50]50. M. Tomasello, The Cultural Origins of Human Cognition. Cambridge, MA, USA: Harvard Univ. Press, 1999.
  5. [54]54. M. Tomasello, Constructing a Language. Cambridge, MA, USA: Harvard Univ. Press, 2009.
  6. [81]81. I. Goodfellow, Y. Bengio, and A. Courville, Deep Learning. Cambridge, MA, USA: MIT Press, 2016.
  7. [142]142. B. Siciliano and O. Khatib, Springer Handbook of Robotics. Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag, 2008. [Online]. Available: https://www.springer.com/us/book/9783540303015
  8. [148]148. K. Pastra, "PRAXICON: The development of a grounding resource," in Proc. Int. Workshop Human-Comput. Convers., 2008.
  9. [160]160. D. Sperber and D. Wilson, Relevance, Blackwell, Oxford, U.K., 1995.
  10. [163]163. N. Iwahashi, K. Sugiura, R. Taguchi, T. Nagai, and T. Taniguchi, "Robots that learn to communicate: A developmental approach to per- sonally and physically situated human-robot conversations," in Proc. AAAI Fall Symp. Dialog Robots, 2010, pp. 38-43.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Taniguchi, T., Piater, J., Worgotter, F., Ugur, E., Hoffmann, M., Jamone, L., Nagai, T., Rosman, B., Matsuka, T., Iwahashi, N., & Oztop, E.
Affiliations
  • Ritsumeikan University (JP)
  • Universität Innsbruck (AT)
  • Czech Technical University in Prague (CZ)
  • Queen Mary University of London (GB)
  • University of Electro-Communications (JP)
  • University of the Witwatersrand (ZA)
  • Chiba University (JP)
  • Okayama Prefectural University (JP)
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Cognitive and Developmental Systems
Published
2019-12
Volume
11
Issue
4
Pages
494-516
ISSN
  • 2379-8920 (ISSN-L)
  • 2379-8939
OpenAlex
W2963475757
Cited by
92
References
171
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 27 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 1
FWCI
57.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IEEE Transactions on Cognitive and Developmental Systems (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • eResearch@Ozyegin (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • OpenMETU (Middle East Technical University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Institutional Repositories DataBase (IRDB) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • GoeScholar The Publication Server of the Georg-August-Universität Göttingen (Georg-August-Universität Göttingen) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • Grants-in-Aid for Young Scientists (15H05319)
  • Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (18H03308)
  • Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (16H06569)
  • European Unions H2020 Research and Innovation Programme (731761 (IMAGINE))
  • Grantová Agentura České Republiky (GA17-15697Y)
  • European H2020 Programme (732266 (Plan4Act))
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Cultural Studies › Language and cultural evolution
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Embodied and Extended Cognition
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Psychiatry, Mental Health, Neuroscience
Keywords
symbol emergence, symbol grounding problem, semiotics, signs, cognitive development, cognitive systems, symbolic AI, human communication

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review