Cited by 41Multi-Agent Systems and NegotiationModular Robots and Swarm IntelligenceSimulation Techniques and Applications

Multi-agent systems powered by large language models: applications in swarm intelligence

Open access
Jimenez-Romero, Cristian, Yegenoglu, Alper, Blum, Christian·2025·Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence

Abstract

This work examines the integration of large language models (LLMs) into multi-agent simulations by replacing the hard-coded programs of agents with LLM-driven prompts. The proposed approach is showcased in the context of two examples of complex systems from the field of swarm intelligence: ant colony foraging and bird flocking. Central to this study is a toolchain that integrates LLMs with the NetLogo simulation platform, leveraging its Python extension to enable communication with GPT-4o via the OpenAI API. This toolchain facilitates prompt-driven behavior generation, allowing agents to respond adaptively to environmental data. For both example applications mentioned above, we employ both structured, rule-based prompts and autonomous, knowledge-driven prompts. Our work demonstrates how this toolchain enables LLMs to study self-organizing processes and induce emergent behaviors within multi-agent environments, paving the way for new approaches to exploring intelligent systems and modeling swarm intelligence inspired by natural phenomena. We provide the code, including simulation files and data at https://github.com/crjimene/swarm_gpt .

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

The paper presents a toolchain that connects NetLogo multi-agent simulations to GPT-4o via Python and the OpenAI API, replacing hard-coded agent rules with LLM prompts in ant foraging and bird flocking. It finds LLM-driven agents can reproduce swarm-like behavior, with hybrid ant colonies sometimes outperforming pure rule-based or pure LLM colonies, while LLM-guided birds show more peripheral, collision-avoiding flocking.

Key findings

  • In ant foraging, NetLogo and LLM variants both collected approximately 85 food units over 1,000 steps, but NetLogo had a standard deviation of about 20 versus about 7 for LLM; the Hybrid variant collected about 95 units with a standard deviation of about 12 and began returning food at around 20 steps versus about 40 steps for LLM and NetLogo.
  • Statistical tests found no practical or statistical difference between LLM and NetLogo in food collection (Cohen’s d = 0.006; Kruskal-Wallis p = 0.99; Levene/Brown-Forsythe p ≈ 0.0045 for variance), while LLM vs. Hybrid and NetLogo vs. Hybrid showed significant differences (p-values close to zero; Cohen’s d ≈ 0.2 and 0.23, respectively).
  • In bird flocking with 30 birds over 800 steps, Hybrid used 5 LLM-guided birds; LLM-guided birds stayed more peripheral, had fewer collisions, and averaged 6.27 neighbors versus 9.23 for Hybrid rule-based birds and 11.42 for NetLogo birds.
  • Iterative prompt tuning was essential: directional cues, the word “only,” random rotation, compass convention, a “rationale” key, and shortest-path turning instructions improved ant foraging and flocking behavior.

Methods

  • Design: two NetLogo swarm-intelligence models—ant colony foraging with structured rule-based zero-shot prompts and bird flocking with knowledge-driven prompts—using a toolchain that encodes environmental states, sends them to GPT-4o through NetLogo’s Python extension and the OpenAI API, and decodes JSON/Python-dictionary outputs into agent actions; ant prompts used temperature 0.0.
  • Data/sample: ant simulations used 10 ants, 3 food patches, 1,000 steps, 5 seeds, and variants NetLogo, LLM, and Hybrid; bird simulations used 30 birds, 800 steps, 5 seeds, and variants NetLogo and Hybrid (5 LLM-guided birds out of 30).
  • Analysis: compared food collected, steps to return/find food, heading differences, collisions, and neighbor counts, using Levene, Brown-Forsythe, Kruskal-Wallis, and Cohen’s d tests.

Limitations

  • Stated: computational overhead and API latency/cost are high—each LLM-agent step took seconds versus milliseconds for rule-based simulation—and using GPT-4o via the OpenAI API introduces token-based costs and external dependency, though the framework is designed to be model-agnostic.
  • Stated: ant simulations were limited to 1,000 steps due to computational and practical constraints even though food depletion typically occurs around 2,000 steps; the hybrid performance advantage warrants further investigation, and prompt sensitivity plus stateless prompts require highly detailed context.
  • Evident: only five seeds per condition, simple 2D simulations, no memory or internal state for agents, and no real-world swarm-robotics validation limit generalizability.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/frai.2025.1593017

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Claims the paper makes

  • Findingown data

    In the first ant foraging simulation, ants often failed to follow pheromone and nest scent gradients effectively, sometimes moving away from stronger cues.

    “Ants often failed to follow pheromone and nest scent gradients effectively, sometimes moving away from stronger cues.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingown data

    Even when successfully parsed, inconsistencies in the agents' behavior were observed, preventing the emergence of flocking.

    “even when successfully parsed, inconsistencies in the agents' behavior were observed, preventing the emergence of flocking”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Findingown data

    Inconsistencies in following pheromone gradients persisted after adding the highest pheromone instruction.

    “However, inconsistencies in following pheromone gradients persisted.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Findingown data

    In the absence of pheromones and nest scents, ants still exhibited limited exploration behaviors, tending to stay near the nest.

    “in the absence of pheromones and nest scents, ants still exhibited limited exploration behaviors, tending to stay near the nest”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingown data

    Inconsistencies in following scent gradients persisted after adding the prioritization instruction.

    “inconsistencies in following scent gradients persisted”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 26
  • May combine two claims. 49
  • The quote only partly states this claim. 1
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingnone given

    The language model offered feedback by highlighting misunderstandings or ambiguities in the prompts.

    “Throughout this iterative process, the language model offered valuable feedback by highlighting misunderstandings or ambiguities in the prompts.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingreasoning

    In both example applications, agents receive localized information about their environment and act based on LLM-generated decisions.

    “In both cases, agents receive localized information about their environment and act based on LLM-generated decisions.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Findingown data

    More explicit rules were essential for consistent and realistic ant behavior.

    “Following the initial evaluation, it became clear that more explicit rules were essential for consistent and realistic ant behavior.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingreasoning

    The feedback from the language model was instrumental in refining the prompts to enhance the ants' performance.

    “This feedback was instrumental in refining the prompts to enhance the ants' performance.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Explicitly stating the ants' status in the prompt improved decision-making by providing clear context, leading to better execution of actions like picking up and dropping food.

    “Explicitly stating the ants' status improved decision-making by providing clear context, leading to better execution of actions like picking up and dropping food.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Instructing ants to release pheromones while carrying food led to stronger trails and improved the efficiency of other ants in locating food sources.

    “This led to stronger trails and improved the efficiency of other ants in locating food sources.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Ants became more consistent in moving toward stronger cues, enhancing their navigation and foraging efficiency.

    “Ants became more consistent in moving toward stronger cues, enhancing their navigation and foraging efficiency.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingreasoning

    This eliminated unnecessary returns and improved foraging efficiency.

    “This eliminated unnecessary returns and improved foraging efficiency.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    From Prompt 5 onward, ants became more adept at following pheromone and nest scent gradients, leading to a more organized foraging behavior.

    “From Prompt 5 onward, ants became more adept at following pheromone and nest scent gradients, leading to a more organized foraging behavior.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Ants continued to exhibit limited exploration when not carrying food, tending to stay near the nest rather than venturing into new areas or effectively following pheromone trails.

    “Ants continued to exhibit limited exploration when not carrying food, tending to stay near the nest rather than venturing into new areas or effectively following pheromone trails.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • The quote only partly states this claim.

    Findingown data

    Expanding the rotation options to include 'random' led ants to demonstrate more varied and unpredictable movement patterns during exploration.

    “ants demonstrated more varied and unpredictable movement patterns during exploration”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    A noticeable bias concerning the rotation remained, particularly around the nest, indicating that the randomness was not functioning as efficiently as intended.

    “a noticeable bias concerning the rotation remained, particularly around the nest, indicating that the randomness was not functioning as efficiently as intended”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Introducing a directive for proactive exploration improved exploration, with ants venturing further from the nest and discovering food sources in fewer simulation steps.

    “This approach improved exploration, with ants venturing further from the nest and discovering food sources in fewer simulation steps.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Findingreasoning

    They effectively moved away from the nest and searched a wider area, increasing their chances of encountering food sources more quickly and efficiently.

    “They effectively moved away from the nest and searched a wider area, increasing their chances of encountering food sources more quickly and efficiently.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Adding a directive restricting the response format to a JSON object successfully constrained the output, making it more reliable and compatible with the simulation.

    “This modification successfully constrained the output, making it more reliable and compatible with the simulation.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Some ants released pheromones unexpectedly, while others exhibited random movement patterns.

    “Some ants released pheromones unexpectedly, while others exhibited random movement patterns.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    When generating a reasoning process before outputting the final heading, the LLM produced correct answers; errors occurred when providing only the numerical result.

    “When generating a reasoning process before outputting the final heading, the LLM produced correct answers. However, errors occurred when providing only the numerical result.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Although central tendencies may be similar, the variance and distributional shape of heading differences differ between Hybrid and NetLogo.

    “In summary, these results suggest that although central tendencies may be similar, the variance and distributional shape differ”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The Kruskal-Wallis test yields a p-value close to zero, signifying statistically significant differences in the overall distributions of the groups.

    “Furthermore, the Kruskal-Wallis test yields a p-value close to zero as well, signifying statistically significant differences in the overall distributions of the groups.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Hybrid starts returning food to the nest at around 20 simulation steps, whereas LLM and NetLogo begin this process at about 40 steps.

    “Hybrid starts returning food to the nest at around 20 simulation steps, whereas LLM and NetLogo begin this process at about 40 steps.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingreasoning

    Rule-based birds exhibit the highest number of neighbors, while LLM-guided birds display the lowest number.

    “As expected, rule-based birds exhibit the highest number of neighbors, while the LLM-guided birds display the lowest number”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The standard deviation for NetLogo is around 20, whereas LLM displays a much lower standard deviation of about 7.

    “the standard deviation for NetLogo is around 20, whereas LLM displays a much lower standard deviation of about 7”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The Levene and Brown-Forsythe tests for the LLM vs. NetLogo group yielded p-values around 0.0045, indicating a significant difference in variance.

    “The Levene and Brown-Forsythe tests for the LLM vs. NetLogo group yielded p-values around 0.0045, indicating a significant difference in variance”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Other tested LLMs often exhibited unreliable and erratic behavior, including ants randomly dropping food and failing to demonstrate expected self-organizing capabilities.

    “Other tested models often exhibited unreliable and erratic behavior, including ants randomly dropping food and failing to demonstrate expected self-organizing capabilities.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    While heading convergence sometimes lagged behind purely rule-based simulations, the resulting formations remained visually coherent.

    “While heading convergence sometimes lagged behind purely rule-based simulations, the resulting formations remained visually coherent.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingreasoning

    The Hybrid model outperforms the other two variants, collecting an average of approximately 95 units of food with a standard deviation of about 12.

    “the Hybrid model outperforms the other two variants, collecting an average of approximately 95 units of food with a standard deviation of about 12”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Levene's test and Brown-Forsythe test return extremely low p-values, indicating that the assumption of homogeneity of variances is violated.

    “Specifically, both Levene's test and the Brown-Forsythe test return extremely low p-values, indicating that the assumption of homogeneity of variances is violated.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The rule-based birds of the original NetLogo model show somewhat lower heading differences than the two bird types of Hybrid, which show similar evolution of heading differences.

    “While the two bird types of Hybrid show a similar evolution of the heading differences, the rule-based birds of the original NetLogo model show somewhat lower heading differences.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Explicitly instructing the model to select the shortest path to the target heading improved flocking behavior significantly, with LLM-driven agents forming larger, more stable flocking clusters, achieving performance comparable to the original rule-based NetLogo model.

    “By explicitly instructing the model to select the shortest path to the target heading, flocking behavior improved significantly. The LLM-driven agents formed larger, more stable flocking clusters, achieving performance comparable to the original, rule-based NetLogo model.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The Cohen's d effect size for LLM vs. Hybrid is approximately 0.2, suggesting a small yet meaningful effect.

    “Additionally, Cohen's d effect size is approximately 0.2, suggesting a small yet meaningful effect.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingown data

    A notable outlier is observed in the context of NetLogo and food patch 2, where an ant required 720 steps to find food.

    “A notable outlier is observed in the context of NetLogo and food patch 2, where an ant required 720 steps to find food.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Findingreasoning

    Even small changes in the prompts, such as specifying the angle to rotate or how to handle conflicting signals, can significantly influence emergent group-level patterns.

    “Even small changes in the prompts, such as specifying the angle to rotate or how to handle conflicting signals, can significantly influence emergent group-level patterns.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Findingreasoning

    The integration of LLMs into agent-based simulations introduces significant computational overhead compared to traditional rule-based implementations, with each agent-LLM interaction requiring network communication and remote inference that substantially increases simulation time.

    “The integration of LLMs into agent-based simulations introduces significant computational overhead compared to traditional rule-based implementations, with each agent-LLM interaction requiring network communication and remote inference that substantially increases simulation time.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The Cohen's d value of 0.006 reflects a small effect size, suggesting nearly identical group means for LLM vs. NetLogo.

    “the Cohen's d value of 0.006 reflects a small effect size, suggesting nearly identical group means”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    LLM-driven birds generally stayed slightly farther from the flock center and experienced fewer collisions than their rule-based counterparts.

    “However, LLM-driven birds generally stayed slightly farther from the flock center and experienced fewer collisions than their rule-based counterparts”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    In our specific experiments, each step involving an LLM-driven agent interaction typically required processing times on the order of seconds, whereas conventional rule-based simulations executed agent interactions within milliseconds or less per simulation step.

    “In our specific experiments, we observed that each step involving an LLM-driven agent interaction typically required processing times on the order of seconds due to network latency and model response times, whereas conventional rule-based simulations executed agent interactions within milliseconds or less per simulation step.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Findingnone given

    In the ant foraging scenario, complete depletion of food resources typically occurs around 2000 steps.

    “particularly since complete depletion of food resources typically occurs around 2000 steps.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Comparing the resulting headings with those produced by a rule-based model, some calculated headings were numerically similar, but they often pointed in opposite directions.

    “While some calculated headings were numerically similar, they often pointed in opposite directions.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    While some flocking behavior emerged after the JSON restriction, it was inconsistent; small clusters formed briefly, but overall alignment and coherence were weaker than expected.

    “while some flocking behavior emerged, it was inconsistent. Small clusters formed briefly, but overall alignment and coherence were weaker than expected.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    In the bird flock simulation, collective behaviors stabilized after approximately 500 steps, with cluster formations remaining relatively unchanged in subsequent simulation steps.

    “In the bird flock simulation, we empirically observed that collective behaviors stabilized after approximately 500 steps, with cluster formations remaining relatively unchanged in subsequent simulation steps.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Explicitly specifying the compass convention for heading calculations improved flocking behavior, with larger clusters formed compared to previous iterations.

    “By explicitly specifying the compass convention for heading calculations, flocking behavior improved. Larger clusters formed compared to previous iterations.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Introducing the 'rationale' key significantly improved flocking behavior, with agents demonstrating more consistent heading adjustments, enhancing the emergence of flocking dynamics.

    “Introducing the “rationale” key significantly improved flocking behavior. The agents demonstrated more consistent heading adjustments, enhancing the emergence of flocking dynamics.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductnone given

    The final prompt used in the experiments resulted from several iterations in a trial-and-error process to ensure the LLM could effectively understand the environment and rules and execute the expected tasks accordingly.

    “The final prompt used in our experiments resulted from several iterations in a trial-and-error process to ensure the LLM could effectively understand the environment and rules and execute the expected tasks accordingly.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The LLM can effectively understand the environment and rules and execute the expected tasks after prompt iterations.
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductreasoning

    The agents are designed to follow explicit, rule-based instructions derived from the LLM, ensuring that their actions are predictable and consistent with predefined conditions.

    “The agents are designed to follow explicit, rule-based instructions derived from the LLM, ensuring that their actions are predictable and consistent with predefined conditions.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The LLM's ability to process complex, context-rich data allows it to infer and propose actions that adhere to predefined rules or leverage general behavioral principles.
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Knowledge-driven prompts enable more adaptive and flexible agent behaviors by relying on the LLM's inherent understanding of broader behavioral concepts and principles.

    “Knowledge-driven prompts, on the other hand, rely on the LLM's inherent understanding of broader behavioral concepts and principles.”
    • Also stated in: § Materials and methods · plain
      “These prompts are less rigid and provide the LLM with general guidelines, enabling more adaptive and flexible agent behaviors.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The LLM has inherent understanding of complex concepts such as flocking dynamics and self-organization.
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Premisereasoning

    This work is one of the first to use LLMs as decentralized behavioral engines for non-human and non-verbal, swarm-like agents.

    “This is one of the first works to use LLMs as decentralized behavioral engines for non-human and non-verbal, swarm-like agents.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Study design and conductnone given

    There is a small chance that the LLM may occasionally generate responses that deviate from the specified rules.

    “Nevertheless, there is still a small chance that the LLM may occasionally generate responses that deviate from the specified rules.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The iterative process of the toolchain ensures that agent behaviors continuously respond to evolving environmental conditions and LLM feedback, fostering emergent behaviors and adaptive responses.

    “The iterative process ensures that agent behaviors continuously respond to evolving environmental conditions and LLM feedback, fostering emergent behaviors and adaptive responses.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The LLM's ability to process complex, context-rich data allows it to infer and propose actions that adhere to predefined rules or leverage general behavioral principles.
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    This change increased the likelihood of ants finding food, as they ventured further from the nest rather than lingering nearby.

    “This change increased the likelihood of ants finding food, as they ventured further from the nest rather than lingering nearby.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductreasoning

    Structured prompts ensure that the ants' responses are clearly defined and predictable, enabling systematic analysis of their behavior.

    “These structured prompts ensure that the ants' responses are clearly defined and predictable, enabling systematic analysis of their behavior.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The LLM's ability to process complex, context-rich data allows it to infer and propose actions that adhere to predefined rules or leverage general behavioral principles.
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductnone given

    Setting the temperature to 0.0 ensures deterministic results based on the provided inputs.

    “The default API parameters are used, with the exception of the temperature, which is set to 0.0 to ensure deterministic results based on the provided inputs.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    There is a statistically significant and practically noticeable difference between the LLM and Hybrid groups.

    “This analysis reveals a statistically significant and practically noticeable difference between the LLM and Hybrid groups.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning

    When using an external API, much of the computational burden is offloaded to the AI service provider, alleviating the direct computational cost from the simulation user's perspective.

    “It is important to clarify, however, that when using an external API (such as the OpenAI API), much of this computational burden is offloaded to the AI service provider, thereby alleviating the direct computational cost from the simulation user's perspective.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    Although significantly more computationally intensive per agent-step, the method remains practically feasible for smaller-scale exploratory simulations and conceptual validations.

    “Thus, although significantly more computationally intensive per agent-step, the method remains practically feasible for smaller-scale exploratory simulations and conceptual validations, as demonstrated in this paper.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Although the experiments utilized a single external model, the methodological approach is fully extendable and compatible with a variety of language models.

    “Although the experiments presented in this study utilized a single external model, our methodological approach is fully extendable and compatible with a variety of language models.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Stateless LLM decision-making guarantees that the model consistently acts on relevant information but also necessitates highly detailed prompts.

    “This guarantees that the model consistently acts on relevant information but also necessitates highly detailed prompts.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Interpretationreasoning

    This work underscores the potential for advanced language models, guided by carefully designed prompts, to enrich or even extend the capabilities of traditional agent-based models.

    “Ultimately, this work underscores the potential for advanced language models, guided by carefully designed prompts, to enrich or even extend the capabilities of traditional agent-based models, offering new perspectives on swarm intelligence, self-organization, and emergent behaviors.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The methodological framework is not inherently tied to GPT-4o or the OpenAI API; it was explicitly designed to ensure adaptability and generality, allowing straightforward integration with alternative LLMs.

    “However, it is crucial to emphasize that our framework is not inherently tied to GPT-4o or the OpenAI API. Rather, we explicitly designed our methodological framework to ensure adaptability and generality, allowing straightforward integration with alternative LLMs, including open-source and locally deployed solutions.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    LLMs can support swarm-like behaviors: guiding ants to locate and retrieve food by following pheromone trails, and prompting "birds" to coordinate alignment according to core flocking principles.

    “In both cases, our experiments demonstrated how LLMs can support swarm-like behaviors: guiding ants to locate and retrieve food by following pheromone trails, and prompting “birds” to coordinate alignment according to core flocking principles.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Interpretationreasoning

    The toolchain integrating NetLogo simulations with LLM interactions via Python extension and the OpenAI API offers a practical contribution in terms of accessibility and pedagogical potential.

    “Additionally, in line with our research objectives, the toolchain we present, integrating NetLogo simulations with LLM interactions via Python extension and the OpenAI API, offers a practical contribution in terms of accessibility and pedagogical potential.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Concerning food patch 1, the models exhibit a higher number of outliers, which can be attributed to the ants' initial exploration of the environment before encountering the food.

    “Notably, concerning food patch 1, the models exhibit a higher number of outliers, which can be attributed to the ants' initial exploration of the environment before encountering the food.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    Our findings highlight the central role of iterative prompt tuning in shaping how LLMs behave within multi-agent environments.

    “Our findings highlight the central role of iterative prompt tuning in shaping how LLMs behave within multi-agent environments.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    Accessing commercial LLM APIs like GPT-4o incurs token-based costs that scale with simulation complexity, agent population, and runtime duration.

    “Additionally, accessing commercial LLM APIs like GPT-4o incurs token-based costs that scale with simulation complexity, agent population, and runtime duration.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    Utilizing GPT-4o through the OpenAI API inherently introduces token-based costs and dependencies associated with external model access, which may affect simulation scalability, cost-efficiency, and reliability.

    “Second, utilizing GPT-4o through the OpenAI API inherently introduces token-based costs and dependencies associated with external model access, which may affect simulation scalability, cost-efficiency, and reliability.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    There are no practical or statistical differences observed between the LLM and NetLogo groups regarding the outcome.

    “In summary, there are no practical or statistical differences observed between the LLM and NetLogo groups regarding the outcome.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    These results confirm that LLMs can serve as flexible engines for agent behaviors that align with swarm principles, offering adaptive, context-driven responses.

    “Together, these results confirm that LLMs can serve as flexible engines for agent behaviors that align with swarm principles, offering adaptive, context-driven responses.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    Overall, the LLM-driven agents performed comparably to their fully rule-based counterparts, but they sometimes displayed notable differences in how they interpreted and prioritized local cues when relying on text-based decision-making.

    “Overall, the LLM-driven agents performed comparably to their fully rule-based counterparts, but they sometimes displayed notable differences in how they interpreted and prioritized local cues when relying on text-based decision-making.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Incorporating LLMs into NetLogo facilitates the study of cognitively richer and more adaptive agent behaviors, while also lowering the barrier to entry for researchers, educators, and students.

    “By incorporating LLMs into this familiar and user-friendly environment, our approach facilitates the study of cognitively richer and more adaptive agent behaviors, while also lowering the barrier to entry for researchers, educators, and students interested in experimenting with advanced AI techniques in agent-based modeling.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Interpretationreasoning

    Careful attention to the length, structure, and clarity of the prompts is essential to achieve consistent, context-aware responses.

    “Careful attention to the length, structure, and clarity of the prompts is essential to achieve consistent, context-aware responses.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
69 of 69
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The LLM has inherent understanding of complex concepts such as flocking dynamics and self-organization.

    “the prompts rely on the LLM's inherent understanding of complex concepts such as flocking dynamics and self-organization”
    “Knowledge-driven prompts, on the other hand, rely on the LLM's inherent understanding of broader behavioral concepts and principles.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The LLM's ability to process complex, context-rich data allows it to infer and propose actions that adhere to predefined rules or leverage general behavioral principles.

    “The LLM's ability to process complex, context-rich data allows it to infer and propose actions that adhere to predefined rules (for structured prompts) or leverage general behavioral principles (in principle-based prompts).”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The simulation environment mimics natural foraging conditions.

    “The environment is designed to mimic natural foraging conditions, where agents (ants) must navigate to find food and return it to the nest while interacting with environmental cues such as pheromone trails and nest scents”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The LLM can effectively understand the environment and rules and execute the expected tasks after prompt iterations.

    “to ensure the LLM could effectively understand the environment and rules and execute the expected tasks accordingly”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The LLM's internal knowledge and general reasoning are sufficient for autonomous prompts.

    “the autonomous prompts rely on the LLM's internal knowledge and general reasoning”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The LLM possesses inherent knowledge of flocking dynamics that allows it to apply general principles to guide bird behavior.

    “The prompts provided to the LLM leverage its inherent knowledge of flocking dynamics, requiring it to apply these general principles to guide the behavior of each bird.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The two-dimensional airspace simulation environment effectively replicates key flocking behaviors like group cohesion.

    “Although this environment is relatively simple, it effectively replicates key flocking behaviors like group cohesion, allowing for the observation of flocking dynamics under varying conditions.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The LLM can interpret environmental data and generate responses that ensure birds align with flockmates, maintain appropriate distance, and stay cohesive.

    “The LLM is responsible for interpreting environmental data and generating responses that ensure the birds align with their flockmates, maintain an appropriate distance to avoid collisions, and stay cohesive as a group.”
8 of 8

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Improving transparency and auditability of MAS reasoning will build confidence that these systems are working as intended.

    “Improving transparency and auditability of MAS reasoning will build confidence that these systems are working as intended [69].”

    From A Review of Multi-Agent AI Systems for Biological and Clinical Data Analysis (2026) · cites this paper as [69]

    Table 5 in the Conclusion identifies reduced transparency and limited explainability of agent decisions as weaknesses, and says unpredictable behavior requires careful monitoring. The paper does not say that improving auditability or transparency will build confidence that MAS are working as intended. (LLM, conf=0.78)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • This dramatically increases runtime and cost, as each agent's inference and communication incurs additional latency and token usage.

    “This dramatically increases runtime and cost, as each agent’s inference and communication incurs additional latency and token usage [69].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

  • Reported first quartile is labeled 20% in Table 2

    Minor

    The text says Table 2 provides three quartiles, but its percentile columns are labeled 20%, 50%, and 75%. The first quartile is the 25th percentile, not the 20th.

  • Bird flocking is described as a simulation of social insects

    Minor

    The methods say both simulations concern social insects, but identify the second simulation's agents as birds.

  • Abstract says both prompt types were used in both applications

    Minor

    The abstract says both prompt approaches were employed for each application, while the discussion describes structured prompts for ant foraging and knowledge-driven prompts for bird flocking as the two strategies explored.

  • Neighbor-distance criterion includes a distance classified as a collision

    Minor

    Figure 11 classifies d = 1 as a collision. Figure 12 says its neighbor criterion starts at d = 1 and thereby excludes collisions, but that boundary value satisfies both criteria.

  • Two different collision thresholds are stated

    Minor

    The results text defines a collision as a distance smaller than one, whereas the Figure 11 caption includes distances equal to one.

5 of 5

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Tisue, 2004, “Netlogo: a simple environment for modeling complexity,”, 16
  2. Wooldridge, 2009, An Introduction to Multiagent Systems

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Jimenez-Romero, C., Yegenoglu, A., & Blum, C.
Affiliations
  • Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
  • Independent Researcher
  • Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (ES)
Corresponding author
Jimenez-Romero, Cristian
Venue
Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence
Published
2025-05-21
Volume
8
Pages
1593017-1593017
ISSN
2624-8212 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4410551457
Cited by
30
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 18 · 2025: 12
FWCI
12.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DIGITAL.CSIC (Spanish National Research Council (CSIC)) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • HORIZON EUROPE Marie Sklodowska-Curie Actions (945380)
  • Agencia Estatal de Investigación (PID2022-136787NB-I00)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Modular Robots and Swarm Intelligence
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Simulation Techniques and Applications
Keywords
large language models, multi-agent systems, swarm intelligence, ant foraging behavior, bird flocking, NetLogo, GPT-4o, emergent behavior, self-organization, complex systems

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-10.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-10.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review