Multi-agent systems powered by large language models: applications in swarm intelligence
Open accessAbstract
This work examines the integration of large language models (LLMs) into multi-agent simulations by replacing the hard-coded programs of agents with LLM-driven prompts. The proposed approach is showcased in the context of two examples of complex systems from the field of swarm intelligence: ant colony foraging and bird flocking. Central to this study is a toolchain that integrates LLMs with the NetLogo simulation platform, leveraging its Python extension to enable communication with GPT-4o via the OpenAI API. This toolchain facilitates prompt-driven behavior generation, allowing agents to respond adaptively to environmental data. For both example applications mentioned above, we employ both structured, rule-based prompts and autonomous, knowledge-driven prompts. Our work demonstrates how this toolchain enables LLMs to study self-organizing processes and induce emergent behaviors within multi-agent environments, paving the way for new approaches to exploring intelligent systems and modeling swarm intelligence inspired by natural phenomena. We provide the code, including simulation files and data at https://github.com/crjimene/swarm_gpt .
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
The paper presents a toolchain that connects NetLogo multi-agent simulations to GPT-4o via Python and the OpenAI API, replacing hard-coded agent rules with LLM prompts in ant foraging and bird flocking. It finds LLM-driven agents can reproduce swarm-like behavior, with hybrid ant colonies sometimes outperforming pure rule-based or pure LLM colonies, while LLM-guided birds show more peripheral, collision-avoiding flocking.
Key findings
- In ant foraging, NetLogo and LLM variants both collected approximately 85 food units over 1,000 steps, but NetLogo had a standard deviation of about 20 versus about 7 for LLM; the Hybrid variant collected about 95 units with a standard deviation of about 12 and began returning food at around 20 steps versus about 40 steps for LLM and NetLogo.
- Statistical tests found no practical or statistical difference between LLM and NetLogo in food collection (Cohen’s d = 0.006; Kruskal-Wallis p = 0.99; Levene/Brown-Forsythe p ≈ 0.0045 for variance), while LLM vs. Hybrid and NetLogo vs. Hybrid showed significant differences (p-values close to zero; Cohen’s d ≈ 0.2 and 0.23, respectively).
- In bird flocking with 30 birds over 800 steps, Hybrid used 5 LLM-guided birds; LLM-guided birds stayed more peripheral, had fewer collisions, and averaged 6.27 neighbors versus 9.23 for Hybrid rule-based birds and 11.42 for NetLogo birds.
- Iterative prompt tuning was essential: directional cues, the word “only,” random rotation, compass convention, a “rationale” key, and shortest-path turning instructions improved ant foraging and flocking behavior.
Methods
- Design: two NetLogo swarm-intelligence models—ant colony foraging with structured rule-based zero-shot prompts and bird flocking with knowledge-driven prompts—using a toolchain that encodes environmental states, sends them to GPT-4o through NetLogo’s Python extension and the OpenAI API, and decodes JSON/Python-dictionary outputs into agent actions; ant prompts used temperature 0.0.
- Data/sample: ant simulations used 10 ants, 3 food patches, 1,000 steps, 5 seeds, and variants NetLogo, LLM, and Hybrid; bird simulations used 30 birds, 800 steps, 5 seeds, and variants NetLogo and Hybrid (5 LLM-guided birds out of 30).
- Analysis: compared food collected, steps to return/find food, heading differences, collisions, and neighbor counts, using Levene, Brown-Forsythe, Kruskal-Wallis, and Cohen’s d tests.
Limitations
- Stated: computational overhead and API latency/cost are high—each LLM-agent step took seconds versus milliseconds for rule-based simulation—and using GPT-4o via the OpenAI API introduces token-based costs and external dependency, though the framework is designed to be model-agnostic.
- Stated: ant simulations were limited to 1,000 steps due to computational and practical constraints even though food depletion typically occurs around 2,000 steps; the hybrid performance advantage warrants further investigation, and prompt sensitivity plus stateless prompts require highly detailed context.
- Evident: only five seeds per condition, simple 2D simulations, no memory or internal state for agents, and no real-world swarm-robotics validation limit generalizability.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
- Findingown data
In the first ant foraging simulation, ants often failed to follow pheromone and nest scent gradients effectively, sometimes moving away from stronger cues.
“Ants often failed to follow pheromone and nest scent gradients effectively, sometimes moving away from stronger cues.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Even when successfully parsed, inconsistencies in the agents' behavior were observed, preventing the emergence of flocking.
“even when successfully parsed, inconsistencies in the agents' behavior were observed, preventing the emergence of flocking”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Inconsistencies in following pheromone gradients persisted after adding the highest pheromone instruction.
“However, inconsistencies in following pheromone gradients persisted.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
In the absence of pheromones and nest scents, ants still exhibited limited exploration behaviors, tending to stay near the nest.
“in the absence of pheromones and nest scents, ants still exhibited limited exploration behaviors, tending to stay near the nest”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Inconsistencies in following scent gradients persisted after adding the prioritization instruction.
“inconsistencies in following scent gradients persisted”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
- Findingown data
Ants not carrying food and not sensing any pheromones tended to remain near the nest without effectively exploring the environment.
“Ants not carrying food and not sensing any pheromones tended to remain near the nest without effectively exploring the environment.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
When no scents were detected, ants still showed limited exploration, often remaining near the nest rather than actively searching new areas.
“when no scents were detected, ants still showed limited exploration, often remaining near the nest rather than actively searching new areas”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning
With the improved gradient-following ability from Prompt 5, ants were more consistent in navigation.
“With the improved gradient-following ability from Prompt 5, ants were more consistent in navigation.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Adding 'only' to the instruction ensured that ants did not prioritize the scent of the nest when they were looking for food.
“Adding “only” to the instruction text was crucial to ensure that the ants did not prioritize the scent of the nest when they were looking for food.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
In the initial bird flocking prompt, most LLM-generated responses were not interpretable by the simulation because they did not adhere to the expected format.
“most of the LLM-generated responses were not interpretable by the simulation, as they did not adhere to the expected format”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Ants still exhibited limited exploration when no sensory cues were present, tending to remain near the nest rather than actively searching new areas.
“ants still exhibited limited exploration when no sensory cues were present, tending to remain near the nest rather than actively searching new areas”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Using directional descriptions instead of numerical values significantly improved the ants' ability to follow pheromone and nest scent gradients.
“This adjustment significantly improved the ants' ability to follow pheromone and nest scent gradients.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Adding an instruction to prioritize nest scent over pheromone trails when carrying food helped align the ants' actions when carrying food.
“Introducing prioritization helped align the ants' actions when carrying food”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Specifying that ants not carrying food should navigate toward food using the highest pheromone concentration improved their ability to find food sources when pheromone trails were present.
“Their ability to find food sources when pheromone trails were present was clearly improved in this way.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
In the absence of pheromones or nest scents, ants tended to remain near the nest, exhibiting inefficient exploration behaviors.
“In the absence of pheromones or nest scents, ants tended to remain near the nest, exhibiting inefficient exploration behaviors.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The lack of specific instructions on following scent gradients meant ants still showed inconsistencies in navigating toward pheromone trails or nest scent.
“the lack of specific instructions on following scent gradients meant ants still showed inconsistencies in navigating toward pheromone trails or nest scent”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
LLM-guided birds tend to congregate at the outer peripheries of the flocks, positioning themselves further away from the flocks' center.
“We also observed that the LLM-guided birds tend to congregate at the outer peripheries of the flocks, positioning themselves further away from the flocks' center.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Among the multiple LLMs evaluated at the outset of this research, GPT-4o emerged as the most efficient and successful in handling tasks, consistently achieving the expected behavior.
“Among those evaluated, GPT-4o emerged as the most efficient and successful in handling tasks, consistently achieving the expected behavior.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The Kruskal-Wallis test produces a high value of 0.99 indicating no statistical difference in the distributions for LLM vs. NetLogo.
“The Kruskal-Wallis test produces a high value of 0.99 (truncated in the figure for improved visibility) indicating no statistical difference in the distributions.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The Levene, Brown-Forsythe, and Kruskal p-values for the LLM vs. Hybrid group are all close to zero, indicating statistically significant differences.
“The Levene, Brown-Forsythe, and Kruskal p-values for the LLM vs. Hybrid group are all close to zero, indicating statistically significant differences.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Early bird flocking prompts that did not define heading conventions caused erratic turns and reversals.
“Early prompts did not define heading conventions (e.g., 0° = north, 90° = east), causing erratic turns and reversals.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Occasional errors persisted after adding the rationale key, particularly when agents needed to turn counterclockwise to reach a nearby target heading.
“However, occasional errors persisted, particularly when agents needed to turn counterclockwise to reach a nearby target heading.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
In the ant foraging simulations, early prompts that did not specify what ants should do if no pheromone or nest scent was present led to confusion or inaction.
“In the ant foraging simulations, early prompts did not specify what ants should do if no pheromone or nest scent was present, leading to confusion or inaction.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
LLM decision-making can function effectively in a "stateless" manner, relying on complete contextual details at every step.
“In both scenarios, we observed that LLM decision-making can function effectively in a “stateless” manner, relying on complete contextual details at every step.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
NetLogo and LLM perform similarly in terms of the ants' success in bringing food back to the nest, with both models accumulating approximately 85 units of food by the end of the simulation.
“NetLogo and LLM perform similarly in terms of the ants' success in bringing food back to the nest, with both models accumulating approximately 85 units of food by the end of the simulation.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Ants in NetLogo (rule-governed ants) require fewer steps than those controlled by the LLM to return to the nest after picking up food.
“Generally, ants in NetLogo (rule-governed ants) require fewer steps than those controlled by the LLM.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingreasoning
LLM-based birds adopted slightly more peripheral positions.
“In particular, LLM-based birds adopted slightly more peripheral positions”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
LLM and NetLogo display a more variable behavior during food searches.
“In contrast, LLM and NetLogo display a more variable behavior during food searches.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingreasoning
Following prompt refinements, the foraging performance of the LLM-driven ants nearly matched that of the standard NetLogo model.
“Following these refinements, the foraging performance of the LLM-driven ants nearly matched that of the standard NetLogo model.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Hybrid demonstrates consistent performance in finding food patches 1 and 2.
“Hybrid demonstrates consistent performance in finding food patches 1 and 2.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingnone given
In ant foraging simulations, LLM-guided ants gathered food at rates comparable to ants of the standard NetLogo model, as long as their instructions were meticulously designed.
“In ant foraging simulations, LLM-guided ants gathered food at rates comparable to ants of the standard NetLogo model, as long as their instructions were meticulously designed.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning
Hybrid ant colonies that integrated LLM-driven and rule-based ants often outperformed both purely rule-based and purely LLM-based groups.
“These mixed colonies often outperformed both purely rule-based and purely LLM-based groups.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Flocking remained inconsistent after specifying compass convention, as some agents moved in seemingly random directions.
“However, flocking remained inconsistent, as some agents moved in seemingly random directions.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
In bird flocking, LLM-driven agents adhered to the separation, alignment, and cohesion principles to form cohesive flocks.
“In bird flocking, LLM-driven agents adhered to the separation, alignment, and cohesion principles to form cohesive flocks.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The observed mean difference in heading differences between Hybrid and NetLogo is relatively small, with a Cohen's d of 0.16.
“Although the observed mean difference is relatively small, as indicated by a Cohen's d of 0.16–suggesting a minor effect size”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingreasoning
The interaction between an agent and the remote LLM at each iteration of a simulation requires significantly more computation time compared to executing simple rules within NetLogo.
“First, the interaction between an agent (such as an ant or bird) and the remote LLM at each iteration of a simulation requires significantly more computation time compared to executing simple rules within NetLogo.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
In the bird flocking simulations, using longer prompts that highlighted alignment, separation, and cohesion improved stability.
“In the bird flocking simulations, using longer prompts that highlighted alignment, separation, and cohesion improved stability.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Hybrid colonies that integrated LLM-driven and rule-based ants showed a promising trend of improved performance compared to uniform groups.
“Moreover, hybrid colonies that integrated LLM-driven and rule-based ants showed a promising trend of improved performance compared to uniform groups”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
LLM-guided ants demonstrate consistent foraging behavior across the different experiments, particularly for food patches 1 and 2.
“The LLM-guided ants demonstrate consistent foraging behavior across the different experiments, particularly for food patches 1 and 2.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Rule-based birds from Hybrid and those from NetLogo exhibit a much higher number of collisions than LLM-guided birds.
“In contrast, the rule-based birds from Hybrid and those from NetLogo, exhibit a much higher number of collisions.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
After establishing heading conventions and clarifying short-turn logic, the flocks became more cohesive.
“After establishing the conventions and clarifying the short-turn logic (which favored minimal angular adjustments), the flocks became more cohesive.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationnone given
The toolchain facilitates prompt-driven behavior generation, allowing agents to respond adaptively to environmental data.
“This toolchain facilitates prompt-driven behavior generation, allowing agents to respond adaptively to environmental data.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
The inconsistency in ant behavior prevented the colony from displaying an organized foraging behavior.
“This inconsistency prevented the colony from displaying an organized foraging behavior”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationnone given
LLM-driven agents can produce adequate and adaptive behaviors that realistically reflect complex, emergent patterns within the simulation.
“As we will show, the LLM can produce adequate and adaptive agent behaviors that realistically reflect complex, emergent patterns within the simulation.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationown data
Through iterative tuning, the simulated ants' behavior was significantly enhanced, making it more consistent with the ant foraging dynamics observed in the rule-based NetLogo model.
“Through iterative tuning, we significantly enhanced the simulated ants' behavior, making it more consistent with the ant foraging dynamics observed in the rule-based NetLogo model.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
Instructing ants to move away from the nest and rotate randomly when not carrying food and not sensing pheromones encouraged them to explore new areas more effectively.
“By instructing ants to move away from the nest and rotate randomly when not carrying food and not sensing pheromones, we encouraged them to explore new areas more effectively.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
The absence of detailed instructions led to ambiguous behaviors, including inconsistencies in following pheromone and nest scent gradients.
“The absence of detailed instructions led to ambiguous behaviors, including inconsistencies in following pheromone and nest scent gradients.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The framework decouples agent logic from hardcoded rules, enabling behavior to be modified or extended via natural language prompts.
“This framework decouples agent logic from hardcoded rules, enabling behavior to be modified or extended via natural language prompts.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The toolchain enables LLMs to study self-organizing processes and induce emergent behaviors within multi-agent environments.
“Our work demonstrates how this toolchain enables LLMs to study self-organizing processes and induce emergent behaviors within multi-agent environments, paving the way for new approaches to exploring intelligent systems and modeling swarm intelligence inspired by natural phenomena.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Nuanced differences in textual instructions, such as how distance and turning are interpreted, can shape global flock patterns.
“indicating that nuanced differences in textual instructions, such as how distance and turning are interpreted, can shape global flock patterns.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Including the shortest-path directive ensured that LLM-based agents correctly aligned their heading adjustments with both LLM-based and rule-based agents.
“Including the shortest-path directive ensured that LLM-based agents correctly aligned their heading adjustments with both LLM-based and rule-based agents.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
Throughout a simulation, LLM-guided birds try to avoid collisions.
“In fact, it turns out that, throughout a simulation, the LLM-guided birds try to avoid collisions; see Figure 11.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
Failing to include key details-like pheromone intensity or heading conventions-can result in ambiguous or incorrect actions.
“Failing to include key details—like pheromone intensity or heading conventions—can result in ambiguous or incorrect actions.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Prompt design and iterative refinement are central to achieving the desired outcomes.
“They also highlight how prompt design and iterative refinement are central to achieving the desired outcomes.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
Extending the bird flock simulations beyond 800 steps would likely have provided minimal additional information on emergent dynamics or system stability.
“Therefore, extending the simulations beyond the chosen limit of 800 steps would likely have provided minimal additional information on emergent dynamics or system stability.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The increase in computation time primarily stems from API latency, the computational complexity of large-scale language model inference, and associated natural language processing operations.
“This increase primarily stems from API latency, the computational complexity of large-scale language model inference, and the associated natural language processing operations.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
This suggested ambiguity in the LLM's coordinate system.
“This suggested ambiguity in the LLM's coordinate system.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Combining traditional rules with text-based reasoning can yield more robust foraging strategies.
“Thus, combining traditional rules with text-based reasoning can yield more robust foraging strategies.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The lower number of neighbors for LLM-guided birds is a result of their conservative behavior.
“while the LLM-guided birds display the lowest number, a result of their conservative behavior.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationown data
By applying LLMs to two classic multiagent models, ant foraging and bird flocking, this study shows that LLMs can serve as a viable alternative or complement to traditional rule-based logic in achieving effective swarm-like dynamics.
“By applying LLMs to two classic multiagent models, ant foraging and bird flocking, this study shows that LLMs can serve as a viable alternative or complement to traditional rule-based logic in achieving effective swarm-like dynamics.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
LLMs can interpret spatial cues in subtly different ways while still maintaining coherent swarm behavior.
“indicating that LLMs can interpret spatial cues in subtly different ways while still maintaining coherent swarm behavior.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
The underlying behavior of the models diverges substantially.
“indicating that the underlying behavior of the models diverges substantially.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
The combination of deterministic efficiency and text-based reasoning can be mutually beneficial.
“suggesting that the combination of deterministic efficiency and text-based reasoning can be mutually beneficial and warrants further investigation.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
Iterative prompt-tuning was essential for producing consistent and context-appropriate responses.
“A key theme across both simulations was the importance of iterative prompt-tuning, which proved essential for producing consistent and context-appropriate responses.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
- Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 26
- May combine two claims. 49
- The quote only partly states this claim. 1
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingnone givenThe language model offered feedback by highlighting misunderstandings or ambiguities in the prompts.
“Throughout this iterative process, the language model offered valuable feedback by highlighting misunderstandings or ambiguities in the prompts.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingreasoningIn both example applications, agents receive localized information about their environment and act based on LLM-generated decisions.
“In both cases, agents receive localized information about their environment and act based on LLM-generated decisions.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Findingown dataMore explicit rules were essential for consistent and realistic ant behavior.
“Following the initial evaluation, it became clear that more explicit rules were essential for consistent and realistic ant behavior.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
FindingreasoningThe feedback from the language model was instrumental in refining the prompts to enhance the ants' performance.
“This feedback was instrumental in refining the prompts to enhance the ants' performance.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataExplicitly stating the ants' status in the prompt improved decision-making by providing clear context, leading to better execution of actions like picking up and dropping food.
“Explicitly stating the ants' status improved decision-making by providing clear context, leading to better execution of actions like picking up and dropping food.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataInstructing ants to release pheromones while carrying food led to stronger trails and improved the efficiency of other ants in locating food sources.
“This led to stronger trails and improved the efficiency of other ants in locating food sources.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataAnts became more consistent in moving toward stronger cues, enhancing their navigation and foraging efficiency.
“Ants became more consistent in moving toward stronger cues, enhancing their navigation and foraging efficiency.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingreasoningThis eliminated unnecessary returns and improved foraging efficiency.
“This eliminated unnecessary returns and improved foraging efficiency.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataFrom Prompt 5 onward, ants became more adept at following pheromone and nest scent gradients, leading to a more organized foraging behavior.
“From Prompt 5 onward, ants became more adept at following pheromone and nest scent gradients, leading to a more organized foraging behavior.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataAnts continued to exhibit limited exploration when not carrying food, tending to stay near the nest rather than venturing into new areas or effectively following pheromone trails.
“Ants continued to exhibit limited exploration when not carrying food, tending to stay near the nest rather than venturing into new areas or effectively following pheromone trails.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimThe quote only partly states this claim.
Findingown dataExpanding the rotation options to include 'random' led ants to demonstrate more varied and unpredictable movement patterns during exploration.
“ants demonstrated more varied and unpredictable movement patterns during exploration”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataA noticeable bias concerning the rotation remained, particularly around the nest, indicating that the randomness was not functioning as efficiently as intended.
“a noticeable bias concerning the rotation remained, particularly around the nest, indicating that the randomness was not functioning as efficiently as intended”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataIntroducing a directive for proactive exploration improved exploration, with ants venturing further from the nest and discovering food sources in fewer simulation steps.
“This approach improved exploration, with ants venturing further from the nest and discovering food sources in fewer simulation steps.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
FindingreasoningThey effectively moved away from the nest and searched a wider area, increasing their chances of encountering food sources more quickly and efficiently.
“They effectively moved away from the nest and searched a wider area, increasing their chances of encountering food sources more quickly and efficiently.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataAdding a directive restricting the response format to a JSON object successfully constrained the output, making it more reliable and compatible with the simulation.
“This modification successfully constrained the output, making it more reliable and compatible with the simulation.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
Findingown dataSome ants released pheromones unexpectedly, while others exhibited random movement patterns.
“Some ants released pheromones unexpectedly, while others exhibited random movement patterns.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataWhen generating a reasoning process before outputting the final heading, the LLM produced correct answers; errors occurred when providing only the numerical result.
“When generating a reasoning process before outputting the final heading, the LLM produced correct answers. However, errors occurred when providing only the numerical result.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataAlthough central tendencies may be similar, the variance and distributional shape of heading differences differ between Hybrid and NetLogo.
“In summary, these results suggest that although central tendencies may be similar, the variance and distributional shape differ”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe Kruskal-Wallis test yields a p-value close to zero, signifying statistically significant differences in the overall distributions of the groups.
“Furthermore, the Kruskal-Wallis test yields a p-value close to zero as well, signifying statistically significant differences in the overall distributions of the groups.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataHybrid starts returning food to the nest at around 20 simulation steps, whereas LLM and NetLogo begin this process at about 40 steps.
“Hybrid starts returning food to the nest at around 20 simulation steps, whereas LLM and NetLogo begin this process at about 40 steps.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingreasoningRule-based birds exhibit the highest number of neighbors, while LLM-guided birds display the lowest number.
“As expected, rule-based birds exhibit the highest number of neighbors, while the LLM-guided birds display the lowest number”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe standard deviation for NetLogo is around 20, whereas LLM displays a much lower standard deviation of about 7.
“the standard deviation for NetLogo is around 20, whereas LLM displays a much lower standard deviation of about 7”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe Levene and Brown-Forsythe tests for the LLM vs. NetLogo group yielded p-values around 0.0045, indicating a significant difference in variance.
“The Levene and Brown-Forsythe tests for the LLM vs. NetLogo group yielded p-values around 0.0045, indicating a significant difference in variance”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataOther tested LLMs often exhibited unreliable and erratic behavior, including ants randomly dropping food and failing to demonstrate expected self-organizing capabilities.
“Other tested models often exhibited unreliable and erratic behavior, including ants randomly dropping food and failing to demonstrate expected self-organizing capabilities.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataWhile heading convergence sometimes lagged behind purely rule-based simulations, the resulting formations remained visually coherent.
“While heading convergence sometimes lagged behind purely rule-based simulations, the resulting formations remained visually coherent.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingreasoningThe Hybrid model outperforms the other two variants, collecting an average of approximately 95 units of food with a standard deviation of about 12.
“the Hybrid model outperforms the other two variants, collecting an average of approximately 95 units of food with a standard deviation of about 12”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataLevene's test and Brown-Forsythe test return extremely low p-values, indicating that the assumption of homogeneity of variances is violated.
“Specifically, both Levene's test and the Brown-Forsythe test return extremely low p-values, indicating that the assumption of homogeneity of variances is violated.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe rule-based birds of the original NetLogo model show somewhat lower heading differences than the two bird types of Hybrid, which show similar evolution of heading differences.
“While the two bird types of Hybrid show a similar evolution of the heading differences, the rule-based birds of the original NetLogo model show somewhat lower heading differences.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataExplicitly instructing the model to select the shortest path to the target heading improved flocking behavior significantly, with LLM-driven agents forming larger, more stable flocking clusters, achieving performance comparable to the original rule-based NetLogo model.
“By explicitly instructing the model to select the shortest path to the target heading, flocking behavior improved significantly. The LLM-driven agents formed larger, more stable flocking clusters, achieving performance comparable to the original, rule-based NetLogo model.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe Cohen's d effect size for LLM vs. Hybrid is approximately 0.2, suggesting a small yet meaningful effect.
“Additionally, Cohen's d effect size is approximately 0.2, suggesting a small yet meaningful effect.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataA notable outlier is observed in the context of NetLogo and food patch 2, where an ant required 720 steps to find food.
“A notable outlier is observed in the context of NetLogo and food patch 2, where an ant required 720 steps to find food.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
FindingreasoningEven small changes in the prompts, such as specifying the angle to rotate or how to handle conflicting signals, can significantly influence emergent group-level patterns.
“Even small changes in the prompts, such as specifying the angle to rotate or how to handle conflicting signals, can significantly influence emergent group-level patterns.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
FindingreasoningThe integration of LLMs into agent-based simulations introduces significant computational overhead compared to traditional rule-based implementations, with each agent-LLM interaction requiring network communication and remote inference that substantially increases simulation time.
“The integration of LLMs into agent-based simulations introduces significant computational overhead compared to traditional rule-based implementations, with each agent-LLM interaction requiring network communication and remote inference that substantially increases simulation time.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe Cohen's d value of 0.006 reflects a small effect size, suggesting nearly identical group means for LLM vs. NetLogo.
“the Cohen's d value of 0.006 reflects a small effect size, suggesting nearly identical group means”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataLLM-driven birds generally stayed slightly farther from the flock center and experienced fewer collisions than their rule-based counterparts.
“However, LLM-driven birds generally stayed slightly farther from the flock center and experienced fewer collisions than their rule-based counterparts”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataIn our specific experiments, each step involving an LLM-driven agent interaction typically required processing times on the order of seconds, whereas conventional rule-based simulations executed agent interactions within milliseconds or less per simulation step.
“In our specific experiments, we observed that each step involving an LLM-driven agent interaction typically required processing times on the order of seconds due to network latency and model response times, whereas conventional rule-based simulations executed agent interactions within milliseconds or less per simulation step.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Findingnone givenIn the ant foraging scenario, complete depletion of food resources typically occurs around 2000 steps.
“particularly since complete depletion of food resources typically occurs around 2000 steps.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataComparing the resulting headings with those produced by a rule-based model, some calculated headings were numerically similar, but they often pointed in opposite directions.
“While some calculated headings were numerically similar, they often pointed in opposite directions.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataWhile some flocking behavior emerged after the JSON restriction, it was inconsistent; small clusters formed briefly, but overall alignment and coherence were weaker than expected.
“while some flocking behavior emerged, it was inconsistent. Small clusters formed briefly, but overall alignment and coherence were weaker than expected.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataIn the bird flock simulation, collective behaviors stabilized after approximately 500 steps, with cluster formations remaining relatively unchanged in subsequent simulation steps.
“In the bird flock simulation, we empirically observed that collective behaviors stabilized after approximately 500 steps, with cluster formations remaining relatively unchanged in subsequent simulation steps.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataExplicitly specifying the compass convention for heading calculations improved flocking behavior, with larger clusters formed compared to previous iterations.
“By explicitly specifying the compass convention for heading calculations, flocking behavior improved. Larger clusters formed compared to previous iterations.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataIntroducing the 'rationale' key significantly improved flocking behavior, with agents demonstrating more consistent heading adjustments, enhancing the emergence of flocking dynamics.
“Introducing the “rationale” key significantly improved flocking behavior. The agents demonstrated more consistent heading adjustments, enhancing the emergence of flocking dynamics.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenThe final prompt used in the experiments resulted from several iterations in a trial-and-error process to ensure the LLM could effectively understand the environment and rules and execute the expected tasks accordingly.
“The final prompt used in our experiments resulted from several iterations in a trial-and-error process to ensure the LLM could effectively understand the environment and rules and execute the expected tasks accordingly.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The LLM can effectively understand the environment and rules and execute the expected tasks after prompt iterations.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
Study design and conductreasoningThe agents are designed to follow explicit, rule-based instructions derived from the LLM, ensuring that their actions are predictable and consistent with predefined conditions.
“The agents are designed to follow explicit, rule-based instructions derived from the LLM, ensuring that their actions are predictable and consistent with predefined conditions.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The LLM's ability to process complex, context-rich data allows it to infer and propose actions that adhere to predefined rules or leverage general behavioral principles.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
InterpretationreasoningKnowledge-driven prompts enable more adaptive and flexible agent behaviors by relying on the LLM's inherent understanding of broader behavioral concepts and principles.
“Knowledge-driven prompts, on the other hand, rely on the LLM's inherent understanding of broader behavioral concepts and principles.”
- Also stated in: § Materials and methods · plain
“These prompts are less rigid and provide the LLM with general guidelines, enabling more adaptive and flexible agent behaviors.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The LLM has inherent understanding of complex concepts such as flocking dynamics and self-organization.
- Also stated in: § Materials and methods · plain
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
PremisereasoningThis work is one of the first to use LLMs as decentralized behavioral engines for non-human and non-verbal, swarm-like agents.
“This is one of the first works to use LLMs as decentralized behavioral engines for non-human and non-verbal, swarm-like agents.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Study design and conductnone givenThere is a small chance that the LLM may occasionally generate responses that deviate from the specified rules.
“Nevertheless, there is still a small chance that the LLM may occasionally generate responses that deviate from the specified rules.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
InterpretationreasoningThe iterative process of the toolchain ensures that agent behaviors continuously respond to evolving environmental conditions and LLM feedback, fostering emergent behaviors and adaptive responses.
“The iterative process ensures that agent behaviors continuously respond to evolving environmental conditions and LLM feedback, fostering emergent behaviors and adaptive responses.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The LLM's ability to process complex, context-rich data allows it to infer and propose actions that adhere to predefined rules or leverage general behavioral principles.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThis change increased the likelihood of ants finding food, as they ventured further from the nest rather than lingering nearby.
“This change increased the likelihood of ants finding food, as they ventured further from the nest rather than lingering nearby.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductreasoningStructured prompts ensure that the ants' responses are clearly defined and predictable, enabling systematic analysis of their behavior.
“These structured prompts ensure that the ants' responses are clearly defined and predictable, enabling systematic analysis of their behavior.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The LLM's ability to process complex, context-rich data allows it to infer and propose actions that adhere to predefined rules or leverage general behavioral principles.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenSetting the temperature to 0.0 ensures deterministic results based on the provided inputs.
“The default API parameters are used, with the exception of the temperature, which is set to 0.0 to ensure deterministic results based on the provided inputs.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataThere is a statistically significant and practically noticeable difference between the LLM and Hybrid groups.
“This analysis reveals a statistically significant and practically noticeable difference between the LLM and Hybrid groups.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationreasoningWhen using an external API, much of the computational burden is offloaded to the AI service provider, alleviating the direct computational cost from the simulation user's perspective.
“It is important to clarify, however, that when using an external API (such as the OpenAI API), much of this computational burden is offloaded to the AI service provider, thereby alleviating the direct computational cost from the simulation user's perspective.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataAlthough significantly more computationally intensive per agent-step, the method remains practically feasible for smaller-scale exploratory simulations and conceptual validations.
“Thus, although significantly more computationally intensive per agent-step, the method remains practically feasible for smaller-scale exploratory simulations and conceptual validations, as demonstrated in this paper.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningAlthough the experiments utilized a single external model, the methodological approach is fully extendable and compatible with a variety of language models.
“Although the experiments presented in this study utilized a single external model, our methodological approach is fully extendable and compatible with a variety of language models.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningStateless LLM decision-making guarantees that the model consistently acts on relevant information but also necessitates highly detailed prompts.
“This guarantees that the model consistently acts on relevant information but also necessitates highly detailed prompts.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
InterpretationreasoningThis work underscores the potential for advanced language models, guided by carefully designed prompts, to enrich or even extend the capabilities of traditional agent-based models.
“Ultimately, this work underscores the potential for advanced language models, guided by carefully designed prompts, to enrich or even extend the capabilities of traditional agent-based models, offering new perspectives on swarm intelligence, self-organization, and emergent behaviors.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThe methodological framework is not inherently tied to GPT-4o or the OpenAI API; it was explicitly designed to ensure adaptability and generality, allowing straightforward integration with alternative LLMs.
“However, it is crucial to emphasize that our framework is not inherently tied to GPT-4o or the OpenAI API. Rather, we explicitly designed our methodological framework to ensure adaptability and generality, allowing straightforward integration with alternative LLMs, including open-source and locally deployed solutions.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataLLMs can support swarm-like behaviors: guiding ants to locate and retrieve food by following pheromone trails, and prompting "birds" to coordinate alignment according to core flocking principles.
“In both cases, our experiments demonstrated how LLMs can support swarm-like behaviors: guiding ants to locate and retrieve food by following pheromone trails, and prompting “birds” to coordinate alignment according to core flocking principles.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
InterpretationreasoningThe toolchain integrating NetLogo simulations with LLM interactions via Python extension and the OpenAI API offers a practical contribution in terms of accessibility and pedagogical potential.
“Additionally, in line with our research objectives, the toolchain we present, integrating NetLogo simulations with LLM interactions via Python extension and the OpenAI API, offers a practical contribution in terms of accessibility and pedagogical potential.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningConcerning food patch 1, the models exhibit a higher number of outliers, which can be attributed to the ants' initial exploration of the environment before encountering the food.
“Notably, concerning food patch 1, the models exhibit a higher number of outliers, which can be attributed to the ants' initial exploration of the environment before encountering the food.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenOur findings highlight the central role of iterative prompt tuning in shaping how LLMs behave within multi-agent environments.
“Our findings highlight the central role of iterative prompt tuning in shaping how LLMs behave within multi-agent environments.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenAccessing commercial LLM APIs like GPT-4o incurs token-based costs that scale with simulation complexity, agent population, and runtime duration.
“Additionally, accessing commercial LLM APIs like GPT-4o incurs token-based costs that scale with simulation complexity, agent population, and runtime duration.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenUtilizing GPT-4o through the OpenAI API inherently introduces token-based costs and dependencies associated with external model access, which may affect simulation scalability, cost-efficiency, and reliability.
“Second, utilizing GPT-4o through the OpenAI API inherently introduces token-based costs and dependencies associated with external model access, which may affect simulation scalability, cost-efficiency, and reliability.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThere are no practical or statistical differences observed between the LLM and NetLogo groups regarding the outcome.
“In summary, there are no practical or statistical differences observed between the LLM and NetLogo groups regarding the outcome.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataThese results confirm that LLMs can serve as flexible engines for agent behaviors that align with swarm principles, offering adaptive, context-driven responses.
“Together, these results confirm that LLMs can serve as flexible engines for agent behaviors that align with swarm principles, offering adaptive, context-driven responses.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataOverall, the LLM-driven agents performed comparably to their fully rule-based counterparts, but they sometimes displayed notable differences in how they interpreted and prioritized local cues when relying on text-based decision-making.
“Overall, the LLM-driven agents performed comparably to their fully rule-based counterparts, but they sometimes displayed notable differences in how they interpreted and prioritized local cues when relying on text-based decision-making.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable). May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningIncorporating LLMs into NetLogo facilitates the study of cognitively richer and more adaptive agent behaviors, while also lowering the barrier to entry for researchers, educators, and students.
“By incorporating LLMs into this familiar and user-friendly environment, our approach facilitates the study of cognitively richer and more adaptive agent behaviors, while also lowering the barrier to entry for researchers, educators, and students interested in experimenting with advanced AI techniques in agent-based modeling.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
InterpretationreasoningCareful attention to the length, structure, and clarity of the prompts is essential to achieve consistent, context-aware responses.
“Careful attention to the length, structure, and clarity of the prompts is essential to achieve consistent, context-aware responses.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
The paper relies on this without support.
The LLM has inherent understanding of complex concepts such as flocking dynamics and self-organization.
“the prompts rely on the LLM's inherent understanding of complex concepts such as flocking dynamics and self-organization”
“Knowledge-driven prompts, on the other hand, rely on the LLM's inherent understanding of broader behavioral concepts and principles.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The LLM's ability to process complex, context-rich data allows it to infer and propose actions that adhere to predefined rules or leverage general behavioral principles.
“The LLM's ability to process complex, context-rich data allows it to infer and propose actions that adhere to predefined rules (for structured prompts) or leverage general behavioral principles (in principle-based prompts).”
The paper relies on this without support.
The simulation environment mimics natural foraging conditions.
“The environment is designed to mimic natural foraging conditions, where agents (ants) must navigate to find food and return it to the nest while interacting with environmental cues such as pheromone trails and nest scents”
The paper relies on this without support.
The LLM can effectively understand the environment and rules and execute the expected tasks after prompt iterations.
“to ensure the LLM could effectively understand the environment and rules and execute the expected tasks accordingly”
The paper relies on this without support.
The LLM's internal knowledge and general reasoning are sufficient for autonomous prompts.
“the autonomous prompts rely on the LLM's internal knowledge and general reasoning”
The paper relies on this without support.
The LLM possesses inherent knowledge of flocking dynamics that allows it to apply general principles to guide bird behavior.
“The prompts provided to the LLM leverage its inherent knowledge of flocking dynamics, requiring it to apply these general principles to guide the behavior of each bird.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The two-dimensional airspace simulation environment effectively replicates key flocking behaviors like group cohesion.
“Although this environment is relatively simple, it effectively replicates key flocking behaviors like group cohesion, allowing for the observation of flocking dynamics under varying conditions.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The LLM can interpret environmental data and generate responses that ensure birds align with flockmates, maintain appropriate distance, and stay cohesive.
“The LLM is responsible for interpreting environmental data and generating responses that ensure the birds align with their flockmates, maintain an appropriate distance to avoid collisions, and stay cohesive as a group.”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Improving transparency and auditability of MAS reasoning will build confidence that these systems are working as intended.
“Improving transparency and auditability of MAS reasoning will build confidence that these systems are working as intended [69].”
From A Review of Multi-Agent AI Systems for Biological and Clinical Data Analysis (2026) · cites this paper as [69]
Table 5 in the Conclusion identifies reduced transparency and limited explainability of agent decisions as weaknesses, and says unpredictable behavior requires careful monitoring. The paper does not say that improving auditability or transparency will build confidence that MAS are working as intended. (LLM, conf=0.78)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThis dramatically increases runtime and cost, as each agent's inference and communication incurs additional latency and token usage.
“This dramatically increases runtime and cost, as each agent’s inference and communication incurs additional latency and token usage [69].”
From A Review of Multi-Agent AI Systems for Biological and Clinical Data Analysis (2026) · cites this paper as [69]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
Reported first quartile is labeled 20% in Table 2
MinorThe text says Table 2 provides three quartiles, but its percentile columns are labeled 20%, 50%, and 75%. The first quartile is the 25th percentile, not the 20th.
“Detailed statistics, including the three quartiles, mean, standard deviation, and minimum and maximum amounts of food collected, are provided in Table 2.”
“| Food patch | Model variant | Mean | Std | Min | 20% | 50% | 75% | Max |”
Bird flocking is described as a simulation of social insects
MinorThe methods say both simulations concern social insects, but identify the second simulation's agents as birds.
“In this study, we employed two distinct simulations of the behavior of social insects”
“The agents in this simulation are modeled as birds, each operating under principle-based prompts.”
Abstract says both prompt types were used in both applications
MinorThe abstract says both prompt approaches were employed for each application, while the discussion describes structured prompts for ant foraging and knowledge-driven prompts for bird flocking as the two strategies explored.
“For both example applications mentioned above, we employ both structured, rule-based prompts and autonomous, knowledge-driven prompts.”
“We explored two complementary strategies for integrating Large Language Models (LLMs) into multi-agent simulations: (i) a structured, rule-based approach in an ant foraging context, and (ii) a principle-based, knowledge-driven approach in a bird flocking scenario.”
Neighbor-distance criterion includes a distance classified as a collision
MinorFigure 11 classifies d = 1 as a collision. Figure 12 says its neighbor criterion starts at d = 1 and thereby excludes collisions, but that boundary value satisfies both criteria.
“Figure: Figure 12 Average number of neighbors: A neighbor is defined as any entity within a distance d such that 1 ≤ d ≤ 5, thereby excluding collisions.”
“Figure: Figure 11 Collisions between birds. A collision occurs when the distance d between birds is at most one (that is, d ≤ 1).”
Two different collision thresholds are stated
MinorThe results text defines a collision as a distance smaller than one, whereas the Figure 11 caption includes distances equal to one.
“collisions between birds, which are defined as occasions in which the Euclidean distance between two birds is smaller than one.”
“Figure: Figure 11 Collisions between birds. A collision occurs when the distance d between birds is at most one (that is, d ≤ 1).”
Cites
Flocks, herds and schools: A distributed behavioral model
Reynolds, C. W. (1987) · ACM SIGGRAPH Annual Conference on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques (SIGGRAPH) · doi:10.1145/37401.37406 · Cited by 7,795 · see citing works
Flocks, herds and schools: A distributed behavioral model
Reynolds, C. W. (1987) · ACM SIGGRAPH Computer Graphics · doi:10.1145/37402.37406 · Cited by 5,148 · see citing works
A Survey on Evaluation of Large Language Models
Chang, Y., Wang, X., Wang, J., Wu, Y., Yang, L., Zhu, K., Chen, H., Yi, X., Wang, C., Wang, Y., et al. (2024) · ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology · doi:10.1145/3641289 · Cited by 2,842 · cited 1× · see citing works
“In this study, we use the terms “agent” and “multi-agent” based on their foundational meanings in agent-based modeling and simulation (ABMS, Macal and North, 2009), while extending them through the integration of large language models (LLMs, Chang et al., 2024).”
Generative Agents: Interactive Simulacra of Human Behavior
Park, J. S., O'Brien, J., Cai, C. J., Morris, M. R., Liang, P., & Bernstein, M. S. (2023) · Proceedings of the 36th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology · doi:10.1145/3586183.3606763 · Cited by 2,187 · see citing works
An Introduction to Multi-Agent Systems
Balaji, P. G., & Srinivasan, D. (2010) · Studies in computational intelligence · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-14435-6_1 · Cited by 1,397 · see citing works
Agent-based modeling and simulation
Macal, C. M., & NORTH, M. J. (2009) · Winter Simulation Conference · doi:10.1109/wsc.2009.5429318 · Cited by 551 · see citing works
A survey on LLM-based multi-agent systems: Workflow, infrastructure, and challenges
Li, X., Wang, S., Zeng, S., Wu, Y., & Yang, Y. (2024) · Vicinagearth · doi:10.1007/s44336-024-00009-2 · Cited by 404 · cited 1× · see citing works
“These agents typically focus on individual task execution rather than the emergent dynamics central to ABMS (Talebirad and Nadiri, 2023; Kannan et al., 2024; Li et al., 2024).”
Agent‐based modeling in ecological economics
Heckbert, S., Baynes, T., & Reeson, A. F. (2010) · Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1111/j.1749-6632.2009.05286.x · Cited by 294 · see citing works
Large language models empowered agent-based modeling and simulation: a survey and perspectives
Gao, C., Lan, X., Li, N., Yuan, Y., Ding, J., Zhou, Z., Xu, F., & Li, Y. (2024) · Humanities and Social Sciences Communications · doi:10.1057/s41599-024-03611-3 · Cited by 294 · see citing works
2024 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS)
Al Omoush, M. H., Kishore, S., & Mehigan, T. (2024) · doi:10.1109/iros58592.2024 · Cited by 263 · see citing works
A survey on multi-agent reinforcement learning and its application
Ning, Z., & Xie, L.-H. (2024) · Journal of Automation and Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.jai.2024.02.003 · Cited by 257 · see citing works
SMART-LLM: Smart Multi-Agent Robot Task Planning using Large Language Models
Kannan, S. S., Venkatesh, V. L. N., & Min, B. (2024) · IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS) · doi:10.1109/iros58592.2024.10802322 · Cited by 199 · see citing works
Agent‐based models in sociology
Bianchi, F., & Squazzoni, F. (2015) · Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Computational Statistics · doi:10.1002/wics.1356 · Cited by 148 · see citing works
S3: Social-network Simulation System with Large Language Model-Empowered Agents
Gao, C., Lan, X., Lu, Z., Mao, J., Piao, J., Wang, H., Jin, D., & Li, Y. (2023) · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4607026 · Cited by 113 · see citing works
Agent-based modeling in urban and architectural research: A brief literature review
Chen, L. (2012) · Frontiers of Architectural Research · doi:10.1016/j.foar.2012.03.003 · Cited by 107 · see citing works
Beyond pheromones: evolving error-tolerant, flexible, and scalable ant-inspired robot swarms
Hecker, J. P., & Moses, M. E. (2015) · Swarm Intelligence · doi:10.1007/s11721-015-0104-z · Cited by 88 · see citing works
Multi-Agent Collaboration: Harnessing the Power of Intelligent LLM Agents
Talebirad, Y., & Nadiri, A. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2306.03314 · Cited by 65 · see citing works
Zhu, X., Chen, Y., Tian, H., Tao, C., Su, W., Yang, C., Huang, G., Li, B., Lu, L., Wang, X., et al. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2305.17144 · Cited by 33 · see citing works
Swarm-GPT: Combining Large Language Models with Safe Motion Planning for Robot Choreography DesignPreprint
Jiao, A., Patel, T. P., Khurana, S., Korol, A.-M., Brunke, L., Adajania, V. K., Çulha, U., Zhou, S., & Schoellig, A. P. (2023) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2312.01059 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
Putra, R. V. W., Marchisio, A., & Shafique, M. (2024) · Frontiers in Robotics and AI · doi:10.3389/frobt.2024.1401677 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
Liu, H., Li, Z., Huang, K., Wang, R., Cheng, G., & Li, T. (2023) · The Journal of Supercomputing · doi:10.1007/s11227-023-05551-2 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Exploring the Intersection of Large Language Models and Agent-Based Modeling via Prompt EngineeringPreprint
Junprung, E. (2023) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2308.07411 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Collaborating with language models for embodied reasoning
Dasgupta, I., Kaeser-Chen, C., Marino, K., Ahuja, A., Babayan, S., Hill, F., & Fergus, R. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2302.00763 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Amblard, F., Daudé, É., Gaudou, B., Grignard, A., Hutzler, G., Lang, C., Marilleau, N., Nicod, J., Sheeren, D., & Taillandier, P. (2015) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-1-78548-055-3.50003-4 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Jimenez-Romero, C., Yegenoglu, A., Martín, A. P., Diaz-Pier, S., & Morrison, A. (2023) · Swarm Intelligence · doi:10.1007/s11721-023-00231-6 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Self-citationQu, Y., Liu, M., Zhu, T., Gao, L., Yu, S., & Zhou, W. (2024) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2406.09831 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Language-Guided Pattern Formation for Swarm Robotics with Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning
Liu, H.-S., Kuroki, S., Kozuno, T., Sun, W.-F., & Lee, C. (2024) · IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS) · doi:10.1109/iros58592.2024.10801665 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Achieving Swarm Intelligence with Spiking Neural Oscillators
Fang, Y., & Dickerson, S. J. (2017) · IEEE International Conference on Rebooting Computing (ICRC) · doi:10.1109/icrc.2017.8123632 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
LLM2Swarm: Robot Swarms that Responsively Reason, Plan, and Collaborate through LLMs
Strobel, V., Dorigo, M., & Fritz, M. (2024) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2410.11387 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Multi-Agent Formation Control Using Large Language ModelsPreprint
Liu, Y., Zhou, Z., Liu, J., Chen, L., & Wang, J. (2024) · doi:10.36227/techrxiv.172954477.70259514/v1 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Model Swarms: Collaborative Search to Adapt LLM Experts via Swarm Intelligence
Feng, S., Wang, Z., Wang, Y., Ebrahimi, S., Palangi, H., Miculicich, L., Kulshrestha, A., Rauschmayr, N., Choi, Y., Tsvetkov, Y., et al. (2024) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2410.11163 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Tisue, 2004, “Netlogo: a simple environment for modeling complexity,”, 16
- Wooldridge, 2009, An Introduction to Multiagent Systems
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Wang, J., Fu, G., & Savic, D. A. (2026) · Water Research · doi:10.1016/j.watres.2026.125433 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
Agentic AI: A Survey of Autonomous Agents, Architectures, and Emerging Applications
Deshmukh, S., Kuri, M. M., Vanarote, V., Nimbalkar, M., Chandre, P. R., & Yadav, M. S. (2025) · IEEE International Conference on ICT in Business Industry & Government (ICTBIG) · doi:10.1109/ictbig68706.2025.11323264 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Ethical issues in multi-agent AI systems for healthcare: a narrative review
Xie, Z., Wang, H., Dai, L., Wang, Z., Song, H., & Qian, J. (2026) · Frontiers in Public Health · doi:10.3389/fpubh.2026.1792627 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Radeva, I., Popchev, I. P., Doukovska, L., & Dimitrova, M. (2025) · Electronics · doi:10.3390/electronics14244883 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
UAV Leveraging GenAI/LLMs, a Brief Survey
Cidjeu, D. D., Fendji, J. L. E. K., Kamla, V. C., & Tchappi, I. (2025) · Procedia Computer Science · doi:10.1016/j.procs.2025.07.195 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Mao, K., Hu, B., Lin, R., Li, Z., Lu, G., & Zhang, Z. (2025) · Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.3389/frai.2025.1660912 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Yazdanian, P., Liu, Y., & Li, Z. (2025) · Asia-Pacific Software Engineering Conference (APSEC) · doi:10.1109/apsec66846.2025.00077 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Exploring LLM Agents as Seamless and Context-aware UI Adjusters for the Visually Impaired
Tang, K., Quinlan, M., & Cho, Y. (2025) · ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing (UbiComp) · doi:10.1145/3714394.3754391 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Tang, K., Li, Y., Han, X., Rui, Z., Zhou, X., & Lin, Q. (2025) · Designing Interactive Systems Conference · doi:10.1145/3715668.3735599 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Deckker, D., & Sumanasekara, S. (2025) · International Journal of Science and Research Archive · doi:10.30574/ijsra.2025.16.2.2412 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
A Review of Multi-Agent AI Systems for Biological and Clinical Data Analysis
Spieser, J., Balapour, A., Meller, J., Patra, K. C., & Shamsaei, B. (2026) · Methods and Protocols · doi:10.3390/mps9020033 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
“Improving transparency and auditability of MAS reasoning will build confidence that these systems are working as intended [69].”
What will be the next step of LLMs in TCM? A narrative review
Chen, S., Zhong, R., Zhang, W., Li, Z., Su, Y., Gao, L., & Hu, K. (2026) · Science of Traditional Chinese Medicine · doi:10.1097/st9.0000000000000109 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Large language model integration in agent-based modeling for the simulation and recycling system
Kuo, T. C., Zulkarnain, I., Rahmat, D. A., Rumanti, A. A., & Pulungan, M. A. (2026) · Resources Conservation and Recycling · doi:10.1016/j.resconrec.2026.108968 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
LLM-Driven Generative Agents for Simulating Occupant Feedback in Built Environments
Lee, M. J., & Zhang, R. (2026) · Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering · doi:10.1061/jccee5.cpeng-7365 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Generative AI and urban modeling
Crooks, A. T., Jiang, N., & Wang, B. (2025) · Environment and Planning B Urban Analytics and City Science · doi:10.1177/23998083251351500 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Vallverdú, J. (2025) · SpringerBriefs in intelligent systems · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-03593-6_11
ARTeMIS: Agent-based Rewriting and Test Case Management with Intelligent Supervision
Carvalho, G., Peralta, A. D., Carvalho, A. L. D. C., Soares, Y., Lima, I., Ferreira, N. B. F., & Melo, H. (2025) · Simpósio Brasileiro de Qualidade de Software (SBQS) · doi:10.5753/sbqs.2025.15058
Wajeed, D. M. A., & Sultana, R. (2026) · IGI Global eBooks · doi:10.4018/979-8-3373-5017-2.ch001
Do-Bui-Khanh, L., Huynh-Quang, N., & Nguyen-Ngoc, D. (2025) · RIVF International Conference on Computing and Communication Technologies (RIVF) · doi:10.1109/rivf68649.2025.11365201
Chaudhuri, S., Saha, D., & Das, D. (2025) · International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing and Conference of the Asia-Pacific Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics (IJCNLP-AACL) · doi:10.18653/v1/2025.findings-ijcnlp.88
Benchmarking Heuristic and Cooperative Agents in AbstractSwarm Logistics Scenarios
Hasan, S. M., & Logofătu, D. (2025) · International Symposium on Symbolic and Numeric Algorithms for Scientific Computing (SYNASC) · doi:10.1109/synasc69064.2025.00059
Xie, C., Zheng, F., Deng, L., & Guo, X. (2025) · International Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Electrical and Electronic Engineering (AI3E) · doi:10.1109/ai3e69313.2025.00056
The Versatility of Large Language Models in Traffic and Mobility Simulations
Schnieder, M., & Glesener, G. B. (2026) · IEEE International Conference on Semantic Computing (ICSC) · doi:10.1109/icsc67292.2026.00048
Verma, K. (2026) · International Journal of Advanced engineering Management and Science · doi:10.22161/ijaems.122.21
A Three-Stage Framework for Navigating AI-Empowered Scientific Research
Xiong, F., Yu, X., & Wu, H. (2025) · International Conference on Intelligent Education and Intelligent Research (IEIR) · doi:10.1109/ieir67391.2025.11491483
The age of Articicial Intelligence: a thematic review on AI agent and explainable AI
de Carvalho, M. F., Dias, M. D. O., & Junior, D. S. D. S. (2026) · Revista edUCA - Revista Multidisciplinar da Faculdade Católica Paulista · doi:10.54901/educa.v9-275
Learning Collaborative Reasoning Strategies Through Trust-Weighted Multi-Agent Consensus
Shakya, P., Bataju, K., Ghimire, K., Mandal, A., Gyawali, S., Awale, M., Dahal, M., Adhikari, S., Rijal, S., You, Y. H., et al. (2026) · IEEE Conference on Artificial Intelligence (CAI) · doi:10.1109/cai68641.2026.11536431
Voice- and Text-Based Tasking for Swarm Robotics: A Leader-Centric Coordination Framework
Mirza, Q. U. A. Z. Z., Kanwal, R., Ashraf, H., Jhanjhi, N., & Reza, A. (2026) · IEEE International Conference on Secure IoT, Assured and Trusted Computing (SATC) · doi:10.1109/satc69565.2026.11542234
Gao, Z., Ding, P., Oğuztüzün, Ç., & Xu, R. (2026) · Drug Design Development and Therapy · doi:10.2147/dddt.s561251
Lu, Z., Zhu, J., Lu, D., Lv, H., Gan, H., & An, Z. (2026) · Biomimetics · doi:10.3390/biomimetics11070468
LLM-driven behavior generation and negotiation for collective robotic construction
Slezak, S., Siriwardena, L., Leder, S., & Menges, A. (2026) · Construction Robotics · doi:10.1007/s41693-026-00216-x
Safe and Efficient Resource Allocation in Multi-AI-Agent LLM Systems
Mori, D. M., & Johnson, N. F. (2026) · IEEE Cloud Summit · doi:10.1109/cloudsummit68932.2026.00053
IMPLEMENTASI MULTI-AGENT UNTUK OTOMATISASI KONTEN PROMOSI DIGITAL PADA UMKM
Nihmah, A. H. (2026) · Jurnal Informatika dan Teknik Elektro Terapan · doi:10.23960/jitet.v14i3.10533
Towards Stable AI-Driven Equity Valuation Using Multi-Agent Large Language Models
Chopra, J. (2026) · International Conference on NextGen Data Science and Analytics (ICNDSA) · doi:10.1109/icndsa68777.2026.11652131
Architectures, Learning Loops, and Emergence in Agentic Services Computing
Shafi, S., Bidollahkhani, M., & Kunkel, J. M. (2026) · IEEE Annual International Computer Software and Applications Conference (COMPSAC) · doi:10.1109/compsac69091.2026.00269
LLM-driven paradigm for agent-based modeling and simulation: A review and organizing framework
Wang, J., Li, X., & Xiao, G. (2026) · Computer Science Review · doi:10.1016/j.cosrev.2026.101054
de Zarzà, I., de Curtò, J., & Calafate, C. T. (2026) · Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.3389/frai.2026.1962295
Zabraoui, O., Hmamou, Y., Chafi, A., & Alami, S. K. (2026) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2026.134471
A Lightweight LLM-Driven Multi-Agent Framework for Virtual Society Simulation with Memory Feedback
Guo, A., Tao, X., Li, H., & Dai, X. (2026) · International Conference on Automation and Computing (ICAC) · doi:10.1109/icac70325.2026.11712497
Korolyov, V. Y., Kulish, O., Ogurtsov, M., Khodzinskyi, O., & Yarushevskyi, O. (2026) · Cybernetics and Computer Technologies · doi:10.34229/2707-451x.26.3.2
Agentic AI Systems in Radiology: Design, Applications, Evaluation, and Challenges
Blüthgen, C., Veen, D. V., Truhn, D., Kather, J. N., Moor, M., Polacin, M., Chaudhari, A. S., Frauenfelder, T., Langlotz, C. P., Krauthammer, M. O., et al. (2026) · Radiology · doi:10.1148/radiol.253226
- Authors
- Jimenez-Romero, C., Yegenoglu, A., & Blum, C.
- Affiliations
- Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
- Independent Researcher
- Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (ES)
- Corresponding author
- Jimenez-Romero, Cristian
- Venue
- Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence
- Publisher
- Frontiers Media SA
- Published
- 2025-05-21
- Volume
- 8
- Pages
- 1593017-1593017
- ISSN
- 2624-8212 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC12135685
- OpenAlex
- W4410551457
- Semantic Scholar
- b4099208cad4840901bc07544d06016ba3d8b5b2
- Cited by
- 30
- References
- 31
- Citations by year
- 2026: 18 · 2025: 12
- FWCI
- 12.81
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Update notices
- correction (2026-01-22)
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DIGITAL.CSIC (Spanish National Research Council (CSIC)) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Funders
- HORIZON EUROPE Marie Sklodowska-Curie Actions (945380)
- Agencia Estatal de Investigación (PID2022-136787NB-I00)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Modular Robots and Swarm Intelligence
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Simulation Techniques and Applications
- Keywords
- large language models, multi-agent systems, swarm intelligence, ant foraging behavior, bird flocking, NetLogo, GPT-4o, emergent behavior, self-organization, complex systems
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-10.
Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-10.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review