Cited by 10Stroke Rehabilitation and RecoveryOccupational Therapy Practice and ResearchMedical Practices and Rehabilitation

Effectiveness of active occupational therapy in patients with acute stroke: A propensity score-weighted retrospective study

Open access
Yamakawa, Shiori, Nagayama, Hirofumi, Tomori, Kounosuke, Ikeda, Kohei, Niimi, Ayaka·2023·Frontiers in Rehabilitation Sciences

Abstract

Background and purpose: The effects of therapy and patient characteristics on rehabilitation outcomes in patients with acute stroke are unclear. We investigated the effects of intensive occupational therapy (OT) on patients with acute stroke. Methods: We performed a retrospective cohort study using the 2005–2016 Japan Rehabilitation Database, from which we identified patients with stroke ( n = 10,270) who were admitted to acute care hospitals ( n = 37). We defined active OT (AOT) and non-AOT as OT intervention times (total intervention time/length of hospital stay) longer or shorter than the daily physical therapy intervention time, respectively. The outcomes assessed were the Functional Independence Measure (FIM) and National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) scores, duration of hospitalization, and rate of discharge. Propensity scores and inverse probability of treatment weighting analyses adjusted for patient characteristics were performed to investigate the effects of AOT on patient outcomes. Results: We enrolled 3,501 patients (1,938 and 1,563 patients in the AOT and non-AOT groups, respectively) in the study. After inverse probability of treatment weighting, the AOT group had a shorter length of hospitalization (95% confidence interval: −3.7, −1.3, p < 0.001), and the FIM (95% confidence interval: 2.0, 5.7, p < 0.001) and NIHSS (95% confidence interval; 0.3, 1.1, p < 0.001) scores improved significantly. Subgroup analysis showed that lower NHISS scores for aphasia, gaze, and neglect and lower overall NIHSS and FIM scores on admission led to a greater increase in FIM scores in the AOT group. Conclusions: AOT improved the limitations in performing activities of daily living (ADL) and physical function in patients with acute stroke and reduced the length of hospitalization. Additionally, subgroup analysis suggested that the increase in FIM score was greater in patients with severe limitations in performing ADLs and worse cognitive impairment, such as neglect, on admission.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fresc.2022.1045231

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Yamakawa et al. reported that an active OT intervention on patients with acute stroke was effective in improving limitations in performing ADLs and reducing length of hospitalization.

    “Yamakawa et al. [50], referred an active OT intervention on patients with acute stroke was effective in improving the limitations in performing ADLs and reducing the length of hospitalization.”
  • Yamakawa et al. also indicated that the intervention was more effective in patients with severe limitations in performing ADLs and cognitive impairment.

    “They also indicated that it was more effective in patients with severe limitations in performing ADLs and cognitive impairment, such as neglect.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Yamakawa, S., Nagayama, H., Tomori, K., Ikeda, K., & Niimi, A.
Affiliations
  • Kanagawa University of Human Services (JP)
  • Tokyo University of Technology (JP)
  • Yokohama Brain and Spine Center (JP)
Corresponding author
Nagayama, Hirofumi
Venue
Frontiers in Rehabilitation Sciences
Published
2023-01-05
Volume
3
Pages
1045231-1045231
ISSN
2673-6861 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4313557087
Cited by
10
References
39
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2
FWCI
1.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Frontiers in Rehabilitation Sciences (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (20H03914)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rehabilitation › Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Occupational Therapy › Occupational Therapy Practice and Research
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Medical Practices and Rehabilitation
Keywords
acute stroke, stroke rehabilitation, functional independence, activities of daily living, length of hospital stay, stroke severity, aphasia, hemispatial neglect, cognitive impairment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review