Cited by 15Migration and Labor DynamicsLatin American rural developmentRegional Socio-Economic Development Trends

Why do rural youth migrate? Evidence from Colombia and Guatemala

Open access
Díaz Baca, Manuel Francisco, Moreno Lerma, Leonardo, Burkart, Stefan, Triana Ángel, Natalia·2024·Frontiers in Sociology

Abstract

Migration, from rural to urban settings is a common phenomenon in Latin America, due to social, economic, political, and other factors. Young people in search of economic and educational opportunities, financial, and social stability, have been migrating to larger urban centers, thus crafting important shifts in rural labor, generational transfer, and domestic economies. Through a systematic literature review of scientific literature, and documents from public institutions and international organizations, published between 2012 and 2022, this article addresses rural–urban migration of youth in Colombia and Guatemala’s cattle sector, particularly identifying (i) driving factors, (ii) their impacts on cattle farming, and (iii) public policies implemented to counteract prejudicial effects. Results show that unemployment, lack of educational opportunities, and insecurity are the main reasons for youth migration to cities or abroad, with Mexico, the United States, and Spain being the most common destinations. Additionally, impacts on the cattle sector include shortage of labor and a perfectible generational transfer, hindering the modernization of the industry and investments in climate change adaptation and mitigation strategies. Despite various implemented public policies, the results are partial, and the issue of accelerated youth migration remains relevant. Consequently, without more effective measures adopted by national governments, the cattle sector will lag behind its regional and international competitors, deterring the achievement of the Sustainable Development Goals. As the main contribution of the study, the analysis of migration is highlighted based on its effects on a specific economic sector and not focused on its causes, as evidenced in a wide range of literature.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fsoc.2024.1439256

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 41

  1. Aguilar T. Serrano D. (2015). Analysis of the social component of livestock in a northern region of Colombia (municipality of Montería). Perspect. Geogr. 20, 133– 154. doi: 10.19053/01233769.4502 · DOI
  2. Aguirre K. (2014). Analyzing violence after the conflict: Guatemala as a case of a sub-national study. Rev. Mex. Cienc. Políti. Soc. 59, 191– 234. doi: 10.1016/S0185-1918(14)70805-0 · DOI
  3. Castelli F. (2018). Drivers of migration: why do people move? J. Travel Med. 25, 1– 7. doi: 10.1093/jtm/tay040, PMID: 30053084 · DOI
  4. Chacón E. (2021). Proposal to measure and categorize rurality in Costa Rica. Perspect. Rural. Nueva Época 18, 1– 21. doi: 10.15359/prne.18-36.1 · DOI
  5. Díaz M. Moreno L. Burkart S. (2024). How do sustainability policies emerge in the Colombian political system? A kaleidoscope model analysis of the policy for sustainable cattle 2022–2050. Clean Circ. Bioecon. 7: 100075. doi: 10.1016/j.clcb.2024.100075 · DOI
  6. Fangqu N. (2022). A push-pull model for inter-city migration simulation. Cities 131: 104005. doi: 10.1016/j.cities.2022.104005 · DOI
  7. García A. (2018). Revisión crítica de las principales teorías que tratan de explicar la migración. España 7, 198– 228. doi: 10.25115/riem.v7i4.1963 · DOI
  8. García V. Masferrer C. Giorguli S. (2019). Cambios futuros en la estructura etaria y diferentes escenarios migratorios. El caso de América del Norte y Central. Rev. Latinoam. Pobl. 13, 36– 53. doi: 10.31406/relap2019.v13.i2.n25.2 · DOI
  9. Gaspar S. Chatti J. (2022). Migración brasileña en Portugal y España: dinámicas y nuevos paradigmas. Migraciones 56, 1– 19. doi: 10.14422/mig.2022.025 · DOI
  10. Gheasi M. Nijkamp P. (2017). A brief overview of international migration motives and impacts, with specific reference to FDI. Economies. 5: 31. doi: 10.3390/economies5030031 · DOI
  11. González M. López A. Esteve A. (2022). Interregional migration of human capital in Spain. Reg. Stud. 9, 324– 342. doi: 10.1080/21681376.2022.2060131 · DOI
  12. Groher T. Heitkämper K. Umstätter C. (2020). Digital technology adoption in livestock production with a special focus on ruminant farming. Animal 14, 2404– 2413. doi: 10.1017/S1751731120001391, PMID: 32613933 PMC7538341 · DOI
  13. Hass H. (2021). A theory of migration: the aspirations-capabilities framework. Comp. Migr. Stud. 9: 8. doi: 10.1186/s40878-020-00210-4, PMID: 33680858 PMC7902564 · DOI · Paper page
  14. Howlett M. Cashore B. (2014). “ Conceptualizing Public Policy” in Comparative policy studies. eds. Engeli I. Allison C. (London: Palgrave Macmillan), 17– 33.
  15. Jiménez E. (2016). La violencia en el Triángulo Norte de Centroamérica: una realidad que genera desplazamiento. Papel Polít. 21, 167– 196. doi: 10.11144/Javeriana.papo21-1.vtnc · DOI
  16. López E. Martínez L. Martínez C. Prieto A. (2017). Rural development and aging: case study in Chinavita, Boyacá, Colombia. Rev. Invest. Desarr. Innova. 8, 193– 206. doi: 10.19053/20278306.v8.n2.2018.7959 · DOI
  17. Lune H. Berg B. (2017). Qualitative research methods for the social sciences. 9th Edn: Pearson Available at: http://law.gtu.ge/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/Berg-B.-Lune-H.-2012.-Qualitative-Research-Methods-for-the-Social-Sciences.pdf.
  18. Martínez G. Menéndez C. Mora J. (2022). Peasant families and milk production systems in the Anaime canyon (Colombia). Perspect. Rural. 21, 1– 25. doi: 10.15359/prne.21-41.5 · DOI
  19. Mina Y. Téllez G. (2022). Oportunidades laborales y la migración rural-urbana juvenil. Juventud rural araucana. Estud. Polít. 65, 89– 118. doi: 10.17533/udea.espo.n65a03 · DOI
  20. Mohamed A. Abdul A. (2020). Push–pull factors influencing international return migration intentions: a systematic literature review. J. Enterpr. Commu. People Places Glob. Econ. 14, 231– 246. doi: 10.1108/JEC-01-2020-0004 · DOI
  21. Morales L. Santos W. Segura E. (2015). The rural development: an approach from the new rurality. Cienc. Agric. 12, 15– 25. doi: 10.19053/01228420.4110 · DOI
  22. Morawska E. (2021). “ Historical-structural models of international migration” in An introduction to international migration studies: European perspectives. ed. Martiniello M. (Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press), 57– 78.
  23. Moreno L. Díaz M. Burkart S. (2022). Public policies for the development of a sustainable cattle sector in Colombia, Argentina, and Costa Rica: a comparative analysis (2010–2020). Front. Sustain. Food Syst. 6, 1– 18. doi: 10.3389/fsufs.2022.722522 · DOI · Paper page
  24. Prieto R. Quiñones M. Lora E. O’Clery N. (2022). Mobility between Colombian cities is predominantly repeat and return migration. Comput. Environ. Urban. Syst. 94, 101774– 101713. doi: 10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2022.101774 · DOI
  25. Resnick D. Haggblade S. Babu S. Hendriks S. Mather D. (2018). The kaleidoscope model of policy change: applications to food security policy in Zambia. World Dev. 109, 101– 120. doi: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2018.04.004 · DOI
  26. Rosendo A. Herrera F. Vizcarra I. Baca N. (2019). Rural territorial development: agriculture and migration in the south of the state of Mexico. Econ. Soc. Territ. 19, 1243– 1274. doi: 10.22136/est20191207 · DOI
  27. Sahu P. (2013). “ Research process” in Research methodology: a guide for researchers in agricultural science, social science and other related fields (New Delhi: Springer New Delhi), 15– 20.
  28. Sandoval D. Moctezuma S. Herrera F. Espinoza A. (2022). Rural youth: a perspective of agricultural labor from their protagonists. Convergencia 29, 1– 23. doi: 10.29101/crcs.v29i0.16508 · DOI
  29. Santibáñez J. Palma S. Ramírez H. Hidalgo N. Urban A. (2017). Estudio cualitativo sobre mujeres jóvenes y la violencia en Centroamérica: efecto en condiciones de salida y retorno de menores migrantes. Nota Técnica No IDB-TN-117. doi: 10.18235/0000630 · DOI
  30. Schiavon J. (2023). How should migration be studied in the meso-north American system? Norteam. Rev. Acad. CISAN-UNAM 17, 171– 190. doi: 10.22201/cisan.24487228e.2022.2.585 · DOI
  31. Sirbu A. Andrienko G. Andrienko N. Boldrini C. Giannotti F. Guidotti R., et al. (2021). Human migration: the big data perspective. Int. J. Data Sci. Anal. 11, 341– 360. doi: 10.1007/s41060-020-00213-5 · DOI
  32. Spanevello R. Moreira S. Matte A. Boscardin M. (2022). La migración juvenil y las dificultades de reproducir la mano de obra en propiedades rurales familiares brasileñas. Rev. Desarr. Econ. Territorial. 22, 54– 73. doi: 10.17141/eutopia.23.2022.5585 · DOI
  33. Spohn M. (2017). Emigrants’ stories of foreign aid and their reasons for emigration: Guatemalans on the move. Univ. Psicol. 16, 1– 15. doi: 10.11144/Javeriana.upsy16-5.esfa · DOI
  34. Suárez M. (2023). Returned migrant children and youths in Mexico: findings, advances, and pending issues (2015-2022). Norteamericana 17, 241– 265. doi: 10.22201/cisan.24487228e.2022.2.587 · DOI
  35. Toney M. Bailey A. (2014). “ Migración, una visión general” in Encyclopedia of quality of life and well-being research. ed. Michalos A. C. (Dordrecht: Springer Dordrecht), 4044– 4050.
  36. Torres M. (2021). Migración en Colombia: causas, efectos y estrategias de retorno. Arkitekturax Vis. 3, 1– 26. doi: 10.29097/26191709.303 · DOI
  37. Triana N. Burkart S. (2023). Youth in livestock and the power of education: the case of heirs of tradition from Colombia, 2012–2020. J. Rural. Stud. 97, 405– 415. doi: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2022.12.032 · DOI
  38. Valenciano J. Capobianco M. Uribe J. (2016). Labor vulnerability of Latin American rural women. Noesis 26, 130– 151. doi: 10.20983/noesis.2017.2.6 · DOI
  39. Velasco O. (2016). Juventud y migración. La construcción de una categoría para los derechos humanos. Inter. Disciplina. 11, 105– 126. doi: 10.22201/ceiich.24485705e.2023.29.84482 · DOI
  40. Villadangos P. (2022). A defense of administrative rule-making powers. Rev. Derecho Estado. 51, 197– 226. doi: 10.18601/01229893.n51.07 · DOI
  41. Zabala A. (2021). A literature review of rural youth studies in Latin America and the Caribbean during 2001-2019. Cien. Tecnol. Agropec. 22, 1– 25. doi: 10.21930/rcta.vol22_num3_art:2310 · DOI

Authors
Díaz Baca, M. F., Moreno Lerma, L., Burkart, S., & Triana Ángel, N.
Affiliations
International Center for Tropical Agriculture (KE)
Venue
Frontiers in Sociology
Published
2024-08-06
Volume
9
Pages
1439256-1439256
ISSN
2297-7775 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4401374852
Cited by
15
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 5
FWCI
7.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Frontiers in Sociology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • CGSPace A Repository of Agricultural Research Outputs (Consultative Group for International Agricultural Research) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
Consortium of International Agricultural Research Centers
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Migration and Labor Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › General Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Latin American rural development
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Regional Socio-Economic Development Trends
Keywords
rural-urban migration, youth migration, cattle sector, rural labor shortage, generational transmission, unemployment, educational opportunities, insecurity, migration policy, climate change adaptation, Sustainable Development Goals, Colombia, Guatemala

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review