Cited by 33Phytochemicals and Antioxidant ActivitiesAgricultural and Biological ResearchFermentation and Sensory Analysis

Optimization of the microwave-assisted extraction of simple phenolic compounds from grape skins and seeds

Open access
Azaroual, Latifa, Liazid, Ali, Mansouri, Fouad El, Brigui, Jamal, Ruíz-Rodriguez, Ana, Barbero, Gerardo F., Palma, Miguel·2021·Agronomy

Abstract

A method for the extraction of phenolic compounds from grape seeds and skins using microwave-assisted extraction (MAE) was developed. Optimization of the effects of the extraction parameters in terms of the results of extraction was obtained using the response surface methodology. The parameters studied were extraction solvent (methanol, ethanol, acetone, and water), percentage of methanol in water, quantity of sample in relation to volume of extraction solvent (solid:liquid, 10–50 mg mL−1), power (100–500 W), magnetic stirring speed (0–100%), and extraction time (5–20 min). Finally, the repeatability and the intermediate precision of the method were determined. The best conditions proved to be: 65% methanol in water as an optimum extraction solvent; 0.5 g of grape skin or seed in a volume of 25 mL; a power of 500 W with the maximum stirring speed (100%); and an extraction time of 5 min. The phenolic compounds proved to be stable in the optimized extraction conditions. The resulting repeatability and the intermediate precision of the optimized method showed a relative standard deviation below 7%. The new method applied on Napoleon grape allowed for the determination of catechin (453.2 (mg kg−1)), epicatechin (306.3 mg kg−1), caftaric acid (22.37 mg caffeic acid equivalents kg−1), dihydrokaempferol-glycoside (11.13 mg kaempferol equivalents kg−1), quercetin (18.28 mg kg−1), quercetin-3-glucoside (20.09 mg quercetin equivalents kg−1), and kaempferol-3-glucoside (11.10 mg kaempferol equivalents kg−1).

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/agronomy11081527

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Most studies conducted on metabolite and oil extraction processes conform to second-order models.

    “Most studies conducted on metabolite and oil extraction processes conform to second-order models [26,32,33].”

    From Optimized microwave-assisted azadirachtin extraction using response surface methodology (2024) · cites this paper as [33]

    Section 2.5 (Experimental Design; page unavailable) says this study of phenolic-compound extraction used a second-order mathematical model. It does not establish that most metabolite and oil extraction studies conform to such models; the oil-extraction and prevalence parts of the claim are unsupported by this source. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 37 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Jackson, R. Wine Science; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2008; ISBN 9780123736468.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Azaroual, L., Liazid, A., Mansouri, F. E., Brigui, J., Ruíz-Rodriguez, A., Barbero, G. F., & Palma, M.
Affiliations
  • Abdelmalek Essaâdi University (MA)
  • Universidad de Cádiz (ES)
  • Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Science, Abdelmalek Essaâdi University, B.P. 2121, M’Hannech II, Tétouan 93002, Morocco
Corresponding author
Palma, Miguel
Venue
Agronomy
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2021-07-30
Volume
11
Issue
8
Pages
1527
ISSN
2073-4395 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3192307693
Cited by
33
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 9
FWCI
3.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Agronomy (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • RODIN (Universidad de Cádiz) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
2014-2020 ERDF Operational Programme and by the Department of Economy, Knowledge, Busi-ness and University of the Regional Government of Andalusia (FEDER-UCA18-108366)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Biochemistry › Phytochemicals and Antioxidant Activities
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Agricultural and Biological Research
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Fermentation and Sensory Analysis
Keywords
microwave-assisted extraction, phenolic compounds, grape skin, grape seeds, extraction optimization, response surface methodology, catechins, epicatechin, caftaric acid, quercetin, kaempferol glycosides, methanol-water mixtures, method validation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review