Cited by 56Adsorption and biosorption for pollutant removalPesticide and Herbicide Environmental StudiesEnvironmental remediation with nanomaterials

Understanding activation effects on low-temperature biochar for optimization of herbicide sorption

Open access
Gámiz, Beatriz, Hall, Kathleen, Spokas, Kurt A., Cox, Lucia·2019·Agronomy

Abstract

Activation treatments are often used as a means of increasing a biochar’s sorption capacity for agrochemical compounds but can also provide valuable insight into sorption mechanisms. This work investigates the effects of H2O2 activation on a low-temperature (350 °C) grape wood biochar, evaluates subsequent changes to the removal efficiency (RE) of cyhalofop and clomazone, and elucidates potential sorption mechanisms. Activation by H2O2 decreased the biochar pH, ash content, and C content. Additionally, the biochar O content and surface area increased following activation, and Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) data suggested a slight increase in surface O groups and a decrease in aliphatic C. Cyhalofop RE significantly increased following activation, while clomazone RE was unchanged. The increased sorption of cyhalofop was attributed to pH effects and charge-based interactions with biochar O moieties. Results from this study suggest that H2O2 activation treatments on low-temperature biochars may improve the removal of organic acid herbicides but are of little value in optimizing the removal of polar, non-ionizable herbicides.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/agronomy9100588

Cites

46 of 46 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The few literatures reporting the implications of high-temperature physical and chemical activation on biochar properties have been limited to pyrolysis temperatures of 350-550 °C.

    “The few literatures reporting the implications of high-temperature physical and chemical activation on biochar properties have been limited to pyrolysis temperatures of 350-550 ◦ C (Mia et al., 2017; Gámiz et al., 2019).”

    From Effect of Pyrolysis Temperature on PhysicoChemical Properties and Acoustic-Based Amination of Biochar for Efficient CO2 Adsorption (2020) · cites this paper as Gámiz et al., 2019

    The Introduction (page not provided) discusses chemical and thermal activation studies using biochars pyrolyzed at 400 °C and 500 °C, and says little had been reported on H₂O₂ activation of biochar produced at 350 °C. It does not say that literature on high-temperature physical and chemical activation was limited to pyrolysis temperatures of 350–550 °C; its statement about limited literature concerns the narrower 350 °C H₂O₂ treatment. (LLM, conf=0.83)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Jackson, R.; Douglas, M. An aquatic risk assessment for cyhalofop-butyl: A new herbicide for control of barnyard grass in rice. In Proceedings of the Human and Environmental Exposure to Xenobiotics, Proceedings of the XI Symposium Pesticide Chemistry, Cremona, Italy, 11-15 September 1999; Volume 1999, pp. 345-354.
  2. Robinson, W.O. The determination of organic matter in soils by means of hydrogen peroxide. J. Agric. Res. 1927, 34, 339-356.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gámiz, B., Hall, K., Spokas, K. A., & Cox, L.
Affiliations
  • Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (ES)
  • University of Minnesota (US)
  • Agricultural Research Service (US)
  • Instituto de Recursos Naturales y Agrobiología de Sevilla, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (IRNAS-CSIC), Reina Mercedes, Av. 10, 41012 Seville, Spain
Corresponding author
Gámiz, Beatriz
Venue
Agronomy
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2019-09-27
Volume
9
Issue
10
Pages
588
ISSN
2073-4395 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2976803939
Cited by
56
References
46
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 5
FWCI
2.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Agronomy (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • DIGITAL.CSIC (Spanish National Research Council (CSIC)) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DIGITAL.CSIC (Spanish National Research Council (CSIC)) (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación (AGL2016-77821-R)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Adsorption and biosorption for pollutant removal
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Pollution › Pesticide and Herbicide Environmental Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Environmental remediation with nanomaterials
Keywords
biochar activation, hydrogen peroxide activation, herbicide adsorption, clomazone, sorption mechanism, pH effect, oxygen-containing functional groups, removal efficiency

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review