The DOI matches its Crossref record; 129 of the 129 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Phytogenic Feed Additives in Poultry: Achievements, Prospective and Challenges
Open accessAbstract
Phytogenic feed additives have been largely tested in poultry production with the aim to identify their effects on the gastrointestinal function and health, and their implications on the birds’ systemic health and welfare, the production efficiency of flocks, food safety, and environmental impact. These feed additives originating from plants, and consisting of herbs, spices, fruit, and other plant parts, include many different bioactive ingredients. Reviewing published documents about the supplementation of phytogenic feed additives reveals contradictory results regarding their effectiveness in poultry production. This indicates that more effort is still needed to determine the appropriate inclusion levels and fully elucidate their mode of actions. In this frame, this review aimed to sum up the current trends in the use of phytogenic feed additives in poultry with a special focus on their interaction with gut ecosystem, gut function, in vivo oxidative status and immune system as well as other feed additives, especially organic acids.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
1 retracted
Lee, Y., Lee, S. H., Gadde, U. D., Oh, S., Lee, S., & Lillehoj, H. S. (2017) · Research in Veterinary Science · doi:10.1016/j.rvsc.2017.03.019 · Cited by 62
RetractedLiposome: classification, preparation, and applications
Akbarzadeh, A., Rezaei-Sadabady, R., Davaran, S., Joo, S. W., Zarghami, N., Hanifehpour, Y., Samiei, M., Kouhi, M., & Nejati-Koshki, K. (2013) · Nanoscale Research Letters · doi:10.1186/1556-276x-8-102 · Cited by 3,632
Effect of essential oils on pathogenic bacteria
Nazzaro, F., Fratianni, F., De Martino, L., Coppola, R., & De Feo, V. (2013) · Pharmaceuticals · doi:10.3390/ph6121451 · Cited by 2,186
Antimicrobial Activity of Some Essential Oils—Present Status and Future Perspectives
Chouhan, S., Sharma, K., & Guleria, S. (2017) · Medicines · doi:10.3390/medicines4030058 · Cited by 1,562
Use of phytogenic products as feed additives for swine and poultry1
Windisch, W., Schedle, K., Plitzner, C., & Kroismayr, A. (2008) · Journal of Animal Science · doi:10.2527/jas.2007-0459 · Cited by 1,514
Antibiotic growth promoters in agriculture: history and mode of action
Dibner, J. J., & Richards, J. D. (2005) · Poultry Science · doi:10.1093/ps/84.4.634 · Cited by 1,432
Essential Oils in Combination and Their Antimicrobial Properties
Bassolé, I. H. N., & Juliani, H. R. (2012) · Molecules · doi:10.3390/molecules17043989 · Cited by 1,322
Regulation of cytoplasmic pH in bacteria
Booth, I. R. (1985) · Microbiological Reviews · doi:10.1128/mmbr.49.4.359-378.1985 · Cited by 1,200
Perspectives on the use of organic acids and short chain fatty acids as antimicrobials
Ricke, S. (2003) · Poultry Science · doi:10.1093/ps/82.4.632 · Cited by 1,030
Gadde, U., Kim, W. H., Oh, S. T., & Lillehoj, H. S. (2017) · Animal Health Research Reviews · doi:10.1017/s1466252316000207 · Cited by 796
Metadata
- Authors
- Abdelli, N., Solà-Oriol, D., & Pérez, J. F.
- Venue
- Animals
- Publisher
- MDPI AG
- Published
- 2021-12-06
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 3471
- ISSN
- 2076-2615 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4200278820
- Cited by
- 259
- References
- 129
- FWCI
- 16.88
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Phytogenic Feed Additives in Poultry: Achievements, Prospective and Challenges. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3390/ani11123471
- The paper
- Abdelli, N., Solà-Oriol, D., & Pérez, J. F. (2021). Phytogenic Feed Additives in Poultry: Achievements, Prospective and Challenges. Animals. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11123471
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
