The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Alternatives to antibiotics for maximizing growth performance and feed efficiency in poultry: a review
Open accessAbstract
With the increase in regulations regarding the use of antibiotic growth promoters and the rise in consumer demand for poultry products from ‘Raised Without Antibiotics’ or ‘No Antibiotics Ever’ flocks, the quest for alternative products or approaches has intensified in recent years. A great deal of research has focused on the development of antibiotic alternatives to maintain or improve poultry health and performance. This review describes the potential for the various alternatives available to increase animal productivity and help poultry perform to their genetic potential under existing commercial conditions. The classes of alternatives described include probiotics, prebiotics, synbiotics, organic acids, enzymes, phytogenics, antimicrobial peptides, hyperimmune egg antibodies, bacteriophages, clay, and metals. A brief description of the mechanism of action, efficacy, and advantages and disadvantages of their uses are also presented. Though the beneficial effects of many of the alternatives developed have been well demonstrated, the general consensus is that these products lack consistency and the results vary greatly from farm to farm. Furthermore, their mode of action needs to be better defined. Optimal combinations of various alternatives coupled with good management and husbandry practices will be the key to maximize performance and maintain animal productivity, while we move forward with the ultimate goal of reducing antibiotic use in the animal industry.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Bacteriocins: Developing innate immunity for food
Cotter, P. D., Hill, C., & Ross, R. P. (2005) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/nrmicro1273 · Cited by 2,380
Cox, L. M., Yamanishi, S., Sohn, J., Alekseyenko, A. V., Leung, J. M., Cho, I., Kim, S. G., Li, H., Gao, Z., Mahana, D., et al. (2014) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2014.05.052 · Cited by 1,859
Bacteriocins: safe, natural antimicrobials for food preservation.
Cleveland, J., Montville, T. J., Nes, I. F., & Chikindas, M. L. (2001) · International Journal of Food Microbiology · doi:10.1016/s0168-1605(01)00560-8 · Cited by 1,835
Antibiotics in early life alter the murine colonic microbiome and adiposity
Cho, I., Yamanishi, S., Cox, L., Methé, B. A., Zavadil, J., Li, K., Gao, Z., Mahana, D., Raju, K., Teitler, I., et al. (2012) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature11400 · Cited by 1,613
Probiotics and their fermented food products are beneficial for health
Parvez, S., Malik, K. A., Ah Kang, S., & Kim, H.-Y. (2006) · Journal of Applied Microbiology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2672.2006.02963.x · Cited by 1,435
Mechanisms of action of probiotics: Recent advances
Ng, S. C., Hart, A. L., Kamm, M. A., Stagg, A. J., & Knight, S. C. (2009) · Inflammatory Bowel Diseases · doi:10.1002/ibd.20602 · Cited by 596
The effect of feeding essential oils on broiler performance and gut microbiota
Tiihonen, K., Kettunen, H., Bento, M. H. L., Saarinen, M., Lahtinen, S., Ouwehand, A. C., Schulze, H., & Rautonen, N. (2010) · British Poultry Science · doi:10.1080/00071668.2010.496446 · Cited by 186
Cited by
Phytochemicals as antibiotic alternatives to promote growth and enhance host health
Lillehoj, H., Liu, Y., Calsamiglia, S., Fernandez-Miyakawa, M. E., Chi, F., Cravens, R. L., Oh, S., & Gay, C. G. (2018) · Veterinary Research · doi:10.1186/s13567-018-0562-6 · Cited by 515
Self-citationPatra, A. K., Amasheh, S., & Aschenbach, J. R. (2019) · Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition · doi:10.1080/10408398.2018.1486284 · Cited by 130
Zhou, Z., Huang, J., Hao, H., Wei, H., Zhou, Y., & Peng, J. (2019) · Journal of Functional Foods · doi:10.1016/j.jff.2018.11.028 · Cited by 20
Metadata
- Authors
- Gadde, U., Kim, W. H., Oh, S. T., & Lillehoj, H. S.
- Venue
- Animal Health Research Reviews
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 2017-05-09
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 26-45
- ISSN
- 1466-2523 (ISSN-L)
- 1475-2654
- OpenAlex
- W2613568424
- Cited by
- 796
- References
- 7
- FWCI
- 51.16
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Alternatives to antibiotics for maximizing growth performance and feed efficiency in poultry: a review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1017/s1466252316000207
- The paper
- Gadde, U., Kim, W. H., Oh, S. T., & Lillehoj, H. S. (2017). Alternatives to antibiotics for maximizing growth performance and feed efficiency in poultry: a review. Animal Health Research Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1466252316000207
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.