Cited by 30Bee Products Chemical AnalysisHealthcare and Venom ResearchPhytochemistry Medicinal Plant Applications

Comparison of the Biological Potential and Chemical Composition of Brazilian and Mexican Propolis

Open access
Silva-Beltrán, Norma Patricia, Umsza-Guez, Marcelo Andrés, Ramos Rodrigues, Daniela Méria, Gálvez-Ruiz, Juan Carlos, de Paula Castro, Thiago Luiz, Balderrama-Carmona, Ana Paola·2021·Applied Sciences

Abstract

Propolis is a resinous substance collected by bees from plants and its natural product is available as a safe therapeutic option easily administered orally and readily available as a natural supplement and functional food. In this work, we review the most recent scientific evidence involving propolis from two countries (Brazil and Mexico) located in different hemispheres and with varied biomes. Brazil has a scientifically well documented classification of different types of propolis. Although propolis from Brazil and Mexico present varied compositions, they share compounds with recognized biological activities in different extraction processes. Gram-negative bacteria growth is inhibited with lower concentrations of different types of propolis extracts, regardless of origin. Prominent biological activities against cancer cells and fungi were verified in the different types of extracts evaluated. Antiprotozoal activity needs to be further evaluated for propolis of both origins. Regarding the contamination of propolis (e.g., pesticides, toxic metals), few studies have been carried out. However, there is evidence of chemical contamination in propolis by anthropological action. Studies demonstrate the versatility of using propolis in its different forms (extracts, products, etc.), but several potential applications that might improve the value of Brazilian and Mexican propolis should still be investigated.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/app112311417

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The same antibacterial behavior (better against Gram-positive than Gram-negative) has been reported for propolis from Brazil, Canada, Africa, and Mexico (Sonora).

    “The same behavior has already been reported with propolis from Brazil, Canada, Africa and Mexico (Sonora) [38,39,40,41,42].”

    From Anti-Inflammatory and Histological Analysis of Skin Wound Healing through Topical Application of Mexican Propolis (2023) · cites this paper as [42]

    Section 3.5 (Antibacterial Activity; page unavailable) reports higher activity against Gram-positive than Gram-negative strains for Brazilian and Mexican propolis extracts. The paper does not establish that pattern for Canada or Africa, and the passage does not identify the Mexican samples as specifically from Sonora. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Part of this paper’s reference list could not be split into single entries.

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 109

  1. Ghisalberti, L.E. Propolis: A review. Bee World 1979, 60, 59-84. [CrossRef] · DOI
  2. Castaldo, S.; Capasso, F. Propolis, an old remedy used in modern medicine. Fitoterapia 2002, 73, S1-S6. [CrossRef] · DOI
  3. Crane, E. Bee Products; Springer: Boston, MA, USA; Tel Aviv, Israel, 1996; ISBN 9780123741448.
  4. Helfenberg, K.D. The analysis of beeswax and propolis. Chem. Ztg. 1908, 2, 987-988.
  5. Pereira, D.S.; Iberê, C.; Freitas, A.; Freitas, M.O.; Berg, J.; Agra, R. Histórico e principais usos da própolis apícola. Agropecuária CIientífica No Semi-Árido 2015, 11, 1-21.
  6. Quezada-Euán, J.J.G. The Past, Present, and Future of Meliponiculture in Mexico. Stingless Bees Mex. 2018, 243-269. [CrossRef] · DOI
  7. Machado, B.A.S.; Santos Cruz, L.; Baptista Nunes, S.; Andres Umsza Guez, M.; Ferreira Padilha, F. Estudo Prospectivo Da Própolis E Tecnologias Correlatas Sob O Enfoque Em Documentos De Patentes Depositados No Brasil. Rev. Gestão Inovação E Tecnol. 2012, 2, 221-235. [CrossRef] · DOI
  8. Fraga, É.E.A.; De Oliveira, C.R.; Da Cruz, C.A.B.; De Vasconcelos, C.R.; Almeida Paixão, A.E. Prospecção tecnológica: Um mapeamento de patentes da própolis vermelha. Cad. De Prospecção 2017, 10, 524. [CrossRef] · DOI
  9. Araujo Neto, E.; da Morais, L.S.; da Cunha, A.F.S. Mapeamento Tecnológico: Uma prospecção de patentes e trabalhos científicos à própolis verde. Cad. De Prospecção 2019, 13, 268-279. [CrossRef] · DOI
  10. Trusheva, B.; Trunkova, D.; Bankova, V. Different extraction methods of biologically active components from propolis: A preliminary study. Chem. Cent. J. 2007, 1, 1-4. [CrossRef] · DOI
  11. Katekhaye, S.; Fearnley, H.; Fearnley, J.; Paradkar, A. Gaps in propolis research: Challenges posed to commercialization and the need for an holistic approach. J. Apic. Res. 2019, 58, 604-616. [CrossRef] · DOI
  12. Hodel, K.V.S.; MacHado, B.A.S.; Santos, N.R.; Costa, R.G.; Menezes-Filho, J.A.; Umsza-Guez, M.A. Metal Content of Nutritional and Toxic Value in Different Types of Brazilian Propolis. Sci. World J. 2020, 2020. [CrossRef] · DOI
  13. Umsza-Guez, M.A.; Silva-Beltrán, N.P.; Machado, B.A.S.; Balderrama-Carmona, A.P. Herbicide determination in Brazilian propolis using high pressure liquid chromatography. Int. J. Environ. Health Res. 2021, 31, 507-517. [CrossRef] · DOI
  14. Salatino, A.; Salatino, M.L.F. Scientific note: Often quoted, but not factual data about propolis composition. Apidologie 2021, 52, 312-314. [CrossRef] · DOI
  15. Papotti, G.; Bertelli, D.; Bortolotti, L.; Plessi, M. Chemical and Functional Characterization of Italian Propolis Obtained by Different Harvesting Methods. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2012, 60, 2852-2862. [CrossRef] · DOI
  16. Funari, C.S.; Ferro, V.O. Análise de própolis. Food Sci. Technol. 2006, 26, 171-178. [CrossRef] · DOI
  17. Falcão, S.I.; Lopes, M.; Vilas-Boas, M. A First Approach to the Chemical Composition and Antioxidant Potential of Guinea-Bissau Propolis. Nat. Prod. Commun. 2019, 14. [CrossRef] · DOI
  18. Diriba Jobir, M.; Belay, A. Comparative study of different Ethiopian propolis: In vivo wound healing, antioxidant, antibacterial, physicochemical properties and mineral profiles. J. Apitherapy 2020, 7. [CrossRef] · DOI
  19. Popova, M.; Lyoussi, B.; Aazza, S.; Antunes, D.; Bankova, V.; Miguel, G. Antioxidant and α-Glucosidase Inhibitory Properties and Chemical Profiles of Moroccan Propolis. Nat. Prod. Commun. 2015, 10, 1961-1964. [CrossRef] · DOI
  20. Martinez, O.A.; Soares, A.E.E. Genetic improvement in the commercial beekeeping in production of propolis. Rev. Bras. De Saude E Prod. Anim. 2012, 13, 982-990. [CrossRef] · DOI
  21. Barros, K.B.N.T.; Neto, E.M.R.; de Fonteles, M.M.F. Propolis and its Cosmetic Applications: A Technological Prospection. J. Young Pharm. 2019, 11, 350-352. [CrossRef] · DOI
  22. Silva, R.P.D.; Machado, B.A.S.; Costa, S.S.; Barreto, G.A.; Padilha, F.F.; Umsza-Guez, M.A. Application of propolis extract in food products: A prospecting based in patent documents. Rev. Virtual Quim. 2016, 8, 1251-1261. [CrossRef] · DOI
  23. Vidal, M.D.F. Potencial da produção de própolis no nordeste. Escritório Técnico Estud. Econômicos Nordeste-ETENE 2021, 153, 1-9.
  24. Vargas Sánchez, R.D.; Martínez Benavidez, E.; Hernández, J.; Torrescano Urrutia, G.R.; Sánchez Escalante, A. Effect of physico- chemical properties and phenolic compounds of bifloral propolis on antioxidant and antimicrobial capacity. Nova Sci. 2020, 12. [CrossRef] · DOI
  25. Teixeira, É.W.; Message, D.; Meira, R.M.S.A.; Salantino, A. Indicadores Da Origem Botânica Da Própolis Importância E Perspecti- vas. B Indústr.Anim. 2003, 60, 83-106.
  26. Daugsch, A.; Moraes, C.S.; Fort, P.; Park, Y.K. Brazilian red propolis-Chemical composition and botanical origin. Evid.-Based Complementary Altern. Med. 2008, 5, 435-441. [CrossRef] [PubMed] · DOI
  27. Machado, B.A.S.; Silva, R.P.D.; Barreto, G.D.A.; Costa, S.S.; Da Silva, D.F.; Brandão, H.N.; Da Rocha, J.L.C.; Dellagostin, O.A.; Henriques, J.A.P.; Umsza-Guez, M.A.; et al. Chemical composition and biological activity of extracts obtained by supercritical extraction and ethanolic extraction of brown, green and red propolis derived from different geographic regions in Brazil. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0145954. [CrossRef] · DOI
  28. Devequi-Nunes, D.; Machado, B.A.S.; De Abreu Barreto, G.; Silva, J.R.; Da Silva, D.F.; Da Rocha, J.L.C.; Brandão, H.N.; Borges, V.M.; Umsza-Guez, M.A. Chemical characterization and biological activity of six different extracts of propolis through conventional methods and supercritical extraction. PLoS ONE 2018, 13, e0207676. [CrossRef] [PubMed] · DOI
  29. Rufatto, L.C.; dos Santos, D.A.; Marinho, F.; Henriques, J.A.P.; Roesch Ely, M.; Moura, S. Red propolis: Chemical composition and pharmacological activity. Asian Pac. J. Trop. Biomed. 2017, 7, 591-598. [CrossRef] · DOI
  30. do Nascimento, T.G.; dos Santos Arruda, R.E.; da Cruz Almeida, E.T.; dos Santos Oliveira, J.M.; Basílio-Júnior, I.D.; Celerino de Moraes Porto, I.C.; Rodrigues Sabino, A.; Tonholo, J.; Gray, A.; Ebel, R.A.E.; et al. Comprehensive multivariate correlations between climatic effect, metabolite-profile, antioxidant capacity and antibacterial activity of Brazilian red propolis metabolites during seasonal study. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 1-16. [CrossRef] [PubMed] · DOI
  31. Coelho, J.; Falcão, S.I.; Vale, N.; Almeida-Muradian, L.B.; Vilas-Boas, M. Phenolic composition and antioxidant activity assessment of southeastern and south Brazilian propolis. J. Apic. Res. 2017, 56, 21-31. [CrossRef] · DOI
  32. Fausto Rivero-Cruz, J.; Rodríguez de San Miguel, E.; Robles-Obregón, S.; Hernández-Espino, C.C.; Rivero-Cruz, B.E.; Pedraza- Chaverri, J.; Esturau-Escofet, N. Prediction of antimicrobial and antioxidant activities of Mexican propolis by 1H-NMR spec- troscopy and chemometrics data analysis. Molecules 2017, 22, 1184. [CrossRef] · DOI
  33. Rivero-Cruz, J.F.; Granados-Pineda, J.; Pedraza-Chaverri, J.; Pérez-Rojas, J.M.; Kumar-Passari, A.; Diaz-Ruiz, G.; Rivero-Cruz, B.E. Phytochemical Constituents, Antioxidant, Cytotoxic, and Antimicrobial Activities of the Ethanolic Extract of Mexican Brown Propolis. Antioxidant (Basel Switz.) 2020, 9, 70. [CrossRef] [PubMed] · DOI
  34. Rivera-Yañez, N.; Rodriguez-Canales, M.; Nieto-Yañez, O.; Jimenez-Estrada, M.; Ibarra-Barajas, M.; Canales-Martinez, M.M.; Rodriguez-Monroy, M.A. Hypoglycaemic and Antioxidant Effects of Propolis of Chihuahua in a Model of Experimental Diabetes. Evid.-Based Complementary Altern. Med. 2018, 2018. [CrossRef] · DOI · Paper page
  35. Li, F.; He, Y.M.; Awale, S.; Kadota, S.; Tezuka, Y. Two new cytotoxic phenylallylflavanones from mexican propolis. Chem. Pharm. Bull. 2011, 59, 1194-1196. [CrossRef] · DOI
  36. Park, Y.K.; Paredes-Guzman, J.F.; Aguiar, C.L.; Alencar, S.M.; Fujiwara, F.Y. Chemical Constituents in Baccharis dracunculifolia as the Main Botanical Origin of Southeastern Brazilian Propolis. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2004, 52, 1100-1103. [CrossRef] · DOI
  37. Lugo, E.; Martinez-Robinson, K.; Morales Ramírez, G.; De la Rosa López, R.; Noriega Rodríguez, J.A. Determinación del Origen Botánico de los Propóleos Sonorenses (CABORCA) Mediante HPLC Determination of Botanic Origen of Sonoran Propolis (CABORCA) by HPLC analysis. Invurnus 2009, 4, 24-30.
  38. Riani, L.R.; Silva, L.M.; da Silva, O.O.Z.; Junqueira, L.R.; Nascimento, J.W.L.; da Filho, A.A.S. Development and validation of a uhplc-esi-ms/ms method for the quantification of artepillin c in brazilian green propolis. Rev. Cienc. Farm. Basica E Appl. 2021, 42. [CrossRef] · DOI
  39. Guimarães, N.S.S.; Mello, J.C.; Paiva, J.S.; Bueno, P.C.P.; Berretta, A.A.; Torquato, R.J.; Nantes, I.L.; Rodrigues, T. Baccharis dracunculifolia, the main source of green propolis, exhibits potent antioxidant activity and prevents oxidative mitochondrial damage. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2012, 50, 1091-1097. [CrossRef] · DOI
  40. Marcucci, M.C.; Bankova, V. Chemical composition, plant origin and biological activity of Brazilian propolis. Curr. Top. Phytochem. 1999, 2, 115-123.
  41. Silva, B.B.; Rosalen, P.L.; Cury, J.A.; Ikegaki, M.; Souza, V.C.; Esteves, A.; Alencar, S.M. Chemical composition and botanical origin of red propolis, a new type of Brazilian propolis. Evid.-Based Complementary Altern. Med. 2008, 5, 313-316. [CrossRef] · DOI
  42. de Mendonça, I.C.G.; de Porto, I.C.C.M.; do Nascimento, T.G.; de Souza, N.S.; dos Oliveira, J.M.S.; dos Arruda, R.E.S.; Mousinho, K.C.; dos Santos, A.F.; Basílio-Júnior, I.D.; Parolia, A.; et al. Brazilian red propolis: Phytochemical screening, antioxidant activity and effect against cancer cells. BMC Complementary Altern. Med. 2015, 15, 1-12. [CrossRef] [PubMed] · DOI
  43. Xu, X.; Yang, B.; Wang, D.; Zhu, Y.; Miao, X.; Yang, W. The chemical composition of brazilian green propolis and its protective effects on mouse aortic endothelial cells against inflammatory injury. Molecules 2020, 25, 4612. [CrossRef] · DOI
  44. Park, Y.; Alencar, S.; Aguiar, S. Botanical origin and chemical composition of Brazilian propolis. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2002, 50, 2502-2506. [CrossRef] [PubMed] · DOI
  45. De da Freitas, A.S.; Barth, O.M.; da Luz, C.F.P. Própolis marrom da vertente atlântica do Estado do Rio de Janeiro, Brasil: Uma avaliação palinológica. Rev. Bras. Botânica 2010, 33, 343-354. [CrossRef] · DOI
  46. Lotti, C.; Fernandez, M.C.; Piccinelli, A.L.; Cuesta-Rubio, O.; Hernández, I.M.; Rastrelli, L. Chemical Constituents of Red Mexican Propolis. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2010, 58, 2209-2213. [CrossRef] [PubMed] · DOI
  47. Boisard, S.; Huynh, T.H.T.; Escalante-Erosa, F.; Hernández-Chavez, L.I.; Peña-Rodríguez, L.M.; Richomme, P. Unusual chemical composition of a Mexican propolis collected in Quintana Roo, Mexico. J. Apic. Res. 2016, 54, 350-357. [CrossRef] · DOI
  48. Guzmán-Gutiérrez, S.L.; Nieto-Camacho, A.; Castillo-Arellano, J.I.; Huerta-Salazar, E.; Hernández-Pasteur, G.; Silva-Miranda, M.; ello-Nájera, O.A.; Sepúlveda-Robles, O.; Espitia, C.I.; Reyes-Chilpa, R. Mexican propolis: A source of antioxidants and anti-inflammatory compounds, and isolation of a novel chalcone and ε-caprolactone derivative. Molecules 2018, 23, 334. [CrossRef] · DOI
  49. Valencia, D.; Alday, E.; Robles-Zepeda, R.; Garibay-Escobar, A.; Galvez-Ruiz, J.C.; Salas-Reyes, M.; Jiménez-Estrada, M.; Velazquez-Contreras, E.; Hernandez, J.; Velazquez, C. Seasonal effect on chemical composition and biological activities of Sonoran propolis. Food Chem. 2012, 131, 645-651. [CrossRef] · DOI
  50. Bankova, V.; Trusheva, B.; Popova, M. Propolis extraction methods: A review. J. Apic. Res. 2021, 1-10. [CrossRef] · DOI
  51. Oliveira, A.; França, H.; Kuster, R.; Teixeira, L.; Rocha, L. Chemical composition and antibacterial activity of Brazilian propolis essential oil. J. Venom. Anim. Toxins 2010, 16, 121-130. [CrossRef] · DOI
  52. Silva, C.S.R.; Villaça, C.L.P.B.; de Peixoto, R.M.; Mota, R.A.; de Ribeiro, M.F.; da Costa, M.M. Antibacterial effect of Brazilian brown propolis in different solvents against staphylococcus spp. isolated from caprine mastitis. Cienc. Anim. Bras. 2012, 13, 247-251. [CrossRef] · DOI
  53. Sauri-Duch, E.; Gutiérrez-Canul, C.; Cuevas-Glory, L.F.; Ramón-Canul, L.; Pérez-Pacheco, E.; Moo-Huchin, V.M. Determination of quality characteristics, phenolic compounds and antioxidant activity of propolis from southeastern Mexico. J. Apic. Sci. 2021, 65, 109. [CrossRef] · DOI
  54. Machado, B.A.S.; Pereira, C.G.; Nunes, S.B.; Padilha, F.F.; Umsza-Guez, M.A. Supercritical Fluid Extraction Using CO 2 : Main Applications and Future Perspectives. Sep. Sci. Technol. 2013, 48, 2741-2760. [CrossRef] · DOI
  55. Machado, B.A.S.; De Abreu Barreto, G.; Costa, A.S.; Costa, S.S.; Silva, R.P.D.; Da Silva, D.F.; Brandao, H.N.; Da Rocha, J.L.C.; Nunes, S.B.; Umsza-Guez, M.A.; et al. Determination of parameters for the supercritical extraction of antioxidant compounds from green propolis using carbon dioxide and ethanol as co-solvent. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0134489. [CrossRef] · DOI
  56. De Oliveira Reis, J.H.; De Abreu Barreto, G.; Cerqueira, J.C.; Dos Anjos, J.P.; Andrade, L.N.; Padilha, F.F.; Druzian, J.I.; MacHado, B.A.S. Evaluation of the antioxidant profile and cytotoxic activity of red propolis extracts from different regions of northeastern Brazil obtained by conventional and ultrasoundassisted extraction. PLoS ONE 2019, 14, e0219063. [CrossRef] · DOI
  57. Margeretha, I.; Fatma Suniarti, D.; Herda, E.; Mas'ud, Z.A. Optimization and comparative study of different extraction methods of biologically active components of Indonesian propolis Trigona spp. J. Nat. Prod. 2012, 5, 233-242.
  58. Orsat, V.; Routray, W. Microwave-Assisted Extraction of Flavonoids. Water Extr. Bioact. Compd. Plants Drug Dev. 2017, 221-244. [CrossRef] · DOI
  59. Saito, É.; Sacoda, P.; Paviani, L.C.; Paula, J.T.; Cabral, F.A. Conventional and supercritical extraction of phenolic compounds from Brazilian red and green propolis. Sep. Sci. Technol. 2020, 1-8. [CrossRef] · DOI
  60. Xie, M.; Fan, D.; Zhao, Z.; Li, Z.; Li, G.; Chen, Y.; He, X.; Chen, A.; Li, J.; Lin, X.; et al. Nano-curcumin prepared via supercritical: Improved anti-bacterial, anti-oxidant and anti-cancer efficacy. Int. J. Pharm. 2015, 496, 732-740. [CrossRef] [PubMed] · DOI
  61. Zhang, X.; Wu, J.Z.; Lin, Z.X.; Yuan, Q.J.; Li, Y.C.; Liang, J.L.; Zhan, J.Y.X.; Xie, Y.L.; Su, Z.R.; Liu, Y.H. Ameliorative effect of supercritical fluid extract of Chrysanthemum indicum Linnén against D-galactose induced brain and liver injury in senescent mice via suppression of oxidative stress, inflammation and apoptosis. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2019, 234, 44-56. [CrossRef] [PubMed] · DOI
  62. You, G.S.G.S.; Lin, S.C.; Chen, C.R.; Tsai, W.C.; Chang, C.M.J.; Huang, W.W. Supercritical carbon dioxide extraction enhances flavonoids in water-soluble propolis. J. Chin. Inst. Chem. Eng. 2002, 33, 233-241.
  63. Garcia-Mendoza, M.P.; Paula, J.T.; Paviani, L.C.; Cabral, F.A.; Martinez-Correa, H.A. Extracts from mango peel by-product obtained by supercritical CO 2 and pressurized solvent processes. LWT-Food Sci. Technol. 2015, 62, 131-137. [CrossRef] · DOI
  64. Chen, C.R.; Shen, C.T.; Wu, J.J.; Yang, H.L.; Hsu, S.L.; Chang, C.M.J. Precipitation of sub-micron particles of 3,5-diprenyl-4- hydroxycinnamic acid in Brazilian propolis from supercritical carbon dioxide anti-solvent solutions. J. Supercrit. Fluids 2009, 50, 176-182. [CrossRef] · DOI
  65. De Zordi, N.; Cortesi, A.; Kikic, I.; Moneghini, M.; Solinas, D.; Innocenti, G.; Portolan, A.; Baratto, G.; Dall'Acqua, S. The super- critical carbon dioxide extraction of polyphenols from Propolis: A central composite design approach. J. Supercrit. Fluids 2014, 95, 491-498. [CrossRef] · DOI
  66. Monroy, Y.M.; Rodrigues, R.A.F.; Rodrigues, M.V.N.; Sant'Ana, A.S.; Silva, B.S.; Cabral, F.A. Brazilian green propolis extracts obtained by conventional processes and by processes at high pressure with supercritical carbon dioxide, ethanol and water. J. Supercrit. Fluids 2017, 130, 189-197. [CrossRef] · DOI
  67. Bastos, E.M.A.F.; Simone, M.; Jorge, D.M.; Soares, A.E.E.; Spivak, M. In vitro study of the antimicrobial activity of Brazilian propolis against Paenibacillus larvae. J. Invertebr. Pathol. 2008, 97, 273-281. [CrossRef] · DOI
  68. Botteon, C.E.A.; Silva, L.B.; Ccana-Ccapatinta, G.V.; Silva, T.S.; Ambrosio, S.R.; Veneziani, R.C.S.; Bastos, J.K.; Marcato, P.D. Biosynthesis and characterization of gold nanoparticles using Brazilian red propolis and evaluation of its antimicrobial and anticancer activities. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 1-16. [CrossRef] · DOI
  69. Vasconcelos, W.A.; Braga, N.M.A.; Chitarra, V.R.; Santos, V.R.; Andrade, Â.L.; Domingues, R.Z. Bioactive Glass-Green and Red Propolis Association: Antimicrobial Activity Against Oral Pathogen Bacteria. Nat. Prod. Chem. Res. 2014, 2. [CrossRef] · DOI
  70. Bueno-Silva, B.; Marsola, A.; Ikegaki, M.; Alencar, S.M.; Rosalen, P.L. The effect of seasons on Brazilian red propolis and its botanical source: Chemical composition and antibacterial activity. Nat. Prod. Res. 2017, 31, 1318-1324. [CrossRef] · DOI
  71. Kalil, M.A.; Santos, L.M.; Barral, T.D.; Rodrigues, D.M.; Pereira, N.P.; da Sá, M.C.A.; Umsza-Guez, M.A.; Machado, B.A.S.; Meyer, R.; Portela, R.W. Brazilian Green Propolis as a Therapeutic Agent for the Post-surgical Treatment of Caseous Lymphadenitis in Sheep. Front. Vet. Sci. 2019, 6. [CrossRef] · DOI
  72. Martins, M.L.; Monteiro, A.S.N.; Ferreira-Filho, J.C.C.; Vieira, T.I.; de Guimarães, M.B.C.T.; Farah, A.; Romanos, M.T.V.; Maia, L.C.; Cavalcanti, Y.W.; Fonseca-Gonçalves, A. Antibacterial and cytotoxic potential of a brazilian red propolis. Pesqui. Bras. Em Odontopediatria E Clin. Integr. 2019, 19, 1-9. [CrossRef] · DOI
  73. Orozco, A.L.; Acevedo, J.G.A.; Martinez, M.M.C.; Delgado, C.T.H.; Serrano, P.R.; Ortiz, C.M.F.; Diaz, A.D.; Carrillo, J.G.P.; Tovar, C.G.G.; Sanchez, T.A.C. Antibacterial comparative study between extracts of mexican propolis and of three plants which use apis mellifera for its production. J. Anim. Vet. Adv. 2010, 9, 1250-1254. [CrossRef] · DOI
  74. Carrillo, M.L.; Castillo, L.N.; Mauricio, R. Evaluación de la Actividad Antimicrobiana de Extractos de Propóleos de la Huasteca Potosina (México). Inf. Tecnol. 2011, 22, 21-28. [CrossRef] · DOI
  75. Enciso-Díaz, O.J.; Méndez-Gutiérrez, A.; De Jesús, L.H.; Sharma, A.; Villarreal, M.L.; Taketa, A.C. Antibacterial Activity of Bougainvillea Glabra, Eucalyptus Globulus, Gnaphalium Attenuatum, and Propolis Collected in Mexico. Pharmacol. Pharm. 2012, 03, 433-438. [CrossRef] · DOI
  76. Navarro-Navarro, M.; Lugo-Sepúlveda, R.E.; del García-Moraga, M.C.; de la Rosa-López, R.; Robles-Zepada, R.E.; Ruis-Bustos, E.; Veláquez-Contreras, C.A. Antibacterial and antioxidant activities of propolis methanolic extracts from Magdalena de Kino and Sonoyta, Sonora. Rev. Cienc. Biológicas Salud 2012, 14, 9-15.
  77. Rodríguez Pérez, B.; Canales Martínez, M.M.; Penieres Carrillo, J.G.; Cruz Sánchez, T.A. Composición química, propiedades antioxidantes y actividad antimicrobiana de propóleos mexicanos. Acta Univ. 2020, 30, 1-30. [CrossRef] · DOI
  78. Velazquez, C.; Navarro, M.; Acosta, A.; Angulo, A.; Dominguez, Z.; Robles, R.; Robles-Zepeda, R.; Lugo, E.; Goycoolea, F.M.; Velazquez, E.F.; et al. Antibacterial and free-radical scavenging activities of Sonoran propolis. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2007, 103, 1747-1756. [CrossRef] · DOI · Paper page
  79. Navarro-Navarro, M.; Ruiz-Bustos, P.; Valencia, D.; Robles-Zepeda, R.; Ruiz-Bustos, E.; Virués, C.; Hernandez, J.; Domínguez, Z.; Velazquez, C. Antibacterial activity of sonoran propolis and some of its constituents against clinically significant vibrio species. Foodborne Pathog. Dis. 2013, 10, 150-158. [CrossRef] [PubMed] · DOI
  80. Popova, M.; Giannopoulou, E.; Skalicka-Woźniak, K.; Graikou, K.; Widelski, J.; Bankova, V.; Kalofonos, H.; Sivolapenko, G.; Gaweł-Bęben, K.; Antosiewicz, B.; et al. Characterization and Biological Evaluation of Propolis from Poland. Molecules 2017, 22, 1159. [CrossRef] · DOI
  81. Herrera-López, M.G.; Rubio-Hernández, E.I.; Leyte-Lugo, M.A.; Schinkovitz, A.; Richomme, P.; Calvo-Irabién, L.M.; Peña- Rodríguez, L.M. Botanical origin of triterpenoids from Yucatecan propolis. Phytochem. Lett. 2019, 29, 25-29. [CrossRef] · DOI
  82. Koru, O.; Toksoy, F.; Acikel, C.H.; Tunca, Y.M.; Baysallar, M.; Uskudar Guclu, A.; Akca, E.; Ozkok Tuylu, A.; Sorkun, K.; Tanyuksel, M.; et al. In vitro antimicrobial activity of propolis samples from different geographical origins against certain oral pathogens. Anaerobe 2007, 13, 140-145. [CrossRef] [PubMed] · DOI
  83. Vardar-Ünlü, G.; Silici, S.; Ünlü, M. Composition and in vitro antimicrobial activity of Populus buds and poplar-type propolis. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2008, 24, 1011-1017. [CrossRef] · DOI
  84. Kim, Y.H.; Chung, H.J. The effects of Korean propolis against foodborne pathogens and transmission electron microscopic examination. New Biotechnol. 2011, 28, 713-718. [CrossRef] [PubMed] · DOI
  85. Silva, J.C.; Rodrigues, S.; Feás, X.; Estevinho, L.M. Antimicrobial activity, phenolic profile and role in the inflammation of propolis. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2012, 50, 1790-1795.
  86. CrossRef] · DOI
  87. Silici, S.; Kutluca, S. Chemical composition and antibacterial activity of propolis collected by three different races of honeybees in the same region. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2005, 99, 69-73. [CrossRef] · DOI
  88. Mohammadzadeh, S.; Shariatpanahi, M.; Hamedi, M.; Ahmadkhaniha, R.; Samadi, N.; Ostad, S.N. Chemical composition, oral toxicity and antimicrobial activity of Iranian propolis. Food Chem. 2007, 103, 1097-1103. [CrossRef] · DOI · Paper page
  89. Santos, L.M.; Rodrigues, D.M.; Kalil, M.A.; Azevedo, V.; Meyer, R.; Umsza-Guez, M.A.; Machado, B.A.; Seyffert, N.; Portela, R.W. Activity of Ethanolic and Supercritical Propolis Extracts in Corynebacterium pseudotuberculosis and Its Associated Biofilm. Front. Vet. Sci. 2021, 965. [CrossRef] [PubMed] · DOI
  90. Sawaya, A.C.H.F.; Cunha, I.B.S.; Marcucci, M.C.; De Oliveira Rodrigues, R.F.; Eberlin, M.N. Brazilian Propolis of Tetragonisca angustula and Apis mellifera 1. Apidologie 2006, 37, 398-407. [CrossRef] · DOI
  91. Ibitoye, O.B.; Ajiboye, T.O. Ferulic acid potentiates the antibacterial activity of quinolone-based antibiotics against Acinetobacter baumannii. Microb. Pathog. 2019, 126, 393-398. [CrossRef] [PubMed] · DOI
  92. Borges, A.; Ferreira, C.; Saavedra, M.J.; Simões, M. Antibacterial activity and mode of action of ferulic and gallic acids against pathogenic bacteria. Microb. Drug Resist. 2013, 19, 256-265. [CrossRef] 100. Yoshimasu, Y.; Ikeda, T.; Sakai, N.; Yagi, A.; Hirayama, S.; Morinaga, Y.; Furukawa, S.; Nakao, R. Rapid bactericidal action of propolis against Porphyromonas gingivalis. J. Dent. Res. 2018, 97, 928-936. [CrossRef] 101. Vasconcelos, N.G.; Croda, J.; Simionatto, S. Antibacterial mechanisms of cinnamon and its constituents: A review. Microb. Pathog. 2018, 120, 198-203. [CrossRef] 102. Wu, M.; Brown, A.C. Applications of catechins in the treatment of bacterial infections. Pathogens 2021, 10, 546. [CrossRef] 103. Bezerra, C.R.F.; Borges, K.R.A.; de Alves, R.N.S.; Teles, A.M.; Rodrigues, I.V.P.; da Silva, M.A.C.N.; do Nascimento, M.D.S.B.; de Bezerra, G.F.B. Highly efficient antibiofilm and antifungal activity of green propolis against Candida species in dentistry materials. PLoS ONE 2020, 15, e0228828. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 104. · DOI
  93. de Carvalho, F.M.A.; Schneider, J.K.; de Jesus, C.V.F.; de Andrade, L.N.; Amaral, R.G.; David, J.M.; Krause, L.C.; Severino, P.; Soares, C.M.F.; Bastos, E.C.; et al. Brazilian red propolis: Extracts production, physicochemical characterization, and cytotoxicity profile for antitumor activity. Biomolecules 2020, 10, 726. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 123. · DOI
  94. Dantas Silva, R.P.; Machado, B.A.S.; de Barreto, G.A.; Costa, S.S.; Andrade, L.N.; Amaral, R.G.; Carvalho, A.A.; Padilha, F.F.; Barbosa, J.D.V.; Umsza-Guez, M.A. Antioxidant, antimicrobial, antiparasitic, and cytotoxic properties of various Brazilian propolis extracts. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0172585. [CrossRef] 124. Silva, F.R.G.; Matias, T.M.S.; Souza, L.I.O.; Matos-Rocha, T.J.; Fonseca, S.A.; Mousinho, K.C.; Santos, A.F. Phytochemical screening and in vitro antibacterial, antifungal, antioxidant and antitumor activities of the red propolis Alagoas. Braz. J. Biol. 2018, 79, 452-459. [CrossRef] 125. Awale, S.; Li, F.; Onozuka, H.; Esumi, H.; Tezuka, Y.; Kadota, S. Constituents of Brazilian red propolis and their preferential cytotoxic activity against human pancreatic PANC-1 cancer cell line in nutrient-deprived condition. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2008, 16, 181-189. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 126. · DOI
  95. Ishiai, S.; Tahara, W.; Yamamoto, E.; Yamamoto, R.; Nagai, K. Histone deacetylase inhibitory effect of Brazilian propolis and its association with the antitumor effect in Neuro2a cells. Food Sci. Nutr. 2014, 2, 565-570. [CrossRef] 127. Bonamigo, T.; Campos, J.F.; Oliveira, A.S.; Torquato, H.F.V.; Balestieri, J.B.P.; Cardoso, C.A.L.; Paredes-Gamero, E.J.; de Souza, K.P.; Santos, E.L. dos Antioxidant and cytotoxic activity of propolis of Plebeia droryana and Apis mellifera (Hymenoptera, Apidae) from the Brazilian Cerrado biome. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0183983. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 128. Messerli, S.M.; Ahn, M.-R.; Kunimasa, K.; Yanagihara, M.; Tatefuji, T.; Hashimoto, K.; Mautner, V.; Uto, Y.; Hori, H.; Kumazawa, S.; et al. Artepillin C (ARC) in Brazilian green propolis selectively blocks oncogenic PAK1 signaling and suppresses the growth of NF tumors in mice. Phytother. Res. 2009, 23, 423-427. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 129. Yasukawa, K.; Yu, S.Y.; Tsutsumi, S.; Kurokawa, M.; Park, Y.K. Inhibitory effects of Brazilian propolis on tumor promotion in two-stage mouse skin carcinogenesis. J. Pharm. Nutr. Sci. 2012, 2, 71-76. [CrossRef] 130. · DOI
  96. Conti, B.J.; Santiago, K.B.; Búfalo, M.C.; Herrera, Y.F.; Alday, E.; Velazquez, C.; Hernandez, J.; Sforcin, J.M. Modulatory effects of propolis samples from Latin America (Brazil, Cuba and Mexico) on cytokine production by human monocytes. J. Pharm. Pharmacol. 2015, 67, 1431-1438. [CrossRef] 131. Silveira, M.A.D.; Teles, F.; Berretta, A.A.; Sanches, T.R.; Rodrigues, C.E.; Seguro, A.C.; Andrade, L. Effects of Brazilian green propolis on proteinuria and renal function in patients with chronic kidney disease: A randomized, double-blind, placebo- controlled trial. BMC Nephrol. 2019, 20, 1-12. [CrossRef] 132. · DOI
  97. Begnini, K.R.; Moura De Leon, P.M.; Thurow, H.; Schultze, E.; Campos, V.F.; Martins Rodrigues, F.; Borsuk, S.; Dellagostin, O.A.; Savegnago, L.; Roesch-Ely, M.; et al. Brazilian red propolis induces apoptosis-like cell death and decreases migration potential in bladder cancer cells. Evid.-Based Complementary Altern. Med. 2014, 2014. [CrossRef] 133. da Silva Frozza, C.O.; Garcia, C.S.C.; Gambato, G.; de Souza, M.D.O.; Salvador, M.; Moura, S.; Padilha, F.F.; Seixas, F.K.; Collares, T.; Borsuk, S.; et al. Chemical characterization, antioxidant and cytotoxic activities of Brazilian red propolis. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2013, 52, 137-142. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 134. da Frozza, C.O.S.; Santos, D.A.; Rufatto, L.C.; Minetto, L.; Scariot, F.J.; Echeverrigaray, S.; Pich, C.T.; Moura, S.; Padilha, F.F.; Borsuk, S.; et al. Antitumor activity of Brazilian red propolis fractions against Hep-2 cancer cell line. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2017, 91, 951-963. [CrossRef] 135. Costa, A.G.; Yoshida, N.C.; Garcez, W.S.; Perdomo, R.T.; de Matos, M.F.C.; Garcez, F.R. Metabolomics Approach Expands the Classification of Propolis Samples from Midwest Brazil. J. Nat. Prod. 2020, 83, 333-343. [CrossRef] 136. Hernandez, J.; Goycoolea, F.M.; Quintero, J.; Acosta, A.; Castañeda, M.; Dominguez, Z.; Robles, R.; Vazquez-Moreno, L.; Velazquez, E.F.; Astiazaran, H.; et al. Sonoran Propolis: Chemical Composition and Antiproliferative Activity on Cancer Cell Lines. Planta Med. 2007, 73, 1469-1474. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 137. · DOI
  98. Alday, E.; Valencia, D.; Garibay-Escobar, A.; Domínguez-Esquivel, Z.; Piccinelli, A.L.; Rastrelli, L.; Monribot-Villanueva, J.; Guerrero-Analco, J.A.; Robles-Zepeda, R.E.; Hernandez, J.; et al. Plant origin authentication of Sonoran Desert propolis: An antiproliferative propolis from a semi-arid region. Sci. Nat. 2019, 106. [CrossRef] 138. Mendez-Pfeiffer, P.; Alday, E.; Carreño, A.L.; Hernández-Tánori, J.; Montaño-Leyva, B.; Ortega-García, J.; Valdez, J.; Garibay- Escobar, A.; Hernandez, J.; Valencia, D.; et al. Seasonality modulates the cellular antioxidant activity and antiproliferative effect of sonoran desert propolis. Antioxidants 2020, 9, 1294. [CrossRef] 139. Li, F.; Awale, S.; Tezuka, Y.; Esumi, H.; Kadota, S. Study on the constituents of mexican propolis and their cytotoxic activity against PANC-1 human pancreatic cancer cells. J. Nat. Prod. 2010, 73, 623-627. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 140. Li, F.; Awale, S.; Tezuka, Y.; Kadota, S. Cytotoxic constituents from Brazilian red propolis and their structure-activity relationship. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2008, 16, 5434-5440. [CrossRef] 141. · DOI
  99. Alday-Provencio, S.; Diaz, G.; Rascon, L.; Quintero, J.; Alday, E.; Robles-Zepeda, R.; Garibay-Escobar, A.; Astiazaran, H.; Hernandez, J.; Velazquez, C. Sonoran propolis and some of its chemical constituents inhibit in vitro growth of Giardia lamblia trophozoites. Planta Med. 2015, 81, 742-747. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 142. · DOI
  100. Kimoto, T.; Arai, S.; Kohguchi, M.; Aga, M.; Nomura, Y.; Micallef, M.; Kurimoto, M.; Mito, K. Apoptosis and suppression of tumor growth by artepillin C extracted from Brazilian propolis. Cancer Detect. Prev. 1998, 22, 506-515. [CrossRef] 143. Matsumoto, K.; Akao, Y.; Kobayashi, E.; Ito, T.; Ohguchi, K.; Tanaka, T.; Iinuma, M.; Nozawa, Y. Cytotoxic benzophenone derivatives from Garcinia species display a strong apoptosis-inducing effect against human leukemia cell lines. Biol. Pharm. Bull. 2003, 26, 569-571. [CrossRef] 144. Chen, W.; Sun, Y.; Lu, C.; Chao, C. Thermal cycling as a novel thermal therapy to synergistically enhance the anticancer effect of propolis on PANC-1 cells. Int. J. Oncol. 2019, 55, 617-628. [CrossRef] 145. Santos, L.M.; Fonseca, M.S.; Sokolonski, A.R.; Deegan, K.R.; Araújo, R.P.C.; Umsza-Guez, M.A.; Barbosa, J.D.V.; Portela, R.D.; Machado, B.A.S. Propolis: Types, composition, biological activities, and veterinary product patent prospecting. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2020, 100, 1369-1382. [CrossRef] 146. Estrada, S.T.A.; López, G.P.A.; Autran, Z.C.I.; Pérez, M.M.; Londoño, V. V Use of Propolis for Topical Treatment of Dermatophyto- sis in Dog. Open J. Vet. Med. 2014, 4, 239-245. [CrossRef] 147. del Rodríguez, I.S.F.; Monteagudo, M.M.; Orozco, A.L.; Sánchez, T.A.C. Use of Mexican Propolis for the Topical Treatment of Dermatomycosis in Horses. Open J. Vet. Med. 2016, 06, 1-8. [CrossRef] 148. Aguilar-Ayala, F.J.; Rejón-Peraza, M.E.; Cauich-Rodríguez, J.V.; Borges-Argáez, R.; Pinzón-Te, A.L.; González-Alam, C.J.; Aguilar- Perez, F.J. Biophysicochemical study of propolis and its clinical and radiographic assessment in dental pulpectomy. Drug Invent. Today 2019, 12, 2928-2933. 149. Walkwork-Baber, M.; Ferenbaugh, R.; Glandney, E. The use of honey bees as monitor of environment pollution. Am. Bee J. 1982, 112, 770-772. 150. · DOI
  101. Celli, G.; Maccagnani, B. Honey bees as bioindicators of environmental pollution. Bull. Insectology 2003, 56, 137-139. [CrossRef] 151. Borg, D.; Attard, E. Honeybees and theis products as bioindicators for heavy metal pollution in Malta. Acta Bras. 2020, 4, 60-69. [CrossRef] 152. Johnson, R.M. Honey bee toxicology. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 2015, 60, 415-434. [CrossRef] 153. Mizrahi, A.; Lensky, Y. Bee Products; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 1997. 154. · DOI
  102. Moreira, J.C.; Peres, F.; Simões, A.C.; Pignati, W.A.; de Dores, E.C.; Vieira, S.N.; Strüssmann, C.; Mott, T. Contaminação de águas superficiais e de chuva por agrotóxicos em uma região do estado do Mato Grosso. Ciência Saúde Coletiva 2012, 17, 1557-1568. [CrossRef] 156. Kogan, W.R.; Kogam, M.; Parada, A.M. Phytotoxic activity of root absorbed glyphosate in corn seedlings (Zea mays L.). Weed Biol. Manag. 2003, 3, 228-232. [CrossRef] 157. · DOI
  103. Nandula, V.K.; Vencill, W.K. Herbicide Absorption and Translocation in Plants using Radioisotopes. Weed Sci. 2015, 63, 140-151. [CrossRef] 158. Brian, P.W. How Herbicides Work; Alberta Agriculture and Rural Development: Edmonton, AB, Canada, 1999; Volume 246, ISBN 0773261311. 159. Medina-Dzul, K.; Muñoz-Rodríguez, D.; Moguel-Ordoñez, Y.; Carrera-Figueiras, C. Application of mixed solvents for elution of organophosphate pesticides extracted from raw propolis by matrix solid-phase dispersion and analysis by GC-MS. Chem. Pap. 2014, 68, 1474-1481. [CrossRef] 160. González-Martín, M.I.; Revilla, I.; Vivar-Quintana, A.M.; Betances Salcedo, E.V. Pesticide residues in propolis from Spain and Chile. An approach using near infrared spectroscopy. Talanta 2017, 165, 533-539. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 161. González-Martín, M.I.; Revilla, I.; Betances-Salcedo, E.V.; Vivar-Quintana, A.M. Pesticide residues and heavy metals in commer- cially processed propolis. Microchem. J. 2018, 143, 423-429. [CrossRef] 162. · DOI
  104. Martinello, M.; Manzinello, C.; Borin, A.; Avram, L.E.; Dainese, N.; Giuliato, I.; Gallina, A.; Mutinelli, F. A survey from 2015 to 2019 to investigate the occurrence of pesticide residues in dead honeybees and other matrices related to honeybee mortality incidents in Italy. Diversity 2020, 12, 15. [CrossRef] 172. Banks, J.E.; Banks, H.T.; Myers, N.; Laubmeier, A.N.; Bommarco, R. Lethal and sublethal effects of toxicants on bumble bee populations: A modelling approach. Ecotoxicology 2020, 29, 237-245. [CrossRef] 173. Naiara Gomes, I.; Ingred Castelan Vieira, K.; Moreira Gontijo, L.; Canto Resende, H. Honeybee survival and flight capacity are compromised by insecticides used for controlling melon pests in Brazil. Ecotoxicology 2020, 29, 97-107. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 174. Tomé, H.V.V.; Schmehl, D.R.; Wedde, A.E.; Godoy, R.S.M.; Ravaiano, S.V.; Guedes, R.N.C.; Martins, G.F.; Ellis, J.D. Frequently encountered pesticides can cause multiple disorders in developing worker honey bees. Environ. Pollut. 2020, 256. [CrossRef] 175. Sgolastra, F.; Medrzycki, P.; Bortolotti, L.; Maini, S.; Porrini, C.; Simon-Delso, N.; Bosch, J. Bees and pesticide regulation: Lessons from the neonicotinoid experience. Biol. Conserv. 2020, 241. [CrossRef] 176. · DOI
  105. Orsi, R.O.; Barros, D.C.B.; Silva, R.C.M.; Queiroz, J.V.; Araújo, W.L.P.; Shinohara, A.J. Toxic metals in the crude propolis and its transfer rate to the ethanolic extract. Sociobiology 2018, 65, 640-644. [CrossRef] 177. Schmidt, E.M.; Stock, D.; Chada, F.J.; Finger, D.; Christine Helena Frankland Sawaya, A.; Eberlin, M.N.; Felsner, M.L.; Quináia, S.P.; Monteiro, M.C.; Torres, Y.R. A comparison between characterization and biological properties of brazilian fresh and aged propolis. BioMed Res. Int. 2014, 2014. [CrossRef] 178. · DOI
  106. Finger, D.; Filho, I.K.; Torres, Y.R.; Quináia, S.P. Propolis as an indicator of environmental contamination by metals. Bull. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 2014, 92, 259-264. [CrossRef] 179. Divan, A.M.; de Oliveira, P.L.; Perry, C.T.; Atz, V.L.; Azzarini-Rostirola, L.N.; Raya-Rodriguez, M.T. Using wild plant species as indicators for the accumulation of emissions from a thermal power plant, Candiota, South Brazil. Ecol. Indic. 2009, 9, 1156-1162. [CrossRef] 180. Zoffoli, H.J.O.; do Amaral-Sobrinho, N.M.B.; Zonta, E.; Luisi, M.V.; Marcon, G.; Tolón-Becerra, A. Inputs of heavy metals due to agrochemical use in tobacco fields in Brazil's Southern Region. Environ. Monit. Assess. 2012, 185, 2423-2437. [CrossRef] 181. · DOI
  107. Sattler, J.A.G.; Melo, A.A.M.; do Nacimento, K.S.; de Melo, I.L.P.; Mancini-Filho, J.; Sattler, A.; de Almeida-Muradian, L.B. Essential minerals and inorganic contaminants (barium, cadmium, lithium, lead and vanadium) in dried bee pollen produced in Rio Grande do Sul State, Brazil. Food Sci. Technol. 2016, 36, 505-509. [CrossRef] 182. · DOI
  108. Pierini, G.D.; Pistonesi, M.F.; Di Nezio, M.S.; Centurión, M.E. A pencil-lead bismuth film electrode and chemometric tools for simultaneous determination of heavy metals in propolis samples. Microchem. J. 2016, 125, 266-272. [CrossRef] 183. Brasil RESOLUÇÃO-RDC No 42, DE 29 DE AGOSTO DE. 2013. Available online: https://bvsms.saude.gov.br/bvs/saudelegis/ anvisa/2013/rdc0042_29_08_2013.html (accessed on 15 August 2021). 184. · DOI
  109. Montiel, J.; Marmolejo, Y.; Castellanos, I.; Pérez, F.; Prieto, F.; Gaytán, J.; Fonseca, M. Niveles de cadmio, cromo y plomo en abejas (Apis mellifera) y sus productos en Hidalgo, México. Rev. Iberoam. Cienc. 2020, 7, 57-58. 185. Cuba 1994.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Silva-Beltrán, N. P., Umsza-Guez, M. A., Ramos Rodrigues, D. M., Gálvez-Ruiz, J. C., de Paula Castro, T. L., & Balderrama-Carmona, A. P.
Affiliations
  • Universidad de Sonora (MX)
  • Curso de Biotecnologia, Universidade Federal da Bahia, Av. Reitor Miguel Calmon, s/n-Canela, Salvador 40110-902, BA, Brazil
  • Departamento de Ciencias Químico Biológicas, Universidad de Sonora, Blvd. Luis Encinas y Rosales S/N, Colonia Centro, Hermosillo C.P. 83000, Sonora, Mexico
Corresponding author
Balderrama-Carmona, Ana Paola
Venue
Applied Sciences
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2021-12-02
Volume
11
Issue
23
Pages
11417
ISSN
2076-3417 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3217312499
Cited by
30
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 6
FWCI
3.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Applied Sciences (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (304747/2020-3)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Insect Science › Bee Products Chemical Analysis
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Healthcare and Venom Research
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Phytochemistry Medicinal Plant Applications
Keywords
propolis, Brazilian propolis, propolis chemical composition, biological activity, antibacterial activity, antifungal activity, anticancer activity, antiprotozoal activity, pesticide residues, heavy metals, propolis extraction, functional foods, natural supplements

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review