The DOI matches its Crossref record; 48 of the 48 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Laser and Electron Beam Additive Manufacturing Methods of Fabricating Titanium Bone Implants
Open accessAbstract
Additive Manufacturing (AM) methods are generally used to produce an early sample or near net-shape elements based on three-dimensional geometrical modules. To date, publications on AM of metal implants have mainly focused on knee and hip replacements or bone scaffolds for tissue engineering. The direct fabrication of metallic implants can be achieved by methods, such as Selective Laser Melting (SLM) or Electron Beam Melting (EBM). This work compares the SLM and EBM methods used in the fabrication of titanium bone implants by analyzing the microstructure, mechanical properties and cytotoxicity. The SLM process was conducted in an environmental chamber using 0.4–0.6 vol % of oxygen to enhance the mechanical properties of a Ti-6Al-4V alloy. SLM processed material had high anisotropy of mechanical properties and superior UTS (1246–1421 MPa) when compared to the EBM (972–976 MPa) and the wrought material (933–942 MPa). The microstructure and phase composition depended on the used fabrication method. The AM methods caused the formation of long epitaxial grains of the prior β phase. The equilibrium phases (α + β) and non-equilibrium α’ martensite was obtained after EBM and SLM, respectively. Although it was found that the heat transfer that occurs during the layer by layer generation of the component caused aluminum content deviations, neither methods generated any cytotoxic effects. Furthermore, in contrast to SLM, the EBM fabricated material met the ASTMF136 standard for surgical implant applications.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Metal Additive Manufacturing: A Review
Frazier, W. E. (2014) · Journal of Materials Engineering and Performance · doi:10.1007/s11665-014-0958-z · Cited by 5,984
Ti based biomaterials, the ultimate choice for orthopaedic implants – A review
Geetha, M., Singh, A. K., Asokamani, R., & Gogia, A. K. (2009) · Progress in Materials Science · doi:10.1016/j.pmatsci.2008.06.004 · Cited by 5,416
Additive manufacturing of metals
Herzog, D., Seyda, V., Wycisk, E., & Emmelmann, C. (2016) · Acta Materialia · doi:10.1016/j.actamat.2016.07.019 · Cited by 4,759
Additive Manufacturing Technologies: Rapid Prototyping to Direct Digital Manufacturing
Gibson, I., Rosen, D. W., & Stucker, B. (2010) · National University of Singapore · doi:10.1007/978-1-4419-1120-9 · Cited by 2,969
A study of the microstructural evolution during selective laser melting of Ti–6Al–4V
Thijs, L., Verhaeghe, F., Craeghs, T., Humbeeck, J. V., & Kruth, J.-P. (2010) · Acta Materialia · doi:10.1016/j.actamat.2010.02.004 · Cited by 2,929
Metal Additive Manufacturing: A Review of Mechanical Properties
Lewandowski, J. J., & Seifi, M. (2016) · Annual Review of Materials Research · doi:10.1146/annurev-matsci-070115-032024 · Cited by 1,722
Xu, W., Brandt, M., Sun, S., Elambasseril, J., Liu, Q., Latham, K., Xia, K., & Qian, M. (2015) · Acta Materialia · doi:10.1016/j.actamat.2014.11.028 · Cited by 1,245
Gong, H., Rafi, K., Gu, H., Starr, T., & Stucker, B. (2014) · Additive Manufacturing · doi:10.1016/j.addma.2014.08.002 · Cited by 1,038
Effect of the build orientation on the mechanical properties and fracture modes of SLM Ti–6Al–4V
Simonelli, M., Tse, Y. Y., & Tuck, C. (2014) · Materials Science and Engineering: A · doi:10.1016/j.msea.2014.07.086 · Cited by 1,010
Mechanical behavior of additive manufactured, powder-bed laser-fused materials
Mower, T. M., & Long, M. J. (2016) · Materials Science and Engineering: A · doi:10.1016/j.msea.2015.10.068 · Cited by 1,001
Cited by
Svetlizky, D., Das, M., Zheng, B., Vyatskikh, A. L., Bose, S., Bandyopadhyay, A., Schoenung, J. M., Lavernia, E. J., & Eliaz, N. (2021) · Materials Today · doi:10.1016/j.mattod.2021.03.020 · Cited by 1,371
Benedetti, M., du Plessis, A., Ritchie, R. O., Dallago, M., Razavi, N., & Berto, F. (2021) · Materials Science and Engineering: R: Reports · doi:10.1016/j.mser.2021.100606 · Cited by 788
An overview of residual stresses in metal powder bed fusion
Bartlett, J. L., & Li, X. (2019) · Additive Manufacturing · doi:10.1016/j.addma.2019.02.020 · Cited by 616
Metadata
- Authors
- Wysocki, B., Maj, P., Sitek, R., Buhagiar, J., Kurzydłowski, K., & Święszkowski, W.
- Venue
- Applied Sciences
- Publisher
- MDPI AG
- Published
- 2017-06-26
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 657
- ISSN
- 2076-3417 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2720993591
- Cited by
- 300
- References
- 48
- FWCI
- 14.56
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Laser and Electron Beam Additive Manufacturing Methods of Fabricating Titanium Bone Implants. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3390/app7070657
- The paper
- Wysocki, B., Maj, P., Sitek, R., Buhagiar, J., Kurzydłowski, K., & Święszkowski, W. (2017). Laser and Electron Beam Additive Manufacturing Methods of Fabricating Titanium Bone Implants. Applied Sciences. https://doi.org/10.3390/app7070657
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.