Cited by 1,038Digital Transformation in IndustryApplied Advanced TechnologiesDigital Innovation in Industries

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 72 of the 72 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Digital Twin: Origin to Future

Open access

Abstract

Digital Twin (DT) refers to the virtual copy or model of any physical entity (physical twin) both of which are interconnected via exchange of data in real time. Conceptually, a DT mimics the state of its physical twin in real time and vice versa. Application of DT includes real-time monitoring, designing/planning, optimization, maintenance, remote access, etc. Its implementation is expected to grow exponentially in the coming decades. The advent of Industry 4.0 has brought complex industrial systems that are more autonomous, smart, and highly interconnected. These systems generate considerable amounts of data useful for several applications such as improving performance, predictive maintenance, training, etc. A sudden influx in the number of publications related to ‘Digital Twin’ has led to confusion between different terminologies related to the digitalization of industries. Another problem that has arisen due to the growing popularity of DT is a lack of consensus on the description of DT as well as so many different types of DT, which adds to the confusion. This paper intends to consolidate the different types of DT and different definitions of DT throughout the literature for easy identification of DT from the rest of the complimentary terms such as ‘product avatar’, ‘digital thread’, ‘digital model’, and ‘digital shadow’. The paper looks at the concept of DT since its inception to its predicted future to realize the value it can bring to certain sectors. Understanding the characteristics and types of DT while weighing its pros and cons is essential for any researcher, business, or sector before investing in the technology.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/asi4020036

Cites

72 of 72 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 72 references

Research works printed but not linked: 11

  1. Parrott, A., and Warshaw, L. (2017). Industry 4.0 and the Digital Twin: Manufacturing Meets its Match, Deloitte University Press.
  2. Gelernter, D. (1993). Mirror Worlds: Or: The Day Software Puts the Universe in a Shoebox. How it Will Happen and What it Will Mean, Oxford University Press.
  3. Leiva, 2016, Demystifying the digital thread and digital twin concepts, Ind. Week. August, 1, 2016
  4. Almeida, H.A., and Vasco, J.C. (2020). The digital twin of production, the ultimate tool to achieve first-time-right in metal additive manufacturing. Progress in Digital and Physical Manufacturing: Proceedings of ProDPM’19, Springer.
  5. (2020, October 12). Gartner Identifies the Top 10 Strategic Technology Trends for 2017. Available online: https://www.gartner.com/en/newsroom/press-releases/2016-10-18-gartner-identifies-the-top-10-strategic-technology-trends-for-2017.
  6. (2020, October 12). Gartner Identifies the Top 10 Strategic Technology Trends for 2018. Available online: https://www.gartner.com/en/newsroom/press-releases/2017-10-04-gartner-identifies-the-top-10-strategic-technology-trends-for-2018.
  7. (2020, October 12). Gartner Identifies the Top 10 Strategic Technology Trends for 2019. Available online: https://www.gartner.com/en/newsroom/press-releases/2018-10-15-gartner-identifies-the-top-10-strategic-technology-trends-for-2019.
  8. (2020, October 13). Gartner Survey Reveals 47% of Organizations Will Increase Investments in IoT Despite the Impact of COVID-19. Available online: https://www.gartner.com/en/newsroom/press-releases/2020-10-29-gartner-survey-reveals-47-percent-of-organizations-will-increase-investments-in-iot-despite-the-impact-of-covid-19-.
  9. Lamb, K. (2019). Principle-Based Digital Twins: A Scoping Review, Centre for Digital Built Britain.
  10. Parks, M. (2020, October 12). Digita Twinning: Types of Digital Twins. Method: Mouser’s Technology & Solutions Journal. Available online: https://eu.mouser.com/applications/digital-twinning-types/.
  11. Saracco, R. (2020, October 12). Digital Twins: Advantages & Issues of a Powerful Emerging Technology. Available online: https://cmte.ieee.org/futuredirections/2018/06/14/digital-twins-advantages-issues-of-a-powerful-emerging-technology/.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 1,038

Metadata

Authors
Singh, M., Fuenmayor, E., Hinchy, E., Qiao, Y., Murray, N., & Devine, D.
Affiliations
  • Athlone Institute of Technology (IE)
  • University of Limerick (IE)
Corresponding author
Devine, Declan
Venue
Applied System Innovation
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2021-05-24
Volume
4
Issue
2
Pages
36
ISSN
2571-5577 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3164800436
Cited by
1,038
References
72
Citations by year
2026: 189 · 2025: 275 · 2024: 260 · 2023: 198 · 2022: 102 · 2021: 14
FWCI
74.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Applied System Innovation (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • University of Limerick Institutional Repository (University of Limerick) (acceptedVersion, other-oa)
  • Arrow@dit (Dublin Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • Research@THEA (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
Funders
Science Foundation Ireland (16/RC/3918)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering › Digital Transformation in Industry
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering › Applied Advanced Technologies
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management of Technology and Innovation › Digital Innovation in Industries
Keywords
digital twin, physical twin, Industry 4.0, real-time data exchange, predictive maintenance, digital thread, digital models, digital shadow, terminology confusion, industrial digitalization

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review