Cognitive network science reveals bias in GPT-3, GPT-3.5 turbo, and GPT-4 mirroring math anxiety in high-school students
Open accessAbstract
Large Language Models (LLMs) are becoming increasingly integrated into our lives. Hence, it is important to understand the biases present in their outputs in order to avoid perpetuating harmful stereotypes, which originate in our own flawed ways of thinking. This challenge requires developing new benchmarks and methods for quantifying affective and semantic bias, keeping in mind that LLMs act as psycho-social mirrors that reflect the views and tendencies that are prevalent in society. One such tendency that has harmful negative effects is the global phenomenon of anxiety toward math and STEM subjects. In this study, we introduce a novel application of network science and cognitive psychology to understand biases towards math and STEM fields in LLMs from ChatGPT, such as GPT-3, GPT-3.5, and GPT-4. Specifically, we use behavioral forma mentis networks (BFMNs) to understand how these LLMs frame math and STEM disciplines in relation to other concepts. We use data obtained by probing the three LLMs in a language generation task that has previously been applied to humans. Our findings indicate that LLMs have negative perceptions of math and STEM fields, associating math with negative concepts in 6 cases out of 10. We observe significant differences across OpenAI’s models: newer versions (i.e., GPT-4) produce 5× semantically richer, more emotionally polarized perceptions with fewer negative associations compared to older versions and N=159 high-school students. These findings suggest that advances in the architecture of LLMs may lead to increasingly less biased models that could even perhaps someday aid in reducing harmful stereotypes in society rather than perpetuating them.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Inherent technical problems exacerbate malignant conditions, such as GPT-3, GPT-3.5 and GPT-4 mirroring math anxiety in students.
“Inherent technical problems that exacerbate malignant conditions, such as GPT-3, GPT-3.5 and GPT-4 mirroring math anxiety in students (Abramski et al., 2023).”
From Embracing the future of Artificial Intelligence in the classroom: the relevance of AI literacy, prompt engineering, and critical thinking in modern education (2024) · cites this paper as Abramski et al., 2023
Equity in access to technology is a fundamental challenge, as the lack of resources in certain contexts could amplify the digital divide and limit the positive impact of GenAI.
“Equity in access is a fundamental challenge, as the lack of resources in certain contexts could amplify the digital divide and limit the positive impact of these tools (Abramski et al., 2023).”
From Ethical and regulatory challenges of Generative AI in education: a systematic review (2025) · cites this paper as Abramski et al., 2023
A flexible but robust regulation can prevent abuses in the use of generative tools, guaranteeing the protection of data and copyright.
“A flexible but robust regulation can prevent abuses in the use of generative tools, guaranteeing the protection of data and copyright (Abramski et al., 2023).”
From Ethical and regulatory challenges of Generative AI in education: a systematic review (2025) · cites this paper as Abramski et al., 2023
Cites
Distributed Representations of Words and Phrases and their Compositionality
Mikolov, T., Sutskever, I., Chen, K., Corrado, G., & Dean, J. (2013) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1310.4546 · Cited by 24,533 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Since the introduction of word embeddings such as word2vec [28], researchers have been aware that the advantageous operations provided by these models, such as using vector differences to represent semantic relations, are likely to express un-desired biases.”
BackgroundLanguage Models are Few-Shot Learners
Brown, T. B., Mann, B., Ryder, N., Subbiah, M., Kaplan, J., Dhariwal, P., Neelakantan, A., Shyam, P., Sastry, G., Askell, A., et al. (2020) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2005.14165 · Cited by 23,372 · cited 1× · see citing works
“All three belong to the family of generative pre-trained transformer (GPT) models [1] that are trained on massive amounts of textual data to learn patterns and relationships in text [2,3].”
BackgroundRussell, J. A. (1980) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0077714 · Cited by 16,334 · see citing works
Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: the implicit association test
Greenwald, A. G., McGhee, D. E., & Schwartz, J. L. K. (1998) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.74.6.1464 · Cited by 9,210 · see citing works
A spreading-activation theory of semantic processing.
Collins, A. M., & Loftus, E. F. (1975) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.82.6.407 · Cited by 8,141 · cited 1× · see citing works
“For instance, according to the spreading activation model established by pioneering work of psychologists Collins and Loftus [61], providing an individual with a cue word activates a cognitive process acting on a network representation, such that concepts are nodes linked together via conceptual…”
MethodSchermann, M., Hemsen, H., Buchmüller, C., Bitter, T., Krcmar, H., Markl, V., & Hoeren, T. (2014) · Wirtschaftsinf. · doi:10.1007/s11576-014-0434-2 · Cited by 3,555 · see citing works
Semantics derived automatically from language corpora contain human-like biases
Caliskan, A., Bryson, J. J., & Narayanan, A. (2017) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aal4230 · Cited by 2,887 · cited 3× · see citing works
“One approach involves using Association Tests [13,32–34], which may be performed at different levels of discourse.”
BackgroundMethodCROWDSOURCING A WORD–EMOTION ASSOCIATION LEXICON
Mohammad, S. M., & Turney, P. D. (2012) · Computational Intelligence · doi:10.1111/j.1467-8640.2012.00460.x · Cited by 2,757 · see citing works
POSNER, J., RUSSELL, J. A., & PETERSON, B. S. (2005) · Development and Psychopathology · doi:10.1017/s0954579405050340 · Cited by 2,602 · cited 2× · see citing works
“This pattern was identified in two different approaches, one leveraging semantic frame analysis [26] and another using the circumplex model of affect [48], powered through psychological data.”
MethodThe Nature, Effects, and Relief of Mathematics Anxiety
Hembree, R. (1990) · Journal for Research in Mathematics Education · doi:10.2307/749455 · Cited by 1,993 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Math anxiety may deter a large portion of the workforce from pursuing careers in STEM, which are in high demand, and since math anxiety is more prevalent in females as a result of societal stereotypes [24], it may contribute greatly to the gender gap in STEM fields.”
BackgroundMan is to Computer Programmer as Woman is to Homemaker? Debiasing Word Embeddings
Bolukbasi, T., Chang, K.-W., Zou, J., Saligrama, V., & Kalai, A. (2016) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1607.06520 · Cited by 1,615 · cited 1× · see citing works
“For example, sexist and racist word analogies such as “father” is to “doctor” as “mother” is to “nurse” [29] and black is to criminal as Caucasian is to police [30] produced by word embeddings demonstrate how language contains biases that reflect adverse societal stereotypes.”
BackgroundSparks of Artificial General Intelligence: Early experiments with GPT-4
Bubeck, S., Chandrasekaran, V., Eldan, R., Gehrke, J., Horvitz, E., Kamar, E., Lee, P., Lee, Y. T., Li, Y., Lundberg, S., et al. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2303.12712 · Cited by 1,526 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Some researchers have suggested that the impressive performance of LLMs on difficult reasoning tasks is indicative of an early version of general artificial intelligence [9].”
BackgroundMath anxiety: personal, educational, and cognitive consequences
Ashcraft, M. H. (2002) · Current Directions in Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/1467-8721.00196 · Cited by 1,471 · cited 2× · see citing works
“Negative associations of math and other concepts may be very subtle, e.g., LLMs might produce text framing math in ways that confirm students’ pre-existing negative attitudes [21,22].”
BackgroundClimbing towards NLU: On Meaning, Form, and Understanding in the Age of Data
Bender, E. M., & Koller, A. (2020) · Proceedings of the 58th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.18653/v1/2020.acl-main.463 · Cited by 1,082 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Many others argue that LLMs exhibit nothing resembling true understanding because they lack a grasp of meaning [10], arguing that they perform well but for the wrong reasons [8].”
BackgroundStereoSet: Measuring stereotypical bias in pretrained language models
Nadeem, M., Bethke, A., & Reddy, S. (2021) · Proceedings of the 59th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics and the 11th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (Volume 1: Long Papers) · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.acl-long.416 · Cited by 643 · cited 3× · see citing works
“One approach involves using Association Tests [13,32–34], which may be performed at different levels of discourse.”
BackgroundMethodObtaining Reliable Human Ratings of Valence, Arousal, and Dominance for 20,000 English Words
Mohammad, S. M. (2018) · Proceedings of the conference - Association for Computational Linguistics. Meeting · doi:10.18653/v1/p18-1017 · Cited by 616 · cited 2× · see citing works
“We based these investigations on valence–arousal scores obtained by the National Research Canada Valence–Arousal– Dominance lexicon [52].”
MethodWords in the mind: An introduction to the mental lexicon
Jones, D. B. (2004) · Machine Translation · doi:10.1007/bf00713703 · Cited by 572 · cited 3× · see citing works
“…then using the corresponding experimental paradigms to measure relevant emerging properties of LLMs. Firstly, in cognitive psychology, there must be an adequate match between a given implemented task measuring a target process and the cognitive theory or model used to explain that process [59,60].”
BackgroundMethodBeyond the Imitation Game: Quantifying and extrapolating the capabilities of language models
Srivastava, A., Rastogi, A., Rao, A., Shoeb, A. A. M., Abid, A., Fisch, A., Brown, A. R., Santoro, A., Gupta, A., Garriga-Alonso, A., et al. (2022) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2206.04615 · Cited by 569 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Tools from cognitive psychology may be better suited for detecting the subtler dangers of language models where performance-based methods fall short [4,6,7].”
BackgroundUsing cognitive psychology to understand GPT-3
Binz, M., & Schulz, E. (2023) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2218523120 · Cited by 559 · cited 2× · see citing works
“Tools from cognitive psychology may be better suited for detecting the subtler dangers of language models where performance-based methods fall short [4,6,7].”
BackgroundMethodMath anxiety: who has it, why it develops, and how to guard against it.
Maloney, E. A., & Beilock, S. L. (2012) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2012.06.008 · Cited by 509 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Unpleasant feelings about math may already begin to develop as early as first grade [19].”
BackgroundPersistent Anti-Muslim Bias in Large Language Models
Abid, A., Farooqi, M., & Zou, J. (2021) · Proceedings of the 2021 AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society · doi:10.1145/3461702.3462624 · Cited by 476 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Persistent anti-Muslim bias has been detected by probing GPT-3 in various ways, including prompt completion, analogical reasoning, and story generation [35].”
BackgroundLuttenberger, S., Wimmer, S., & Paechter, M. (2018) · Psychology Research and Behavior Management · doi:10.2147/prbm.s141421 · Cited by 456 · cited 1× · see citing works
“This anxiety is a global phenomenon [17,18], and it is deeply rooted, beginning in childhood and persisting throughout adulthood.”
BackgroundDistributional Models of Word Meaning
Lenci, A. (2017) · Annual Review of Linguistics · doi:10.1146/annurev-linguistics-030514-125254 · Cited by 448 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Inspired by the famous quote You shall know a word by the company it keeps [46], which is also the foundation of the distributional semantic hypothesis [47], we could obtain a better understanding of the valence attributed to the cue word by considering the valences of its neighboring associates.”
BackgroundToward a Unified Theory of Similarity and Recognition
Ashby, F., & Perrin, N. A. (1988) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.95.1.124 · Cited by 446 · cited 1× · see citing works
“…then using the corresponding experimental paradigms to measure relevant emerging properties of LLMs. Firstly, in cognitive psychology, there must be an adequate match between a given implemented task measuring a target process and the cognitive theory or model used to explain that process [59,60].”
MethodThe Woman Worked as a Babysitter: On Biases in Language Generation
Sheng, E., Chang, K.-W., Natarajan, P., & Peng, N. (2019) · Proceedings of the 2019 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and the 9th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (EMNLP-IJCNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/d19-1339 · Cited by 431 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Sentiment scores and measurements of “regard” towards a demographic have been applied to assess stereotypes related to gender and sexual orientation in output produced by GPT-2 [37].”
MethodAssessing gender bias in machine translation: a case study with Google Translate
Prates, M. O. R., Avelar, P. H., & Lamb, L. C. (2020) · Neural Computing and Applications · doi:10.1007/s00521-019-04144-6 · Cited by 410 · cited 2× · see citing works
“Given that GPT-4 and its predecessors use vast amounts of human data, interpreting the cognitive structure of LLMs might lead to substantial advancements in understanding how human social cognitions are structured [31].”
BackgroundProbing Neural Network Comprehension of Natural Language Arguments
Niven, T., & Kao, H.-Y. (2019) · Proceedings of the 57th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.18653/v1/p19-1459 · Cited by 395 · cited 1× · see citing works
“In fact, much of the success of LLMs at human-like reasoning tasks can be attributed to spurious correlations rather than actual reasoning capabilities [11].”
BackgroundThe “Small World of Words” English word association norms for over 12,000 cue words
Deyne, S. D., Navarro, D., Perfors, A., Brysbaert, M., & Storms, G. (2018) · Behavior Research Methods · doi:10.3758/s13428-018-1115-7 · Cited by 366 · cited 4× · see citing works
“…and theory-driven link between continued free association tasks—deriving free associations between concepts—and models based on such data whose network structure could explain aspects of conceptual recall from semantic memory [40,44] or even higher-level phenomena such as problem solving [43].”
BackgroundMethodResultInfluentialMeasuring Bias in Contextualized Word Representations
Kurita, K., Vyas, N., Pareek, A., Black, A. W., & Tsvetkov, Y. (2019) · Proceedings of the First Workshop on Gender Bias in Natural Language Processing · doi:10.18653/v1/w19-3823 · Cited by 348 · cited 1× · see citing works
“One approach involves using Association Tests [13,32–34], which may be performed at different levels of discourse.”
MethodThe Math Anxiety-Performance Link
Foley, A. E., Herts, J. B., Borgonovi, F., Guerriero, S., Levine, S. C., & Beilock, S. L. (2017) · Current Directions in Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0963721416672463 · Cited by 346 · cited 4× · see citing works
“While this kind of self-categorization may seem harmless, math anxiety can actually have severe individual and societal consequences [17,21–23].”
BackgroundInfluentialThe debate over understanding in AI’s large language models
Mitchell, M., & Krakauer, D. C. (2023) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2215907120 · Cited by 340 · cited 6× · see citing works
“There has been a spike in research dedicated to this topic, surrounded by a debate about the nature of the capabilities of LLMs [8].”
BackgroundInfluentialGender and Representation Bias in GPT-3 Generated Stories
Lucy, L., & Bamman, D. (2021) · Proceedings of the Third Workshop on Narrative Understanding · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.nuse-1.5 · Cited by 287 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Topic modeling and sentiment analysis techniques have been used to find gender stereotypes in narratives generated by GPT-3 [36].”
MethodManzini, T., Chong, L. Y., Black, A. W., & Tsvetkov, Y. (2019) · Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies (NAACL-HLT) · doi:10.18653/v1/n19-1062 · Cited by 284 · cited 1× · see citing works
“For example, sexist and racist word analogies such as “father” is to “doctor” as “mother” is to “nurse” [29] and black is to criminal as Caucasian is to police [30] produced by word embeddings demonstrate how language contains biases that reflect adverse societal stereotypes.”
BackgroundShould ChatGPT be biased? Challenges and risks of bias in large language models
Ferrara, E. (2023) · First Monday · doi:10.5210/fm.v28i11.13346 · Cited by 282 · cited 6× · see citing works
“According to [12 ?”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialShould ChatGPT be Biased? Challenges and Risks of Bias in Large Language Models
Ferrara, E. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2304.03738 · Cited by 282
Deyne, S. D., Navarro, D., & Storms, G. (2012) · Behavior Research Methods · doi:10.3758/s13428-012-0260-7 · Cited by 211 · see citing works
Daker, R. J., Gattas, S., Sokolowski, H. M., Green, A. E., & Lyons, I. M. (2021) · npj Science of Learning · doi:10.1038/s41539-021-00095-7 · Cited by 195 · cited 4× · see citing works
“This avoidance tendency may cause bright and capable students to avoid math-intensive classes, determining the course of their academic and professional career [23].”
BackgroundInfluentialTeacher Math Anxiety Relates to Adolescent Students’ Math Achievement
Ramirez, G., Hooper, S. Y., Kersting, N. B., Ferguson, R. F., & Yeager, D. S. (2018) · AERA Open · doi:10.1177/2332858418756052 · Cited by 153 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Children pick up on the anxieties of their teachers and parents [20], similar to how LLMs absorb biases from training data.”
BackgroundThe Role of Parental Math Anxiety and Math Attitude in Their Children’s Math Achievement
Soni, A., & Kumari, S. (2015) · International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education · doi:10.1007/s10763-015-9687-5 · Cited by 146 · cited 1× · see citing works
“…interactions with LLMs may, thus, exacerbate already existing stereotypes or insecurities about mathematical topics among students and even parents, analogous to the unconscious diffusion of math anxiety through parent–child interactions, as identified by recent psychological investigations [57].”
BackgroundUnderstanding Human Intelligence through Human Limitations
Griffiths, T. L. (2020) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2020.09.001 · Cited by 88 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Unlike artificial systems, however, real people may produce biases because of three fundamental limitations of human cognition [68]: limited time, limited computation power, and limited communication.”
BackgroundAffective bias as a rational response to the statistics of rewards and punishments
Pulcu, E., & Browning, M. D. (2017) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.27879 · Cited by 88 · cited 3× · see citing works
“A very natural yet negative human phenomena is affective bias [15], the tendency to prioritize the processing of emotionally negative events compared to positive ones [16].”
BackgroundDistributional Semantic Models for Affective Text Analysis
Malandrakis, N., Potamianos, A., Iosif, E., & Narayanan, S. S. (2013) · IEEE Transactions on Audio Speech and Language Processing · doi:10.1109/tasl.2013.2277931 · Cited by 78 · cited 1× · see citing works
“According to semantic frame theory [49] and distributional semantics in psycholinguistics [50], each network neighborhood represents a semantic frame indicating ways in which a given concept is associated with others.”
BackgroundMath Anxiety and Its Cognitive Consequences
Ashcraft, M., & Ridley, K. (2004) · doi:10.4324/9780203998045.ch18 · Cited by 77 · cited 2×
“Negative associations of math and other concepts may be very subtle, e.g., LLMs might produce text framing math in ways that confirm students’ pre-existing negative attitudes [21,22].”
BackgroundThe Development and Part Validation of a U.K. Scale for Mathematics Anxiety
Hunt, T. E., Clark-Carter, D. D., & Sheffield, D. (2011) · Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment · doi:10.1177/0734282910392892 · Cited by 71 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Negative perceptions of algebra represent one of several indicators of math anxiety, as captured by the psychometric scale detecting math anxiety developed by Hunt and colleagues [55].”
BackgroundForma mentis networks quantify crucial differences in STEM perception between students and experts
Stella, M., de Nigris, S., Alorić, A., & Siew, C. S. Q. (2019) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0222870 · Cited by 71 · cited 10× · see citing works
“To investigate attitudes towards math, science, and STEM subjects, we tested ten different cue words, corresponding to the same ten key concepts tested in the study with high-school students [27]: math , physics , science , teacher , scientist , school , biology , art , chemistry , and STEM .”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialSelf-citationProbing the psychology of AI models
Shiffrin, R., & Mitchell, M. (2023) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2300963120 · Cited by 70 · see citing works
Hagendorff, T., Dasgupta, I., Binz, M., Chan, S. C. Y., Lampinen, A., Wang, J. X., Akata, Z., & Schulz, E. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2303.13988 · Cited by 68 · cited 4× · see citing works
“Tools from cognitive psychology may be better suited for detecting the subtler dangers of language models where performance-based methods fall short [4,6,7].”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialNeural activity reveals interactions between episodic and semantic memory systems during retrieval.
Weidemann, C. T., Kragel, J. E., Lega, B. C., Worrell, G. A., Sperling, M. R., Sharan, A. D., Jobst, B. C., Khadjevand, F., Davis, K. A., Wanda, P. A., et al. (2018) · Journal of Experimental Psychology General · doi:10.1037/xge0000480 · Cited by 66 · cited 2× · see citing works
“In humans, recent psychological studies have highlighted an interplay between retrieval processes in the categorical organization of episodic memory and the activation of related concepts in semantic memory [16,65,66].”
BackgroundThe Moral Character of Mad Scientists: A Cultural Critique of Science
Toumey, C. (1992) · Science Technology & Human Values · doi:10.1177/016224399201700401 · Cited by 62 · cited 1× · see citing works
“…to the frame of math , demonstrating the vast range of perceptions about academic disciplines exhibited by these LLMs. Interestingly, GPT-3 provided associations related to the mad scientist stereotype [56], which were found also in the perception that high-school students had of scientist in [42].”
BackgroundIs GPT-3 a Psychopath? Evaluating Large Language Models from a Psychological PerspectivePreprint
Li, X., Li, Y.-T., Liu, L., Bing, L., & Joty, S. R. (2022) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2212.10529 · Cited by 61 · see citing works
spreadr: An R package to simulate spreading activation in a network
Siew, C. S. Q. (2019) · Behavior Research Methods · doi:10.3758/s13428-018-1186-5 · Cited by 61 · cited 1× · see citing works
“This spreading activation model has been extensively tested in cognitive psychology and it represents one among many potentially suitable models for interpreting free association data and their psychological nature within human beings [62,63].”
BackgroundBrigard, F. D., Umanath, S., & Irish, M. (2022) · Memory & Cognition · doi:10.3758/s13421-022-01299-x · Cited by 50 · cited 2× · see citing works
“In humans, recent psychological studies have highlighted an interplay between retrieval processes in the categorical organization of episodic memory and the activation of related concepts in semantic memory [16,65,66].”
BackgroundConvergent thinking and insight problem solving relate to semantic memory network structure
Luchini, S. A., Kenett, Y. N., Zeitlen, D. C., Christensen, A. P., Ellis, D. M., Brewer, G. A., & Beaty, R. E. (2023) · Thinking Skills and Creativity · doi:10.1016/j.tsc.2023.101277 · Cited by 38 · cited 2× · see citing works
“…and theory-driven link between continued free association tasks—deriving free associations between concepts—and models based on such data whose network structure could explain aspects of conceptual recall from semantic memory [40,44] or even higher-level phenomena such as problem solving [43].”
BackgroundNecka, E. A., Sokolowski, H. M., & Lyons, I. M. (2015) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01543 · Cited by 34 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Recent psychological investigations of math anxiety among humans found reduced levels of math anxiety in students with stronger self–math overlap [58], i.e., a psychological construct expressing the extent to which an individual integrates math into their sense of self.”
BackgroundStella, M., & Zaytseva, A. (2019) · PeerJ Computer Science · doi:10.7717/peerj-cs.255 · Cited by 32 · cited 5×
“This finding is analogous to high-school students holding negative perceptions of math and physics while holding positive attitudes towards science [27,41,42].”
BackgroundMethodResultInfluentialSelf-citationStella, M. (2022) · Journal of Complex Networks · doi:10.1093/comnet/cnac012 · Cited by 32 · cited 4× · see citing works
“Such differences could be interpreted in terms of episodic memories attributing different emotional connotations to the outputs of the recall processes activated by the continued free association task in BFMNs (see also [25]).”
BackgroundInfluentialSelf-citationIntersectional Bias in Causal Language ModelsPreprint
Magee, L., Ghahremanlou, L., Soldatić, K., & Robertson, S. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2107.07691 · Cited by 30 · cited 1× · see citing works
“While some biases are easier to spot, others are more nuanced [38] and hidden deeply in the architecture of LLMs but also in their training corpus, e.g., training an LLM on students’ texts complaining about math might produced a biased model unless additional filtering techniques were implemented…”
BackgroundFeature-rich multiplex lexical networks reveal mental strategies of early language learning
Citraro, S., Vitevitch, M. S., Stella, M., & Rossetti, G. (2022) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-022-27029-6 · Cited by 26 · cited 1×
“Using the valence labels for the key concepts and associated responses, we enriched the BFMNs, representing them as feature-rich cognitive networks [45] in which information about the sentiment of associative responses could be used to describe the properties of the cue word [27].”
MethodSelf-citationWhy we need biased AI: How including cognitive biases can enhance AI systems
Hagendorff, T., & Fabi, S. (2024) · Journal of Experimental & Theoretical Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1080/0952813x.2023.2178517 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
Stella, M. (2020) · Education Sciences · doi:10.3390/educsci10010017 · Cited by 19 · cited 8× · see citing works
“Past works using behavioral forma mentis networks have shown that students and STEM experts attribute rather different affective connotations to the same concepts, particularly physics and mathematics [27,42].”
BackgroundMethodResultInfluentialSelf-citationMapping computational thinking mindsets between educational levels with cognitive network science
Stella, M., Kapuza, A., Cramer, C., & Uzzo, S. (2020) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2007.09402 · Cited by 16 · cited 3×
“This is particularly impactful for fighting the spread of distorted mindsets in education [26].”
BackgroundMethodSelf-citationAnoop, K. R., Gangan, M. P., Deepak, P., & Lajish, V. L. (2022) · Lecture notes in electrical engineering · doi:10.1007/978-981-19-4453-6_2 · Cited by 15 · cited 2× · see citing works
“These models are complex enough to capture and mirror such human biases and negative attitudes in ways we do not yet fully understand [15].”
BackgroundA Mirror to Human Question Asking: Analyzing the Akinator Online Question Game
Sasson-Lazovsky, G., & Kenett, Y. N. (2023) · Big Data and Cognitive Computing · doi:10.3390/bdcc7010026 · Cited by 14 · cited 3× · see citing works
“This includes understanding our own human biases as well, since LLMs act as “psycho-social mirrors” [14] that reflect human features of personality as well as societal views and tendencies.”
BackgroundDemetriou, A., Spanoudis, G., Makris, N., Golino, H., & Kazi, S. (2021) · Cognitive development · doi:10.1016/j.cogdev.2021.101124 · Cited by 14 · cited 2× · see citing works
“…yet know whether LLMs are able to approximate human semantic memory or any of its mechanisms [8], mainly because LLMs are trained on massive amounts of textual data [1] in ways that differ greatly from the usual ways in which humans acquire language [64] and its emotional/cognitive components [60].”
BackgroundText characterization based on recurrence networks
Souza, B. C. E., Silva, F. N., de Arruda, H. F., da Silva, G. D., Costa, L. D. F., & Amancio, D. (2022) · Information Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.ins.2023.119124 · Cited by 10 · cited 2×
“All three belong to the family of generative pre-trained transformer (GPT) models [1] that are trained on massive amounts of textual data to learn patterns and relationships in text [2,3].”
BackgroundOpenAI, Achiam, J., Adler, S., Agarwal, S., Ahmad, L., Akkaya, I., Aleman, F. L., Almeida, D., Altenschmidt, J., Altman, S., et al. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2303.08774 · cited 6×
“…yet know whether LLMs are able to approximate human semantic memory or any of its mechanisms [8], mainly because LLMs are trained on massive amounts of textual data [1] in ways that differ greatly from the usual ways in which humans acquire language [64] and its emotional/cognitive components [60].”
BackgroundInfluential
Flagged first, then by citations
2 of the 68 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Walter, Y. (2024) · International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education · doi:10.1186/s41239-024-00448-3 · Cited by 1,113 · see citing works
“5 and GPT-4 mirroring math anxiety in students (Abramski et al., 2023).”
(2024) · doi:10.1109/access.2024.3365742 · Cited by 934 · see citing works
“The influence of GPT-2 has had a significant impact on successor models like GPT-3 and GPT-4, leading to additional advancements in the field of language processing and creation [42].”
BackgroundA systematic review of <scp>ChatGPT</scp> use in K‐12 education
Zhang, P., & Tur, G. (2024) · European Journal of Education · doi:10.1111/ejed.12599 · Cited by 280 · see citing works
Lee, H.-Y., Chen, P.-H., Wang, W.-S., Huang, Y.-M., & Wu, T.-T. (2024) · International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education · doi:10.1186/s41239-024-00447-4 · Cited by 273 · see citing works
“5 introduced directive learning and Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF) to further optimize model performance (Abramski et al., 2023; Wu et al., 2023a).”
BackgroundEthical and regulatory challenges of Generative AI in education: a systematic review
García-López, I. M., & Trujillo-Liñán, L. (2025) · Frontiers in Education · doi:10.3389/feduc.2025.1565938 · Cited by 144 · see citing works
Integrating generative AI in knowledge building
Chen, B., Zhu, X., & Díaz del Castillo H., F. (2023) · Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.caeai.2023.100184 · Cited by 159 · see citing works
Du, L., & Lv, B. (2024) · Education and Information Technologies · doi:10.1007/s10639-024-12835-4 · Cited by 141 · see citing works
“This aligns with earlier research by Abramski et al. (2023), where some students critically evaluate and understand GAI through their learning experience.”
Mallek, F., Mazhar, T., Shah, S. F. A., Ghadi, Y. Y., & Hamam, H. (2024) · PeerJ Computer Science · doi:10.7717/peerj-cs.2000 · Cited by 105 · see citing works
Exploring the frontiers of LLMs in psychological applications: a comprehensive review
Ke, L., Tong, S., Cheng, P., & Peng, K. (2025) · Artificial Intelligence Review · doi:10.1007/s10462-025-11297-5 · Cited by 92 · see citing works
Y Social: an LLM-powered Social Media Digital Twin
Rossetti, G., Stella, M., Cazabet, R., Abramski, K., Cau, E., Citraro, S., Failla, A., Improta, R., Morini, V., & Pansanella, V. (2024) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2408.00818 · Cited by 60
Self-citationFatouros, G., Metaxas, K., Soldatos, J. K., & Kyriazis, D. (2024) · Neural Computing and Applications · doi:10.1007/s00521-024-10613-4 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
“While some biases inherent in their training data can persist, LLMs significantly reduce the influence of human biases, such as overconfidence or confirmation bias, on investment decisions Abramski et al. (2023); Atreides and Kel-ley (2023).”
MACM: Utilizing a Multi-Agent System for Condition Mining in Solving Complex Mathematical Problems
Lei, B., Zhang, Y., Zuo, S., Payani, A., & Ding, C.-W. (2024) · Neural Information Processing Systems · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2404.04735 · Cited by 58
The implications of generative artificial intelligence for mathematics education
Walkington, C. A. (2025) · School Science and Mathematics · doi:10.1111/ssm.18356 · Cited by 49 · see citing works
Using cognitive psychology to understand GPT-like models needs to extend beyond human biases
Stella, M., Hills, T. T., & Kenett, Y. N. (2023) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2312911120 · Cited by 27 · see citing works
“Unlike humans, LLMs also fail to question the premise or reason about things not explicitly asked, sometimes respond - ing to questions (“which option would you choose”) and state - ments (“choose an option”) in different ways (1, 3).”
BackgroundSelf-citationBrand transgressions: How, when, and why home country bias backfires
Davvetas, V., Ulqinaku, A., & Katsikeas, C. S. (2024) · Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science · doi:10.1007/s11747-024-01018-9 · Cited by 36 · see citing works
“Due to (1) the inherent biases of OpenAI in sentiment categorization/cal - culation (Abramski et al., 2023 ), (2) the noise and correla - tional nature of Twitter data, and (3) the analysis of tweets only from users who included brand handles in their tweets, the results of Study 1 prevent…”
Duro, E. S. D., Improta, R., & Stella, M. (2025) · Emerging Trends in Drugs Addictions and Health · doi:10.1016/j.etdah.2025.100170 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
Self-citationAI-Generated Text Detector for Arabic Language Using Encoder-Based Transformer Architecture
Alshammari, H., El-Sayed, A., & Elleithy, K. M. (2024) · Big Data and Cognitive Computing · doi:10.3390/bdcc8030032 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
ChatGPT’s impact on student learning outcomes: a meta-analysis of 35 experimental studies
Wu, X., Zhu, P., Zhang, J., Yin, M., & Wang, Y. (2026) · Humanities and Social Sciences Communications · doi:10.1057/s41599-026-07019-z · Cited by 37 · see citing works
“…2023; Pellas, 2023; Urban et al. 2024); teaching, learning, management, and assessment supported by ChatGPT (Murgia et al. 2023; Lee et al. 2024; Mogavi et al. 2023; Luo et al. 2024); and potential issues emerging from the use of ChatGPT (Abramski et al. 2023; Harrison et al. 2023; Othman, 2023).”
Semeraro, A., Vilella, S., Improta, R., Duro, E. S. D., Mohammad, S. M., Ruffo, G., & Stella, M. (2025) · Behavior Research Methods · doi:10.3758/s13428-024-02553-7 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
“…al., 2020; Moham-mad & Kiritchenko, 2015; Sulis et al., 2016; Hipson & Mohammad, 2021; Semeraro et al., 2021) and their impact over psychological constructs like depression (Fatima et al., 2021), anxiety (Abramski et al., 2023) and trauma (Abramski et al., 2024), linking emotions to psychometrics.”
InfluentialSelf-citationGessinger, I., Seaborn, K., Steeds, M., & Cowan, B. R. (2024) · International Journal of Human-Computer Studies · doi:10.1016/j.ijhcs.2024.103400 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
Fock, A., & Siller, H.-S. (2025) · International Journal of STEM Education · doi:10.1186/s40594-025-00589-5 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
“Another weakness of generative AI concerns the issue of bias, for example regarding gender in STEM job recommendations (Due et al., 2024) or the negative perception of mathematics and STEM (Abramski et al., 2023).”
The fluency-based semantic network of LLMs differs from humans
Wang, Y., Deng, Y., Wang, G., Li, T., Xiao, H., & Zhang, Y. (2024) · Computers in Human Behavior Artificial Humans · doi:10.1016/j.chbah.2024.100103 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
Frenkel, M., & Emara, H. (2024) · Computer Applications in Engineering Education · doi:10.1002/cae.22781 · Cited by 32 · see citing works
Middle school girls using generative AI to engage in mathematical problem-posing
Walkington, C. A., Pando, M., Lipsmeyer, L. L., Beauchamp, T., Sager, M. T., & Milton, S. (2025) · Mathematical Thinking and Learning · doi:10.1080/10986065.2025.2542724 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
“This is an important issue given research showing that relevant names can enhance students’ performance on mathematics story problems (K et al., 2023).”
Towards Transparent AI: A Survey on Explainable Large Language ModelsPreprint
Palikhe, A., Yu, Z., Wang, Z., & Zhang, W. (2025) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2506.21812
“However, its dependence on internals limits use with closed-source LLMs like GPT-4[27] or Claude[6], and its interpretability may fal-ter in high-compositionality tasks (e.g., multi-hop reasoning) or ambiguous language due to unstable masking responses.”
InfluentialGenerative artificial intelligence in K-12 education: A systematic review
Zhang, T., Lai, Y. C., & Yu, P. L. H. (2025) · Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning · doi:10.58459/rptel.2026.21034 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
“Participants in multiple studies have argued that the output of LLMs may be biased (Abramski et al., 2023; ElSayary, 2024; Han & Cai, 2023; Vartiainen & Tedre, 2023) because it is difficult for developers to exclude all biased content in the datasets used to train LLMs. Additionally, participants…”
Enhancing Imbalanced Sentiment Analysis: A GPT-3-Based Sentence-by-Sentence Generation Approach
Suhaeni, C., & Yong, H.-S. (2024) · Applied Sciences · doi:10.3390/app14020622 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Which educational approaches predict students’ generative AI confidence and responsibility?
Consoli, T., & Petko, D. (2025) · Computers and Education Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.caeai.2025.100431 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Ma, L., Zhao, X., Jiang, R., Chengke, W., Liao, L., Yang, Z., & Tan, J. (2025) · Buildings · doi:10.3390/buildings15234296 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Measuring and identifying factors of individuals' trust in Large Language ModelsPreprint
Duro, E. S. D., Veltri, G., Golino, H. F., & Stella, M. (2025) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2502.21028 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
“Conversely, excessive trust may lead to undue reliance on systems that can still produce errors or biased responses [5, 10–12].”
Self-citationThe “LLM World of Words” English free association norms generated by large language models
Abramski, K., Improta, R., Rossetti, G., & Stella, M. (2024) · Scientific Data · doi:10.1038/s41597-025-05156-9 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
“In this way, semantic memory is considered a complex system 2,9,15 , and it can be studied as such even in case of systems without an explicit semantic memory, like LLMs, that are nonetheless capable of processing language 36 .”
Self-citationSE Perspective on LLMs: Biases in Code Generation, Code Interpretability, and Code Security Risks
Krasniqi, R., Xu, D., & Vieira, M. P. A. (2025) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/3774324 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Guo, Q., Guo, Y., & Zhao, J. (2024) · Neural Computing and Applications · doi:10.1007/s00521-024-09728-5 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Cognitive Networks for Knowledge Modeling: A Gentle Introduction for Data‐ and Cognitive Scientists
Haim, E., & Stella, M. (2026) · Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science · doi:10.1002/wcs.70026 · Cited by 8
Self-citationAudit-style framework for evaluating bias in large language models
Baldwin, P. (2025) · Frontiers in Education · doi:10.3389/feduc.2025.1592037 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Hu, Y., Curdt‐Christiansen, X. L., & Wang, J. (2025) · Journal of English for Academic Purposes · doi:10.1016/j.jeap.2025.101586 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
A Multimodal Low Complexity Neural Network Approach for Emotion Recognition
Aguiñaga, A. R., Ramírez, M. R., Soto, M. D. C. S., & Quezada, Á. (2024) · Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies · doi:10.1155/2024/5581443 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Judge AI: A Case-Study of Large Language Models as Judges
Posner, E. A., & Saran, S. (2026) · Journal of law & empirical analysis. · doi:10.1177/2755323x261433614 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
“Thus, we set the temperature to 0.7, a commonly selected setting in scholarly work aimed at balancing coherence and creativity (see, e.g., Mukherjee et al., 2023; Abramski et al., 2023; Osmanovic-Thunstr¨om & Steingrimsson, 2023; see broadly Ramlochan, 2024).”
InfluentialCognitive networks identify AI biases on societal issues in Large Language Models
Duro, E. S. D., Franchino, E., Improta, R., Veltri, G., & Stella, M. (2025) · EPJ Data Science · doi:10.1140/epjds/s13688-025-00600-7 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Self-citationIdentifying Bias at Scale in Clinical Notes Using Large Language Models
Apakama, D. U., Nguyen, K.-A.-N., Hyppolite, D., Soffer, S., Mudrik, A., Ling, E. J., Moses, A., Temnycky, I., Glasser, A., Anderson, R., et al. (2025) · Mayo Clinic Proceedings Digital Health · doi:10.1016/j.mcpdig.2025.100296 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
“47 Furthermore, the subjective nature of bias definitions and the complexity of clinical communication mean that a model trained at 1 time point might not fully capture evolving language norms.”
Examining Chat GPT with nonwords and machine psycholinguistic techniques
Vitevitch, M. S. (2025) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0325612 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
“…subitization, or the direct perception of a small number of visual [70] or auditory [71] objects before explicit counting must occur, finite computational resources that are allocated via attention [72], as well as various biases that may negatively influence decision making processes [64,65,73].”
The impact of DeepSeek’s perceived interactivity on medical students’ self-directed learning ability
Ju, Y., Li, J., Zhang, X., Wu, M., Pang, X., Li, Z., Wang, J., Li, J., Zhang, Y., & Dai, X. (2026) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-025-33780-3 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
“It posits that the degree of alignment between the technology users employ and the characteristics of their tasks directly influences their evaluation of technological performance and willingness to use it 39,40 .”
Joung, E., & Kim, Y. R. (2025) · School Science and Mathematics · doi:10.1111/ssm.18393 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Dynamic Focal Loss for Imbalanced Learning
Ahmad, H. M., & Rahimi, A. (2025) · SN Computer Science · doi:10.1007/s42979-025-04198-5 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Nugumanova, A., Alzhanov, A., Mansurova, A., & Мансурова, М. (2025) · Electronics · doi:10.3390/electronics14112098 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Human languages trade off complexity against efficiency
Koplenig, A., Wolfer, S., Rüdiger, J. O., & Meyer, P. (2025) · PLOS complex systems. · doi:10.1371/journal.pcsy.0000032 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Heuristics and Biases in AI Decision-Making: Implications for Responsible AGI
Saeedi, P., Goodarzi, M., & Canbaz, M. A. (2025) · International Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Robotics and Control (AIRC) · doi:10.1109/airc64931.2025.11077505 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
“Including repetition in performance evaluations enhances robustness and reproducibility [19], yet most existing studies fail to quantify the inconsistency of responses generated across multiple iterations of a prompt [9], [12], [20], [21].”
LLM-Generated Word Association Norms
Abramski, K., Lavorati, C., Rossetti, G., & Stella, M. (2024) · HHAI · doi:10.3233/faia240177 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Self-citationYSocial: An artificial intelligence powered social media virtual twin
Rossetti, G., Stella, M., Cazabet, R., Abramski, K., Citraro, S., Cau, E., Failla, A., Morini, V., & Pansanella, V. (2026) · Big Data & Society · doi:10.1177/20539517261431576
Self-citationIdentifying and Characterizing Bias at Scale in Clinical Notes Using Large Language ModelsPreprint
Apakama, D. U., Nguyen, K.-A.-N., Hyppolite, D., Soffer, S., Mudrik, A., Ling, E. J., Moses, A., Temnycky, I., Glasser, A., Anderson, R., et al. (2024) · medRxiv · doi:10.1101/2024.10.24.24316073 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
“(30) (31) (32) (33) In the context of detecting clinical bias, the LLM might inadvertently reflect these biases, leading to inconsistent identification or introducing new biases through its suggestions.”
Exploring the potential of ChatGPT in enhancing atmospheric pressure plasma research techniques
Bai, R., Zhu, H., Li, J., Liu, D., & Lu, X. P. (2024) · Plasma Processes and Polymers · doi:10.1002/ppap.202400028 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Cheng, M., & Cheung, K. K. C. (2026) · Interactive Learning Environments · doi:10.1080/10494820.2025.2609793 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Guettala, M., Bourekkache, S., Kazar, O., & Harous, S. (2025) · Acta Informatica Pragensia · doi:10.18267/j.aip.269 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Neural Network Architecture of Embodied Intelligence
Nurutdinov, A. R. (2024) · Automatic Documentation and Mathematical Linguistics · doi:10.3103/s0005105525700311 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
“…and cultural groups, the dominance of certain languages and ideologies, and existing stereotypes and emotional associations in training data generate algorithmic biases leading to the inheritance and amplification of biases that are present in the data on which these models are trained [9].”
A Review of Cross-Platform Document File Reader Using Speech Synthesis
Chukwudi, O., Eze, V., & Chinyere, U. (2023) · International Journal of Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.36079/lamintang.ijai-01002.569 · Cited by 3
Ardebili, A. A., & Stella, M. (2026) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2604.27624 · Cited by 2
Self-citationKaplar, M., Kaplar, S., Vucic, M., Ivanović, L., Stevanović, A., Milenković, A., & Vučićević, N. (2026) · Informatics · doi:10.3390/informatics13040063 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
“At the same time, excessive reliance on AI support, as well as affective and attitudinal biases in LLMs toward mathematics, can reduce engagement in reasoning and weaken critical reflection [45–47].”
Citraro, S., Haim, E., Carini, A., Siew, C. S. Q., Rossetti, G., & Stella, M. (2026) · Computers in Human Behavior Reports · doi:10.1016/j.chbr.2026.100940 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Self-citationA word association network methodology for evaluating implicit biases in LLMs compared to humans
Abramski, K., Rossetti, G., & Stella, M. (2025) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2510.24488 · Cited by 2
Self-citationWord Synchronization Challenge: A Benchmark for Word Association Responses for Large Language Models
Cazalets, T., & Dambre, J. (2025) · Interacción · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-93864-1_1 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Adelhardt, Z., & Eberle, T. (2024) · International Conference on AI Research · doi:10.34190/icair.4.1.3205 · Cited by 2
Duro, E. S. D., Taietta, E., Improta, R., & Stella, M. (2024) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2411.10473 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
“…dimensions: (i) LLMs are text-generating agents [4] and could be easily asked why they produced a given numerical response, going beyond psychometric scores; (ii) LLMs are psycho-social mirrors [7] and could reflect potential biases present in specific fields like mental health in academia.”
InfluentialSelf-citationMediating the post-human: cultural implications of generative AI in everyday communication
Fan, R., & Li, Y. Y. (2026) · Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory · doi:10.1007/s10588-025-09415-3 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
“The novelty of the field of machine learning (ML) has made tasks increasingly accurate in terms of task performance and more interpretable in terms of models (Abramski et al. 2023 ).”
Large Language Models as Financial Analysts: Sector-Aware Reasoning for Investment Decisions
Kim, H., Jeong, J., Ko, H., & Lee, W. (2026) · Computational Economics · doi:10.1007/s10614-026-11329-4 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Sai, B., Krishna, R., Reddy, C. L., & Kumari, C. (2025) · International Congress on Information and Communication Technology · doi:10.1109/icict64420.2025.11004777 · Cited by 1
“With an NLP layer built-in, it can comfortably handle greetings, goodbyes, and off-topic questions [9].”
Haim, E., Bergh, L. V. D., Siew, C. S. Q., Kenett, Y. N., Marinazzo, D., & Stella, M. (2025) · J. Complex Networks · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2502.19529 · Cited by 1
“5, in replicating human emotional and cognitive patterns have not been thoroughly explored (Abramski et al., 2023).”
InfluentialSelf-citationLexical organization in humans and large language models: Evidence from L1, L2 and LLM networks
Laserna, M. S.-S. (2026) · Language and Cognition · doi:10.1017/langcog.2026.10119
“Although this choice was theoretically motivated and allows the present findings to be situated in direct relation to existing comparative work (Abramski et al., 2023; Suresh et al., 2023; Wang et al., 2025; Xiao et al., 2025), it limits the ability to determine whether the observed structural…”
Khan, A., Hussain, S., & Khan, F. N. (2026) · Quality & Quantity · doi:10.1007/s11135-026-03030-3
Xervaser, C. R., & Teh, D. T. B. E. (2026) · Malaysian Journal of ELT Research · doi:10.52696/avwe7447
“5 improving alignment with human responses through reinforced learning with human feedback (Abramski et al., 2023).”
Esposito, N., Tricarico, A., Porzio, L., Ardebili, A. A., & Stella, M. (2026) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2604.27618
“MEDS is designed as a reusable resource for research at the intersection of cognitive science 38,40 , educational data science 3,4 , explainable AI 26 , and digital shadowing 27,32 .”
InfluentialSelf-citationLimitations in cultural context: systematic biases of LLMs in Chinese sentiment analysis
Geng, R., Zhang, J., Yang, R., Quan, M., Zheng, X., & Xu, Y. (2026) · Information Research · doi:10.47989/ir31iconf64278
“Some experiments have found that GPT models tend to deviate from a neutral stance when describing mathematical concepts, tending to associate them with negative perception s (Abramski et al., 2023) .”
A 5-Step Framework for Applying and Optimizing Large Language Models in Commercial Systems
Gogineni, S., Yuvaraju, C., Suryanarayana, G., Returi, K. D., Mohan, V. M., & Rao, M. N. (2026) · IEEE International Conference on Emerging Computing and Intelligent Technologies (ICoECIT) · doi:10.1109/icoecit68303.2026.11498008 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Teachers' Thoughts about Using AI Technologies in Classroom Lessons
Falk-Ross, F., & McDermott, P. (2025) · Excelsior Leadership in Teaching and Learning · doi:10.14305/jn.19440413.2025.18.1.03
What is the Current Status of Using GenAI in K-12 Education?
Li, J., Junhao, S., Fuminqiang, G., & Ou, X.-L. (2025) · 2025 International Conference on Distance Education and Learning (ICDEL) · doi:10.1109/icdel65868.2025.11193539
“Second, the use of the product has the potential to transform traditional teaching methods, leading to interactive and personalized learning experiences, especially in elementary and secondary STEM courses [4].”
German Students’ Views on Using Generative AI for Homework: A Three-Layered Ethical Reasoning Model
Adelhardt, Z., & Eberle, T. (2026) · International Journal of Information and Education Technology · doi:10.18178/ijiet.2026.16.5.2601
“In addition, risks related to content accuracy and reliability have also been widely discussed: GenAI tools can generate hallucinated or misleading content [33], reinforce existing societal biases [34, 35], and reproduce problematic stereotypes [36].”
PhDGPT: Measuring bias in academic mental health across quantised and uncensored LLMs
Duro, E. S. D., Taietta, E., D'Alfonso, S., Bentenuto, A., Rossetti, G., & Stella, M. (n.d.) · Information Processing & Management · doi:10.1016/j.ipm.2026.105173
Self-citation
- Authors
- Abramski, K., Citraro, S., Lombardi, L., Rossetti, G., & Stella, M.
- Affiliations
- University of Pisa (IT)
- Istituto di Scienza e Tecnologie dell'Informazione "Alessandro Faedo" (IT)
- University of Trento (IT)
- Corresponding author
- Stella, Massimo
- Venue
- Big Data and Cognitive Computing
- Publisher
- MDPI AG
- Published
- 2023-06-27
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 124
- ISSN
- 2504-2289 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4382583857
- Cited by
- 81
- References
- 68
- Citations by year
- 2026: 20 · 2025: 29 · 2024: 26 · 2023: 6
- FWCI
- 20.27
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Big Data and Cognitive Computing (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Institutional Research Information System (Università degli Studi di Trento) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- CINECA IRIS Institutial research information system (University of Pisa) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- ISTI Open Portal (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Safety Research › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Science Education and Perceptions
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Sentiment Analysis and Opinion Mining
- Keywords
- large language models, algorithmic bias, mathematics anxiety, GPT-3, GPT-3.5, GPT-4, high school students, affective bias, semantic bias, language model architecture
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review