The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Methods for Separation and Characterization of Extracellular Vesicles: Results of a Worldwide Survey Performed by the ISEV Rigor and Standardization Subcommittee
Open accessAbstract
Research on extracellular vesicles (EVs) is growing exponentially due to an increasing appreciation of EVs as disease biomarkers and therapeutics, an expanding number of EV-containing materials under study, and application of new preparation, detection, and cargo analysis methods. Diversity of both sources and methodologies imposes challenges on the comparison of measurement results between studies and laboratories. While reference guidelines and minimal requirements for EV research have achieved the important objective of assembling community consensus, it is also essential to understand which methodologies and quality controls are currently being applied, and how usage trends are evolving. As an initial response to this need, the International Society for Extracellular Vesicles (ISEV) performed a worldwide survey in 2015 on “Techniques used for the isolation and characterization of extracellular vesicles” and published the results from this survey in 2016. In 2019, a new survey was performed to assess the changing state of the field. The questionnaire received more than 600 full or partial responses, and the present manuscript summarizes the results of this second worldwide survey. The results emphasize that separation methods such as ultracentrifugation and density gradients are still the most commonly used methods, the use of size exclusion chromatography has increased, and techniques based on tangential flow and microfluidics are now being used by more than 10% of respondents. The survey also reveals that most EV researchers still do not perform sample quality controls before or after isolation of EVs. Finally, the majority of EV researchers emphasize that separation and characterization of EVs should receive more attention.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Kowal, J., Arras, G., Colombo, M., Jouve, M., Morath, J. P., Primdal-Bengtson, B., Dingli, F., Loew, D., Tkach, M., & Théry, C. (2016) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1521230113 · Cited by 3,426
Self-citationReassessment of exosome composition
Jeppesen, D. K., Fenix, A. M., Franklin, J. L., Higginbotham, J. N., Zhang, Q., Zimmerman, L. J., Liebler, D. C., Ping, J., Liu, Q., Evans, R., et al. (2019) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2019.02.029 · Cited by 2,975
Webber, J., & Clayton, A. (2013) · Journal of Extracellular Vesicles · doi:10.3402/jev.v2i0.19861 · Cited by 817
Cited by
Welsh, J. A., Goberdhan, D. C. I., O'Driscoll, L., Buzas, E. I., Blenkiron, C., Bussolati, B., Cai, H., Di Vizio, D., Driedonks, T. A. P., Erdbrügger, U., et al. (2024) · Journal of Extracellular Vesicles · doi:10.1002/jev2.12404 · Cited by 4,663
Self-citationChallenges and directions in studying cell–cell communication by extracellular vesicles
van Niel, G., Carter, D. R. F., Clayton, A., Lambert, D. W., Raposo, G., & Vader, P. (2022) · Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/s41580-022-00460-3 · Cited by 1,229
Exosomes as a new frontier of cancer liquid biopsy
Yu, D., Li, Y., Wang, M., Gu, J., Xu, W., Cai, H., Fang, X., & Zhang, X. (2022) · Molecular Cancer · doi:10.1186/s12943-022-01509-9 · Cited by 855
The Machinery of Exosomes: Biogenesis, Release, and Uptake
Krylova, S. V., & Feng, D. (2023) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms24021337 · Cited by 678
Modern isolation and separation techniques for extracellular vesicles
Liangsupree, T., Multia, E., & Riekkola, M.-L. (2021) · Journal of Chromatography A · doi:10.1016/j.chroma.2020.461773 · Cited by 512
Metadata
- Authors
- Royo, F., Théry, C., Falcón-Pérez, J. M., Nieuwland, R., & Witwer, K. W.
- Venue
- Cells
- Publisher
- MDPI AG
- Published
- 2020-08-25
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 1955
- ISSN
- 2073-4409 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3081011277
- Cited by
- 385
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 14.31
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Methods for Separation and Characterization of Extracellular Vesicles: Results of a Worldwide Survey Performed by the ISEV Rigor and Standardization Subcommittee. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3390/cells9091955
- The paper
- Royo, F., Théry, C., Falcón-Pérez, J. M., Nieuwland, R., & Witwer, K. W. (2020). Methods for Separation and Characterization of Extracellular Vesicles: Results of a Worldwide Survey Performed by the ISEV Rigor and Standardization Subcommittee. Cells. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells9091955
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.