Cited by 57Machine Learning in Materials ScienceAdvancements in Battery MaterialsAdvanced Battery Technologies Research

Data-Driven Studies of Li-Ion-Battery Materials

Open access
Kauwe, Steven K., Rhone, Trevor David, Sparks, Taylor D.·2019·Crystals

Abstract

Batteries are a critical component of modern society. The growing demand for new battery materials—coupled with a historically long materials development time—highlights the need for advances in battery materials development. Understanding battery systems has been frustratingly slow for the materials science community. In particular, the discovery of more abundant battery materials has been difficult. In this paper, we describe how machine learning tools can be exploited to predict the properties of battery materials. In particular, we report the challenges associated with a data-driven investigation of battery systems. Using a dataset of cathode materials and various statistical models, we predicted the specific discharge capacity at 25 cycles. We discuss the present limitations of this approach and propose a paradigm shift in the materials research process that would better allow data-driven approaches to excel in aiding the discovery of battery materials.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/cryst9010054

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Work in battery ML has focused on predicting battery state, degradation, and remaining lifetime using supervised learning, fuzzy logic, and clustering.

    “Work in this area has focused on predicting battery state, degradation, and remaining lifetime using supervised learning techniques, fuzzy logic, and clustering [42,104,218,358,414,725,735,819,854].”

    From Tackling climate change with machine learning (2023) · cites this paper as [414]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Rhone, T.D.; Chen, W.; Desai, S.; Yacoby, A.; Kaxiras, E. Data-Driven Studies of Magnetic Two-Dimensional Materials. arXiv 2018, arXiv:1806.07989. · arXiv

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kauwe, S. K., Rhone, T. D., & Sparks, T. D.
Affiliations
  • University of Utah (US)
  • Harvard University (US)
Corresponding author
Sparks, Taylor D.
Venue
Crystals
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2019-01-18
Volume
9
Issue
1
Pages
54
ISSN
2073-4352 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2909102051
Cited by
57
References
39
Citations by year
2025: 4 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 2
FWCI
3.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Crystals (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
National Science Foundation (1651668)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Machine Learning in Materials Science
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Advancements in Battery Materials
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Advanced Battery Technologies Research
Keywords
lithium-ion batteries, machine learning property prediction, cathode materials, discharge specific capacity, statistical models

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review