Cited by 182Machine Learning in Materials ScienceBiomedical Text Mining and OntologiesComputational and Text Analysis Methods

Opportunities and challenges of text mining in materials research

Open access
Kononova, Olga, He, Tanjin, Huo, Haoyan, Trewartha, Amalie, Olivetti, Elsa A., Ceder, Gerbrand·2021·iScience

Abstract

Research publications are the major repository of scientific knowledge. However, their unstructured and highly heterogenous format creates a significant obstacle to large-scale analysis of the information contained within. Recent progress in natural language processing (NLP) has provided a variety of tools for high-quality information extraction from unstructured text. These tools are primarily trained on non-technical text and struggle to produce accurate results when applied to scientific text, involving specific technical terminology. During the last years, significant efforts in information retrieval have been made for biomedical and biochemical publications. For materials science, text mining (TM) methodology is still at the dawn of its development. In this review, we survey the recent progress in creating and applying TM and NLP approaches to materials science field. This review is directed at the broad class of researchers aiming to learn the fundamentals of TM as applied to the materials science publications.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.isci.2021.102155

Cites

149 of 149 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In experimental data sets extracted from the literature, there can be positive bias for reporting only successful experiments, leading to challenges in classification tasks.

    “For example, in experimental data sets extracted from the literature (14,15,19), there can be positive bias for reporting only successful experiments (16, 107, 108), leading to challenges in classification tasks (17).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Bahdanau D. Cho K. Bengio Y. Neural machine translation by jointly learning to align and translate arXiv 2016 1409.0473
  2. Mikolov T. Sutskever I. Chen K. Corrado G.S. Dean J. Distributed representations of words and phrases and their compositionality arXiv 2013 1310.4546

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kononova, O., He, T., Huo, H., Trewartha, A., Olivetti, E. A., & Ceder, G.
Affiliations
  • Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (US)
  • Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US)
Corresponding author
Ceder, Gerbrand
Venue
iScience
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-03
Volume
24
Issue
3
Pages
102155
ISSN
2589-0042 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3127365350
Cited by
182
References
149
Citations by year
2026: 34 · 2025: 30 · 2024: 40 · 2023: 37 · 2022: 31 · 2021: 10
FWCI
1.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • iScience (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • DSpace@MIT (Massachusetts Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
  • OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (1922090, 1922311, 1922372)
  • Division of Materials Sciences and Engineering (DE-AC02-05-CH11231, KCD2S2)
  • Office of Naval Research (00014-16-1-2432)
  • Energy Biosciences Institute
  • U.S. Department of Energy
  • US Department of Energy Office of Science
  • Basic Energy Sciences
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Machine Learning in Materials Science
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Biomedical Text Mining and Ontologies
  • Social Sciences › General Social Sciences › Computational and Text Analysis Methods
Keywords
text mining, natural language processing, information extraction, scientific texts, information retrieval, terminology, unstructured text, scientific publications

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review