Cited by 0Diabetes Management and ResearchDiabetes Management and EducationDiabetes and associated disorders

Effect of Menstrual Cycle on Glycemic Outcomes and Insulin Requirements in Women with Type 1 Diabetes Who Are Users of Advanced Hybrid Closed-Loop Systems

Open access
Rosado-Fernández, Marta, Climent, Elisenda, Fernández-Miró, Mercè, Garrido, Anna, Gaja, Rosa, Amador, Verónica, Natera, Gracia, González, Andrea +3 more·2025·Diabetology

Abstract

Purpose: It has been previously described that some women with type 1 diabetes (T1D) may experience changes in glucose levels in relation to their menstrual cycle. However, whether an advanced hybrid closed-loop system (AHCL) can mitigate these cycle-dependent changes is yet to be determined. Methods: This study is a prospective analysis of a cohort of premenopausal women with T1D with spontaneous menstrual cycles who are users of an AHCL system 780G Medtronic®. Three consecutive cycles were analyzed for each patient, and each cycle was divided into three phases (menstrual, luteal, and rest of cycle phase). Results: Fifteen subjects were included. Mean age was 38 ± 7.6 years, HbA1c was 7.12 ± 0.7%, and diabetes duration was 21 ± 13.7 years. Mean glucose was higher in the luteal phase compared to the menstrual period (p = 0.029 luteal vs. menstrual) and the rest of the cycle (p = 0.018 luteal vs. rest of cycle). The time in range (TIR) was lower in the luteal phase compared to the rest of cycle phase (p = 0.015 luteal vs. rest of cycle). The time below range (TBR) was significantly higher in the menstrual compared to the luteal phase (p = 0.007 luteal vs. menstrual). Daily insulin requirements were higher in luteal phase compared to rest of cycle (p = 0.017 luteal vs. rest of cycle). Conclusions: A higher mean glucose and lower TIR, despite a higher total insulin dose, was observed in the luteal phase. A higher TBR was observed in the menstrual phase. However, AHCL with 780G Medtronic® achieves a TIR of almost 70% in all cycle phases.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/diabetology6110139

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Rosado-Fernández, M., Climent, E., Fernández-Miró, M., Garrido, A., Gaja, R., Amador, V., Natera, G., González, A., Llauradó, G., Chillarón, J. J., & Flores-Le Roux, J. A.
Affiliations
  • Universitat Pompeu Fabra (ES)
  • Hospital Del Mar (ES)
  • Medicine Department (MELIS), Universitat Pompeu Fabra, 08003 Barcelona, Spain
Corresponding author
Chillarón, Juan José
Venue
Diabetology
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2025-11-04
Volume
6
Issue
11
Pages
139
ISSN
2673-4540 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4415908577
Cited by
0
References
5
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Diabetology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Education
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Diabetes and associated disorders
Keywords
type 1 diabetes, menstrual cycle, luteal phase, glycemic variability, time in range, time below range, insulin requirement, hybrid closed-loop system, continuous glucose monitoring, insulin pump therapy, women with diabetes

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review