Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 31

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV)/Unmanned Ground Vehicle (UGV) Dynamic Autonomous Docking Scheme in GPS-Denied Environments

Cheng, Cheng, Li, Xiuxian, Xie, Lihua, Li, Li·2023·Drones
DOI 10.3390/drones7100613
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

This study designs a navigation and landing scheme for an unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) to autonomously land on an arbitrarily moving unmanned ground vehicle (UGV) in GPS-denied environments based on vision, ultra-wideband (UWB) and system information. In the approaching phase, an effective multi-innovation forgetting gradient (MIFG) algorithm is proposed to estimate the position of the UAV relative to the target using historical data (estimated distance and relative displacement measurements). Using these estimates, a saturated proportional navigation controller is developed, by which the UAV can approach the target, making the UGV enter the field of view (FOV) of the camera deployed in the UAV. Then, a sensor fusion estimation algorithm based on an extended Kalman filter (EKF) is proposed to achieve accurate landing. Finally, a numerical example and a real experiment are used to support the theoretical results.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/drones7100613

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 42

  1. Huzaefa, 2021, Force distribution and estimation for cooperative transportation control on multiple unmanned ground vehicles, IEEE Trans. Cybern., 53, 1335, 10.1109/TCYB.2021.3131483 · doi:10.1109/tcyb.2021.3131483
  2. Chae, 2021, Façade cleaning robot with manipulating and sensing devices equipped on a gondola, IEEE/ASME Trans. Mechatron., 26, 1719, 10.1109/TMECH.2021.3077634 · DOI
  3. Chernik, C., Tajvar, P., and Tumova, J. (October, January 27). Robust Feedback Motion Primitives for Exploration of Unknown Terrains. Proceedings of the IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), Prague, Czech Republic.
  4. Pradhan, 2020, Security, privacy, and dependability evaluation in verification and validation life cycles for military IoT systems, IEEE Commun. Mag., 58, 14, 10.1109/MCOM.001.2000342 · doi:10.1109/mcom.001.2000342
  5. Li, 2023, Autonomous air combat decision-making of UAV based on parallel self-play reinforcement learning, CAAI Trans. Intell. Technol., 8, 64, 10.1049/cit2.12109 · DOI
  6. Shao, 2021, Real-time and accurate UAV pedestrian detection for social distancing monitoring in COVID-19 pandemic, IEEE Trans. Multimed., 24, 2069, 10.1109/TMM.2021.3075566 · DOI
  7. Couturier, 2021, A review on absolute visual localization for UAV, Robot. Auton. Syst., 135, 103666, 10.1016/j.robot.2020.103666 · DOI · Paper page
  8. Gyagenda, 2022, A review of GNSS-independent UAV navigation techniques, Robot. Auton. Syst., 152, 104069, 10.1016/j.robot.2022.104069 · DOI · Paper page
  9. Guo, 2019, Covert spoofing algorithm of UAV based on GPS/INS-integrated navigation, IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol., 68, 6557, 10.1109/TVT.2019.2914477 · doi:10.1109/tvt.2019.2914477
  10. Queralta, J.P., Almansa, C.M., Schiano, F., Floreano, D., and Westerlund, T. (January, January 24). UWB-based system for UAV localization in GNSS-denied environments: Characterization and dataset. Proceedings of the IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), Las Vegas, NV, USA.
  11. Yang, X., Lin, D., Zhang, F., Song, T., and Jiang, T. (2019, January 11–13). High accuracy active stand-off target geolocation using UAV platform. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Signal, Information and Data Processing (ICSIDP), Chongqing, China. · doi:10.1109/icsidp47821.2019.9172919
  12. Kallwies, J., Forkel, B., and Wuensche, H.J. (August, January 31). Determining and improving the localization accuracy of AprilTag detection. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), Paris, France.
  13. Fang, 2022, Target-driven visual navigation in indoor scenes using reinforcement learning and imitation learning, CAAI Trans. Intell. Technol., 7, 167, 10.1049/cit2.12043 · DOI
  14. Vandendaele, B., Fournier, R.A., Vepakomma, U., Pelletier, G., Lejeune, P., and Martin-Ducup, O. (2021). Estimation of northern hardwood forest inventory attributes using UAV laser scanning (ULS): Transferability of laser scanning methods and comparison of automated approaches at the tree-and stand-level. Remote Sens., 13. · doi:10.3390/rs13142796
  15. Stuckey, H., Al-Radaideh, A., Escamilla, L., Sun, L., Carrillo, L.G., and Tang, W. (October, January 27). An Optical Spatial Localization System for Tracking Unmanned Aerial Vehicles Using a Single Dynamic Vision Sensor. Proceedings of the IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), Prague, Czech Republic.
  16. Wang, J., and Olson, E. (2016, January 9–14). AprilTag 2: Efficient and robust fiducial detection. Proceedings of the IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), Daejeon, Republic of Korea. · DOI · Paper page
  17. Chen, 2020, Heuristic Monte Carlo Algorithm for Unmanned Ground Vehicles Realtime Localization and Mapping, IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol., 69, 10642, 10.1109/TVT.2020.3019581 · DOI
  18. Jiang, 2021, Localization of Multiple RF Sources Based on Bayesian Compressive Sensing Using a Limited Number of UAVs With Airborne RSS Sensor, IEEE Sens. J., 21, 7067, 10.1109/JSEN.2020.3040280 · DOI
  19. Chen, 2021, An adaptive clustering-based algorithm for automatic path planning of heterogeneous UAVs, IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst., 23, 16842, 10.1109/TITS.2021.3131473 · doi:10.1109/tits.2021.3131473
  20. Uluskan, 2020, Noncausal trajectory optimization for real-time range-only target localization by multiple UAVs, Aerosp. Sci. Technol., 99, 105558, 10.1016/j.ast.2019.105558 · doi:10.1016/j.ast.2019.105558
  21. Miki, T., Khrapchenkov, P., and Hori, K. (2019, January 20–24). UAV/UGV autonomous cooperation: UAV assists UGV to climb a cliff by attaching a tether. Proceedings of the 2019 International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), Montreal, QC, Canada. · DOI
  22. Cantieri, A., Ferraz, M., Szekir, G., Antônio Teixeira, M., Lima, J., Schneider Oliveira, A., and Aurélio Wehrmeister, M. (2020). Cooperative UAV–UGV autonomous power pylon inspection: An investigation of cooperative outdoor vehicle positioning architecture. Sensors, 20. · DOI
  23. Zhang, 2019, Intelligent Collaborative Localization Among Air-Ground Robots for Industrial Environment Perception, IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron., 66, 9673, 10.1109/TIE.2018.2880727 · DOI
  24. Oluoch, 2021, A survey of safe landing zone detection techniques for autonomous unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs), Expert Syst. Appl., 179, 115091, 10.1016/j.eswa.2021.115091 · DOI
  25. Meng, 2019, A visual/inertial integrated landing guidance method for UAV landing on the ship, Aerosp. Sci. Technol., 85, 474, 10.1016/j.ast.2018.12.030 · DOI
  26. Xia, 2022, Landing a quadrotor UAV on a moving platform with sway motion using robust control, Control Eng. Pract., 128, 105288, 10.1016/j.conengprac.2022.105288 · doi:10.1016/j.conengprac.2022.105288
  27. Nguyen, T.M., Nguyen, T.H., Cao, M., Qiu, Z., and Xie, L. (2019, January 20–24). Integrated UWB-vision approach for autonomous docking of UAVs in GPS-denied environments. Proceedings of the International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), Montreal, QC, Canada. · doi:10.1109/icra.2019.8793851
  28. Nguyen, 2019, Single landmark distance-based navigation, IEEE Trans. Control Syst. Technol., 28, 2021, 10.1109/TCST.2019.2916089 · doi:10.1109/tcst.2019.2916089
  29. Cheng, 2022, Autonomous dynamic docking of UAV based on UWB-vision in GPS-denied environment, J. Frankl. Inst., 359, 2788, 10.1016/j.jfranklin.2022.03.005 · doi:10.1016/j.jfranklin.2022.03.005
  30. Spica, 2020, A real-time game theoretic planner for autonomous two-player drone racing, IEEE Trans. Robot., 36, 1389, 10.1109/TRO.2020.2994881 · DOI
  31. Li, J., Ran, M., Wang, H., and Xie, L. (2019, January 16–19). MPC-based Unified Trajectory Planning and Tracking Control Approach for Automated Guided Vehicles. Proceedings of the IEEE 15th International Conference on Control and Automation (ICCA), Edinburgh, UK. · doi:10.1109/icca.2019.8899955
  32. Ren, 2020, Optimal path planning and speed control integration strategy for UGVs in static and dynamic environments, IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol., 69, 10619, 10.1109/TVT.2020.3015582 · doi:10.1109/tvt.2020.3015582
  33. Cao, 2011, Formation control using range-only measurements, Automatica, 47, 776, 10.1016/j.automatica.2011.01.067 · doi:10.1016/j.automatica.2011.01.067
  34. Lisus, 2021, Heading Estimation Using Ultra-Wideband Received Signal Strength and Gaussian Processes, IEEE Robot. Autom. Lett., 6, 8387, 10.1109/LRA.2021.3102300 · doi:10.1109/lra.2021.3102300
  35. Maaref, 2021, Aerial Vehicle Protection Level Reduction by Fusing GNSS and Terrestrial Signals of Opportunity, IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst., 22, 5976, 10.1109/TITS.2021.3095184 · DOI
  36. Chen, 2022, Cooperative polynomial guidance law with collision avoidance and flight path angle coordination, Aerosp. Sci. Technol., 130, 107809, 10.1016/j.ast.2022.107809 · doi:10.1016/j.ast.2022.107809
  37. Jia, 2022, Agile Flight Control Under Multiple Disturbances for Quadrotor: Algorithms and Evaluation, IEEE Trans. Aerosp. Electron. Syst., 58, 3049, 10.1109/TAES.2022.3143781 · doi:10.1109/taes.2022.3143781
  38. Yu, 2023, Impact Time Consensus Cooperative Guidance Against the Maneuvering Target: Theory and Experiment, IEEE Trans. Aerosp. Electron. Syst., 59, 4590, 10.1109/TAES.2023.3243154 · DOI
  39. Jepsen, J.H., Terkildsen, K.H., Hasan, A., Jensen, K., and Schultz, U.P. (2021, January 15–18). UAVAT framework: UAV auto test framework for experimental validation of multirotor sUAS using a motion capture system. Proceedings of the International Conference on Unmanned Aircraft Systems (ICUAS), Athens, Greece. · doi:10.1109/icuas51884.2021.9476699
  40. Nguyen, T.M., Zaini, A.H., Wang, C., Guo, K., and Xie, L. (2018, January 21–25). Robust target-relative localization with ultra-wideband ranging and communication. Proceedings of the IEEE international conference on robotics and automation (ICRA), Brisbane, Australia. · doi:10.1109/icra.2018.8460844
  41. Simanek, 2015, Evaluation of the EKF-Based Estimation Architectures for Data Fusion in Mobile Robots, IEEE/ASME Trans. Mechatronics, 20, 985, 10.1109/TMECH.2014.2311416 · DOI
  42. Tang, 2020, Recognition and localization methods for vision-based fruit picking robots: A review, Front. Plant Sci., 11, 510, 10.3389/fpls.2020.00510 · DOI · Paper page

Metadata

Authors
Cheng, C., Li, X., Xie, L., & Li, L.
Venue
Drones
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2023-09-29
Volume
7
Issue
10
Pages
613
ISSN
2504-446X
DOI
10.3390/drones7100613
Cited by
31
References
1
Language
en
Licence
creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (vor)
Funders
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (62003243, 62088101, 22120210099, 19511132101, 2021SHZDZX0100, 22-3)
  • Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (62003243, 62088101, 22120210099, 19511132101, 2021SHZDZX0100, 22-3)
  • Shanghai Municipal Commission of Science and Technology (62003243, 62088101, 22120210099, 19511132101, 2021SHZDZX0100, 22-3)
  • Shanghai Municipal Science and Technology Major Project (62003243, 62088101, 22120210099, 19511132101, 2021SHZDZX0100, 22-3)
  • Shanghai Gaofeng & Gaoyuan Project for University Academic Program Development (62003243, 62088101, 22120210099, 19511132101, 2021SHZDZX0100, 22-3)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.