Cited by 323Privacy-Preserving Technologies in DataUAV Applications and OptimizationMobile Crowdsensing and Crowdsourcing

Learning in the Air: Secure Federated Learning for UAV-Assisted Crowdsensing

Wang, Yuntao, Su, Zhou, Zhang, Ning, Benslimane, Abderrahim·2021·IEEE Transactions on Network Science and Engineering

Abstract

Unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) combined with artificial intelligence (AI) have opened a revolutionized way for mobile crowdsensing (MCS). Conventional AI models, built on aggregation of UAVs' sensing data (typically contain private and sensitive user information), may arise severe privacy and data misuse concerns. Federated learning, as a promising distributed AI paradigm, has opened up possibilities for UAVs to collaboratively train a shared global model without revealing their local sensing data. However, there still exist potential security and privacy threats for UAV-assisted crowdsensing with federated learning due to vulnerability of central curator, unreliable contribution recording, and low-quality shared local models. In this paper, we propose SFAC, a secure federated learning framework for UAV-assisted MCS. Specifically, we first introduce a blockchain-based collaborative learning architecture for UAVs to securely exchange local model updates and verify contributions without the central curator. Then, by applying local differential privacy, we design a privacy-preserving algorithm to protect UAVs' privacy of updated local models with desirable learning accuracy. Furthermore, a two-tier reinforcement learning-based incentive mechanism is exploited to promote UAVs' high-quality model sharing when explicit knowledge of network parameters are not available in practice. Extensive simulations are conducted, and the results demonstrate that the proposed SFAC can effectively improve utilities for UAVs, promote high-quality model sharing, and ensure privacy protection in federated learning, compared with existing schemes.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tnse.2020.3014385

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In the UAV crowdsensing FLchain scheme of [65], blockchain is employed to build a decentralized learning network by interconnecting UAVs with data task publishers through an immutable ledger, which ensures that data training and model exchange among UAVs are monitored and traced for attack detection and data modification prevention.

    “Blockchain is employed to build a decentralized learning network by interconnecting UAVs with data task publishers through an immutable ledger, which ensures that data training and model exchange among UAVs are monitored and traced for attack detection and data modification prevention.”
  • An FLchain scheme is studied in [65] to construct a mobile crowdsensing system based on Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs).

    “For example, an FLchain scheme is studied in [65] to construct a mobile crowdsensing system based on Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), as indicated in Fig. 6.”
  • Evaluation results confirm a high utility of UAVs and low aggregation error while reducing convergence latency for the differential privacy and incentive mechanism approach in [65].

    “Evaluation results confirm a high utility of UAVs and low aggregation error while reducing convergence latency.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wang, Y., Su, Z., Zhang, N., & Benslimane, A.
Affiliations
  • Xi'an Jiaotong University (CN)
  • Shanghai University (CN)
  • University of Windsor (CA)
  • Université d'Avignon et des Pays de Vaucluse (FR)
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Network Science and Engineering
Published
2021-04-01
Volume
8
Issue
2
Pages
1055-1069
ISSN
  • 2327-4697 (ISSN-L)
  • 2334-329X
OpenAlex
W3048295601
Cited by
323
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 36 · 2025: 62 · 2024: 70 · 2023: 72 · 2022: 44 · 2021: 37 · 2020: 2
FWCI
15.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • IEEE Transactions on Network Science and Engineering (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (U1808207, 91746114)
  • Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality (18510761000)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › UAV Applications and Optimization
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Science Applications › Mobile Crowdsensing and Crowdsourcing
Keywords
secure federated learning, mobile crowdsensing, differential privacy, privacy preservation, incentive mechanisms, reinforcement learning

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review