Cited by 980Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive LearningArtificial Intelligence in EducationOnline Learning and Analytics

Adaptive Learning Using Artificial Intelligence in e-Learning: A Literature Review

Open access
Gligorea, Ilie, Cioca, Marius, Oancea, Romana, Gorski, Andra-Teodora, Gorski, Hortensia, Tudorache, Paul·2023·Education Sciences

Abstract

The rapid evolution of e-learning platforms, propelled by advancements in artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML), presents a transformative potential in education. This dynamic landscape necessitates an exploration of AI/ML integration in adaptive learning systems to enhance educational outcomes. This study aims to map the current utilization of AI/ML in e-learning for adaptive learning, elucidating the benefits and challenges of such integration and assessing its impact on student engagement, retention, and performance. A comprehensive literature review was conducted, focusing on articles published from 2010 onwards, to document the integration of AI/ML in e-learning. The review analyzed 63 articles, employing a systematic approach to evaluate the deployment of adaptive learning algorithms and their educational implications. Findings reveal that AI/ML algorithms are instrumental in personalizing learning experiences. These technologies have been shown to optimize learning paths, enhance engagement, and improve academic performance, with some studies reporting increased test scores. The integration of AI/ML in e-learning platforms significantly contributes to the personalization and effectiveness of the educational process. Despite challenges like data privacy and the complexity of AI/ML systems, the results underscore the potential of adaptive learning to revolutionize education by catering to individual learner needs.

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

This literature review maps AI/ML use in e-learning adaptive learning by analyzing 63 articles published from 2010 onward. It reports that AI/ML personalizes learning, optimizes paths, and may improve engagement, retention, and performance, while identifying challenges such as data privacy, cold-start problems, cost, and over-reliance on technology.

Key findings

  • The review analyzed 63 articles (from 698 initial records; 537 unique after duplicate removal; 161 full-text read; 98 excluded) and cataloged algorithms including K-means clustering, HVDM/NBC, reinforcement learning, cGANs, collaborative filtering, genetic algorithms, LGBM, and others.
  • Reported benefits include personalized learning experiences/pathways, dynamic recommendations, optimized learning paths/objects, rapid learner-model adaptation, enhanced recommendation systems, efficient learner clustering, and learning-style identification for academic prediction.
  • Reported challenges include cold-start problems, complexity of combining multiple ML techniques, data privacy/security, integration/compatibility with existing infrastructure, ongoing model training/updates, expense, and over-reliance on technology.
  • Impact on engagement, retention, and performance is described as potentially positive, with tailored content, real-time feedback, and optimal pathways; the abstract notes some studies reported increased test scores, but no specific effect sizes are given.

Methods

  • Systematic literature review; searched Web of Science and Scopus for articles published 2010 onwards; study conducted March–June 2023; search query combined adaptive/personalized learning, ML/AI/deep learning, and e-learning/online/distance learning terms.
  • Screening: 698 papers found; duplicates removed via Mendeley leaving 537 unique; abstracts reviewed; 161 full texts read; 98 excluded; final sample 63 articles. Rayyan was used for collaborative blinded screening; disagreements were resolved by consensus.
  • Inclusion criteria: document type article, proceedings paper, or review article; publication years 2010–May 2023; exclusions included duplicates, no public full text, non-English, out of focus, not higher education, no algorithm/method description, and articles categorized only as literature/systematic reviews.

Limitations

  • Stated: keyword selection may not be exhaustive; relevant educational tools may not be documented in reference databases (e.g., analytical summaries, conferences, hackathons); English-only query omits resources published solely in other languages.
  • Evident: only Web of Science and Scopus were searched, and the search focused on titles, abstracts, and keywords, which may narrow coverage.
  • Evident: final sample excluded literature reviews/systematic reviews and articles without algorithm/method descriptions, and the review reports no quantitative effect sizes or meta-analysis for engagement, retention, or performance outcomes.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/educsci13121216

Cites

83 of 83 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Claims the paper makes

0 of 22 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged

  • Findingnone given

    AI/ML technologies optimize learning paths.

    “These technologies have been shown to optimize learning paths, enhance engagement, and improve academic performance, with some studies reporting increased test scores.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The 63 included articles are representative of the current deployment of AI/ML in e-learning for adaptive learning.
  • Findingreasoning

    AI/ML technologies improve academic performance.

    “These technologies have been shown to optimize learning paths, enhance engagement, and improve academic performance, with some studies reporting increased test scores.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The 63 included articles are representative of the current deployment of AI/ML in e-learning for adaptive learning.
  • Findingnone given

    AI/ML technologies enhance engagement.

    “These technologies have been shown to optimize learning paths, enhance engagement, and improve academic performance, with some studies reporting increased test scores.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The 63 included articles are representative of the current deployment of AI/ML in e-learning for adaptive learning.
  • Findingnone given

    Some studies report increased test scores with AI/ML technologies.

    “These technologies have been shown to optimize learning paths, enhance engagement, and improve academic performance, with some studies reporting increased test scores.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The 63 included articles are representative of the current deployment of AI/ML in e-learning for adaptive learning.
  • Findingown data

    AI/ML algorithms are instrumental in personalizing learning experiences.

    “Findings reveal that AI/ML algorithms are instrumental in personalizing learning experiences.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The 63 included articles are representative of the current deployment of AI/ML in e-learning for adaptive learning.
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 77
  • May combine two claims. 30
  • The quote only partly states this claim. 2
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Findingnone given

    The co-occurrence network reinforces the intertwined relationship between contemporary e-learning platforms, learning systems, and artificial intelligence.

    “This co-occurrence network reinforces the intertwined relationship between contemporary e-learning platforms, learning systems, and artificial intelligence.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    In [26], neural networks, graph theory, fuzzy sets, classifications, and agent systems were used to create individual learning paths in intelligent learning environments.

    “Neural networks, graphs, fuzzy sets, classifications, and agent systems are used as methods in the creation of individual learning paths.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [26] Afanasyev, A., Voit, N., Voevodin, E., Egorova, T., and Novikova, O. (2014, January 10–12). Methods and tools for the development, implementation and use of the intelligent distance learning environment. Proceedings of the INTED2014 Conference, Valencia, Spain.

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    In [28], the C4.5 decision tree algorithm was used to measure and categorize a learner's knowledge level based on quiz results to personalize the e-learning system.

    “The C4.5 decision tree algorithm is used to measure and categorize a learner's knowledge level (e.g., beginner, intermediate, advanced) based on their quiz results.The results then inform the personalization of the e-learning system to cater to the individual needs of the students, which subsequently enhances their knowledge level.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [28] AL-Chalabi, H.K.M., Hussein, A.M.A., and Apoki, U.C. (2021, January 1–3). An Adaptive Learning System Based on Learner’s Knowledge Level. Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Electronics, Computers and Artificial Intelligence (ECAI), Pitesti, Romania. source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    AI/ML methodologies aid in tailoring content, predicting academic performance, mapping knowledge gaps, and offering dynamic assessments.

    “These methodologies aid in tailoring content, predicting academic performance, mapping knowledge gaps, and offering dynamic assessments.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The reviewed studies' reported algorithm usages, benefits, challenges, and impacts are accurate and applicable to e-learning adaptive learning.
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    In [36], K-means clustering was used to identify and cluster learners based on learning behavior patterns to design personalized online learning environments.

    “K-means clustering is used to identify and cluster learners based on their learning behavior patterns, with the aim of understanding and predicting their personalities for the purpose of designing personalized online learning environments.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [36] Denden, M., Tlili, A., Chang, M., Krahn, T., Kuo, R., Abed, M., and Jemni, M. (2021, January 8–10). Can we predict learners’ personalities through their behavioural patterns? A pilot study using Behaviour Analytics-Moodle plugin. . Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on ICT & Accessibility (ICTA), Tunis, Tunisia. source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    In [39], Bayesian networks and ant colony optimization were used to infer learner features and select and sequence learning objects under time constraints.

    “Bayesian networks are used to infer the learner's features based on some input data (probably their interactions or preferences in the e-learning system).Once these features are understood, the system uses the 0/1 knapsack problem to select the best learning objects for the learner in the given time constraint.The ACO algorithm helps to solve this knapsack problem efficiently.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [39] Haghshenas, E., Mazaheri, A., Gholipour, A., Tavakoli, M., Zandi, N., Narimani, H., Rahimi, F., and Nouri, S. (2010, January 1–2). Introducing a new intelligent adaptive learning content generation method. Proceedings of the Second International Conference on E-Learning and E-Teaching (ICELET 2010), Tehran, Iran. source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    In [31], LSTM, random forest classification, and CNNs were used to create a deep learning model for a personalized e-learning system, with random forest predicting learner level and CNN identifying learner style.

    “The machine learning algorithms used in the article are long short-term memory (LSTM), random forest classification, and convolutional neural networks (CNNs).The method employed is the creation of a comprehensive model based on deep learning to provide a highly personalized e-learning system.”
    • Also stated in: § Citation of Author(s) Algorithm(s)/Method(s) · plain
      “The random forest classifier is used to predict the learner level, which pertains to the difficulty of the course.”
    • Also stated in: § Citation of Author(s) Algorithm(s)/Method(s) · plain
      “CNN is used in the identification of the learner style.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [31] Anantharaman, H., Mubarak, A., and Shobana, B.T. (2018, January 21–22). Modelling an Adaptive e-Learning System Using LSTM and Random Forest Classification. Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on e-Learning, e-Management and e-Services (IC3e), Langkawi, Malaysia. source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • The quote only partly states this claim.

    Premisecitation

    In [23], supervised learning algorithms (SVMs, kNN, Naïve Bayes, random forest, logistic regression) were used to predict learner personality dimensions from educational data features in an online learning system.

    “The system focuses on developing a classifier based on supervised learning algorithms to predict the learner's personality dimensions discreetly using educational data features in an online learning system.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [23] Abyaa, A., Idrissi, M.K., and Bennani, S. (2018, January 24–25). Predicting the learner’s personality from educational data using supervised learning. Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Intelligent Systems: Theories and Applications (SITA’18), Rabat, Morocco. Article 19. source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductnone given

    Disagreements among reviewers were deliberated and resolved after removal of the blinded protocol, leading to unanimous consensus.

    “Disagreements among reviewers were deliberated and resolved following the removal of the blinded protocol, leading to a unanimous consensus among all authors regarding the final decision on inclusion or exclusion of articles.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    In [34], chatbots using ML algorithms were used to analyze learner requirements and generate personalized learning paths with tailored content.

    “The application of ML algorithms is used to analyze each learner's personal requirements and generate a corresponding personalized learning path with tailored educational content.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [34] Shkarlet, S., Morozov, A., and Palagin, A. (2021). Mathematical Modeling and Simulation of Systems (MODS’2020); MODS 2020 Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, Springer. source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    Reinforcement learning (RL) is employed to optimize learning paths and learning objects using implicit feedback from learners.

    “• Reinforcement learning (RL) is employed to optimize learning paths and learning objects using implicit feedback from learners.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The reviewed studies' reported algorithm usages, benefits, challenges, and impacts are accurate and applicable to e-learning adaptive learning.
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    Rapid adaptation of learner models is a perceived benefit of using AI/ML to power adaptive learning in e-learning systems.

    “• Rapid adaptation of learner models.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The reviewed studies' reported algorithm usages, benefits, challenges, and impacts are accurate and applicable to e-learning adaptive learning.
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    Genetic algorithms map optimal individualized learning paths.

    “• Genetic algorithms map optimal individualized learning paths.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The reviewed studies' reported algorithm usages, benefits, challenges, and impacts are accurate and applicable to e-learning adaptive learning.
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationnone given

    Dynamic recommendations of supplementary materials are a perceived benefit of using AI/ML to power adaptive learning in e-learning systems.

    “• Dynamic recommendations of supplementary materials.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The reviewed studies' reported algorithm usages, benefits, challenges, and impacts are accurate and applicable to e-learning adaptive learning.
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    Logistic regression, SVM, ARIMA, deep neural networks, and RNNs are combined to enhance and customize the learning environment.

    “• Logistic regression, SVM, ARIMA, deep neural networks, and RNNs are combined to enhance and customize the learning environment.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The reviewed studies' reported algorithm usages, benefits, challenges, and impacts are accurate and applicable to e-learning adaptive learning.
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    In [30], latent semantic analysis and fuzzy C-means were used to extract metadata from learning objects and identify learning objects based on similarity.

    “LSA is used to extract metadata from learning objects (LOs).LSA is a technique that finds patterns in relationships between terms and concepts in unstructured data, mainly used for analyzing relationships in a set of documents.Fuzzy C-means (FCM) algorithms: FCM is used to identify learning objects based on a specific form of similarity.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [30] Amane, 2023, New perspective of learning objects in e-learning system, Int. J. Inf. Learn. Technology. source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    Efficient clustering of learners for tailored strategies is a perceived benefit of using AI/ML to power adaptive learning in e-learning systems.

    “• Efficient clustering of learners for tailored strategies.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The reviewed studies' reported algorithm usages, benefits, challenges, and impacts are accurate and applicable to e-learning adaptive learning.
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    Two-stage Bayesian functions as a recommendation system, customizing learning materials.

    “• Two-stage Bayesian functions as a recommendation system, customizing learning materials.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The reviewed studies' reported algorithm usages, benefits, challenges, and impacts are accurate and applicable to e-learning adaptive learning.
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    In [27], ant colony optimization was used to optimize learning paths for groups of students based on their knowledge patterns.

    “The ACO algorithm is used to optimize learning paths for different groups of students.The first stage involves grouping learners based on their knowledge patterns.The second stage then uses the ACO algorithm to determine the best learning path for each of these groups, with the end goal being a concept map tailored to the needs of each group.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [27] Ahmad, K., Maryam, B.I., and Molood, A.E. (2013, January 13–14). A novel adaptive learning path method. Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on e-Learning and e-Teaching (ICELET 2013), Shiraz, Iran. source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    In [37], machine learning within the LearnFit framework was used to personalize and adapt learning paths using learning style models and learner profiles.

    “Machine learning is used in this article to apply machine learning techniques within the LearnFit framework to personalize and adapt the learning paths for learners.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [37] Berrada, K., and Burgos, D. (2022). Pedagogy, Didactics and Educational Technologies, Springer. Lecture Notes in Educational Technology. source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Adaptive learning has the potential to revolutionize education by catering to individual learner needs, despite challenges like data privacy and complexity of AI/ML systems.

    “Despite challenges like data privacy and the complexity of AI/ML systems, the results underscore the potential of adaptive learning to revolutionize education by catering to individual learner needs.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The 63 included articles are representative of the current deployment of AI/ML in e-learning for adaptive learning.
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Interpretationnone given

    Personalized learning experiences and pathways are a perceived benefit of using AI/ML to power adaptive learning in e-learning systems.

    “• Personalized learning experiences and pathways.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The reviewed studies' reported algorithm usages, benefits, challenges, and impacts are accurate and applicable to e-learning adaptive learning.
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    In [40], an optimized K-means clustering algorithm was used to cluster learners in MOOC forums and aid instructors in designing personalized learning strategies.

    “An optimized version of the K-means clustering algorithm, an unsupervised learning method, is used to efficiently cluster learners in MOOC (massive open online course) forums and aid instructors in designing personalized learning strategies.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [40] Hou, X., Lei, C.-U., and Kwok, Y.-K. (2017, January 18–21). OP-DCI: A Riskless K-Means Clustering for Influential User Identification. Proceedings of the 16th IEEE International Conference on Machine Learning and Applications (ICMLA), Cancun, Mexico. source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    Q-learning recommends adaptive learning paths.

    “• Q-learning recommends adaptive learning paths.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The reviewed studies' reported algorithm usages, benefits, challenges, and impacts are accurate and applicable to e-learning adaptive learning.
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    In [32], evolutionary algorithm, ant colony optimization, and social network analysis were used to determine future educational objectives, generate adaptive learning paths, and assign learning rhythm.

    “Evolutionary algorithm used for determining relevant future educational objectives using an adequate learner e-assessment method.ACO is used for generating an adaptive learning path for each learner.SNA is used for determining the learner's motivation and social productivity to assign a specific learning rhythm to each learner.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [32] Birjali, 2018, A novel adaptive e-learning model based on Big Data by using competence-based knowledge and social learner activities, Appl. Soft Comput. source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    Conditional generative adversarial networks (cGANs) adapt a model of the learner's characteristics to simulate performance and improve training.

    “• Conditional generative adversarial networks (cGANs) adapt a model of the learner's characteristics to simulate performance and improve training.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The reviewed studies' reported algorithm usages, benefits, challenges, and impacts are accurate and applicable to e-learning adaptive learning.
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    K-means clustering is used to cluster learners in MOOC forums, segment datasets based on similarity, and identify learning behavior patterns.

    “• K-means clustering is used to cluster learners in MOOC forums, segment datasets based on similarity, and identify learning behavior patterns.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The reviewed studies' reported algorithm usages, benefits, challenges, and impacts are accurate and applicable to e-learning adaptive learning.
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    In [24], DBSCAN was used to process learners' contextual information from mobile devices to group learners and provide personalized, adaptive guidance.

    “DBSCAN is used to process the learners' contextual information extracted from their mobile devices.It is likely being used to group or categorize learners based on their contextual information such as background knowledge, learning time, learning location, and environmental situation.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [24] Adnan, 2019, Cloud-supported machine learning system for context-aware adaptive M-learning, Turk. J. Electr. Eng. Comput. Sci. source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    Light gradient boosting machine (LGBM) identifies learning styles and predicts academic performance.

    “• Light gradient boosting machine (LGBM) identifies learning styles and predicts academic performance.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The reviewed studies' reported algorithm usages, benefits, challenges, and impacts are accurate and applicable to e-learning adaptive learning.
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationnone given

    Optimized learning paths and objects are a perceived benefit of using AI/ML to power adaptive learning in e-learning systems.

    “• Optimized learning paths and objects.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The reviewed studies' reported algorithm usages, benefits, challenges, and impacts are accurate and applicable to e-learning adaptive learning.
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    In [25], a linearization algorithm generated a suggested learning path for students based on the Educational Concept Map to personalize learning materials.

    “The linearization algorithm generates a suggested learning path for students based on the Educational Concept Map (ECM).The algorithm is used to personalize the learning materials and educational resources for each student based on their self-evaluation of knowledge and learning objectives.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [25] Adorni, G., Cagnoni, S., Gori, M., and Maratea, M. (2016). AI*IA 2016 Advances in Artificial Intelligence, Springer. AI*IA 2016 Lecture Notes in Computer Science. source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    In [33], genetic algorithm with forcing legality and particle swarm optimization were used to create personalized e-courses by selecting appropriate e-learning materials from a database.

    “The algorithm is utilized for creating personalized e-courses in adaptive learning systems.The goal is to efficiently select appropriate e-learning materials from a database tailored to individual learners.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [33] Chang, 2013, A personalized e-course composition based on a genetic algorithm with forcing legality in an adaptive learning system, J. Netw. Comput. Appl. source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    Heterogeneous value difference metric (HVDM) and naïve Bayes classifier (NBC) provide adaptive learning support by measuring similarity between learners and predicting their needs.

    “• Heterogeneous value difference metric (HVDM) and naïve Bayes classifier (NBC) provide adaptive learning support by measuring similarity between learners and predicting their needs.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The reviewed studies' reported algorithm usages, benefits, challenges, and impacts are accurate and applicable to e-learning adaptive learning.
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    Enhanced recommendation systems and targeted learning material delivery are perceived benefits of using AI/ML to power adaptive learning in e-learning systems.

    “• Enhanced recommendation systems and targeted learning material delivery.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The reviewed studies' reported algorithm usages, benefits, challenges, and impacts are accurate and applicable to e-learning adaptive learning.
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    Collaborative filtering (CF) constructs personalized learning platforms.

    “• Collaborative filtering (CF) constructs personalized learning platforms.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The reviewed studies' reported algorithm usages, benefits, challenges, and impacts are accurate and applicable to e-learning adaptive learning.
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    Deep learning (DL) analyzes students' learning situations, providing targeted resources.

    “• Deep learning (DL) analyzes students' learning situations, providing targeted resources.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The reviewed studies' reported algorithm usages, benefits, challenges, and impacts are accurate and applicable to e-learning adaptive learning.
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    Immediate feedback helps learners understand their mistakes, make corrections, and reinforce their understanding, facilitating a more efficient learning process.

    “This immediate feedback helps learners understand their mistakes, make corrections, and reinforce their understanding, facilitating a more efficient learning process [88].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [88] Phon-Amnuaisuk, S., Au, T.W., and Omar, S. (2017). Computational Intelligence in Information Systems, Springer. CIIS 2016 Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing. source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductnone given

    The selection of keywords to compile the publication samples may not be exhaustive, potentially missing pertinent studies.

    “Firstly, the selection of keywords to compile the publication samples may not be exhaustive, potentially missing out on pertinent studies.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    Adaptive e-learning platforms powered by AI/ML algorithms can track and analyze learner performance, identify knowledge gaps, and offer remedial content or activities to address those gaps.

    “Improved Learning Outcomes: Adaptive e-learning platforms powered by AI/ML algorithms can track and analyze learner performance, identify knowledge gaps, and offer remedial content or activities to address those gaps.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    The integration of AI/ML, particularly adaptive learning algorithms, stands as a pillar influencing key sectors from personalized learning experiences to intelligent recommendation systems.

    “In the realm of e-learning, the integration of AI/ML, particularly adaptive learning algorithms, stands as a pillar influencing key sectors from personalized learning experiences to intelligent recommendation systems.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductnone given

    Clear inclusion and exclusion criteria were established to minimize potential bias in the selection of studies.

    “To minimize potential bias in the selection of studies, clear inclusion and exclusion criteria are established.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Adaptive learning systems can enhance student engagement, foster self-directed learning, and improve overall learning outcomes by leveraging data-driven personalization, timely feedback, and dynamic content delivery.

    “By leveraging the power of datadriven personalization, timely feedback, and dynamic content delivery, adaptive learning systems can enhance student engagement, foster self-directed learning, and improve overall learning outcomes.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductreasoning

    The research query was framed exclusively in English, so it omits any resource published solely in other languages.

    “Additionally, since our research query was framed exclusively in English, it inherently omits any resource published solely in other languages.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductnone given

    Tools discussed in analytical summaries, conferences, or developer hackathons were not considered for this study.

    “Such tools might be discussed in analytical summaries, showcased in conferences, or highlighted during developer hackathons, all of which were not considered for this study.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    AI/ML algorithms can analyze learner interactions, group dynamics, and social network data to provide personalized recommendations for group projects, collaborative learning activities, and peer feedback.

    “AI/ML algorithms can analyze learner interactions, group dynamics, and social network data to provide personalized recommendations for group projects, collaborative learning activities, and peer feedback.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The flexibility and adaptability of content delivery ensure that students receive the most up-to-date and relevant information, making their learning experiences more meaningful and effective.

    “The flexibility and adaptability of content delivery ensure that students receive the most up-to-date and relevant information, making their learning experiences more meaningful and effective.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductnone given

    Proper referencing and citation practices were followed to avoid plagiarism and respect intellectual property rights, and all sources are appropriately cited and credited.

    “Proper referencing and citation practices are followed to avoid plagiarism and respect the intellectual property rights of the original authors.”
    • Also stated in: § 6. Ethical Considerations · plain
      “All sources used in the literature review are appropriately cited and credited, following established citation styles.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationnone given

    Need for ongoing training and updates to machine learning models is a challenge educators and developers face when integrating AI/ML into e-learning platforms for adaptive learning.

    “• Need for ongoing training and updates to machine learning models.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The reviewed studies' reported algorithm usages, benefits, challenges, and impacts are accurate and applicable to e-learning adaptive learning.
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Explainable AI helps people understand how and why models give certain recommendations.

    “Explainable artificial intelligence mitigates to help people to understand how and why models give certain recommendations [90].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [90] Miller, T. (2023, January 12–15). Explainable AI is Dead, Long Live Explainable AI! Hypothesis-driven Decision Support using Evaluative AI. Proceedings of the 2023 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (FAccT ‘23), Chicago, IL, USA. source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    Identification of learning styles for improved academic predictions is a perceived benefit of using AI/ML to power adaptive learning in e-learning systems.

    “• Identification of learning styles for improved academic predictions.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The reviewed studies' reported algorithm usages, benefits, challenges, and impacts are accurate and applicable to e-learning adaptive learning.
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    Harnessing machine learning in e-learning systems unlocks a spectrum of benefits, central to which is the creation of highly personalized educational journeys.

    “Harnessing the power of machine learning in e-learning systems unlocks a spectrum of benefits, central to which is the creation of highly personalized educational journeys.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The reviewed studies' reported algorithm usages, benefits, challenges, and impacts are accurate and applicable to e-learning adaptive learning.
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning

    The actual array of educational tools may be broader and more varied than presented.

    “This implies that the actual array of tools may be broader and more varied than presented.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductnone given

    Critical evaluation and transparent reporting of the review process were carried out to ensure objectivity in synthesis and reporting.

    “Critical evaluation and transparent reporting of the review process are carried out to ensure objectivity in the synthesis and reporting of the results.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). The quote only partly states this claim.

    Interpretationnone given

    Cold-start problems, where systems have little initial data on learners, are a challenge educators and developers face when integrating AI/ML into e-learning platforms for adaptive learning.

    “• Cold-start problems, where systems have little initial data on learners.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The reviewed studies' reported algorithm usages, benefits, challenges, and impacts are accurate and applicable to e-learning adaptive learning.
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    Adaptive learning driven by AI/ML enhances the learning experience by clustering similar learners.

    “• Enhances the learning experience by clustering similar learners.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The reviewed studies' reported algorithm usages, benefits, challenges, and impacts are accurate and applicable to e-learning adaptive learning.
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    Adaptive learning driven by AI/ML predicts student performance using learning styles.

    “• Predicts student performance using learning styles.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The reviewed studies' reported algorithm usages, benefits, challenges, and impacts are accurate and applicable to e-learning adaptive learning.
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Interpretationreasoning

    Adaptive learning driven by AI/ML improves personalization through targeted material delivery.

    “• Improves personalization through targeted material delivery.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The reviewed studies' reported algorithm usages, benefits, challenges, and impacts are accurate and applicable to e-learning adaptive learning.
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    Adaptive learning driven by AI/ML focuses on optimal learning activities based on learner profiles.

    “• Focuses on optimal learning activities based on learner profiles.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The reviewed studies' reported algorithm usages, benefits, challenges, and impacts are accurate and applicable to e-learning adaptive learning.
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    Adaptive e-learning systems engage and encourage learners by adding features like gamification and tailored information, which can increase student motivation and drive, leading to improved learning outcomes.

    “These systems engage and encourage learners by adding features like gamification and tailored information, which can increase student motivation and drive, leading to improved learning outcomes [89].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [89] Greene, R.T. (2023, May 12). The Future of Instructional Design: Engaging Students Through Gamified, Personalized, and Flexible Learning with AI and Partnerships; e-Learning Industry. Available online: https://elearningindustry.com/future-of-instructional-design-engaging-students-through-gamified-personalized-flexible-learning-with-ai-and-partnerships.

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductreasoning

    Since this literature review involves analyzing previously published works, obtaining informed consent from human participants is not applicable.

    “Informed consent: Since this literature review involves analyzing previously published works, obtaining informed consent from human participants is not applicable.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    Adaptive learning driven by AI/ML provides real-time assistance through chatbots.

    “• Provides real-time assistance through chatbots.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The reviewed studies' reported algorithm usages, benefits, challenges, and impacts are accurate and applicable to e-learning adaptive learning.
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    These technologies can analyze vast repositories of educational resources, adaptively recommend relevant content based on individual learner profiles, and generate customized learning materials.

    “These technologies can analyze vast repositories of educational resources, adaptively recommend relevant content based on individual learner profiles, and even generate customized learning materials.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    The integration of machine learning into e-learning platforms comes with challenges including initial data scarcity, complexities in amalgamating AI/ML techniques, data privacy concerns, and potential algorithmic biases.

    “From the hurdles of initial data scarcity and complexities in amalgamating AI/ML techniques, to looming concerns of data privacy and potential algorithmic biases, educators and developers must tread carefully.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The reviewed studies' reported algorithm usages, benefits, challenges, and impacts are accurate and applicable to e-learning adaptive learning.
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    Developing, integrating, and maintaining AI-driven systems can be expensive.

    “• Developing, integrating, and maintaining AI-driven systems can be expensive.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The reviewed studies' reported algorithm usages, benefits, challenges, and impacts are accurate and applicable to e-learning adaptive learning.
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    Data privacy concerns in collecting and analyzing student data can raise privacy issues.

    “• Data privacy concerns in collecting and analyzing student data can raise privacy issues.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The reviewed studies' reported algorithm usages, benefits, challenges, and impacts are accurate and applicable to e-learning adaptive learning.
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductnone given

    Not all relevant educational tools were documented in research papers listed in reference databases.

    “Moreover, there is a likelihood that not all relevant educational tools were documented in research papers listed in reference databases.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    This individualized approach enhances engagement, motivation, and knowledge retention, ultimately leading to improved academic performance.

    “This individualized approach enhances engagement, motivation, and knowledge retention, ultimately leading to improved academic performance.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationnone given

    Adaptive e-learning is increasingly incorporating collaborative and social learning components.

    “Adaptive e-learning is increasingly incorporating collaborative and social learning components.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Chatbots, voice assistants, and natural language-based assessment and feedback systems can enhance conversational and personalized learning experiences.

    “This includes chatbots, voice assistants, and natural language-based assessment and feedback systems that can enhance conversational and personalized learning experiences.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Data-driven decision making facilitates targeted interventions and allows for continuous improvement of the e-learning environment.

    “Such data-driven decision making not only facilitates targeted interventions but also allows for continuous improvement of the e-learning environment.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationnone given

    Complexity of combining multiple machine learning techniques is a challenge educators and developers face when integrating AI/ML into e-learning platforms for adaptive learning.

    “• Complexity of combining multiple machine learning techniques.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The reviewed studies' reported algorithm usages, benefits, challenges, and impacts are accurate and applicable to e-learning adaptive learning.
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductnone given

    The literature review employed a comprehensive search strategy inclusive of various databases and sources to minimize potential bias in selection of studies.

    “A comprehensive search strategy, inclusive of various databases and sources, is employed to minimize potential bias in the selection of studies.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Adaptive learning aligns closely with the diverse needs and styles of learners and drives favorable outcomes in key educational metrics by delivering tailored content, real-time feedback, and optimizing the learning journey according to individual learner profiles.

    “By delivering tailored content and real-time feedback, and by optimizing the learning journey according to individual learner profiles, this modern pedagogical approach aligns closely with the diverse needs and styles of learners, thereby driving favorable outcomes in key educational metrics.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    AI and ML capabilities allow these systems to analyze large volumes of data, identify patterns, and generate actionable insights for both students and instructors.

    “By leveraging AI and ML capabilities, these systems can analyze large volumes of data, identify patterns, and generate actionable insights for both students and instructors.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Features of adaptive learning driven by AI/ML potentially increase engagement, retention, and performance by offering tailored content, real-time feedback, and optimal learning pathways.

    “• Such features potentially increase engagement, retention, and performance by offering tailored content, real-time feedback, and optimal learning pathways.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The reviewed studies' reported algorithm usages, benefits, challenges, and impacts are accurate and applicable to e-learning adaptive learning.
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Interpretationreasoning

    Integration of AI and ML in e-learning opens up opportunities for dynamic content generation and usage.

    “Moreover, the integration of AI and ML in e-learning opens up opportunities for dynamic content generation and usage.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Adaptive learning systems provide real-time feedback and progress tracking, enabling educators to identify students' areas of struggle and intervene promptly.

    “Furthermore, adaptive learning systems provide real-time feedback and progress tracking, enabling educators to identify students' areas of struggle and intervene promptly.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    By analyzing individual learners' strengths, weaknesses, and learning styles, AI and ML algorithms can adapt content, pace, and delivery methods to optimize learning outcomes.

    “By analyzing individual learners' strengths, weaknesses, and learning styles, AI and ML algorithms can adapt the content, the pace, and the delivery methods to optimize learning outcomes.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductnone given

    A comprehensive search across multiple databases and sources was conducted, and the selection process was documented to provide transparency and a clear rationale for inclusion/exclusion.

    “A comprehensive search across multiple databases and sources is conducted, and the selection process is documented to provide transparency and a clear rationale for the inclusion or exclusion of specific studies.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Adaptive learning powered by machine learning leads to heightened engagement, bolstered retention, and enhanced performance.

    “Adaptive learning, powered by machine learning, profoundly reshapes the educational landscape, leading to heightened engagement, bolstered retention, and enhanced performance.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Adaptive learning driven by AI/ML improves test scores and overall academic performance.

    “• Improve test scores and overall academic performance.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The reviewed studies' reported algorithm usages, benefits, challenges, and impacts are accurate and applicable to e-learning adaptive learning.
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    AI-powered systems can process and understand human language, enabling more advanced interactions with learners.

    “AI-powered systems can process and understand human language, enabling more advanced interactions with learners.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    Over-reliance on technology carries a risk of neglecting the human aspect of education.

    “• Over-reliance on technology-there is a risk of neglecting the human aspect of education.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The reviewed studies' reported algorithm usages, benefits, challenges, and impacts are accurate and applicable to e-learning adaptive learning.
83 of 83
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    There remains a paucity of comprehensive research on the actual deployment, benefits, challenges, and overall impact of AI/ML in e-learning.

    “While the potential benefits of integrating AI/ML into e-learning platforms are vast, there remains a paucity of comprehensive research on its actual deployment, benefits, challenges, and overall impact.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Adaptive learning promotes effective and efficient learning, maximizes engagement, and enhances educational outcomes.

    “By adapting to the specific requirements of each student, adaptive learning promotes effective and efficient learning, maximizes engagement, and enhances educational outcomes.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The selected databases (Web of Science and Scopus) and search query capture the relevant literature on AI/ML in adaptive e-learning.

    “Publications were selected in the two largest bibliographic databases-Web of Science and Scopus.The selection of these databases was driven by their extensive collection of pertinent and up-to-date publications.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The 63 included articles are representative of the current deployment of AI/ML in e-learning for adaptive learning.

    “The final sample consisted of 63 articles.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The reviewed studies' reported algorithm usages, benefits, challenges, and impacts are accurate and applicable to e-learning adaptive learning.

    “Based on the above analyses, answers to the research questions can be provided in summary.”
5 of 5

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • GenAI-driven adaptive learning systems that modify instructional content based on learner responses significantly improve student performance.

    “For example, a review by Gligorea, Cioca [47] found that GenAI-driven adaptive learning systems, which modify instructional content based on learner responses, significantly improve student performance.”

    From Generative AI in Higher Education: Balancing Innovation and Integrity (2025) · cites this paper as [47]

    The Introduction describes adaptive systems changing content based on learner performance, and the Conclusions say AI/ML-based adaptation leads to improved academic performance. The review does not establish that this improvement is statistically significant or specifically attributable to GenAI-driven systems; its performance claim concerns AI/ML-based adaptive learning more broadly. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

  • Learner-instructor interaction claim points to a different study

    Minor

    The discussion cites [92] for a claim about learner-instructor interaction, but [92] is a swarm-based adaptive-learning study. The bibliography lists a study explicitly about learner-instructor interaction as [100].

1 of 1

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. Green, T.D., and Donovan, L.C. (2018). The Wiley Handbook of Teaching and Learning, Wiley.
  2. Lin, J., Zhao, Y., Gao, T., Liu, C., and Pu, H. (2021). Human Centered Computing: 6th International Conference, Springer.
  3. Lincke, A., Jansen, M., Milrad, M., and Berge, E. (2019). ICCE 2019—27th International Conference on Computers in Education, Proceedings: Volume 1, Asia-Pacific Society for Computers in Education. Available online: https://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:lnu:diva-92120.
  4. Zilinskiene, I., Dagiene, V., and Kurilovas, E. (2023, May 14). A Swarm-Based Approach to Adaptive Learning: Selection of a Dynamic Learning Scenario; Kidmore End: Academic Conferences International Limited. Available online: https://www.proquest.com/conference-papers-proceedings/swarm-based-approach-adaptive-learning-selection/docview/1328341510/se-2.
  5. Isotani, S., Millán, E., Ogan, A., Hastings, P., McLaren, B., and Luckin, R. (2019). Artificial Intelligence in Education, Springer. AIED 2019 Lecture Notes in Computer Science. · DOI
  6. Maach, 2019, Context Aware in Adaptive Ubiquitous E-learning System for Adaptation Presentation Content, J. Theor. Appl. Inf. Technol., 97, 4424

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gligorea, I., Cioca, M., Oancea, R., Gorski, A.-T., Gorski, H., & Tudorache, P.
Affiliations
  • Nicolae Bălcescu Land Forces Academy (RO)
  • Lucian Blaga University of Sibiu (RO)
Corresponding author
Gligorea, Ilie
Venue
Education Sciences
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2023-12-06
Volume
13
Issue
12
Pages
1216
ISSN
2227-7102 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4389365236
Cited by
980
References
83
Citations by year
2026: 335 · 2025: 445 · 2024: 194 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 1
FWCI
91.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Education Sciences (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Artificial Intelligence in Education
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Science Applications › Online Learning and Analytics
Keywords
adaptive learning, artificial intelligence in education, online learning, machine learning, personalized learning, student engagement, student retention, academic performance, learning path optimization, data privacy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-08.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-08.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review