Cited by 108Neuroscience, Education and Cognitive FunctionMathematics Education and Teaching TechniquesTeacher Education and Leadership Studies

Achieving Elusive Teacher Change through Challenging Myths about Learning: A Blended Approach

Open access
Anderson, Robin, Boaler, Jo, Dieckmann, Jack·2018·Education Sciences

Abstract

The idea that success in mathematics is only available to those born as “mathematics people” has been challenged in recent years by neuroscience, showing that mathematics pathways develop in the brain through learning and practice. This paper reports on a blended professional learning model of online and in-person meetings during which 40 teachers in 8 school districts in the US learned about the new brain science, challenging the “math person” myth, as well as effective mathematics teaching methods. We refer to the combination as a Mathematical Mindset Approach. Using mixed methods, we conducted a one-year study to investigate teacher and student learning in a Mathematical Mindset network. We collected data on teacher and student beliefs, teacher instructional practice, and student learning gains on state achievement tests. The results from our quantitative analyses found statistically significant positive improvements in student beliefs, teacher’s instructional practice, and on students’ math test scores. The mindset approach particularly raised the achievement of girls, English learners, and economically disadvantaged students. Based on our qualitative analysis, we propose that the success of the intervention rests upon two central factors: (1) The different forms of PD served to eradicate the learning myths that had held up teachers and learners; and that (2) Teachers had space for identity work as mathematical learners.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/educsci8030098

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 30

  1. Cohen, D.K. A revolution in one classroom: The case of Mrs. Oublier. Educ. Eval. Policy Anal. 1990, 12, 311-329. [CrossRef] · DOI
  2. Santagata, R.; Kersting, N.; Givvin, K.B.; Stigler, J.W. Problem implementation as a lever for change: An Experimental study of the effects of a professional development program on students' mathematics learning. J. Res. Educ. Eff. 2011, 4, 1-24. [CrossRef] · DOI
  3. Maguire, E.A.; Woollett, K.; Spiers, H.J. London taxi drivers and bus drivers: A structural MRI and neuropsychological analysis. Hippocampus 2006, 16, 1091-1101. [CrossRef] [PubMed] · DOI · Paper page
  4. Woollett, K.; Maguire, E.A. Acquiring "the Knowledge" of London's layout drives structural brain changes. Curr. Biol. 2011, 21, 2109-2114. [CrossRef] [PubMed] · DOI
  5. Luculano, T.; Rosenberg-Lee, M.; Richardson, J.; Tenison, C.; Fuchs, L.; Supekar, K.; Menon, V. Cognitive tutoring induces widespread neuroplasticity and remediates brain function in children with mathematical learning disabilities. Nat. Commun. 2015, 6, 8453. [CrossRef] [PubMed] · DOI
  6. Chestnut, E.; Lei, L.S.; Cimpian, A.; Chestnut, E.K.; Lei, R.F.; Leslie, S.J.; Cimpian, A. The Myth that only brilliant people are good at math and its implications for diversity. Educ. Sci. 2018, 8, 65. [CrossRef] · DOI
  7. Beilock, S.L. Grounding cognition in action: Expertise, comprehension, and judgment. Prog. Brain Res. 2009, 174, 3-11. [PubMed]
  8. Bussey, K.; Bandura, A. Influence of gender constancy and social power on sex-linked modeling. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 1984, 47, 1292-1302. [CrossRef] [PubMed] · DOI
  9. Gunderson, E.A.; Ramirez, G.; Levine, S.C.; Beilock, S.L. The role of parents and teachers in the development of gender-related math attitudes. Sex Roles 2012, 66, 153-166. [CrossRef] · DOI
  10. Borko, H. Professional development and teacher learning: Mapping the terrain. Educ. Res. 2004, 33, 3-15. [CrossRef] · DOI · Paper page
  11. Opfer, V.D.; Pedder, D. Conceptualizing teacher professional learning. Rev. Edu. Res. 2011, 81, 376-407. [CrossRef] · DOI · Paper page
  12. Aronson, J.; Fried, C.B.; Good, C. Reducing the effects of stereotype threat on African American college students by shaping theories of intelligence. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 2002, 38, 113-125. [CrossRef] · DOI · Paper page
  13. Steele, C.M. A threat in the air: How stereotypes shape intellectual identity and performance. Am. Psychol. 1997, 52, 613-629. [CrossRef] [PubMed] · DOI · Paper page
  14. Jonsson, A.C.; Beach, D.; Korp, H.; Erlandson, P. Teachers' implicit theories of intelligence: Influences from different disciplines and scientific theories. Eur. J. Teach. Educ. 2012, 35, 387-400. [CrossRef] · DOI
  15. Stipek, D.; Givven, K.; Salmon, J.; MacGyvers, V. Teachers' beliefs and practices related to mathematics instruction. Teach. Teach. Educ. 2001, 17, 213-226. [CrossRef] · DOI
  16. Horn, I. Fast kids, slow kids, lazy kids: Framing the mismatch problem in mathematics teachers' conversation. J. Learn. Sci. 2007, 16, 37-79.
  17. Sun, K.L. There's no Limit: Mathematics Teaching for a Growth Mindset. Ph.D. Thesis, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA, USA, 2015.
  18. Brahier, D.J., Ed.; National Council of Teachers of Mathematics: Reston, VA, USA, 2011; pp. 169-184.
  19. Boaler, J.; Chen, L.; Williams, C.; Cordero, M. Seeing as understanding: The importance of visual mathematics for our brain and learning. J. Appl. Computat. Math. 2016, 5, 325. [CrossRef] · DOI
  20. Mayer, R.E. The promise of multimedia learning: Using the same instructional design methods across different media. Learn Instr. 2003, 13, 125-139. [CrossRef] · DOI · Paper page
  21. Desimone, L. Improving impact studies of teachers' professional development: Toward better conceptualizations and measures. Educ. Res. 2009, 38, 181-199. [CrossRef] · DOI · Paper page
  22. Borko, H.; Jacobs, J.; Koellner, K. Contemporary approaches to teacher professional development. Int. Encycl. Educ. 2010, 7, 548-556.
  23. Sherin, M.G.; van Es, A.E. Effects of video club participation on teachers' professional vision. Educ. J. Teach. Educ. 2009, 60, 20-37. [CrossRef] · DOI
  24. Ball, D.L.; Cohen, D.K. Developing practice, developing practitioners. In Teaching as the Learning Profession: Handbook of Policy and Practice; Darling-Hammond, L., Sykes, G., Eds.; Jossey-Bass: San Francisco, CA, USA, 1999; pp. 3-22.
  25. Bastable, V.; Schifter, D. Classroom stories: Examples of elementary students engaged in early algebra. In Algebra in the Early Grades; Kaput, J., Carraher, D., Blanton, M., Eds.; Erlbaum: Mahwah, NJ, USA, 2008; pp. 165-184.
  26. Festinger, L. A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance; Stanford University Press: Stanford, CA, USA, 1957.
  27. Strauss, A.; Corbin, J.M. Basics of Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory Procedures and Techniques; Sage Publications: Thousand Oaks, CA, USA, 1990.
  28. Huberman, A.M., Miles, M., Eds.; Sage Publications: Thousand Oaks, CA, USA, 2002; pp. 3-36.
  29. Gates, B.; Gates, M. Teachers Know Best: Teachers' Views on Professional Development; Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation: Seatle, WA, USA, 2015; pp. 1-20.
  30. Cuban, L. Inside the Black Box of Classroom Practice: Change without Reform in American Education; Harvard Education Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2013.

Authors
Anderson, R., Boaler, J., & Dieckmann, J.
Affiliations
Stanford University (US)
Corresponding author
  • Boaler, Jo
  • Dieckmann, Jack
Venue
Education Sciences
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2018-07-04
Volume
8
Issue
3
Pages
98
ISSN
2227-7102 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2810699792
Cited by
108
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 1
FWCI
5.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Education Sciences (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
Stanford University TELOS (Faculty Grantee 2016)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neuroscience, Education and Cognitive Function
  • Social Sciences › Education › Mathematics Education and Teaching Techniques
  • Social Sciences › Education › Teacher Education and Leadership Studies
Keywords
teacher professional development, mathematical mindset, growth mindset, mathematics education, brain research, teacher beliefs, student beliefs, mathematics achievement, English language learners, low-income students, teacher identity, instructional practices

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review