Cited by 106Optimal Power Flow DistributionSmart Grid and Power SystemsPower System Optimization and Stability

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 52 of the 53 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A Review of Power Distribution Test Feeders in the United States and the Need for Synthetic Representative Networks

Open access
Postigo Marcos, Fernando, Mateo Domingo, Carlos, Gómez San Román, Tomás, Palmintier, Bryan, Hodge, Bri-Mathias, Krishnan, Venkat, De Cuadra García, Fernando, Mather, Barry·2017·Energies

Abstract

Under the increasing penetration of distributed energy resources and new smart network technologies, distribution utilities face new challenges and opportunities to ensure reliable operations, manage service quality, and reduce operational and investment costs. Simultaneously, the research community is developing algorithms for advanced controls and distribution automation that can help to address some of these challenges. However, there is a shortage of realistic test systems that are publically available for development, testing, and evaluation of such new algorithms. Concerns around revealing critical infrastructure details and customer privacy have severely limited the number of actual networks published and that are available for testing. In recent decades, several distribution test feeders and US-featured representative networks have been published, but the scale, complexity, and control data vary widely. This paper presents a first-of-a-kind structured literature review of published distribution test networks with a special emphasis on classifying their main characteristics and identifying the types of studies for which they have been used. This both aids researchers in choosing suitable test networks for their needs and highlights the opportunities and directions for further test system development. In particular, we highlight the need for building large-scale synthetic networks to overcome the identified drawbacks of current distribution test feeders.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/en10111896

Cites

52 of 52 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 53 references

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Rodriguez-Calvo, A. (2017). Scalability and Replicability of the Impact of Smart Grid Solutions on Distribution Networks. [Ph.D. Thesis, Universidad Pontificia Comillas].
  2. Kersting, W.H. (February, January 28). Radial distribution test feeders. Proceedings of the 2001 IEEE Power Engineering Society Winter Meeting (Cat. No.01CH37194), Columbus, OH, USA.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 106

Metadata

Authors
Postigo Marcos, F., Mateo Domingo, C., Gómez San Román, T., Palmintier, B., Hodge, B.-M., Krishnan, V., De Cuadra García, F., & Mather, B.
Affiliations
  • Institute for Research in Technology (IIT), Comillas Pontifical University, Madrid 28015, Spain
  • National Laboratory of the Rockies (US)
Venue
Energies
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2017-11-18
Volume
10
Issue
11
Pages
1896
ISSN
1996-1073 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2768772793
Cited by
106
References
53
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 2
FWCI
3.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Energies (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information) (submittedVersion)
  • CU Scholar (University of Colorado Boulder) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
U.S. Department of Energy (DE-AC36-08GO28308)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Optimal Power Flow Distribution
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Smart Grid and Power Systems
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Power System Optimization and Stability
Keywords
distribution networks, test system design, distributed energy resources, distribution automation, control data, network classification, distribution utilities

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review