Cited by 32Innovative Energy Harvesting TechnologiesAdvanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting MaterialsStructural Engineering and Vibration Analysis

Study of a piezoelectric energy harvesting floor structure with force amplification mechanism

Open access
He, Ming, Wang, Sheng, Zhong, Xiang, Guan, Mingjie·2019·Energies

Abstract

This paper proposes a novel energy harvesting floor structure using piezoelectric elements for converting energy from human steps into electricity. The piezoelectric energy harvesting structure was constructed by a force amplification mechanism and a double-layer squeezing structure in which piezoelectric beams were deployed. The generated electrical voltage and output power were investigated in practical conditions under different strokes and step frequencies. The maximum peak-to-peak voltage was found to be 51.2 V at a stroke of 5 mm and a step frequency of 1.81 Hz. In addition, the corresponding output power for a single piezoelectric beam was tested to be 134.2 μW, demonstrating the potential of harvesting energy from the pedestrians for powering low-power electronic devices.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/en12183516

Cites

18 of 18 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A voltage magnitude of 49 V peak-to-peak was achieved at a 5 mm stroke.

    “A voltage magnitude of 49 V (peak-to-peak) was achieved at a 5 mm stroke.”

    From A review of piezoelectric energy harvesting tiles: Available designs and future perspective (2022) · cites this paper as [98]

    Section 3.2 (p. 6) says the experiments included a 5 mm stroke. The available passage in Section 3.3 reports peak-to-peak voltages of about 52.2 V and 51.4 V at different step frequencies, but does not report 49 V at a 5 mm stroke. (LLM, conf=0.83)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • A force amplification mechanism using a double-layer squeezing mechanism overcame the issue of substrate absorbing force and reducing tensile stress in the piezoelectric element.

    “This issue was overcome by employing a force amplification mechanism for achieving the bending of piezoelectric beams through a double-layer squeezing mechanism [98].”

    From A review of piezoelectric energy harvesting tiles: Available designs and future perspective (2022) · cites this paper as [98]

    The Introduction (page unavailable) describes a force-amplification mechanism and double-layer squeezing structure designed to deflect piezoelectric beams and provide stress to the elements. It does not say that the mechanism overcame force absorption by a substrate or the resulting reduction in tensile stress. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The maximum power output of one beam was 134.2 μW for a step frequency of 1.84 Hz, while the total power output of 40 such beams under a single tile was 5.368 mW.

    “The maximum power output of one beam was 134.2 µ W for a step frequency of 1.84 Hz, while the total power output of 40 such beams under a single tile was 5.368 mW.”

    From A review of piezoelectric energy harvesting tiles: Available designs and future perspective (2022) · cites this paper as [98]

    Section 3.3 discusses a tested piezoelectric beam and says output power increased with step frequency, but the passage gives voltage measurements at 0.95 and 1.81 Hz, not the claimed power figures. Searches for 134.2 µW, 1.84 Hz, 40 beams, and 5.368 mW found no passage in our copy establishing those values. (LLM, conf=0.73)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
He, M., Wang, S., Zhong, X., & Guan, M.
Affiliations
Xiamen University (CN)
Corresponding author
Guan, Mingjie
Venue
Energies
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2019-09-12
Volume
12
Issue
18
Pages
3516
ISSN
1996-1073 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2972334152
Cited by
28
References
18
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 1
FWCI
1.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Energies (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
National Natural Science Foundation of China (51777177, 51707168)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Innovative Energy Harvesting Technologies
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Advanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting Materials
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Structural Engineering and Vibration Analysis
Keywords
piezoelectric energy harvesting, floor structures, piezoelectric beam, cadence, output power, low-power devices

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review