Cited by 76Advanced Battery Technologies ResearchSpacecraft Design and TechnologySpace Technology and Applications

A Review of Battery Technology in CubeSats and Small Satellite Solutions

Open access
Knap, Vaclav, Vestergaard, Lars Kjeldgaard, Stroe, Daniel-Ioan·2020·Energies

Abstract

CubeSats and small satellite solutions are increasing in popularity as they enable a fast, cheap, and agile way for satellite applications. An essential component of nearly every satellite is the energy storage device, which is practically equal to a battery. Consequently, an overview of past, present, and future battery technologies for CubeSats is presented. CubeSats use typically commercial off-the-shelf (COTS) batteries. They are not primarily dedicated to space, so their suitability to the space environment needs to be evaluated. Batteries are also considered as potentially dangerous goods. Thus, there are guidelines and standards that specify safety criteria and tests for the batteries in order to be allowed for transportation and launch. Furthermore, the character of satellites’ missions determines their demand on batteries in terms of current rates, depth-of-discharge, and lifetime. Thus, these expectations are discussed. A market survey was also carried out to identify currently available commercial battery solutions and their parameters. This work summarizes the status, requirements, and the market situation of batteries for CubeSats.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/en13164097

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The levels of irradiation and its accumulation through the orbit lifetime reduce the battery's performance, especially when shielding is absent.

    “The levels of irradiation and its accumulation through the orbit lifetime reduce the battery's performance, especially when shielding is absent.”

    From Irradiation Flux Modelling for Thermal–Electrical Simulation of CubeSats: Orbit, Attitude and Radiation Integration (2020) · cites this paper as [11]

    Section 3.1.1 (Space Radiation; page unavailable) says radiation dose accumulates over time, shielding reduces exposure, and high doses impair Li-ion battery performance. But it estimates that expected doses for CubeSat batteries in low Earth orbit cause at most 0.1% capacity loss and are generally negligible. The claim omits that important qualification. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • For low temperatures, usually below -20°C for discharge and 0°C for charge, there is rapid degradation of battery performance.

    “For low values of temperature, usually below -20 • C and 0 • for discharge and charge conditions, respectively, there is a rapid degradation of its performance.”
  • To obtain better performance, passive treatment methods such as back surface coatings and paint are applied.

    “To obtain better performance, passive treatment method such as back surface coatings and paint is applied [153].”

    From A Comprehensive Review on Small Satellite Microgrids (2022) · cites this paper as [153]

    The retrieved Temperature section (page unavailable) discusses thermal testing, not passive surface treatments. Searches for back-surface coatings, paint, and passive treatment found no passage in our copy saying these methods are applied to improve performance; the other matches were References entries. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 52

  1. Villela, T.; Costa, C.A.; Brandão, A.M.; Bueno, F.T.; Leonardi, R. Towards the Thousandth CubeSat: A Statistical Overview. Int. J. Aerosp. Eng. 2019, 2019, 1-13. [CrossRef] · DOI · Paper page
  2. Camps, A. Nanosatellites and Applications to Commercial and Scientific Missions. In Ionospheric and Atmospheric Threats for GNSS and Satellite Telecommunications; IntechOpen: London, UK, 2019; Volume i, p. 13. [CrossRef] · DOI · Paper page
  3. Saeed, N.; Elzanaty, A.; Almorad, H.; Dahrouj, H.; Al-Naffouri, T.Y.; Alouini, M.-S. CubeSat Communications: Recent Advances and Future Challenges. IEEE Commun. Surv. Tutor. 2020, 1-24. [CrossRef] · DOI · Paper page
  4. Bouwmeester, J.; Guo, J. Survey of Worldwide Pico-and Nanosatellite Missions, Distributions and Subsystem Technology. Acta Astronaut. 2010, 67, 854-862. [CrossRef] · DOI · Paper page
  5. Rao, G.M.; Pandipati, R.C. Satellites: Batteries. In Encyclopedia of Electrochemical Power Sources; Elseiver: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2009; pp. 323-337.
  6. Kopacz, J.R.; Herschitz, R.; Roney, J. Small Satellites an Overview and Assessment. Acta Astronaut. 2020, 170, 93-105. [CrossRef] · DOI
  7. Pearson, C.; Thwaite, C.; Russel, N. The Use of Small Cell Lithium-Ion Batteries for Small Satellite Applications. In Proceedings of the 18th Annual AIAA/USU Conference on Small Satellites, Logan, UT, USA, 9-12 August 2004; pp. 1-11.
  8. Navarathinam, N.; Lee, R.; Chesser, H. Characterization of Lithium-Polymer Batteries for CubeSat Applications. Acta Astronaut. 2011, 68, 1752-1760. [CrossRef] · DOI · Paper page
  9. Uno, M.; Ogawa, K.; Takeda, Y.; Sone, Y.; Tanaka, K.; Mita, M.; Saito, H. Development and On-Orbit Operation of Lithium-Ion Pouch Battery for Small Scientific Satellite "REIMEI". J. Power Sources 2011, 196, 8755-8763. [CrossRef] · DOI
  10. Vanessa, A.; Jacky, C.; Hyvert, J.; Aurelie, G.; Paul, P.J.; Stephane, R.; Yannick, B. MP XLR Battery Range for Constellation. In Proceedings of the 2019 European Space Power Conference (ESPC), Juan-les-Pins, Côte d'Azur, France, 30 September-4 October 2019; pp. 1-8. [CrossRef] · DOI
  11. Jacky, C.; Stephane, R.; Yannick, B. VES16 Battery Range: Every Space Application Has a VES16 Solution. In Proceedings of the 2019 European Space Power Conference (ESPC), Juan-les-Pins, Côte d'Azur, France, 30 September-4 October 2019.
  12. Gave, G.; Borthomieu, Y.; Lagattu, B.; Planchat, J.-P. Evaluation of a Low Temperature Li-Ion Cell for Space. Acta Astronaut. 2004, 54, 559-563. [CrossRef] · DOI
  13. Farmakis, F.; Georgoulas, N.; Karafyllidis, I.; Amoiridis, I.; Elmasides, C.; Balomenou, S.; Tsiplakides, D.; Nestoridi, M. High Specific Energy Lithium Cells for Space Exploration. E3S Web Conf. 2017, 16, 08003. [CrossRef] · DOI
  14. Chin, K.B.; Smart, M.C.; Brandon, E.J.; Bolotin, G.S.; Palmer, N.K.; Katz, S.; Flynn, J.A. Li-Ion Battery and Super-Capacitor Hybrid Energy System for Low Temperature SmallSat Applications Conference on Small Satellites. In Proceedings of the Proceedings of the 28th AIAA/USU Conference on Small Satellites, Logan, UT, USA, 4-7 August 2014; pp. 1-7.
  15. Luo, J.; Zhang, W.; Yuan, H.; Jin, C.; Zhang, L.; Huang, H.; Liang, C.; Xia, Y.; Zhang, J.; Gan, Y.; et al. Pillared Structure Design of MXene with Ultralarge Interlayer Spacing for High-Performance Lithium-Ion Capacitors. ACS Nano 2017, 11, 2459-2469. [CrossRef] [PubMed] · DOI
  16. Akio, K.; Shuhei, O. In-Orbit Demonstration and Preliminary Study on the Applicability of Lithium-Ion Capacitor to Spacecrafts. In Proceedings of the 2019 European Space Power Conference (ESPC), Juan-les-Pins, Côte d'Azur, France, 30 September-4 October 2019.
  17. Nestoridi, M.; Barde, H. Beyond Lithium-Ion: Lithium-Sulphur Batteries for Space? E3S Web Conf. 2017, 16, 08005. [CrossRef] · DOI
  18. Samaniego, B.; Carla, E.; O'Neill, L.; Nestoridi, M. High Specific Energy Lithium Sulfur Cell for Space Application. E3S Web Conf. 2017, 16, 08006. [CrossRef] · DOI
  19. Mourembles, D.; Buergler, B.; Gajewski, L.; Cooke, A.; Barchasz, C. Li-S Cells for Space Applications (LISSA). In Proceedings of the 2019 European Space Power Conference (ESPC), Juan-les-Pins, Côte d'Azur, France, 30 September-4 October 2019; pp. 1-5. [CrossRef] · DOI
  20. Borthomieu, Y.; Biensan, P.; Nechev, K.; Peres, J.-P. Next Generation of Space Battery Using Solid State Batteries (SSB). In Proceedings of the 2019 European Space Power Conference (ESPC), Juan-les-Pins, Côte d'Azur, France, 30 September-4 October 2019.
  21. Beutl, A.; Zhang, N.; Jahn, M.; Nestoridi, M. All-Solid State Batteries for Space Exploration. In Proceedings of the 2019 European Space Power Conference (ESPC), Juan-les-Pins, Côte d'Azur, France, 30 September-4 October 2019; pp. 1-8. [CrossRef] · DOI
  22. Lyman, P.; Olson, J.; Feaver, T. Application of Emerging Structural Energy Storage Technology to Small Satellite Systems. In Proceedings of the Proceedings of the 18th Annual AIAA/USU Conference on Small Satellites, Logan, UT, USA, 9-12 August 2004.
  23. Barth, J.L. Space and Atmospheric Environments: From Low Earth Orbits to Deep Space. In Protection of Materials and Structures from Space Environment; Kluwer Academic Publishers: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2003; pp. 7-29. [CrossRef] · DOI
  24. Selčan, D.; Kirbiš, G.; Kramberger, I. Nanosatellites in LEO and beyond: Advanced Radiation Protection Techniques for COTS-Based Spacecraft. Acta Astronaut. 2017, 131, 131-144. [CrossRef] · DOI
  25. Sinclair, D.; Dyer, J. Radiation Effects and COTS Parts in SmallSats. In Proceedings of the 27th Annual AIAA/USU Conference on Small Satellites, Logan, UT, USA, 12-15 August 2013.
  26. Samwel, S.W.; El-Aziz, E.A.; Garrett, H.B.; Hady, A.A.; Ibrahim, M.; Amin, M.Y. Space Radiation Impact on Smallsats during Maximum and Minimum Solar Activity. Adv. Space Res. 2019, 64, 239-251. [CrossRef] · DOI
  27. Qiu, J.; He, D.; Sun, M.; Li, S.; Wen, C.; Hattrick-Simpers, J.; Zheng, Y.F.; Cao, L. Effects of Neutron and Gamma Radiation on Lithium-Ion Batteries. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. Sect. B 2015, 345, 27-32. [CrossRef] · DOI
  28. Tan, C.; Leung, K.Y.; Liu, D.X.; Canova, M.; Downing, R.G.; Co, A.C.; Cao, L.R. Gamma Radiation Effects on Li-Ion Battery Electrolyte in Neutron Depth Profiling for Lithium Quantification. J. Radioanal. Nucl. Chem. 2015, 305, 675-680. [CrossRef] · DOI
  29. Tan, C.; Lyons, D.J.; Pan, K.; Leung, K.Y.; Chuirazzi, W.C.; Canova, M.; Co, A.C.; Cao, L.R. Radiation Effects on the Electrode and Electrolyte of a Lithium-Ion Battery. J. Power Sources 2016, 318, 242-250. [CrossRef] · DOI
  30. Ratnakumar, B.V.; Smart, M.C.; Whitcanack, L.D.; Davies, E.D.; Chin, K.B.; Deligiannis, F.; Surampudi, S. Behavior of Li-Ion Cells in High-Intensity Radiation Environments. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2004, 151, A652. [CrossRef] · DOI
  31. Ratnakumar, B.V.; Smart, M.C.; Whitcanack, L.D.; Davies, E.D.; Chin, K.B.; Deligiannis, F.; Surampudi, S. Behavior of Li-Ion Cells in High-Intensity Radiation Environments: II. Sony/AEA/ComDEV Cells. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2005, 152, A357. [CrossRef] · DOI
  32. Bausier, F.; Nestoridi, M.; Samaniego, B.; Simola, J.; Wolahan, A.; Austin, J.; Soares, T. Spacecraft Electrical Passivation: From Study to Reality. E3S Web Conf. 2017, 16, 13002. [CrossRef] · DOI
  33. ESA-ESTEC. Space Engineering Li-Ion Battery Testing Handbook (ECSS-E-HB-20-02A); ESA Reuqirements and Standards Division: Noordwijk, The Netherlands, 2015; pp. 1-31.
  34. Initiative, N.C.L. CubeSat 101: Basic Concepts and Processes for First-Time CubeSat Developers. NASA 2017, 2017, 96.
  35. Jeevarajan, J. Requirements for Flight Certification and Acceptance of Commercial off the Shelf (Cots) Lithium-Ion (Li-Ion) Batteries (JSC 66548); Engineering Directorate Energy, Systems Division, NASA: Washington, DC, USA, 2013; pp. 1-24.
  36. Clarke, A.; Buckle, R. Identification of COTS Cells to Meet Space Market Segment Requirements. In Proceedings of the 2019 European Space Power Conference (ESPC), Juan-les-Pins, Côte d'Azur, France, 30 September-4 October 2019; pp. 1-4. [CrossRef] · DOI
  37. Motohata, T.; Shimizu, T.; Masui, H.; Cho, M. Development of a Testing Standard of COTS Lithium-Ion Batteries for Nano-Satellite. In Proceedings of the 65th International Astronautical Congress (IAC), Toronto, Canada, 29 September-3 October 2014.
  38. Bandhauer, T.M.; Garimella, S.; Fuller, T.F. A Critical Review of Thermal Issues in Lithium-Ion Batteries. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2011, 158, R1. [CrossRef] · DOI · Paper page
  39. Carré, A.; Ruiz, R.A. Overview of Current Safety Requirements for the On-Ground Handling and Transportation of Li-Ion Cells and Batteries for Space Applications. In Proceedings of the 2019 European Space Power Conference (ESPC), Juan-les-Pins, Côte d'Azur, France, 30 September-4 October 2019.
  40. Aouizerate, M.; Samaniego, B.; Bausier, F.; Nestoridi, M. Spacecraft Battery Passivation. In Proceedings of the 2019 European Space Power Conference (ESPC), Juan-les-Pins, Côte d'Azur, France, 30 September-4 October 2019.
  41. Roth, E.; Doughty, D. Thermal Abuse Performance of High-Power 18650 Li-Ion Cells. J. Power Sources 2004, 128, 308-318. [CrossRef] · DOI
  42. Borthomieu, Y. Satellite Lithium-Ion Batteries. In Lithium-Ion Batteries; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2014; pp. 311-344. [CrossRef] · DOI
  43. Sweeting, M.N. Modern Small Satellites-Changing the Economics of Space. Proc. IEEE 2018, 106, 343-361. [CrossRef] · DOI
  44. Buckle, R.; Roberts, S. Review of Commercial Cells For Space Applications. E3S Web Conf. 2017, 16, 17006. [CrossRef] · DOI
  45. Buckle, R. Life Testing of COTS Cells for Optimum Battery Sizing. In Proceedings of the 2019 European Space Power Conference (ESPC), Juan-les-Pins, Côte d'Azur, France, 30 September-4 October 2019; pp. 1-7. [CrossRef] · DOI
  46. Lee, J.-W.; Anguchamy, Y.K.; Popov, B.N. Simulation of Charge-Discharge Cycling of Lithium-Ion Batteries under Low-Earth-Orbit Conditions. J. Power Sources 2006, 162, 1395-1400. [CrossRef] · DOI
  47. Notani, S.; Bhattacharya, S. Flexible Electrical Power System Controller Design and Battery Integration for 1U to 12U CubeSats. In Proceedings of the 2011 IEEE Energy Conversion Congress and Exposition, Phoenix, AZ, USA, 17-22 September 2011; pp. 3633-3640. [CrossRef] · DOI
  48. Gary, Q.; Boris, S.; Christophe, K.; Benoît, M. Attitude Control: A Key Factor during the Design of Low-Thrust Propulsion for CubeSats. Acta Astronaut. 2020, 176, 40-51. [CrossRef] · DOI
  49. Fortescue, P.; Swinerd, G.; Stark, J. Spacecraft Systems Engineering; Fortescue, P., Swinerd, G., Stark, J., Eds.; John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.: Chichester, UK, 2011. [CrossRef] · DOI
  50. Bard, F.; Carré, A.; Fernandez, P.; Nestoridi, M.; Alia, S.; Datta, A.; Durodola, O. In-Orbit Trend Analysis of Galileo Satellites for Power Sources Degradation Estimation. E3S Web Conf. 2017, 16, 13005. [CrossRef] · DOI
  51. Pérez, L.L.; Koch, P.; Walker, R. GOMX-4-The Twin European Mission for IOD Purposes. In Proceedings of the 32nd Annual AIAA/USU Conference on Small Satellites, Logan, UT, USA, 6-9 August 2018.
  52. Nykvist, B.; Sprei, F.; Nilsson, M. Assessing the Progress toward Lower Priced Long Range Battery Electric Vehicles. Energy Policy 2019, 124, 144-155. [CrossRef] · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Knap, V., Vestergaard, L. K., & Stroe, D.-I.
Affiliations
  • GomSpace A/S, 9220 Aalborg East, Denmark
  • Aalborg University (DK)
Venue
Energies
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2020-08-07
Volume
13
Issue
16
Pages
4097
ISSN
1996-1073 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3047674441
Cited by
76
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2
FWCI
3.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Energies (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • VBN Forskningsportal (Aalborg Universitet) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
Innovationsfonden (8054-00027B)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Advanced Battery Technologies Research
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Spacecraft Design and Technology
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Space Technology and Applications
Keywords
CubeSat, small satellites, battery technology, energy storage, dangerous goods, battery safety standards, depth of discharge, battery life

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review