Cited by 72IoT and Edge/Fog ComputingInternet of Things and AINetwork Security and Intrusion Detection

IoVT: Internet of Vulnerable Things? Threat Architecture, Attack Surfaces, and Vulnerabilities in Internet of Things and Its Applications towards Smart Grids

Open access
Anand, Pooja, Singh, Yashwant, Selwal, Arvind, Singh, Pradeep Kumar, Felseghi, Raluca Andreea, Raboaca, Maria Simona·2020·Energies

Abstract

In recent years, people have witnessed numerous Internet of Things (IoT)-based attacks with the exponential increase in the number of IoT devices. Alongside this, the means to secure IoT-based applications are maturing slower than our budding dependence on them. Moreover, the vulnerabilities in an IoT system are exploited in chains to penetrate deep into the network and yield more adverse aftereffects. To mitigate these issues, this paper gives unique insights for handling the growing vulnerabilities in common IoT devices and proposes a threat architecture for IoT, addressing threats in the context of a three-layer IoT reference architecture. Furthermore, the vulnerabilities exploited at the several IoT attack surfaces and the challenges they exert are explored. Thereafter, the challenges in quantifying the IoT vulnerabilities with the existing framework are also analyzed. The study also covers a case study on the Intelligent Transportation System, covering road transport and traffic control specifically in terms of threats and vulnerabilities. Another case study on secure energy management in the Smart Grid is also presented. This case study covers the applications of Internet of Vulnerable Things (IoVT) in Smart energy Grid solutions, as there will be tremendous use of IoT in future Smart Grids to save energy and improve overall distribution. The analysis shows that the integration of the proposed architecture in existing applications alarms the developers about the embedded threats in the system.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/en13184813

Cites

53 of 53 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The distributed architecture of an IoT application significantly impacts its performance.

    “the distributed architecture of an IoT application also significantly impacts its performance [52].”

    From QoE in IoT: a vision, survey and future directions (2021) · cites this paper as [52]

    In the section labeled “X X X” (page not given), the paper reports that particular IoT architectures can reduce energy consumption or detect attacks with fewer overheads. It does not establish the broader claim that an IoT application's distributed architecture significantly affects its overall performance. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Data transfer between different networks in autonomic IoT applications renders a threat to the security aspects of the applications.

    “This necessitates data transfer between different networks rendering threat to the security aspects of the applications [52].”

    From QoE in IoT: a vision, survey and future directions (2021) · cites this paper as [52]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 10

  1. Corser, G.; Fink, G.A.; Aledhari, M. Internet of Things (IoT) security best practices. IEEE Internet Technol. Policy Commun. White Pap. Available online: https://internetinitiative.ieee.org/images/files/resources/white_ papers/internet_of_things_feb2017.pdf (accessed on 9 June 2020).
  2. Insights, C. The CEO's guide to data security: Protect your data through innovation. ATT Cybersecur. Insights 2017, 5, 1-20.
  3. Lee, R.M.; Assante, M.J.; Conway, T. German steel mill cyber attack. SANS Ind. Control Syst. 2014, 30, 1-15.
  4. BullGuard Press Releases, Latest News BullGuard. Available online: https://www.bullguard.com/press/ press-releases/2018/dojo-by-bullguard-introduces-first-of-its-kind-int.aspx (accessed on 9 June 2020).
  5. Barbieri, G.; Conti, M.; Tippenhauer, N.O.; Turrin, F. Sorry, Shodan is not Enough! Assessing ICS Security via IXP Network Traffic Analysis 2020. arXiv 2020, arXiv:2007.01114. · arXiv
  6. Chattopadhyay, A.; Lam, K.-Y.; Tavva, Y. Autonomous vehicle: Security by design. IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst. 2020, 1-15. [CrossRef] · DOI
  7. Miller, C.; Valasek, C. Remote exploitation of an unaltered passenger vehicle. Black Hat USA 2015, 2015, 1-91.
  8. Cerrudo, C. Hacking US traffic control system. Present. Defcon. 2014, 22, 1-28.
  9. Levy-Bencheton, C.; Darra, E. Cyber security and resilience of intelligent public transport. ENISA Rep. 2015. [CrossRef] · DOI
  10. Singh, P.K.; Arpan, K.K.; Yashwant, S.; Maheshkumar, H.; Kolekar, S.T. Recent Innovations in Computing; Springer Nature: Cham, Switzerland, 2019; ISBN 978-3-030-29406-9.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Anand, P., Singh, Y., Selwal, A., Singh, P. K., Felseghi, R. A., & Raboaca, M. S.
Affiliations
  • Central University of Jammu (IN)
  • ABES Engineering College (IN)
  • Ştefan cel Mare University of Suceava (RO)
  • National Research and Development Institute for Cryogenic and Isotopic Technologies—ICSI Rm. Valcea, Uzinei Street, No. 4, P.O. Box 7 Raureni, 240050 Valcea, Romania
Corresponding author
Singh, Pradeep Kumar
Venue
Energies
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2020-09-15
Volume
13
Issue
18
Pages
4813
ISSN
1996-1073 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3085019966
Cited by
72
References
53
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 1
FWCI
4.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Energies (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • Unitatea Executiva pentru Finantarea Invatamantului Superior, a Cercetarii, Dezvoltarii si Inovarii (PN- III -P1-1, PN-III-P1-1.2-PCCDI)
  • Colegiul Consultativ pentru Cercetare-Dezvoltare şi Inovare
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › IoT and Edge/Fog Computing
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Internet of Things and AI
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Network Security and Intrusion Detection
Keywords
Internet of Things security, IoT vulnerabilities, attack surface, vulnerability quantification, intelligent transportation systems, traffic management, smart grid, energy management

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review