Cited by 9Green IT and SustainabilityEnergy Efficiency in ComputingEnergy Efficiency and Management

Awareness of the Impact of IT/AI on Energy Consumption in Enterprises: A Machine Learning-Based Modelling Towards a Sustainable Digital Transformation

Open access
Słoniec, Jolanta, Kulisz, Monika, Małecka-Dobrogowska, Marta, Konurbayeva, Zhadyra, Sobaszek, Łukasz·2025·Energies

Abstract

The integration of artificial intelligence (AI) and information technology (IT) is transforming business operations while increasing energy demand. A scalable and nonintrusive method for assessing the adoption of energy-conscious IT governance without direct measurements of energy use is lacking. To address this gap, a machine learning framework is developed and validated that infers the presence of energy-conscious IT governance from five indicators of digital maturity and AI adoption. Enterprise survey data were used to train five classification algorithms—support vector machine, logistic regression, decision tree, neural network, and k-nearest neighbors—to identify organizations implementing energy-efficient IT/AI management. All models achieved strong predictive performance, with SVM achieving 90% test accuracy and an F1 score of 89.8%. The findings demonstrate that an enterprise’s technological profile can serve as a reliable proxy for assessing sustainable IT/AI practices, enabling rapid assessment, benchmarking, and targeted support for green digital transformation. This approach offers significant implications for policy design, ESG reporting, and managerial decision-making in energy-conscious governance, supporting the alignment of digital innovation with environmental objectives.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/en18215573

Cites

50 of 50 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. Leal Filho, W.; Wall, T.; Williams, K.; Dinis, M.A.P.; Fernandez Martin, R.M.; Mazhar, M.; Gatto, A. European Sustainability Reporting Standards: An Assessment of Requirements and Preparedness of EU Companies. J. Environ. Manag. 2025, 380, 125008.
  2. Brachten, F.; Kissmer, T.; Stieglitz, S. The Acceptance of Chatbots in an Enterprise Context-A Survey Study. Int. J. Inf. Manag. 2021, 60, 102375. [CrossRef] · DOI
  3. George, A.S.; Hovan George, A.S.; Gabrio Martin, A.S. The Environmental Impact of AI: A Case Study of Water Consumption by Chat GPT. Partn. Univers. Int. Innov. J. 2023, 1, 97-104. [CrossRef] · DOI
  4. Levy, J.; Prizzia, R. From Data Modeling to Algorithmic Modeling in the Big Data Era: Water Resources Security in the Asia- Pacific Region under Conditions of Climate Change. In Asia-Pacific Security Challenges; Masys, A.J., Lin, L.S.F., Eds.; Advanced Sciences and Technologies for Security Applications; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2018; pp. 197-220, ISBN 978-3-319-61728-2.
  5. Saheb, T.; Dehghani, M.; Saheb, T. Artificial Intelligence for Sustainable Energy: A Contextual Topic Modeling and Content Analysis. Sustain. Comput. Inform. Syst. 2022, 35, 100699. [CrossRef] · DOI
  6. Wang, X. The Hidden Cost of AI: Unveiling and Addressing the Environmental Impact of Digital Consumption. J. Syst. Softw. 2024, 12, 676-683. [CrossRef] · DOI
  7. Acar, E.; Sariyer, G. Use of Machine Learning for Classifying Manufacturing Companies Based on Their Digital Transformation Levels. Int. J. Intell. Enterp. 2025, 12, 305-320. [CrossRef] · DOI

Authors
Słoniec, J., Kulisz, M., Małecka-Dobrogowska, M., Konurbayeva, Z., & Sobaszek, Ł.
Affiliations
  • Lublin University of Technology (PL)
  • Bialystok University of Technology (PL)
  • D. Serikbayev East Kazakhstan State Technical University (KZ)
Corresponding author
  • Kulisz, Monika
  • Konurbayeva, Zhadyra
Venue
Energies
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2025-10-23
Volume
18
Issue
21
Pages
5573
ISSN
1996-1073 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4415489932
Cited by
9
References
50
Citations by year
2026: 9
FWCI
2.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Energies (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
Polish Ministry of Science and Higher Education (FN-40/24/25/WZ/KOP, WZ/WIZ-INZ/3/2023)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Green IT and Sustainability
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Hardware and Architecture › Energy Efficiency in Computing
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Energy Efficiency and Management
Keywords
energy consumption, artificial intelligence, information technology, digital maturity, artificial intelligence adoption, green digital transformation, sustainable digital transformation, classification models, support vector machine, ESG reporting, energy efficiency

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review