The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Application of Ultrasound in Food Science and Technology: A Perspective
Open accessAbstract
Ultrasound is composed of mechanical sound waves that originate from molecular movements that oscillate in a propagation medium. The waves have a very high frequency, equal to approximately 20 kHz, are divided into two categories (i.e., low-intensity and high-intensity waves) and cannot be perceived by the human ear. Nature has created the first ultrasound applications. Bats use ultrasound to navigate in the dark, and many cetaceans use echolocation to detect prey or obstacles using ultrasound produced by their vocal system. Ultrasound is commonly associated with the biomedical field. Today, ultrasound-based methods and equipment are available to detect organs, motion, tumour masses, and pre/post-natal handicaps, and for kidney stone removal, physiotherapy, and aesthetic cures. However, ultrasound has found multiple applications in many other fields as well. In particular, ultrasound has recently been used in the food industry to develop various effective and reliable food processing applications. Therefore, this review summarizes the major applications of ultrasound in the food industry. The most common applications in the food industry include cell destruction and extraction of intracellular material. Depending on its intensity, ultrasound is used for the activation or deactivation of enzymes, mixing and homogenization, emulsification, dispersion, preservation, stabilization, dissolution and crystallization, hydrogenation, tenderization of meat, ripening, ageing and oxidation, and as an adjuvant for solid-liquid extraction for maceration to accelerate and to improve the extraction of active ingredients from different matrices, as well as the degassing and atomization of food preparations.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Supercritical fluid extraction of bioactive compounds
da Silva, R. P. F. F., Rocha-Santos, T. A. P., & Duarte, A. C. (2016) · TrAC Trends in Analytical Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.trac.2015.11.013 · Cited by 704 · cited 1×
“Novel extraction methods include UAE [88], microwave-assisted extraction (MAE) [89], supercritical fluid extraction (SFE) [90] accelerated solvent extraction (ASE) [91] and a cyclically pressurized solid-liquid extraction with the Naviglio extractor (NE) or Rapid Solid-Liquid Dynamic Extraction (RSLDE) [92], and are f…”
Method
Cited by
Sonication, a potential technique for extraction of phytoconstituents: a systematic review
Ranjha, M. M. A. N., Irfan, S., Lorenzo, J. M., Shafique, B., Kanwal, R., Pateiro, M., Arshad, R. N., Wang, L., Nayik, G. A., Roobab, U., et al. (2021) · Processes · doi:10.3390/pr9081406 · Cited by 158
Xu, B., Azam, S. M. R., Feng, M., Wu, B., Yan, W., Zhou, C., & Ma, H. (2021) · Ultrasonics Sonochemistry · doi:10.1016/j.ultsonch.2021.105855 · Cited by 108
Cano-Lamadrid, M., Martínez-Zamora, L., Castillejo, N., & Artés-Hernández, F. (2022) · Foods · doi:10.3390/foods11172596 · Cited by 69
Yang, P., Rao, L., Zhao, L., Wu, X., Wang, Y., & Liao, X. (2021) · Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety · doi:10.1111/1541-4337.12724 · Cited by 63
Ultrasound-induced changes in the structure and functionality of starch and protein
Zhu, M., Xiong, W., Devkota, L., & Dhital, S. (2026) · Food Hydrocolloids · doi:10.1016/j.foodhyd.2025.112111 · Cited by 40
Metadata
- Authors
- Gallo, M., Ferrara, L., & Naviglio, D.
- Venue
- Foods
- Publisher
- MDPI AG
- Published
- 2018-10-04
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 164
- ISSN
- 2304-8158 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2894559296
- Cited by
- 449
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 9.22
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.