Cited by 15Liver Disease Diagnosis and TreatmentPhysical Activity and HealthAlcohol Consumption and Health Effects

Exercise does not independently improve histological outcomes in biopsy-proven non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Open access
Chen, George, Banini, Bubu A., Do, Albert, Gunderson, Craig, Zaman, Saif, Lim, Joseph K.·2023·Genes

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The independent effect of exercise on liver histology in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) remains unclear. As such, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of the effect of exercise alone on histological endpoints in biopsy-proven NAFLD. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A systematic literature search was conducted to include controlled clinical trials investigating the effect of exercise alone on liver histology in biopsy-proven NAFLD. Meta-analysis was conducted for histological outcomes with available data from a minimum of three studies. Pooled estimates of the effect of exercise on histological endpoints were calculated using random-effects models. RESULTS: We identified three controlled clinical trials that assessed the independent effect of exercise on histological outcomes in patients with biopsy-proven NAFLD. The studies consisted of 72 total participants, including 40 subjects in the exercise intervention and 32 individuals in the comparison group. Meta-analysis showed that exercise did not significantly improve Brunt grade, NAFLD activity score, and fibrosis in NAFLD. DISCUSSION: Exercise alone may not lead to significant histopathological improvement in NAFLD. Future well-powered randomized controlled trials are needed to better characterize the impact of exercise on histological outcomes and clinical endpoints.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/genes14091811

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chen, G., Banini, B. A., Do, A., Gunderson, C., Zaman, S., & Lim, J. K.
Affiliations
Yale University (US)
Corresponding author
Chen, George
Venue
Genes
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2023-09-17
Volume
14
Issue
9
Pages
1811
ISSN
2073-4425 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4386814536
Cited by
15
References
11
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 2
FWCI
0.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Genes (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (UL1TR001863)
  • National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Liver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Alcohol Consumption and Health Effects
Keywords
non-alcoholic fatty liver disease, physical activity, liver histopathology, NAFLD activity score, liver fibrosis, histological outcomes, exercise therapy
MeSH terms
Biopsy, Humans, Exercise, Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review