Unlocking AI Chatbot Potential in Healthcare: Trust-Enhanced DeLone & McLean IS Success Model
Open accessAbstract
Background: Healthcare chatbots have emerged as a promising application of artificial intelligence in healthcare, offering potential benefits in accessibility, efficiency, and patient engagement. However, despite their growing adoption, limited research has examined the factors that determine their success from the user’s perspective. Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the success of a health chatbot service by applying the updated DeLone and McLean Information Systems Success Model augmented with a trust construct, examining the effects of information quality, system quality, service quality, and trust on intention to use, user satisfaction, and net benefits. Methods: An online survey design was employed, utilizing a structured questionnaire with 28 items measuring seven constructs on a seven-point Likert scale. Data were collected electronically from residents of Saudi Arabia between July and September 2024 using convenience sampling. Eligible participants were adults aged 18 years or older who had previously used the health chatbot service. A total of 321 valid responses were obtained. Partial Least Squares Structural Equation (PLS-SEM) was conducted using SmartPLS 3.3 software for measurement and structural model analysis. Results: The measurement model demonstrated acceptable reliability and validity, with composite reliability values exceeding 0.90 and average variance extracted values above 0.70 for all constructs. Structural model analysis supported eight of ten hypotheses. Trust exhibited the strongest effect on intention to use (β = 0.359, p < 0.001), followed by system quality (β = 0.234, p < 0.001) and information quality (β = 0.147, p < 0.01). Intention to use significantly predicted user satisfaction (β = 0.620, p < 0.001) and net benefits (β = 0.278, p < 0.001). User satisfaction demonstrated a strong positive effect on net benefits (β = 0.610, p < 0.001). The model explained 67.6% of the variance in intention to use, 72.7% in user satisfaction, and 71.4% in net benefits. Conclusions: Trust emerged as the most influential factor affecting intention to use the healthcare chatbot service, underscoring its critical role in user acceptance of health chatbot services. Information quality, system quality, and service quality exerted small to moderate effects on behavioral outcomes. These findings suggest that healthcare organizations deploying chatbot services should prioritize building user trust alongside ensuring high system and information quality to maximize user satisfaction and realized net benefits.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
AR technology's use in a blended-reality approach is considered effective for administering CBT, particularly for SAD.
“While AR technology has been developed for various applications in healthcare and education, its use in a blended-reality approach is considered effective for administering CBT, particularly for SAD [28,29,30,31,32].”
From Advancing Undergraduate Student Mental Healthcare of Social Anxiety Disorder: Evaluating the Acceptance of AR-Assisted Cognitive Behavioral Therapy Through TAM-Based Constructs. (2026) · cites this paper as [32]
The Introduction discusses healthcare chatbots and mental-health applications, not augmented reality or blended-reality CBT for social anxiety disorder. Searches for augmented reality, blended reality, CBT, and SAD found no passage addressing the claimed effectiveness; the References list a chatbot-delivered CBT trial, but that does not establish the AR claim. No page numbers were provided for these passages. (LLM, conf=0.76)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1177/002224378101800104 · Cited by 109,190 · cited 1× · see citing works
“The Fornell–Larcker criterion stipulates that the square root of AVE for each latent variable should be greater than the correlations with other variables [135].”
Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A.-G., & Buchner, A. (2007) · Behavior Research Methods · doi:10.3758/bf03193146 · Cited by 65,971 · cited 1× · see citing works
“To further justify sample adequacy, a post hoc power analysis was conducted using G*Power 3 [134] for an F-test (R 2 increase) with 10 predictors.”
When to Use and How to Report the Results of PLS-SEM
Hair, J. F., Risher, J. J., Sarstedt, M., & Ringle, C. M. (2019) · European Business Review · doi:10.1108/ebr-11-2018-0203 · Cited by 27,541 · cited 1× · see citing works
“However, in most management, health informatics, and IS studies using PLS-SEM, a sample size between 200 and 300 is generally considered robust [129].”
The commitment-trust theory of relationship marketing
Morgan, R. M., & Hunt, S. D. (1994) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1177/002224299405800302 · Cited by 22,355 · cited 1× · see citing works
“A study shows that trust exists when one party has confidence in the reliability and integrity of an exchange partner [119].”
The DeLone and McLean Model of Information Systems Success: A Ten-Year Update
(2003) · Journal of Management Information Systems · doi:10.1080/07421222.2003.11045748 · Cited by 11,791 · cited 8× · see citing works
“The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the success of the Healthcare Chatbot Service from the user’s perspective by using the D&M ISS Model as a guiding framework for this research [52].”
InfluentialComparison of convenience sampling and purposive sampling
Etikan, I. (2016) · American Journal of Theoretical and Applied Statistics · doi:10.11648/j.ajtas.20160501.11 · Cited by 11,412 · cited 1× · see citing works
“This approach was chosen because the target population was not centrally registered and could only be reached via online platforms [123,124].”
Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) Using R: A Workbook
Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., Sarstedt, M., Danks, N. P., & Ray, S. (2021) · Classroom Companion: Business · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-80519-7 · Cited by 10,343 · see citing works
Common Method Bias in PLS-SEM: A Full Collinearity Assessment Approach
Kock, N. (2015) · International Journal of e-Collaboration · doi:10.4018/ijec.2015100101 · Cited by 10,215 · cited 1× · see citing works
“In this study, all three endogenous variables exhibited VIF values greater than 4 and tolerance values less than 0.25, indicating the potential presence of multicollinearity [140,141].”
InfluentialChin, W. W., Marcolin, B. L., & Newsted, P. R. (2003) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.14.2.189.16018 · Cited by 6,479 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Effect size measures the impact of each predictor on the dependent construct [138].”
PLS-SEM or CB-SEM: updated guidelines on which method to use
Jr., J. F. H., Matthews, L. M., Matthews, R. L., & Sarstedt, M. (2017) · International Journal of Multivariate Data Analysis · doi:10.1504/ijmda.2017.087624 · Cited by 5,441 · see citing works
Mathieson, K. (1991) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.2.3.173 · Cited by 4,216 · see citing works
Fitzpatrick, K. K., Darcy, A., & Vierhile, M. (2017) · JMIR Mental Health · doi:10.2196/mental.7785 · Cited by 2,730 · cited 2× · see citing works
“…vaccine hesitancy [16–19] improving diabetic patient education [20,21], providing emotional support for patient [22,23], assisting in remote mental health monitoring [24–26], aiding tobacco cessation [27–30], enhancing drug compliance, and alleviating symptoms of depression and anxiety [7,31,32].”
Minimum sample size estimation in PLS‐SEM: The inverse square root and gamma‐exponential methods
Kock, N., & Hadaya, P. (2018) · Information Systems Journal · doi:10.1111/isj.12131 · Cited by 2,621 · cited 1× · see citing works
“…Modeling (PLS-SEM) is commonly determined using the “10-times rule,” which advises that the minimum sample should be ten times the largest number of indicators used to measure any single construct, or ten times the largest number of structural paths directed at any endogenous construct [127,128].”
A Respecification and Extension of the DeLone and McLean Model of IS Success
Seddon, P. B. (1997) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.8.3.240 · Cited by 2,440 · cited 2× · see citing works
“Research tends to affirm the significant impact of system quality on user satisfaction across various types of IS, including healthcare applications [52,63,76,79,82,92–95].”
What trust means in e-commerce customer relationships: an interdisciplinary conceptual typology
McKnight, D. H., & Chervany, N. L. (2001) · International Journal of Electronic Commerce · doi:10.1080/10864415.2001.11044235 · Cited by 2,282 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Consequently, many studies over the past decade have conceptually and empirically explored factors influencing users’ trust [121].”
Service Quality: A Measure of Information Systems Effectiveness
PITT, L. F., Watson, R. T., & Kavan, C. B. (1995) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/249687 · Cited by 1,776 · cited 1× · see citing works
“This modification underscores the necessity of incorporating service quality when evaluating IS, as previously advocated by several scholars [72].”
Assessing the Validity of IS Success Models: An Empirical Test and Theoretical Analysis
Rai, A., Lang, S. S., & Welker, R. B. (2002) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.13.1.50.96 · Cited by 1,611 · cited 2× · see citing works
“Information quality is the degree to which an information system produces outputs that are appropriate for user decision-making [74,75].”
Conversational agents in healthcare: a systematic review
Laranjo, L., Dunn, A. G., Tong, H. L., Kocaballi, A. B., Chen, J., Bashir, R., Surian, D., Gallego, B., Magrabi, F., Lau, A. Y. S., et al. (2018) · Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association · doi:10.1093/jamia/ocy072 · Cited by 1,388 · cited 1× · see citing works
“…on users’ behavioural intentions and acceptance studies [35], we nonetheless produce little, if at all, clear understanding about how core information system attributes contribute to user satisfaction, usage, and overall system success when engaging with AI-powered healthcare services [14,48–51].”
The technology acceptance model and the World Wide Web
Lederer, A. L., Maupin, D. J., Sena, M. P., & Zhuang, Y. (2000) · Decision Support Systems · doi:10.1016/s0167-9236(00)00076-2 · Cited by 1,323 · cited 1× · see citing works
“It is defined as “an estimate of the probability that a person will use the application” [105].”
A perspective on using partial least squares structural equation modelling in data articles
Ringle, C. M., Sarstedt, M., Sinkovics, N., & Sinkovics, R. R. (2023) · Data in Brief · doi:10.1016/j.dib.2023.109074 · Cited by 975 · cited 3× · see citing works
“This non-probability design supports feasibility in an otherwise hard-to-reach population, but it also constrains external validity and limits generalization beyond the study sample [125,126].”
Trust in the health care professional and health outcome: A meta-analysis
Birkhäuer, J., Gaab, J., Kossowsky, J., Hasler, S., Krummenacher, P., Werner, C. P., & Gerger, H. (2017) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0170988 · Cited by 964 · cited 1× · see citing works
“However, in the context of healthcare services, omitting trust would be a critical limitation, as it has long been fundamental to healthcare delivery, underpinning users and provider relationships and shaping reliance on healthcare outcomes [53,54].”
Variance-Based Structural Equation Modeling
Roldán, J. L., & Sánchez‐Franco, M. J. (2012) · IGI Global eBooks · doi:10.4018/978-1-4666-0179-6.ch010 · Cited by 881 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Path coefficients: bootstrapping (5000 bootstrap samples; 321 bootstrap cases; no sign changes) [136,137].”
Wang, Y., & Liao, Y.-W. (2007) · Government Information Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.giq.2007.06.002 · Cited by 866 · cited 5× · see citing works
“The adaptability and robustness of the D&M ISS Model have also been demonstrated in several health IT success projects in both developing and developed nations [63,66–69].”
InfluentialArtificial Intelligence and Human Trust in Healthcare: Focus on Clinicians
Asan, O., Bayrak, A. E., & Choudhury, A. (2020) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/15154 · Cited by 825 · cited 1× · see citing works
“In this vein, as chatbots become increasingly embedded in healthcare workflows, establishing trust from both patients and providers is essential for adoption and meaningful use [55,56].”
Nadarzynski, T., Miles, O., Cowie, A., & Ridge, D. (2019) · DIGITAL HEALTH · doi:10.1177/2055207619871808 · Cited by 810 · cited 4× · see citing works
“…services over other AI technological alternatives, particularly in reshaping healthcare service delivery models by enhancing accessibility, personalization, and efficiency [5,8,9], while simultaneously recasting patient education, interaction, and engagement with health information [10–12].”
InfluentialInvestigating users’ perspectives on e-learning: An integration of TAM and IS success model
Mohammadi, H. (2015) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2014.07.044 · Cited by 779 · cited 1× · see citing works
“The domain has been recognized in the extant literature as a significant factor influencing users’ behavioral intentions [99,100] and actual use of digital systems [101].”
A Partial Test and Development of Delone and Mclean's Model of IS Success
Seddon, P. B., & Kiew, M.-Y. (1996) · AJIS. Australasian journal of information systems/AJIS. Australian journal of information systems/Australian journal of information systems · doi:10.3127/ajis.v4i1.379 · Cited by 756 · cited 3× · see citing works
“While prior studies have linked increased user satisfaction to higher levels of information quality [82,85,87,111], this study diverges from that established relationship.”
Re-conceptualizing Information System Success: The IS-Impact Measurement Model
Gable, G. G., Sedera, D., & Chan, T. (2008) · Journal of the Association for Information Systems · doi:10.17705/1jais.00164 · Cited by 740 · cited 1× · see citing works
“However, the measurement of net benefits should be contextualized according to the specific system and level of impact under examination [113], recognizing that user perception and satisfaction have emerged as pivotal proxies for evaluating the actual value realized from system use [110,114].”
Fulmer, R., Joerin, A., Gentile, B., Lakerink, L., & Rauws, M. (2018) · doi:10.2196/preprints.9782 · Cited by 715 · cited 1× · see citing works
“…vaccine hesitancy [16–19] improving diabetic patient education [20,21], providing emotional support for patient [22,23], assisting in remote mental health monitoring [24–26], aiding tobacco cessation [27–30], enhancing drug compliance, and alleviating symptoms of depression and anxiety [7,31,32].”
Petter, S., & McLean, E. R. (2009) · Information & Management · doi:10.1016/j.im.2008.12.006 · Cited by 702 · cited 2× · see citing works
“Net benefits refer to the extent to which the system contributes to the success of target subjects [52,110].”
Artificial Intelligence-Based Chatbots for Promoting Health Behavioral Changes: Systematic Review.
Aggarwal, A., Tam, C. C., Wu, D., Li, X., & Qiao, S. (2023) · Journal of medical Internet research · doi:10.2196/40789 · Cited by 683 · cited 1× · see citing works
“…on users’ behavioural intentions and acceptance studies [35], we nonetheless produce little, if at all, clear understanding about how core information system attributes contribute to user satisfaction, usage, and overall system success when engaging with AI-powered healthcare services [14,48–51].”
The Effectiveness of Artificial Intelligence Conversational Agents in Health Care: Systematic Review
Milne-Ives, M., de Cock, C., Lim, E., Shehadeh, M. H., de Pennington, N., Mole, G., Normando, E., & Meinert, E. (2020) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/20346 · Cited by 626 · see citing works
Wang, Y. (2008) · Information Systems Journal · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2575.2007.00268.x · Cited by 624 · cited 1× · see citing works
“This model has been extensively tested in the context of e-commerce systems [62], e-government systems [63,64], and technology adoption in tourism [65].”
Onukwugha, E., Yong, C., Hussain, A., Seal, B., & Mullins, C. D. (2014) · BMC Medical Research Methodology · doi:10.1186/1471-2288-14-1 · Cited by 589 · see citing works
Do as AI say: susceptibility in deployment of clinical decision-aids
Gaube, S., Suresh, H., Raue, M., Merritt, A., Berkowitz, S. J., Lermer, E., Coughlin, J. F., Guttag, J. V., Colak, E., & Ghassemi, M. (2021) · npj Digital Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41746-021-00385-9 · Cited by 543 · see citing works
Quality and effectiveness in Web-based customer support systems
Negash, S., Ryan, T., & Igbaria, M. (2002) · Information & Management · doi:10.1016/s0378-7206(02)00101-5 · Cited by 508 · cited 1× · see citing works
“User satisfaction is a crucial metric for measuring the impact of IS benefits, as well as a key aspect of implementing new technologies [117].”
Investigating the impact of user trust on the adoption and use of ChatGPT: Survey analysis
Choudhury, A., & Shamszare, H. (2023) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/47184 · Cited by 470 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Prior studies articulated that trust functions as a central mechanism that introduces perceptions of safety and credibility beyond what quality dimensions alone can ensure [57–59].”
Physicians’ perceptions of chatbots in health Care: cross-sectional web-based survey
Palanica, A., Flaschner, P., Thommandram, A., Li, M., & Fossat, Y. (2019) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/12887 · Cited by 384 · cited 1× · see citing works
“…services over other AI technological alternatives, particularly in reshaping healthcare service delivery models by enhancing accessibility, personalization, and efficiency [5,8,9], while simultaneously recasting patient education, interaction, and engagement with health information [10–12].”
In bot we trust: A new methodology of chatbot performance measures
Przegalińska, A., Ciechanowski, L., Stróż, A., Gloor, P. A., & Mazurek, G. (2019) · Business Horizons · doi:10.1016/j.bushor.2019.08.005 · Cited by 355 · see citing works
User Developed Applications and Information Systems Success
McGill, T. J., Hobbs, V. J., & Klobas, J. E. (2003) · Information Resources Management Journal · doi:10.4018/irmj.2003010103 · Cited by 354 · cited 2× · see citing works
“While prior studies have linked increased user satisfaction to higher levels of information quality [82,85,87,111], this study diverges from that established relationship.”
One Size Does Not Fit All---A Contingency Approach to Data Governance
Weber, K., Otto, B., & Österle, H. (2009) · Journal of Data and Information Quality · doi:10.1145/1515693.1515696 · Cited by 345 · cited 1× · see citing works
“…this vein, evaluating information quality involves assessing factors such as completeness, accuracy, uniqueness, relevance, timeliness, precision, comprehensibility, conciseness, and informativeness that pertain to relationships with users’ acceptance and intention to use IS-based services [76,77].”
Shahsavar, Y., & Choudhury, A. (2023) · JMIR Human Factors · doi:10.2196/47564 · Cited by 341 · see citing works
Emotional Support from AI Chatbots: Should a Supportive Partner Self-Disclose or Not?
Meng, J., & Dai, Y. H. (2021) · Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication · doi:10.1093/jcmc/zmab005 · Cited by 325 · cited 1× · see citing works
“…vaccine literacy and mitigate vaccine hesitancy [16–19] improving diabetic patient education [20,21], providing emotional support for patient [22,23], assisting in remote mental health monitoring [24–26], aiding tobacco cessation [27–30], enhancing drug compliance, and alleviating symptoms…”
Roles, Users, Benefits, and Limitations of Chatbots in Health Care: Rapid Review
Laymouna, M., Ma, Y., Lessard, D., Schuster, T., Engler, K., & Lebouché, B. (2024) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/56930 · Cited by 305 · see citing works
Roles, Users, Benefits, and Limitations of Chatbots in Health Care: Rapid Review (Preprint)
Laymouna, M., Ma, Y., Lessard, D., Schuster, T., Engler, K., & Lebouché, B. (2024) · doi:10.2196/preprints.56930 · Cited by 302 · see citing works
Arfi, W. B., Nasr, I. B., Kondrateva, G., & Hikkerova, L. (2021) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2021.120688 · Cited by 290 · cited 2× · see citing works
“Users with stronger intentions to use the system are more likely to develop deeper, ongoing interactions with the service, which results in increased satisfaction [94,106–109].”
Chatbots, Humbots, and the Quest for Artificial General Intelligence
Grudin, J., & Jacques, R. (2019) · Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3290605.3300439 · Cited by 275 · cited 2× · see citing works
“In this vein, Chatbots, also known as conversational agents or virtual agents, represent a type of AI application designed to simulate human-like conversations with users in natural language, providing information or services in specific domains [2–4].”
Modelling digital library success using the DeLone and McLean information system success model
Alzahrani, A. I., Mahmud, I., Ramayah, T., Alfarraj, O., & Alalwan, N. (2017) · Journal of Librarianship and Information Science · doi:10.1177/0961000617726123 · Cited by 246 · cited 2× · see citing works
“Evidence from the literature asserts that when IS-based health services deliver accurate, complete, timely, and relevant information that meets users’ informational needs, users are more likely to positively engage with the services [83–87].”
The Past, Present, and Future of “IS Success”
Petter, S., DeLone, W. H., & McLean, E. R. (2012) · Journal of the Association for Information Systems · doi:10.17705/1jais.00296 · Cited by 235 · see citing works
Elements of Trust in Digital Health Systems: Scoping Review
Adjekum, A., Blasimme, A., & Vayena, E. (2018) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/11254 · Cited by 231 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Research has affirmed the critical importance of trust in driving intention to use healthcare and digital health technologies [80,106,122].”
Validation of the DeLone and McLean Information Systems Success Model
Ojo, A. I. (2017) · Healthcare Informatics Research · doi:10.4258/hir.2017.23.1.60 · Cited by 222 · cited 1× · see citing works
“The adaptability and robustness of the D&M ISS Model have also been demonstrated in several health IT success projects in both developing and developed nations [63,66–69].”
Henry, J. W., & Stone, R. W. (1994) · Information Resources Management Journal · doi:10.4018/irmj.1994070102 · Cited by 221 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Indices and factor loading thresholds were set according to established standards [130–133].”
Examining the success factors for mobile work in healthcare: A deductive study
Chatterjee, S., Chakraborty, S., Sarker, S., Sarker, S., & Lau, F. (2008) · Decision Support Systems · doi:10.1016/j.dss.2008.11.003 · Cited by 213 · see citing works
Understanding mobile banking individual performance
Tam, C., & Oliveira, T. (2017) · Internet Research · doi:10.1108/intr-05-2016-0117 · Cited by 209 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Consequently, the updated D&M ISS model posits that three core components—service quality, information quality, and system quality—collectively influence system utilization and user satisfaction, thereby explaining the success of the IS platform [73].”
AI Chatbots for Mental Health: A Scoping Review of Effectiveness, Feasibility, and Applications
Casu, M., Triscari, S., Battiato, S., Guarnera, L., & Caponnetto, P. (2024) · Applied Sciences · doi:10.3390/app14135889 · Cited by 205 · cited 1× · see citing works
“…vaccine hesitancy [16–19] improving diabetic patient education [20,21], providing emotional support for patient [22,23], assisting in remote mental health monitoring [24–26], aiding tobacco cessation [27–30], enhancing drug compliance, and alleviating symptoms of depression and anxiety [7,31,32].”
User Satisfaction with Information Technology Service Delivery: A Social Capital Perspective
Sun, Y., Fang, Y., Lim, K. H., & Straub, D. W. (2012) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.1120.0421 · Cited by 197 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Users with stronger intentions to use the system are more likely to develop deeper, ongoing interactions with the service, which results in increased satisfaction [94,106–109].”
Bossen, C., Jensen, L. G., & Udsen, F. W. (2013) · International Journal of Medical Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2013.05.010 · Cited by 185 · cited 1× · see citing works
“The D&M ISS Model provides a practical framework for evaluating the effectiveness of health IS [70].”
Electronic Health Record Data Quality Assessment and Tools: A Systematic Review
Lewis, A. E., Weiskopf, N., Abrams, Z. B., Foraker, R., Lai, A. M., Payne, P. R. O., & Gupta, A. (2023) · Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association · doi:10.1093/jamia/ocad120 · Cited by 171 · cited 1× · see citing works
“While prior studies have linked increased user satisfaction to higher levels of information quality [82,85,87,111], this study diverges from that established relationship.”
Rathnayaka, P., Mills, N., Burnett, D., Silva, D. D., Alahakoon, D., & Gray, R. J. (2022) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s22103653 · Cited by 169 · see citing works
The critical factors impact on online customer satisfaction
Lin, C.-C., Wu, H.-Y., & Chang, Y.-F. (2011) · Procedia Computer Science · doi:10.1016/j.procs.2010.12.047 · Cited by 156 · cited 1× · see citing works
“It has been shown that system quality plays a central role in shaping how users perceive and interact with a website, as their continued use often depends on how reliable, responsive, and user-friendly they find the system to be [88].”
Technical metrics used to evaluate health care chatbots: scoping review
Abd-Alrazaq, A., Safi, Z., Alajlani, M., Warren, J., Househ, M., & Denecke, K. (2020) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/18301 · Cited by 150 · see citing works
The role of quality factors in intention to continue using an e-learning system in Malaysia
Ramayah, T., Ahmad, N. H., & Lo, M. (2010) · Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.03.885 · Cited by 137 · cited 2× · see citing works
“The domain has been recognized in the extant literature as a significant factor influencing users’ behavioral intentions [99,100] and actual use of digital systems [101].”
Trust in and Acceptance of Artificial Intelligence Applications in Medicine: Mixed Methods Study
Shevtsova, D., Ahmed, A., Boot, I. W. A., Sanges, C., Hudecek, M., Jacobs, J. J. L., Hort, S., & Vrijhoef, H. J. M. (2024) · JMIR Human Factors · doi:10.2196/47031 · Cited by 124 · see citing works
Chatbots as Conversational Healthcare Services
Jovanovic, M., Báez, M., & Casati, F. (2020) · IEEE Internet Computing · doi:10.1109/mic.2020.3037151 · Cited by 123 · cited 1× · see citing works
“In the extant literature, chatbot applications in the health services domain are neither novel nor marginal; rather, they have gained ground in the existing body of literature, reflecting a sustained and evolving scholarly interest in their potential and applications [13–15].”
Seitz, L., Bekmeier‐Feuerhahn, S., & Gohil, K. (2022) · International Journal of Human-Computer Studies · doi:10.1016/j.ijhcs.2022.102848 · Cited by 117 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Users may acknowledge a chatbot’s technical quality yet still require trust before engaging in repeated use or acting upon its health-related recommendations [60].”
Quality measurement in the public sector: Some perspectives from the service quality literature
Rowley, J. (1998) · Total Quality Management · doi:10.1080/0954412989171 · Cited by 108 · see citing works
Lutfi, A., Al‐Okaily, M., Alsyouf, A., & Alrawad, M. (2022) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su14138120 · Cited by 91 · cited 1× · see citing works
“However, prior D&M ISS-based studies show that user satisfaction and net benefits are closely related, with user satisfaction often functioning as an important antecedent of net benefits [142–144].”
Information System Acceptance and User Satisfaction: The Mediating Role of Trust
Kassim, E. S., Jailani, S. F. A. K., Hairuddin, H., & Zamzuri, N. H. (2012) · Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.09.1205 · Cited by 87 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Prior studies articulated that trust functions as a central mechanism that introduces perceptions of safety and credibility beyond what quality dimensions alone can ensure [57–59].”
Dwivedi, Y. K., Balakrishnan, J., Baabdullah, A. M., & Das, R. (2023) · Psychology and Marketing · doi:10.1002/mar.21888 · Cited by 87 · see citing works
Gunzler, D. D., & Morris, N. J. (2015) · Statistics in Medicine · doi:10.1002/sim.6541 · Cited by 86 · see citing works
Cho, K., Bae, S.-K., Ryu, J.-H., Kim, K. N., An, C.-H., & Chae, Y. M. (2015) · Healthcare Informatics Research · doi:10.4258/hir.2015.21.1.43 · Cited by 82 · see citing works
Schillaci, C. E., de Cosmo, L. M., Piper, L., Nicotra, M., & Guido, G. (2023) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2023.123025 · Cited by 82 · cited 2× · see citing works
“Because prior research suggests that gender can shape technology-related perceptions and adoption behavior, the observed relationships may not be identical in a more gender-balanced sample [146,147].”
A literature review on users' behavioral intention toward chatbots' adoption
Gatzioufa, P., & Saprikis, V. (2022) · Applied Computing and Informatics · doi:10.1108/aci-01-2022-0021 · Cited by 81 · see citing works
Al-Okaily, A., Al‐Okaily, M., Ping, T. A., Al-Mawali, H. H., & Zaidan, H. (2021) · Cogent Business & Management · doi:10.1080/23311975.2021.1918847 · Cited by 73 · see citing works
Validity of Chatbot Use for Mental Health Assessment: Experimental Study
Schick, A., Feine, J., Morana, S., Maedche, A., & Reininghaus, U. (2022) · JMIR mhealth and uhealth · doi:10.2196/28082 · Cited by 71 · cited 1× · see citing works
“…vaccine hesitancy [16–19] improving diabetic patient education [20,21], providing emotional support for patient [22,23], assisting in remote mental health monitoring [24–26], aiding tobacco cessation [27–30], enhancing drug compliance, and alleviating symptoms of depression and anxiety [7,31,32].”
Rethinking Student Services: Assessing and Improving Service Quality
Zammuto, R. F., Keaveney, S. M., & O’Connor, E. J. (1996) · Journal of Marketing for HIGHER EDUCATION · doi:10.1300/j050v07n01_05 · Cited by 70 · cited 1× · see citing works
“…has affirmed the relationship between service quality and user satisfaction on the grounds of users’ general judgment of an entity’s excellence or superiority of the services that arises from comparing their expectations before experiencing the service with their actual experiences [102–104].”
Su, J., Wang, Y., Liu, H., Zhang, Z., Wang, Z., & Li, Z. (2025) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-025-01897-0 · Cited by 68 · cited 1× · see citing works
“…informed by Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) and Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT) perspectives, and focuses primarily on users’ behavioral intentions [36–44], leaving limited explanation on how healthcare chatbots function as effective service systems for use in practice.”
Factors Influencing User Satisfaction with Information Systems: A Systematic Review
Kalankesh, L. R., Nasiry, Z., Fein, R., & Damanabi, S. (2020) · Galen Medical Journal · doi:10.31661/gmj.v9i0.1686 · Cited by 67 · see citing works
Application of Chatbots to Help Patients Self-Manage Diabetes: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Wu, Y., Zhang, J., Ge, P., Duan, T., Zhou, J., Wu, Y., Zhang, Y.-P., Liu, S., Liu, X., Wan, E., et al. (2024) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/60380 · Cited by 66 · cited 1× · see citing works
“…in promoting public health messages to enhance vaccine literacy and mitigate vaccine hesitancy [16–19] improving diabetic patient education [20,21], providing emotional support for patient [22,23], assisting in remote mental health monitoring [24–26], aiding tobacco cessation [27–30],…”
A systematic review of consumers’ and healthcare professionals’ trust in digital healthcare
Catapan, S. D. C., Sazon, H., Zheng, S., Gallegos-Rejas, V. M., Mendis, R., Santiago, P. H. R., & Kelly, J. T. (2025) · npj Digital Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41746-025-01510-8 · Cited by 63 · cited 3× · see citing works
“Information quality, as described earlier, also affects user satisfaction [80–82].”
Task difficulty, task variability and satisfaction with management support systems
Gelderman, M. (2002) · Information & Management · doi:10.1016/s0378-7206(01)00124-0 · Cited by 56 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Research tends to affirm the significant impact of system quality on user satisfaction across various types of IS, including healthcare applications [52,63,76,79,82,92–95].”
Hipgrave, L., Goldie, J., Dennis, S. J., & Coleman, A. (2025) · Frontiers in Digital Health · doi:10.3389/fdgth.2025.1606291 · Cited by 54 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Others have gone so far as to demonstrate benefits and utilization of AI-powered chatbots in various healthcare environments [5,35,45–47], but how effectively it is utilized to provide appropriate service support to the users remains an unresolved concern in the extant literature.”
Important Factors Affecting Student Information System Quality and Satisfaction
Gürkut, C., & Nat, M. C. (2017) · Eurasia Journal of Mathematics Science and Technology Education · doi:10.12973/ejmste/81147 · Cited by 54 · see citing works
Abiy, R., Gashu, K. D., Asemaw, T., Reta, M. M., Fekadie, B., Mekonnen, Z. A., Mamuye, A. L., Tazebew, A., Toni, A. T., Nurhussien, F., et al. (2018) · Online Journal of Public Health Informatics · doi:10.5210/ojphi.v10i2.8309 · Cited by 45 · cited 1× · see citing works
“The adaptability and robustness of the D&M ISS Model have also been demonstrated in several health IT success projects in both developing and developed nations [63,66–69].”
Ariyanto, D., Dewi, A. A., Hasibuan, H. T., & Paramadani, R. B. (2022) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su14073851 · Cited by 45 · see citing works
Understanding older adults’ acceptance of Chatbots in healthcare delivery: an extended UTAUT model
Yu, S., & Chen, T. (2024) · Frontiers in Public Health · doi:10.3389/fpubh.2024.1435329 · Cited by 45 · see citing works
Chatbots for Smoking Cessation: Scoping Review
Whittaker, R., Dobson, R., & Garner, K. (2022) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/35556 · Cited by 41 · cited 1× · see citing works
“…vaccine hesitancy [16–19] improving diabetic patient education [20,21], providing emotional support for patient [22,23], assisting in remote mental health monitoring [24–26], aiding tobacco cessation [27–30], enhancing drug compliance, and alleviating symptoms of depression and anxiety [7,31,32].”
A Strategy to Improve The Usage of ICT in The Kingdom of Saudi Arabia Primary School
Almalki, G., & Williams, N. (2012) · International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications · doi:10.14569/ijacsa.2012.031007 · Cited by 40 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Recognized as a type of IS, the healthcare chatbot service can be assessed using the D&M ISS Model [61].”
Multicollinearity: An Overview and Introduction of Ridge PLS-SEM Estimation
Streukens, S., & Leroi‐Werelds, S. (2023) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-37772-3_7 · Cited by 36 · see citing works
Lee, K. Y., Dabak, S. V., Kong, V. H., Park, M., Kwok, S. L. L., Silzle, M., Rachatan, C., Cook, A. R., Passanante, A., Pertwee, E., et al. (2023) · npj Digital Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41746-023-00843-6 · Cited by 35 · see citing works
Alsaedi, A., Alneami, N. A., Almajnoni, F. S., Alamri, O., Aljohni, K., Alrwaily, M., Eid, M., Budayr, A., Alrehaili, M., Alghamdi, M., et al. (2024) · Nursing Reports · doi:10.3390/nursrep14040271 · Cited by 33 · cited 2× · see citing works
“Because prior research suggests that gender can shape technology-related perceptions and adoption behavior, the observed relationships may not be identical in a more gender-balanced sample [146,147].”
Understanding the Benefits and Design of Chatbots to Meet the Healthcare Needs of Migrant Workers
Tseng, Y., Jarupreechachan, W., & Lee, T.-H. (2023) · Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1145/3610106 · Cited by 31 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Others have gone so far as to demonstrate benefits and utilization of AI-powered chatbots in various healthcare environments [5,35,45–47], but how effectively it is utilized to provide appropriate service support to the users remains an unresolved concern in the extant literature.”
The first AI ‐based Chatbot to promote HIV self‐management: A mixed methods usability study
Ma, Y., Achiche, S., Tu, G., Vicente, S., Lessard, D., Engler, K., Lemire, B., Laymouna, M. A., de Pokomandy, A., Cox, J., et al. (2024) · HIV Medicine · doi:10.1111/hiv.13720 · Cited by 31 · see citing works
Weeks, R., Cooper, L., Sangha, P., Sedoc, J., White, S., Toledo, A., Gretz, S., Lahav, D., Martin, N., Michel, A. E., et al. (2022) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/38418 · Cited by 30 · cited 1× · see citing works
“…appear to affirm the growing role of chatbots in promoting public health messages to enhance vaccine literacy and mitigate vaccine hesitancy [16–19] improving diabetic patient education [20,21], providing emotional support for patient [22,23], assisting in remote mental health monitoring…”
Students’ Perceptions on Chatbots’ Potential and Design Characteristics in Healthcare Education
Natalia, S., Sokratis, N., Klas, K., Konstantinidis Stathis, T., Bamidis Panagiotis, D., Pattichis Constantinos, S., & Nadia, D. (2020) · Studies in Health Technology and Informatics · doi:10.3233/shti200531 · Cited by 29 · see citing works
Cosma, C., Radi, A., Cattano, R., Zanobini, P., Bonaccorsi, G., Lorini, C., & Riccio, M. D. (2024) · Vaccine · doi:10.1016/j.vaccine.2024.126559 · Cited by 28 · cited 1× · see citing works
“…appear to affirm the growing role of chatbots in promoting public health messages to enhance vaccine literacy and mitigate vaccine hesitancy [16–19] improving diabetic patient education [20,21], providing emotional support for patient [22,23], assisting in remote mental health monitoring…”
Albaom, M. A., Sidi, F., Jabar, M. A., Abdullah, R., Ishak, I., Yunikawati, N. A., Priambodo, M. P., Nusari, M., & Ali, D. A. (2022) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su142113935 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
Cui, J., Du, J., Zhang, N., & Liang, Z. (2025) · Patient Preference and Adherence · doi:10.2147/ppa.s496684 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
A systematic review of AI-based chatbot usages in healthcare services
Jasim, K. M., Malathi, A., Bhardwaj, S., & Aw, E. C. (2025) · Journal of Health Organization and Management · doi:10.1108/jhom-12-2023-0376 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
Potential application of conversational agents in HIV testing uptake among high-risk populations
Garett, R., & Young, S. D. (2022) · Journal of Public Health · doi:10.1093/pubmed/fdac020 · Cited by 19 · cited 1× · see citing works
“…been to convey the message that chatbots have the toolkit to assist users with various healthcare services yet remains less conclusive regarding the extent to which users find them useful for delivering context-sensitive healthcare service advice, which needs to be thoroughly evaluated [14,33–35].”
Introducing Quin: The Design and Development of a Prototype Chatbot to Support Smoking Cessation
Bendotti, H., Ireland, D., Lawler, S., Oates, D., GARTNER, C. E., & Marshall, H. (2023) · Nicotine & Tobacco Research · doi:10.1093/ntr/ntad217 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
Building Emotional Support Chatbots in the Era of LLMsPreprint
Zheng, Z., Liao, L., Deng, Y., & Nie, L. (2023) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2308.11584 · Cited by 15 · cited 1× · see citing works
“…vaccine literacy and mitigate vaccine hesitancy [16–19] improving diabetic patient education [20,21], providing emotional support for patient [22,23], assisting in remote mental health monitoring [24–26], aiding tobacco cessation [27–30], enhancing drug compliance, and alleviating symptoms of…”
Dissection of medical AI reasoning processes via physician and generative-AI collaborationPreprint
DeGrave, A. J., Cai, Z. R., Janizek, J. D., Daneshjou, R., & Lee, S. (2023) · medRxiv · doi:10.1101/2023.05.12.23289878 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Naji, G. M. A., Yuan, F., Azzura, N., Danish, F. M., Ateeq, A. A., Ibrahim, S. B., Hakimi, H., Abdollah, A. B., & Iskandar, Y. H. P. (2025) · Frontiers in Digital Health · doi:10.3389/fdgth.2025.1606273 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Exploring trust factors in AI-healthcare integration: a rapid review
Mertz, M., Toskovich, K., Shields, G., Attema, G., Dumond, J., & Cameron, E. (2025) · Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.3389/frai.2025.1658510 · Cited by 14 · cited 1× · see citing works
“In this vein, as chatbots become increasingly embedded in healthcare workflows, establishing trust from both patients and providers is essential for adoption and meaningful use [55,56].”
Istianingsih, I., & Wijanto, S. H. (2008) · Jurnal Akuntansi dan Keuangan Indonesia · doi:10.21002/jaki.2008.03 · Cited by 13 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Based on the D&M ISS Model, the extant literature has established that users are more likely to adopt and continue using a system if they perceive the information provided to be of high quality [5,52,78,79].”
Kaur, J., Sharma, P., Kumar, V., Duggal, M., Diamond‐Smith, N., Ayadi, A. E., Vosburg, K. B., & Singh, P. (2024) · Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1145/3637332 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
Oudbier, S. J., Smets, E. M. A., Nieuwkerk, P. T., Neal, D. P., Nurmohamed, A. S., Meij, H. J., & Peute, L. (2024) · JMIR Medical Informatics · doi:10.2196/63703 · Cited by 13 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Research tends to affirm the significant impact of system quality on user satisfaction across various types of IS, including healthcare applications [52,63,76,79,82,92–95].”
Hosseinzadeh, M., Pouladzadeh, M., & Eskandari, A. (2024) · Jundishapur Journal of Chronic Disease Care · doi:10.5812/jjcdc-146329 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Information quality of conversational agents in healthcare
Liu, C., Zowghi, D., Peng, G., & Kong, S. (2023) · Information Development · doi:10.1177/02666669231172434 · Cited by 11 · cited 1× · see citing works
“…services over other AI technological alternatives, particularly in reshaping healthcare service delivery models by enhancing accessibility, personalization, and efficiency [5,8,9], while simultaneously recasting patient education, interaction, and engagement with health information [10–12].”
Dolničar, V., Petrovčič, A., Škafar, M., Laznik, J., Prevodnik, K., & Touzery, S. H. (2024) · International Journal of Medical Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2024.105537 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Factors influencing the adoption of chatbots by healthcare users
Bermeo-Giraldo, M. C., Patiño-Toro, O. N., Valencia-Arías, A., & Rodríguez-Correa, P. A. (2023) · Journal of Innovation Management · doi:10.24840/2183-0606_011.003_0004 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Li, C., Li, W., Shao, Y., Xu, Z., Song, J., & Wang, Y. (2025) · Diabetes Metabolic Syndrome and Obesity · doi:10.2147/dmso.s541515 · Cited by 8 · cited 1× · see citing works
“…in promoting public health messages to enhance vaccine literacy and mitigate vaccine hesitancy [16–19] improving diabetic patient education [20,21], providing emotional support for patient [22,23], assisting in remote mental health monitoring [24–26], aiding tobacco cessation [27–30],…”
Koscelny, S. N., & Neyens, D. M. (2024) · Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting · doi:10.1177/10711813241263509 · Cited by 7 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Recent empirical evidence from digital health implementations consistently validates the positive relationship between system quality and user acceptance [90,91].”
Gui, A., Ryan, Lay, W. B., Chia, J. J., & Chanda, R. C. (2024) · International Conference on Data Science and Its Applications (ICoDSA) · doi:10.1109/icodsa62899.2024.10651702 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
The DeLone and McLean model for measuring success in online learning systems: Indonesian evidence
Sarasi, V., Chaerudin, I., & Sundoro, I. A. (2023) · Journal of Education and Learning (EduLearn) · doi:10.11591/edulearn.v17i4.20839 · Cited by 7 · cited 1× · see citing works
“However, prior D&M ISS-based studies show that user satisfaction and net benefits are closely related, with user satisfaction often functioning as an important antecedent of net benefits [142–144].”
Communication and online business opportunities in virtual environment: Second Life
Sharma, G., Ye, Q., Sun, W., & Qi, L. (2012) · International Journal of Web Based Communities · doi:10.1504/ijwbc.2012.046261 · Cited by 6 · cited 1× · see citing works
“…with prior empirical evidence affirming that satisfaction functions as a direct predictor and motivator for sustained system engagement [52,94,116,118], this study posits that users who experience high satisfaction with healthcare chatbot services through positive interactions, perceived…”
Khatun, F., Das, N. C., Hoque, M. R., Saqeeb, K. N., Rahman, M., Park, K. R., Rasheed, S., & Reidpath, D. D. (2024) · JMIR Human Factors · doi:10.2196/46566 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Andrew, A. (2025) · Global Health Journal · doi:10.1016/j.glohj.2025.02.003 · Cited by 6 · cited 1× · see citing works
“…vaccine hesitancy [16–19] improving diabetic patient education [20,21], providing emotional support for patient [22,23], assisting in remote mental health monitoring [24–26], aiding tobacco cessation [27–30], enhancing drug compliance, and alleviating symptoms of depression and anxiety [7,31,32].”
The role of chatbots and virtual assistants in enhancing tobacco cessation counselling
Deepika, V., Jodalli, P. S., & Avinash, B. R. (2025) · Frontiers in Digital Health · doi:10.3389/fdgth.2025.1503227 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Jarrahi, M. H., Karami, A., Conway, P., Memariani, A., & Lutz, C. (2025) · Technology in Society · doi:10.1016/j.techsoc.2025.103127 · Cited by 6 · cited 1× · see citing works
“…of Artificial Intelligence (AI), characterized by unprecedented advances in machine learning algorithms and large language models, has pervaded many decision-making domains [1], enabling AI systems to imitate and augment human cognitive functions in reasoning, learning, and problem solving [2–4].”
Giang, N. T. T., & Nga, P. T. H. (2024) · Tạp chí Nghiên cứu Tài chính - Marketing · doi:10.52932/jfm.vi2.479 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Pognon, P. R., Boima, F., & Mekonnen, Z. A. (2025) · Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare · doi:10.2147/jmdh.s509441 · Cited by 5 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Recent empirical evidence from digital health implementations consistently validates the positive relationship between system quality and user acceptance [90,91].”
Abdullah, M. S. A. M., Aizuddin, A. N., & Manaf, M. R. A. (2025) · Malaysian Journal of Medical Sciences · doi:10.21315/mjms-12-2024-952 · Cited by 5 · cited 4× · see citing works
“…this vein, evaluating information quality involves assessing factors such as completeness, accuracy, uniqueness, relevance, timeliness, precision, comprehensibility, conciseness, and informativeness that pertain to relationships with users’ acceptance and intention to use IS-based services [76,77].”
InfluentialLawati, A. A., Al-Mahrouqi, T., Maskari, A. A., Riyami, Q. A., Aufi, H. A., Jose, S., & Sinawi, H. A. (2026) · Middle East Current Psychiatry · doi:10.1186/s43045-026-00628-z · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Customers' intentions to adopt digital health services: An extended TAM
Mechta, M., Mouloudj, K., Bouarar, A. C., et al. (2024) · Marketing Science & Inspirations · doi:10.46286/msi.2024.19.4.1 · Cited by 5 · cited 1× · see citing works
“The domain has been recognized in the extant literature as a significant factor influencing users’ behavioral intentions [99,100] and actual use of digital systems [101].”
Nuhadriel, Y., & Keni, K. (2022) · Advances in economics, business and management research/Advances in Economics, Business and Management Research · doi:10.2991/aebmr.k.220501.072 · Cited by 4 · cited 1× · see citing works
“[150] confirmed that system quality does not significantly influence behavioral intention to use online services, suggesting that technical attributes become less salient when trust and service interactions dominate adoption decisions.”
Widiatmo, A. B., Astuti, S., & Waluyo, D. E. (2025) · International Journal of Professional Business Review · doi:10.26668/businessreview/2025.v10i3.5347 · Cited by 4 · cited 3× · see citing works
“…with prior empirical evidence affirming that satisfaction functions as a direct predictor and motivator for sustained system engagement [52,94,116,118], this study posits that users who experience high satisfaction with healthcare chatbot services through positive interactions, perceived…”
Public acceptance of LLM-driven healthcare chatbots in China: An empirical study
Qian, Y., Fu, Y., Chen, Y., Ke, L., & Zhao, X. (2026) · Digital Health · doi:10.1177/20552076261437614 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
MedBot : A GenAI based Chatbot for Healthcare
Agarwal, P. (2024) · INTERANTIONAL JOURNAL OF SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH IN ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT · doi:10.55041/ijsrem35757 · Cited by 2 · cited 1× · see citing works
“…services over other AI technological alternatives, particularly in reshaping healthcare service delivery models by enhancing accessibility, personalization, and efficiency [5,8,9], while simultaneously recasting patient education, interaction, and engagement with health information [10–12].”
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 10
- [15]Ramesh G. Deekshitha Priyanka M. Suhas S. Tarun M. Transforming Healthcare: A Comprehensive Review of AI-Powered Chatbots Impact and Applications in Healthcare Services Proceedings of the 2025 International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Data Engineering (AIDE) Nitte, India 6–7 February 2025 73 78
- [31]Fang K.Y. Bjering H. Ginige A. Adherence, Avatars and Where to from Here Connecting the System to Enhance the Practitioner and Consumer Experience in Healthcare IOS Press Amsterdam, The Netherlands 2018 45 50
- [36]Lai Y. Lioliou E. Panagiotopoulos P. Understanding Users’ Switching Intention To Ai-Powered Healthcare Chatbots Proceedings of the 29th European Conference on Information Systems (ECIS 2021) Marrakech, Morocco 14–16 June 2021
- [75]Romney M. Steinbart P. Mula J. McNamara R. Tonkin T. Accounting Information Systems Australasian Pearson Higher Education AU Melbourne, VIC, Australia 2012
- [81]Gatiti P. Ndirangu E. Mwangi J. Mwanzu A. Ramadhani T. Enhancing Healthcare Quality in Hospitals through Electronic Health Records: A Systematic Review J. Health Inform. Dev. Ctries. 2021 15 1
- [98]Zaineldeen S. Hongbo L. Koffi A.L. Review of the DeLone and McLean Model of Information Systems Success’ Background and It’s an Application in the Education Setting, and Association Linking with Technology Acceptance Model Int. J. Res. Soc. Sci. 2020 10 27 42
- [112]Scott M. DeLone W.H. Golden W. Understanding Net Benefits: A Citizen-Based Perspective on eGovernment Success Proceedings of the 30th International Conference on Information Systems (ICIS 2009) Phoenix, AZ, USA 15–18 December 2009
- [113]Urbach N. Müller B. The Updated DeLone and McLean Model of Information Systems Success Information Systems Theory: Explaining and Predicting Our Digital Society Springer New York, NY, USA 2011 Volume 1 1 18
- [127]Hair J.F. Hult G.T.M. Ringle C.M. Sarstedt M. A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) 3rd ed. Sage Publications Thousand Oaks, CA, USA 2022
- [132]Hair J.F. Hult G. Ringle C.M. Sarstedt M. A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) SAGE Publications Thousand Oaks, CA, USA 2014
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Zhou, Z., Zhou, Y., Ouyang, B., Man, S. S., & Chan, A. H. S. (2026) · Healthcare · doi:10.3390/healthcare14131978
“While AR technology has been developed for various applications in healthcare and education, its use in a blended-reality approach is considered effective for administering CBT, particularly for SAD [28–32].”
Dabas, D., & Singh, S. (2026) · International Journal of Quality and Service Sciences · doi:10.1108/ijqss-04-2026-0125
- Authors
- Sarhan, M. Y., Alarify, M., & Khojah, M.
- Affiliations
- King Abdulaziz University (SA)
- Engineering Department, Real Estate General Authority, Riyadh 13325, Saudi Arabia
- Corresponding author
- Khojah, Mohammed
- Venue
- Healthcare
- Publisher
- MDPI AG
- Published
- 2026-05-13
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 1324
- ISSN
- 2227-9032 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC13205441
- OpenAlex
- W7161063586
- Cited by
- 2
- References
- 114
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2
- FWCI
- 14.49
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Healthcare (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- KAU Endowment (WAQF) at King Abdulaziz University
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Technology Adoption and User Behaviour
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Health, Technology, Consumer Behavior
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
- Keywords
- healthcare chatbots, trust, DeLone and McLean IS success model, information quality, system quality, service quality, intention to use, user satisfaction, net benefit, user acceptance, technology adoption, patient engagement, artificial intelligence in healthcare
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review