Cited by 339Health, Environment, Cognitive AgingAir Quality and Health ImpactsToxic Organic Pollutants Impact

Effects of Age, Season, Gender and Urban-Rural Status on Time-Activity: Canadian Human Activity Pattern Survey 2 (CHAPS 2)

Open access
Matz, Carlyn, Stieb, David, Davis, Karelyn, Egyed, Marika, Rose, Andreas, Chou, Benedito, Brion, Orly·2014·International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health

Abstract

Estimation of population exposure is a main component of human health risk assessment for environmental contaminants. Population-level exposure assessments require time-activity pattern distributions in relation to microenvironments where people spend their time. Societal trends may have influenced time-activity patterns since previous Canadian data were collected 15 years ago. The Canadian Human Activity Pattern Survey 2 (CHAPS 2) was a national survey conducted in 2010–2011 to collect time-activity information from Canadians of all ages. Five urban and two rural locations were sampled using telephone surveys. Infants and children, key groups in risk assessment activities, were over-sampled. Survey participants (n = 5,011) provided time-activity information in 24-hour recall diaries and responded to supplemental questionnaires concerning potential exposures to specific pollutants, dwelling characteristics, and socio-economic factors. Results indicated that a majority of the time was spent indoors (88.9%), most of which was indoors at home, with limited time spent outdoors (5.8%) or in a vehicle (5.3%). Season, age, gender and rurality were significant predictors of time activity patterns. Compared to earlier data, adults reported spending more time indoors at home and adolescents reported spending less time outdoors, which could be indicative of broader societal trends. These findings have potentially important implications for assessment of exposure and risk. The CHAPS 2 data also provide much larger sample sizes to allow for improved precision and are more representative of infants, children and rural residents.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/ijerph110202108

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [25]Isaacs K. Goldsmith R. Challenges in Building a Framework for Rapid Collection and Dissemination of Human Activity Data for Use in Exposure and Risk Assessment Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the International Society of Exposure Science Seattle, WA, USA 28 October–1 November 2010
  2. [29]Assessing the Representativeness of Public Opinion Surveys Available online: http://www.people-press.org/2012/05/15/assessing-the-representativeness-of-public-opinion-surveys/ (accessed on 7 November 2013)

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Matz, C., Stieb, D., Davis, K., Egyed, M., Rose, A., Chou, B., & Brion, O.
Affiliations
  • Health Canada (CA)
  • Malatest & Associates, Ltd., 858 Pandora Ave, Victoria, BC V8W 1P4, Canada
Corresponding author
Matz, Carlyn
Venue
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2014-02-19
Volume
11
Issue
2
Pages
2108-2124
ISSN
1660-4601 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2062857997
Cited by
339
References
23
Citations by year
2026: 28 · 2025: 44 · 2024: 43 · 2023: 32 · 2022: 34 · 2021: 42 · 2020: 37 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 24 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 8
FWCI
9.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
Health Canada
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Health, Environment, Cognitive Aging
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Air Quality and Health Impacts
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Toxic Organic Pollutants Impact
Keywords
time-activity patterns, human activity patterns, indoor time, outdoor time, urban-rural differences, seasonal variation, age differences, gender differences, infants and children, environmental exposure assessment, human health risk assessment, housing characteristics, socioeconomic factors
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Age Factors, Aged, Canada, Child, Child, Preschool, Environmental Exposure, Female, Humans, Human Activities, Infant, Male, Middle Aged, Rural Population, Seasons, Sex Factors, Urban Population, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review