Cited by 8Air Quality and Health ImpactsIndoor Air Quality and Microbial ExposureAllergic Rhinitis and Sensitization

Association of Short-Term Exposure to Ambient Fine Particulate Matter with Skin Symptoms in Schoolchildren: A Panel Study in a Rural Area of Western Japan

Open access
Watanabe, Masanari, Noma, Hisashi, Kurai, Jun, Sano, Hiroyuki, Iwata, Kyoko, Hantan, Degejirihu, Tohda, Yuji, Shimizu, Eiji·2017·International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health

Abstract

Numerous studies have unmasked the deleterious effects of particulate matter less than 2.5 μm (PM2.5) on health. However, epidemiologic evidence focusing on the effects of PM2.5 on skin health remains limited. An important aspect of Asian dust (AD) in relationship to health is the amount of PM2.5 contained therein. Several studies have demonstrated that AD can aggravate skin symptoms. The current study aimed to investigate the effects of short-term exposure to PM2.5 and AD particles on skin symptoms in schoolchildren. A total of 339 children recorded daily skin symptom scores during February 2015. Light detection and ranging were used to calculate AD particle size. Generalized estimating equation logistic regression analyses were used to estimate the associations among skin symptoms and the daily levels of PM2.5 and AD particles. Increases in the levels of PM2.5 and AD particles were not related to an increased risk of skin symptom events, with increases of 10.1 μg/m3 in PM2.5 and 0.01 km−1 in AD particles changing odds ratios by 1.03 and 0.99, respectively. These results suggest that short-term exposure to PM2.5 and AD does not impact skin symptoms in schoolchildren.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/ijerph14030299

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • 10-unit increases in PM2.5 or O3 and 2-unit increases in NO2 or SO2 did not correlate with worsening of AD symptoms in Japanese school children (N=339).

    “In contrast, 10‐unit increases in PM2.5 or O3 and 2‐unit increases in NO2 or SO2 did not correlate with worsening of AD symptoms in Japanese school children (N = 339).89”

    From The impact of airborne pollution on skin (2019) · cites this paper as [89]

    Results §3.3 reports no increased risk of skin-symptom events with higher PM2.5, ozone, NO2, or SO2 in children with or without atopic dermatitis; the Abstract gives a sample of 339. But the study measured skin symptoms, not specifically worsening of atopic dermatitis, and the passages report effects per interquartile-range increase rather than the claimed 10- and 2-unit increases (Methods §2.4; page numbers unavailable). (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. [3]World Health Organization Health Relevance of Particulate Matter from Various Sources Report on a WHO Workshop Bonn, Germany 26–27 3 2007 Available online: http://www.euro.who.int/data/assets/pdf_file/0007/78658/E90672.pdf (accessed on 4 January 2017)
  2. [4]Health Effects Institute Health Effects of Outdoor Air Pollution in Developing Countries of Asia: A Literature Review Special Report 15 Health Effects Institute Boston, MA, USA 2004
  3. [22]Verbeke G. Molenberghs G. Linear Mixed Models for Longitudinal Data 2nd ed. Springer New York, NY, USA 2009

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Watanabe, M., Noma, H., Kurai, J., Sano, H., Iwata, K., Hantan, D., Tohda, Y., & Shimizu, E.
Affiliations
  • Tottori University (JP)
  • The Institute of Statistical Mathematics (JP)
  • Kindai University (JP)
Corresponding author
Watanabe, Masanari
Venue
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2017-03-13
Volume
14
Issue
3
Pages
299
ISSN
1660-4601 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2595249139
Cited by
8
References
36
Citations by year
2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3
FWCI
0.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Air Quality and Health Impacts
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Indoor Air Quality and Microbial Exposure
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Immunology and Allergy › Allergic Rhinitis and Sensitization
Keywords
PM2.5, Asian dust, cutaneous manifestations, elementary school students, short-term air pollution exposure, rural children, air quality
MeSH terms
Air Pollutants, Child, Dust, Environmental Exposure, Female, Humans, Japan, Male, Particle Size, Rural Population, Skin Diseases, Odds Ratio

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review