Cited by 107Sleep and Work-Related FatigueSleep and related disordersWorkplace Health and Well-being

Sleep Quality among Police Officers: Implications and Insights from a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Literature

Open access
Garbarino, Sergio, Guglielmi, Ottavia, Puntoni, Matteo, Bragazzi, Nicola Luigi, Magnavita, Nicola·2019·International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health

Abstract

Poor sleep is associated with bad health outcomes, worse wellbeing and decreases in performance, productivity and safety at work. Police officers are exposed to several risk factors including extended work schedules, shift work, occupational stress, dangerous and traumatic events and can, as such, develop sleep problems. The aim of the present study was to analyze the sleep quality among police officers. A systematic literature search, in PubMed/MEDLINE, PsycINFO, Scopus, ISI/Web of Science (WoS) and the Cochrane Library was conducted. Original articles, published in English, French, Italian, Spanish and Portuguese, the primary objective of which was the evaluation of the quality of sleep through the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) in Police Forces, were selected. From an initial sample of 1,149 studies, 13 articles were included in the meta-analysis (3,722 police officers). The pooled prevalence of bad sleep quality in police officers was 51% [95%CI 42–60%]. The pooled global score of the PSQI was 5.6 [95%CI 5.0–6.3], corresponding to a low average quality. At the meta-regressions, statistically significant associations could be found for work seniority (in terms of years of service) and being on shift. The poor quality of sleep in police officers could have negative consequences for workers’ health and for the safety of third parts. The implementation of health and sleep hygiene promotion programs in police forces is strongly recommended.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/ijerph16050885

Cites

59 of 59 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [32]Borenstein M. Hedges L.V. Higgins J.P.T. Rothstein H.R. Introduction to Meta-Analysis Wiley Chichester, UK 2011

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Garbarino, S., Guglielmi, O., Puntoni, M., Bragazzi, N. L., & Magnavita, N.
Affiliations
  • Ospedale Policlinico San Martino (IT)
  • Ente Ospedaliero Ospedali Galliera (IT)
  • UNESCO (FR)
  • Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore (IT)
Corresponding author
Guglielmi, Ottavia
Venue
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2019-03-11
Volume
16
Issue
5
Pages
885
ISSN
1660-4601 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2922039249
Cited by
107
References
59
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 3
FWCI
1.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and Work-Related Fatigue
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and related disorders
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Workplace Health and Well-being
Keywords
sleep quality, police officers, shift work, occupational stress, traumatic events, work seniority, Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index, sleep hygiene, occupational health, occupational safety
MeSH terms
Adult, Female, Humans, Male, Sleep Wake Disorders, Occupational Health, Police

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review