Cited by 43Child Nutrition and Water AccessWater Resource Management and QualityPublic Health and Environmental Issues

Geographic inequalities in accessing improved water and sanitation facilities in Nepal

Open access
Wang, Chao, Pan, Jing, Yaya, Sanni, Yadav, Ram Bilash, Yao, Dechao·2019·International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health

Abstract

In this study, we aimed to assess the geographic inequalities in access to improved water and sanitation facilities among Nepalese households. We conducted this study based on cross-sectional data obtained from Nepal Demographic and Health Surveys. The quality of water sources and sanitation were defined by World Health Organization (WHO) guidelines. The geographic categories used in the analyses included developmental region, ecological zone, and urbanicity. Percentages of households having access to improved toilet (5.6% in 1996 vs. 40.5% in 2016) and water (19.3% in 1996 vs. 27% in 2016) facilities has been increasing steadily since 1996 with a great proportion of the households still lacking access to these services. The number of households sharing the same toilet and traveling time to reach water sources have also decreased at the same time. Households in Far Western and Mountains had the lowest odds of having access to improved toilet and water facilities. Noticeable progress has been achieved in improving WASH (water, sanitation, and hygiene) coverage at national level, however, it is uneven across developmental and ecological zones. Households in the Far Western and Mountain regions appeared to be the most geographically disadvantaged in terms of having access to improved water and sanitation facilities.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/ijerph16071269

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In Ghana, availability and access to safe drinking water and proper sanitation depend on several factors, including geographical location.

    “in Ghana, availability and access to safe drinking water and proper sanitation depend on several factors, including geographical location.”

    From Demographic disparities in unimproved drinking water and sanitation in Ghana: a nationally representative cross-sectional study (2022) · cites this paper as [17]

    The Introduction and Conclusions report that geographic location is associated with access to improved water and sanitation facilities in Nepal. The paper does not establish that this relationship holds in Ghana; the Ghana mention found in our copy is only in a reference title. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [1]Cairncross S. Valdmanis V. Water Supply, Sanitation, and Hygiene Promotion Disease Control Priorities in Developing Countries Jamison D.T. Breman J.G. Measham A.R. Alleyne G. Claeson M. Evans D.B. Jha P. Mills A. Musgrove P. World Bank Washington, DC, USA 2006 978-0-8213-6179-5 21250333

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wang, C., Pan, J., Yaya, S., Yadav, R. B., & Yao, D.
Affiliations
  • China University of Mining and Technology (CN)
  • Université de Parakou (BJ)
  • Social Research Development Centre, Janakpur 03, Nepal
  • Hunan University of Finance and Economics (CN)
Corresponding author
Yao, Dechao
Venue
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2019-04-09
Volume
16
Issue
7
Pages
1269
ISSN
1660-4601 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2939101385
Cited by
43
References
22
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 4
FWCI
3.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Funders
the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (71974168)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Child Nutrition and Water Access
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Water Resource Management and Quality
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Public Health and Environmental Issues
Keywords
regional disparities, improved water access, improved sanitation, household toilets, water sources, ecoregions, urban-rural disparities, mountainous terrain, Nepal, shared toilets
MeSH terms
Cross-Sectional Studies, Demography, Geography, Humans, Nepal, Sanitation, Socioeconomic Factors, Toilet Facilities, Water Supply

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review