Cited by 70Child Nutrition and Water AccessWater Resource Management and QualityPublic Health and Environmental Issues

Households access to improved drinking water sources and toilet facilities in Ethiopia: a multilevel analysis based on 2016 Ethiopian Demographic and Health Survey

Open access
Andualem, Zewudu, Dagne, Henok, Azene, Zelalem Nigussie, Taddese, Asefa Adimasu, Dagnew, Baye, Fisseha, Roman, Muluneh, Atalay Goshu, Yeshaw, Yigizie·2021·BMJ Open

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to assess households access to improved drinking water sources and sanitation facilities and their associated factors in Ethiopia. Design: Cross-sectional study. Setting: Ethiopia. Participants: Household heads. Primary outcomes: Access to improved drinking water sources and toilet facilities. Methods: We conducted an in-depth secondary data analysis of 2016 Ethiopian Demographic and Health Survey. Data from a total of 16 650 households and 645 clusters were included in the analysis. The households were selected using a stratified two-stage cluster sampling technique. Multilevel binary logistic regression analyses were performed to identify factors associated with access to an improved drinking water source and toilet facilities. Adjusted OR with a 95% CI was reported with p value <0.05 was used to declare a significant association between the covariates and the outcome variables. Results: The proportions of households’ access to improved sources of drinking water and toilet facilities were 69.94% (95% CI: 69.23% to 70.63%) and 25.36% (95% CI: 24.69% to 26.03%), respectively. Households headed by women and households with a better wealth index were positively associated with access to improved drinking water sources. Whereas rural households, ≥30 min round trip to obtain drinking water and region were factors negatively associated with households access to improved drinking water sources. A higher probability of having access to improved toilet facilities: households with heads who had attained higher education, households having better access to improved sources of drinking water and households with better wealth index. While the following households were less likely to have access to improved toilet facilities: households with heads were widowed, households with four to six members, rural households and region. Conclusion: The study found that the proportions of households’ access to improved drinking water sources and toilet facilities in Ethiopia were relatively low, which demands the need to tailor strategies to increase the coverage of access to improved drinking water sources and toilet facilities.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-042071

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Households with more members are likely to contribute and mobilise resources for the construction of improved toilet facilities.

    “The possible explanation could be that households with more members are likely to contribute and mobilise resources for the construction of improved toilet facilities.19 28”

    From Demographic disparities in unimproved drinking water and sanitation in Ghana: a nationally representative cross-sectional study (2022) · cites this paper as [28]

    The Discussion says the opposite: households with more members may have fewer resources to build improved toilet facilities. The Results also report that households with four to six members were less likely to have access to improved toilet facilities than households with one to three members. No page numbers are provided in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.94)

    Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [33]Prasetyoputra P, Irianti S. Access to improved sanitation facilities in Indonesia: an econometric analysis of geographical and socioeconomic disparities. Journal of Applied Sciences in Environmental Sanitation 2013; 8.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Andualem, Z., Dagne, H., Azene, Z. N., Taddese, A. A., Dagnew, B., Fisseha, R., Muluneh, A. G., & Yeshaw, Y.
Affiliations
University of Gondar (ET)
Corresponding author
Andualem, Zewudu
Venue
BMJ Open
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2021-03
Volume
11
Issue
3
Pages
e042071
ISSN
2044-6055 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3137850412
Cited by
70
References
23
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 2
FWCI
7.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BMJ Open (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Child Nutrition and Water Access
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Water Resource Management and Quality
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Public Health and Environmental Issues
Keywords
household sanitation, toilets, Ethiopia, household wealth index, household head education, urban-rural differences
MeSH terms
Cross-Sectional Studies, Ethiopia, Family Characteristics, Female, Humans, Sanitation, Toilet Facilities, Multilevel Analysis, Drinking Water

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review