Cited by 35Water Resource Management and QualityChild Nutrition and Water AccessWater Quality and Resources Studies

Water source preferences and water quality perceptions among women in the eastern region, Ghana: a grounded theory study.

Open access
Chew, Jhanel F., Corlin, Laura, Ona, Fernando, Pinto, Sarah, Fenyi-Baah, Esther, Osei, Bernard G., Gute, David M.·2019·International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health

Abstract

Residents in the Eastern Region, Ghana with access to improved water sources (e.g., boreholes and covered wells) often choose to collect water from unimproved sources (e.g., rivers and uncovered wells). To assess why, we conducted two field studies to coincide with Ghana's rainy and dry seasons. During the rainy season, we conducted semi-structured in-depth interviews among a convenience sample of 26 women in four rural communities (including one woman in the dry season). We asked each participant about their attitudes and perceptions of water sources. During the dry season, we observed four women for ≤4 days each to provide context for water collection and water source choice. We used a grounded theory approach considering the multiple household water sources and uses approach to identify three themes informing water source choice: collection of and access to water, water quality perception, and the dynamic interaction of these. Women selected water sources based on multiple factors, including season, accessibility, religious/spiritual messaging, community messaging (e.g., health risks), and ease-of-use (e.g., physical burden). Gender and power dynamics created structural barriers that affected the use of unimproved water sources. A larger role for women in water management and supply decision-making could advance population health goals.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/ijerph16203835

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Providing water on premises is important for overall wellbeing through benefits to quality of life, positive health effects, reduced labour and calorie expenditure, and a potential increase in water quantity for other activities.

    “Other research suggests that providing water on premises is important for overall wellbeing90 through benefits to quality of life, such as the ability to reallocate time previously used for water collection to income generation or leisure,91 positive health effects (eg, on musculoskeletal disorders),92 reduced labour and calorie expenditure,93 and a potential increase in water quantity for other”
  • Women's and girls' bodily integrity has been constrained due to water and sanitation conditions, including limiting bathing and washing, restricting food and water, suppressing defecation and urination urges, delaying changing menstrual materials, and taking anti-diarrheal medicines when lacking sufficient, safe or clean water and sanitation.

    “Specifically, women limited bathing and washing hands, clothes, menstrual materials, and bathrooms; [76,86,98,100,123,144,165,197,198,200,202,229,232,281] restricted food and water to avoid defecation and urination; [135, 168, 174, 179, 184, 192, 212, 224] suppressed defecation and urination urges; [2,62,181,184,188,190,191, 214, 217, 229, 235, 236, 238, 241, 247, 248, 250, 270] delayed changing”
  • Women qualitatively reported perceived linkages between various illnesses and their water and sanitation environments, including diarrhea, vomiting, dysentery, cholera, hepatitis, schistosomiasis, and skin diseases due to polluted water, and diarrhea due to limitations on hygiene in times of water scarcity.

    “Women reported experiencing or fearing diarrhea, vomiting, dysentery, cholera, hepatitis, schistosomiasis, and skin diseases due to polluted water, [65,70,86,111,144,177,178,197,199,214,220,225,231,248,259,273,288] and experiencing diarrhea due to limitations on hygiene in times of water scarcity [70,123,202].”
  • Seasonal changes impacted time spent on water acquisition: during the dry season, women waited for unpredictable water deliveries, spent extra time collecting water when sources dried up, slept or cooked at sources when lines were long, and walked long distances in the dark.

    “Seasonal changes impacted time spent on water acquisition: during the dry season, women waited for often unpredictable and therefore disruptive water deliveries (Philippines [100]); spent extra time collecting water when sources dried up (Ghana [197]); slept or cooked at sources when lines were long (Mozambique [261]); and walked long distances in the dark (Mozambique [153]).”
  • Constraints on women's time limit access to safe water or resources needed to treat or boil water; women also spend considerable time caring for family members ill with water-related diseases.

    “Constraints on women's time limit access to safe water or resources needed to treat or boil water [92,118,197,199,208]. Women also spend considerable time caring for family members ill with waterrelated diseases [26,63,111,177,193,239,240,248,259].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chew, J. F., Corlin, L., Ona, F., Pinto, S., Fenyi-Baah, E., Osei, B. G., & Gute, D. M.
Affiliations
  • Tufts University (US)
  • Boston University (US)
  • Government of Ghana (GH)
  • Wageningen University & Research (NL)
Corresponding author
Chew, Jhanel F.
Venue
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2019-10-11
Volume
16
Issue
20
Pages
3835
ISSN
1660-4601 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2980074894
Cited by
35
References
23
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2
FWCI
0.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (0966093)
  • National Institutes of Health (1T32HL125232)
  • Philanthropic Educational Organization Esther Garrett Edgerton Endowed Scholar Award (NA)
  • Tufts University Vice Provost for Research (NA)
  • Tufts University Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering (NA)
  • Tufts University Jonathon M. Tisch College of Civic Life (NA)
  • Tufts University Institute for Global Leadership (NA)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Water Resource Management and Quality
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Child Nutrition and Water Access
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Water Quality and Resources Studies
Keywords
water quality perception, women, rural water supply, unimproved water sources, seasonal variation, religious and spiritual beliefs, women in water management, Eastern Region of Ghana
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Female, Ghana, Humans, Middle Aged, Rural Population, Seasons, Water Supply, Women, Water Quality, Drinking Water, Grounded Theory

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review