Cited by 27Gestational Diabetes Research and ManagementClinical Laboratory Practices and Quality ControlDiabetes Management and Research

Real-World Gestational Diabetes Screening: Problems with the Oral Glucose Tolerance Test in Rural and Remote Australia

Open access
Jamieson, Emma L., Spry, Erica P., Kirke, Andrew B., Atkinson, David N., Marley, Julia V.·2019·International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health

Abstract

Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is the most common antenatal complication in Australia. All pregnant women are recommended for screening by 75 g oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT). As part of a study to improve screening, 694 women from 27 regional, rural and remote clinics were recruited from 2015–2018 into the Optimisation of Rural Clinical and Haematological Indicators for Diabetes in pregnancy (ORCHID) study. Most routine OGTT samples were analysed more than four hours post fasting collection (median 5.0 h, range 2.3 to 124 h), potentially reducing glucose levels due to glycolysis. In 2019, to assess pre-analytical plasma glucose (PG) instability over time, we evaluated alternative sample handling protocols in a sample of participants. Four extra samples were collected alongside routine room temperature (RT) fluoride-oxalate samples (FLOXRT): study FLOXRT; ice slurry (FLOXICE); RT fluoride-citrate-EDTA (FC Mix), and RT lithium-heparin plasma separation tubes (PST). Time course glucose measurements were then used to estimate glycolysis from ORCHID participants who completed routine OGTT after 24 weeks gestation (n = 501). Adjusting for glycolysis using FLOXICE measurements estimated 62% under-diagnosis of GDM (FLOXRT 10.8% v FLOXICE 28.5% (95% CI, 20.8–29.5%), p < 0.001). FC Mix tubes provided excellent glucose stability but gave slightly higher results (Fasting PG: +0.20 ± 0.05 mmol/L). While providing a realistic alternative to the impractical FLOXICE protocol, direct substitution of FC Mix tubes in clinical practice may require revision of GDM diagnostic thresholds.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/ijerph16224488

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 26

  1. [3]Metzger B.E. Lowe L.P. Dyer A.R. Trimble E.R. Chaovarindr U. Coustan D.R. Hadden D.R. McCance D.R. Hod M. McIntyre H.D. Hyperglycemia and adverse pregnancy outcomes N. Engl. J. Med. 2008 358 1991 2002 10.1056/NEJMoa0707943 18463375 · DOI · Paper page
  2. [4]Pettitt D.J. Knowler W.C. Baird H.R. Bennett P.H. Gestational diabetes: Infant and maternal complications of pregnancy in relation to third-trimester glucose tolerance in the Pima Indians Diabetes Care 1980 3 458 464 10.2337/diacare.3.3.458 7389563 · DOI
  3. [6]Jensen D.M. Damm P. Sorensen B. Molsted-Pedersen L. Westergaard J.G. Klebe J. Beck-Nielsen H. Clinical impact of mild carbohydrate intolerance in pregnancy: A study of 2904 nondiabetic Danish women with risk factors for gestational diabetes mellitus Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2001 185 413 419 10.1067/mob.2001.115864 11518901 · DOI
  4. [8]Chan A.Y. Swaminathan R. Cockram C.S. Effectiveness of sodium fluoride as a preservative of glucose in blood Clin. Chem. 1989 35 315 317 2914384
  5. [10]Nesbitt G.S. Smye M. Sheridan B. Lappin T.R. Trimble E.R. Integration of local and central laboratory functions in a worldwide multicentre study: Experience from the Hyperglycemia and Adverse Pregnancy Outcome (HAPO) Study Clin. Trials 2006 3 397 407 17060214
  6. [11]Hapo Study Cooperative Research Group The Hyperglycemia and Adverse Pregnancy Outcome (HAPO) Study Int. J. Gynaecol. Obstet. 2002 78 69 77 10.1016/S0020-7292(02)00092-9 12113977 · DOI · Paper page
  7. [12]Sacks D.B. Arnold M. Bakris G.L. Bruns D.E. Horvath A.R. Kirkman M.S. Lernmark A. Metzger B.E. Nathan D.M. Clinical B. National Academy of Guidelines and recommendations for laboratory analysis in the diagnosis and management of diabetes mellitus Diabetes Care 2011 34 61 99 10.2337/dc11-9998 21617108 PMC3114322 · DOI · Paper page
  8. [17]Chan H. Lunt H. Thompson H. Heenan H.F. Frampton C.M. Florkowski C.M. Plasma glucose measurement in diabetes: Impact and implications of variations in sample collection procedures with a focus on the first hour after sample collection Clin. Chem. Lab. Med. 2014 52 1061 1068 10.1515/cclm-2013-1059 24706432 · DOI
  9. [18]Daly N. Flynn I. Carroll C. Farren M. McKeating A. Turner M.J. Impact of Implementing Preanalytical Laboratory Standards on the Diagnosis of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus: A Prospective Observational Study Clin. Chem. 2016 62 387 391 10.1373/clinchem.2015.247478 26637478 · DOI · Paper page
  10. [19]Stapleton M. Daly N. O’Kelly R. Turner M.J. Time and temperature affect glycolysis in blood samples regardless of fluoride-based preservatives: A potential underestimation of diabetes Ann. Clin. Biochem. 2017 54 671 676 10.1177/0004563216682978 28084093 · DOI
  11. [20]Song D. Lia M. Hurley J.C. Recommended pre-analytical plasma glucose sampling methodology may distort gestational diabetes mellitus prevalence: Implications for diagnostic thresholds Diabet. Med. 2019 11 11 10.1111/dme.14073 31295362 · DOI
  12. [21]Kirke A.B. Atkinson D. Moore S. Sterry K. Singleton S. Roxburgh C. Parrish K. Porter C. Marley J.V. Diabetes screening in pregnancy failing women in rural Western Australia: An audit of oral glucose tolerance test completion rates Aust. J. Rural Health 2019 10.1111/ajr.12465 30693987 · DOI · Paper page
  13. [23]Coburn H.J. Carroll J.J. Improved manual and automated colorimetric determination of serum glucose, with use of hexokinase and glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase Clin. Chem. 1973 19 127 130 4405159
  14. [24]Harris P.A. Taylor R. Thielke R. Payne J. Gonzalez N. Conde J.G. Research electronic data capture (REDCap)—A metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support J. Biomed. Inf. 2009 42 377 381 10.1016/j.jbi.2008.08.010 PMC2700030 18929686 · DOI · Paper page
  15. [25]Gambino R. Sodium fluoride: An ineffective inhibitor of glycolysis Ann. Clin. Biochem. 2013 50 3 5 10.1258/acb.2012.012135 23129725 · DOI
  16. [26]Daly N. Stapleton M. O’Kelly R. Kinsley B. Daly S. Turner M.J. The role of preanalytical glycolysis in the diagnosis of gestational diabetes mellitus in obese women Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2015 213 84.e1 84.e5 10.1016/j.ajog.2015.03.022 25772210 · DOI
  17. [27]Shen E.X. Moses R.G. Oats J.J.N. Lowe J. McIntyre H.D. Seasonality, temperature and pregnancy oral glucose tolerance test results in Australia BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2019 19 263 10.1186/s12884-019-2413-5 31340766 PMC6657158 · DOI
  18. [28]Brandhorst G. Engelmayer J. Gotze S. Oellerich M. von Ahsen N. Pre-analytical effects of different lithium heparin plasma separation tubes in the routine clinical chemistry laboratory Clin. Chem. Lab. Med. 2011 49 1473 1477 10.1515/CCLM.2011.606 21605014 · DOI
  19. [29]Carey R. Lunt H. Heenan H.F. Frampton C.M. Florkowski C.M. Collection tubes containing citrate stabiliser over-estimate plasma glucose, when compared to other samples undergoing immediate plasma separation Clin. Biochem. 2016 49 1406 1411 10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2016.05.017 27234599 · DOI · Paper page
  20. [30]Desoye G. Nolan C.J. The fetal glucose steal: An underappreciated phenomenon in diabetic pregnancy Diabetologia 2016 59 1089 1094 10.1007/s00125-016-3931-6 26995651 PMC4861753 · DOI
  21. [31]Troisi R.J. Cowie C.C. Harris M.I. Diurnal Variation in Fasting Plasma GlucoseImplications for Diagnosis of Diabetes in Patients Examined in the Afternoon JAMA 2000 284 3157 3159 10.1001/jama.284.24.3157 11135780 · DOI · Paper page
  22. [32]Agarwal M.M. Gestational diabetes mellitus: Screening with fasting plasma glucose World J. Diabetes 2016 7 279 289 10.4239/wjd.v7.i14.279 27525055 PMC4958688 · DOI
  23. [33]van den Berg S.A. Thelen M.H. Salden L.P. van Thiel S.W. Boonen K.J. It takes acid, rather than ice, to freeze glucose Sci. Rep. 2015 5 8875 10.1038/srep08875 25748167 PMC4352852 · DOI · Paper page
  24. [34]Mikesh L.M. Bruns D.E. Stabilization of glucose in blood specimens: Mechanism of delay in fluoride inhibition of glycolysis Clin. Chem. 2008 54 930 932 10.1373/clinchem.2007.102160 18443184 · DOI
  25. [35]Agarwal M.M. Dhatt G.S. Othman Y. Gestational diabetes mellitus prevalence: Effect of the laboratory analytical variation Diabetes Res. Clin. Pract. 2015 109 493 499 10.1016/j.diabres.2015.06.001 26164090 · DOI
  26. [37]White G.H. Farrance I. Uncertainty of measurement in quantitative medical testing: A laboratory implementation guide by the AACB Uncertainty of Measurement Working Group Clin. Biochem. Rev. 2004 25 S1 S24 18650962 PMC1934961

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Jamieson, E. L., Spry, E. P., Kirke, A. B., Atkinson, D. N., & Marley, J. V.
Affiliations
The University of Western Australia (AU)
Corresponding author
Jamieson, Emma L.
Venue
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2019-11-14
Volume
16
Issue
22
Pages
4488
ISSN
1660-4601 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2987418002
Cited by
27
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 7
FWCI
3.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • UWA Profiles and Research Repository (UWA) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • Diabetes Australia (Y17G-MARJ)
  • Lishman Health Foundation (PG 63000695)
  • The University of Western Australia, Rural Clinical School of WA multi-site project grant (PG 63000694)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Gestational Diabetes Research and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Clinical Laboratory Practices and Quality Control
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
Keywords
gestational diabetes mellitus, oral glucose tolerance test, glycolysis, ice slurry storage, diagnostic thresholds
MeSH terms
Adult, Australia, Blood Glucose, Female, Gestational Age, Glucose Tolerance Test, Glycolysis, Humans, Infant, Newborn, Male, Mass Screening, Pregnancy, Rural Population, Diabetes, Gestational, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review