The DOI matches its Crossref record; 21 of the 21 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Using Social Media to Mine and Analyze Public Opinion Related to COVID-19 in China
Open accessAbstract
The outbreak of Corona Virus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) is a grave global public health emergency. Nowadays, social media has become the main channel through which the public can obtain information and express their opinions and feelings. This study explored public opinion in the early stages of COVID-19 in China by analyzing Sina-Weibo (a Twitter-like microblogging system in China) texts in terms of space, time, and content. Temporal changes within one-hour intervals and the spatial distribution of COVID-19-related Weibo texts were analyzed. Based on the latent Dirichlet allocation model and the random forest algorithm, a topic extraction and classification model was developed to hierarchically identify seven COVID-19-relevant topics and 13 sub-topics from Weibo texts. The results indicate that the number of Weibo texts varied over time for different topics and sub-topics corresponding with the different developmental stages of the event. The spatial distribution of COVID-19-relevant Weibo was mainly concentrated in Wuhan, Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei, the Yangtze River Delta, the Pearl River Delta, and the Chengdu-Chongqing urban agglomeration. There is a synchronization between frequent daily discussions on Weibo and the trend of the COVID-19 outbreak in the real world. Public response is very sensitive to the epidemic and significant social events, especially in urban agglomerations with convenient transportation and a large population. The timely dissemination and updating of epidemic-related information and the popularization of such information by the government can contribute to stabilizing public sentiments. However, the surge of public demand and the hysteresis of social support demonstrated that the allocation of medical resources was under enormous pressure in the early stage of the epidemic. It is suggested that the government should strengthen the response in terms of public opinion and epidemic prevention and exert control in key epidemic areas, urban agglomerations, and transboundary areas at the province level. In controlling the crisis, accurate response countermeasures should be formulated following public help demands. The findings can help government and emergency agencies to better understand the public opinion and sentiments towards COVID-19, to accelerate emergency responses, and to support post-disaster management.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Breiman, L. (2001) · Machine Learning · doi:10.1023/a:1010933404324 · Cited by 133,538
(2003) · Journal of Machine Learning Research · doi:10.5555/944919.944937 · Cited by 32,337
Griffiths, T. L., & Steyvers, M. (2004) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0307752101 · Cited by 6,049
Crowdsourcing geographic information for disaster response: a research frontier
Goodchild, M. F., & Glennon, J. A. (2010) · International Journal of Digital Earth · doi:10.1080/17538941003759255 · Cited by 909
Saffari, A., Leistner, C., Santner, J., Godec, M., & Bischof, H. (2009) · 2009 IEEE 12th International Conference on Computer Vision Workshops, ICCV Workshops · doi:10.1109/iccvw.2009.5457447 · Cited by 481
Miller, H. J., & Goodchild, M. F. (2015) · GeoJournal · doi:10.1007/s10708-014-9602-6 · Cited by 391
Jung, S.-M., Akhmetzhanov, A. R., Hayashi, K., Linton, N. M., Yang, Y., Yuan, B., Kobayashi, T., Kinoshita, R., & Nishiura, H. (2020) · Journal of Clinical Medicine · doi:10.3390/jcm9020523 · Cited by 374
Social media analytics for natural disaster management
Wang, Z., & Ye, X. (2018) · International Journal of Geographical Information Science · doi:10.1080/13658816.2017.1367003 · Cited by 314
Topic modeling and sentiment analysis of global climate change tweets
Dahal, B., Kumar, S. A. P., & Li, Z. (2019) · Social Network Analysis and Mining · doi:10.1007/s13278-019-0568-8 · Cited by 296
Latent dirichlet allocation: stability and applications to studies of user-generated content
Koltcov, S., Koltsova, O., & Nikolenko, S. (2014) · Proceedings of the 2014 ACM conference on Web science · doi:10.1145/2615569.2615680 · Cited by 280
Cited by
What social media told us in the time of COVID-19: A scoping review
Tsao, S.-F., Chen, H., Tisseverasinghe, T., Yang, Y., Li, L., & Butt, Z. A. (2021) · The Lancet Digital Health · doi:10.1016/s2589-7500(20)30315-0 · Cited by 816
Social media trust: Fighting misinformation in the time of crisis
Shahbazi, M., & Bunker, D. (2024) · International Journal of Information Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2024.102780 · Cited by 126
Tayal, P., & Bharathi. S, V. (2021) · Journal of Human Behavior in the Social Environment · doi:10.1080/10911359.2020.1825254 · Cited by 23
Metadata
- Authors
- Han, X., Wang, J., Zhang, M., & Wang, X.
- Venue
- International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
- Publisher
- MDPI AG
- Published
- 2020-04-17
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 2788
- ISSN
- 1660-4601 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3017197529
- Cited by
- 361
- References
- 21
- FWCI
- 26.61
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Using Social Media to Mine and Analyze Public Opinion Related to COVID-19 in China. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3390/ijerph17082788
- The paper
- Han, X., Wang, J., Zhang, M., & Wang, X. (2020). Using Social Media to Mine and Analyze Public Opinion Related to COVID-19 in China. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17082788
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.