Cited by 53COVID-19 Prevention and ImpactCOVID-19 and Mental HealthHealth and Wellbeing Research

Correlation between preventive health behaviors and psycho-social health based on the leisure activities of South Koreans in the COVID-19 crisis

Open access
Kim, Young-Jae, Cho, Jeong-Hyung·2020·International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health

Abstract

COVID-19 has caused unprecedented damage worldwide, and quarantine and lockdown measures have been undertaken globally. This study focused on the differences in preventive behaviors and psycho-social health of South Koreans, as people continue engaging in leisure activities under self-regulation without a lockdown measure imposed by the government. For the sample, the frame of the “2018 Population and Housing Census” in South Korea was applied, and data from 1770 people were analyzed. The results showed that the groups participating in culture and arts and social activities displayed characteristics with high prevention. Additionally, the groups that continued leisure activities for more than five years and with family showed high preventive behaviors. Meanwhile, participation in leisure activities with friends of the opposite sex lowered preventive behavior. In terms of psycho-social health, all groups were affiliated to the potential stress group and there were no differences in the period and participation time for leisure activities. Furthermore, the group participating in leisure activities with their school and group experienced psychological stability. When lockdown measures are eased, the aforementioned characteristics should be considered to design government policy; they can also be used as a reference for public health in case of a future outbreak of an epidemic.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/ijerph17114066

Cites

28 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • There is a link between carrying out activities with others frequently and better psychological wellbeing, rather than simply being engaged in leisure activities.

    “because there is a link between carrying out activities with others frequently and better psychological wellbeing, rather than simply being engaged in leisure activities.”

    From Social connections combat loneliness and promote wellbeing among college students coming out of the COVID-19 pandemic (2025) · cites this paper as Kim and Cho, 2020

    The Discussion reports higher psycho-social health among people who participated in leisure activities with others than among those who participated alone. It does not establish that doing activities with others *frequently* is linked to better wellbeing; the Results report no significant difference by leisure-activity participation time or period. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Disruptions in social interactions can have a negative impact on mental health.

    “Disruptions in social interactions can have a negative impact on mental health (Kim and Cho, 2020; Shen et al., 2022)”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [4]CoronaBoard. COVID-19 Dashboard. Last update: 5/1/2020, 10:00:21 AM Available online: https://coronaboard.kr/en/ (accessed on 1 May 2020)

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kim, Y.-J., & Cho, J.-H.
Affiliations
Chung-Ang University (KR)
Corresponding author
Cho, Jeong-Hyung
Venue
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2020-06-07
Volume
17
Issue
11
Pages
4066
ISSN
1660-4601 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3033096366
Cited by
53
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 10 · 2018: 1
FWCI
13.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › COVID-19 Prevention and Impact
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › COVID-19 and Mental Health
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health and Wellbeing Research
Keywords
COVID-19 pandemic, preventive health behavior, leisure, South Koreans, quarantine, lockdown, social activity, psychological stress, family involvement, opposite-sex friends, psychological stability, public health policy
MeSH terms
COVID-19, Adolescent, Adult, Child, Female, Health Surveys, Humans, Leisure Activities, Male, Middle Aged, Pneumonia, Viral, Preventive Health Services, Quarantine, Health Behavior, Coronavirus Infections, Young Adult, Republic of Korea, Pandemics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review