Cited by 8Physical Activity and HealthContext-Aware Activity Recognition SystemsCardiovascular and exercise physiology

Lack of Correlation between Accelerometers and Heart-Rate Monitorization during Exercise Session in Older Adults

Open access
Carbonell-Hernández, Laura, Pastor, Diego, Jiménez-Loaisa, Alejandro, Ballester-Ferrer, Juan Arturo, Montero-Carretero, Carlos, Cervelló, Eduardo·2020·International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health

Abstract

Aging is increasing worldwide; hence, aging-related health is also more relevant. Well-programmed physical exercise is now an indispensable tool to achieve active aging and preserve older people's health. Such "well-programmed" exercise requires efficient and useful tools to measure the activity. The objective of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of accelerometers to estimate two different intensities of physical exercise in older people. Thirty-eight subjects (64.5 ± 5.3 years) were measured during two different sessions of physical exercise: one moderate in intensity, the other of low intensity. Heart rate and accelerometry were recorded and analyzed. The results showed that the two variables in the physical exercise sessions were not highly correlated, and that accelerometry did not seem useful to assess low-intensity sessions not based on walking.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/ijerph17155518

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Generic targets based on broad classifications of intensity are effective at encouraging general lifestyle physical activity, but the one-size-fits-all approach does not provide personalised formative feedback.

    “Generic targets based on such broad classifications of intensity are effective at encouraging general lifestyle PA, but the one-size-fits-all approach does not provide personalised formative feedback.”

    From Mobile Health Biometrics to Enhance Exercise and Physical Activity Adherence in Type 2 Diabetes (MOTIVATE-T2D): a decentralised feasibility randomised controlled trial delivered across the UK and Canada (2025) · cites this paper as [18]

    The Discussion (page not supplied) says standard accelerometer cut-offs may miss differences in older adults’ functional ability and calls for more specific cut-offs, supporting the concern about a one-size-fits-all approach. The paper does not establish that generic intensity targets encourage lifestyle physical activity or assess whether they provide personalised formative feedback. (LLM, conf=0.79)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Participants cannot use generic intensity targets to optimise intensity during purposeful exercise, which may be crucial for improving glycaemic control.

    “Therefore, participants cannot use these targets to optimise intensity during purposeful exercise,18 which may be crucial for improving glycaemic control.4”

    From Mobile Health Biometrics to Enhance Exercise and Physical Activity Adherence in Type 2 Diabetes (MOTIVATE-T2D): a decentralised feasibility randomised controlled trial delivered across the UK and Canada (2025) · cites this paper as [18]

    The Discussion (page unavailable) says accelerometers inadequately assess some exercise sessions in older adults and calls for intensity cut-offs tailored to functional ability and exercise type. This supports a limitation of generic accelerometer targets, but not the broader claim that participants generally cannot use generic intensity targets to optimise exercise. The glycaemic-control clause is attached to a different citation and is not judged here. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 27 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Carbonell-Hernández, L., Pastor, D., Jiménez-Loaisa, A., Ballester-Ferrer, J. A., Montero-Carretero, C., & Cervelló, E.
Affiliations
Universitat de Miguel Hernández d'Elx (ES)
Corresponding author
Pastor, Diego
Venue
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2020-07-30
Volume
17
Issue
15
Pages
5518
ISSN
1660-4601 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3046028643
Cited by
8
References
27
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2
FWCI
0.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación (RTI2018-098335-B-I00, MCIU/AEI/FEDER, UE)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Context-Aware Activity Recognition Systems
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
Keywords
accelerometer, heart rate monitoring, exercise intensity, older adults, active ageing, exercise monitoring, low-intensity exercise, walking, activity measurement
MeSH terms
Aged, Heart Rate, Humans, Exercise, Walking, Accelerometry

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review