Cited by 18Adventure Sports and Sensation SeekingOutdoor and Experiential EducationArt Therapy and Mental Health

Gender Differences in Psychological Outcomes Following Surf Therapy Sessions among U.S. Service Members

Open access
Glassman, Lisa H., Otis, Nicholas P., Michalewicz-Kragh, Betty, Walter, Kristen H.·2021·International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health

Abstract

Surf therapy is increasingly being used as an intervention to address various health problems, including psychological symptoms. Although recent research supports the positive impact of surf therapy on psychological outcomes, it is unclear whether these outcomes differ between men and women. This study compared changes in depression/anxiety (Patient Health Questionnaire-4), positive affect (Positive and Negative Affect Schedule), and pain (Numerical Pain Rating Scale) between U.S. service men and women (N = 74) during six weekly surf therapy sessions. Overall, participants reported decreased depression/anxiety (p < 0.001) and increased positive affect (p < 0.001), but no change in pain rating following each session (p = 0.141). Significant gender differences were found in the magnitude of changes in depression/anxiety (B = −1.01, p = 0.008) and positive affect (B = 4.53, p < 0.001) during surf sessions, despite no differences in pre-session scores on either outcome. Women showed greater improvements in depression/anxiety and positive affect compared with men—an important finding, given that surfing and military environments are often socially dominated by men. Future research is needed to replicate these findings in other samples, extend this research to other underrepresented populations, and identify barriers and facilitators of the sustainable implementation of surf therapy across populations.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/ijerph18094634

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Female and male military service members and veterans demonstrate respite from PTSD symptoms utilizing surf therapy, including decreased depression and anxiety, as well as increased positive affect.

    “Female and male military service members and veterans demonstrate respite from (PTSD) symptoms utilizing surf therapy, including decreased depression and anxiety, as well as increased positive affect.”

    From The Groundswell Community Surf Therapy Intervention for At-Risk Women and Changes in Body Acceptance, Resilience, and Emotional Regulation (2024) · cites this paper as [27]

    The Discussion (page not provided) reports that both male and female service members had decreased depression/anxiety and increased positive affect during surf therapy sessions. The Introduction reports PTSD improvements among some service members and veterans, but does not establish PTSD improvement for both genders or the full set of outcomes for veterans. This study’s own session measures did not assess PTSD symptoms. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 42 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. [12]Booth D. Surf lifesavers and surfers: Cultural and spatial conflict on the Australian beach Sites of Sport: Space, Place Experience Bale J. Vertinsky P. Routledge London, UK 2004 115 131
  2. [24]Borne G. Ponting J. Sustainable Stoke: Transitions to Sustainability in the Surfing World University of Plymouth Press Devon, UK 2015
  3. [34]McCaffery M. Beebe A. Pain: Clinical Manual for Nursing Practice C.V. Mosby Company New York, NY, USA 1989

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Glassman, L. H., Otis, N. P., Michalewicz-Kragh, B., & Walter, K. H.
Affiliations
  • Naval Health Research Center (US)
  • Naval Medical Center San Diego (US)
Corresponding author
Walter, Kristen H.
Venue
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2021-04-27
Volume
18
Issue
9
Pages
4634
ISSN
1660-4601 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3158050556
Cited by
18
References
42
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1
FWCI
3.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
U.S. Navy Bureau of Medicine (Work unit no. N1600)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Adventure Sports and Sensation Seeking
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Outdoor and Experiential Education
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Conservation › Art Therapy and Mental Health
Keywords
surf therapy, gender differences, military personnel, depression, anxiety, positive affect, pain, psychological outcomes, aquatic therapy, implementation barriers and facilitators
MeSH terms
Anxiety, Depression, Female, Humans, Male, Pain, Sex Characteristics, Sex Factors, Sports

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review