Cited by 164Vaccine Coverage and HesitancyRacial and Ethnic Identity ResearchSARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research

Changing the narrative: structural barriers and racial and ethnic inequities in COVID-19 vaccination

Open access
Njoku, Anuli, Joseph, Marcelin, Felix, Rochelle·2021·International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic has disproportionately affected racial and ethnic minority groups in the United States. Although a promising solution of the COVID-19 vaccination offers hope, disparities in access again threaten the health of these communities. Various explanations have arisen for the cause of disparate vaccination rates among racial and ethnic minorities, including discussion of vaccine hesitancy. Conversely, the role of vaccine accessibility rooted in structural racism as a driver in these disparities should be further explored. This paper discusses the impact of structural barriers on racial and ethnic disparities in COVID-19 vaccine uptake. We also recommend public health, health system, and community-engaged approaches to reduce racial disparities in COVID-19 disease and mortality.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/ijerph18189904

Cites

61 of 61 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Inadequate efforts were made to prioritise health and safety of these workers, first in workplace precautions and later in reducing barriers to vaccine access.

    “Inadequate efforts were made to prioritise the health and safety of these workers, first in requiring precautions in their workplaces, and later in reducing structural barriers to accessing vaccines when they became available.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Njoku, A., Joseph, M., & Felix, R.
Affiliations
Southern Connecticut State University (US)
Corresponding author
Njoku, Anuli
Venue
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2021-09-20
Volume
18
Issue
18
Pages
9904
ISSN
1660-4601 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3201399764
Cited by
164
References
61
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 50 · 2023: 52 · 2022: 34 · 2021: 2
FWCI
19.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Racial and Ethnic Identity Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research
Keywords
COVID-19 vaccination, vaccine uptake disparities, racial and ethnic disparities, structural racism, structural barriers, vaccine hesitancy, vaccine access, health disparities, public health interventions
MeSH terms
COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2, COVID-19 Vaccines, Ethnicity, Humans, Minority Groups, United States, Vaccination, Health Status Disparities, Healthcare Disparities, Pandemics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review