Cited by 14Work-Family Balance ChallengesWorkplace Health and Well-beingIntergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving

How do Informal Caregivers of Seniors; Tasks Lead to Presenteeism and Absenteeism Behaviors? A Canadian Quantitative Study

Open access
Beauchamp Legault, Marie-Ève, Chênevert, Denis, Maisonneuve, Francis, Mansour, Sari·2023·International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health

Abstract

This study extends our knowledge on the role of informal caregivers of seniors and the impact of this role on presenteeism and absenteeism at work. Based on the conservation of resources theory, this article seeks to gain insights into the mechanisms and antecedents of presenteeism and absenteeism among employees who are also informal caregivers of seniors. Specifically, this article argues that family-work conflict and emotional exhaustion mediate the relationship between the informal caregiver's role, presenteeism, and absenteeism. Quantitative data (questionnaire) from this cross-sectional study were collected from 915 informal caregivers of seniors from 8 Canadian organizations. Structural equation modelling (SEM) was undertaken using IBM SPSS AMOS 28.0 to test all hypotheses. Informal caregivers of seniors who need to coordinate and organize healthcare are at a higher risk of experiencing family-work conflict. Family-work conflict experienced by informal caregivers subsequently leads to emotional exhaustion, presenteeism, and absenteeism. Because informal caregiving of seniors is likely to increase in coming years for many workers, organizations must be aware of the possible consequences of this role on work productivity. This study shows that not all tasks of informal caregivers of older adults lead to presenteeism and absenteeism through family-work conflict and emotional exhaustion. This study is innovative because, to our knowledge, no study of informal caregivers of older adults has examined the effect of different tasks in this role on presenteeism and absenteeism.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/ijerph20075392

Cites

40 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Navigation load and care-coordination burden, rather than hands-on care alone, is strongly associated with caregiver distress, overwhelm, and burnout.

    “It is this navigation load and care-coordination burden, rather than hands-on care alone, that is strongly associated with caregiver distress, overwhelm, and burnout [31,32].”

    From Home care comparison (2026) · cites this paper as [32]

    The Results (section 5; page unavailable) find that healthcare coordination was associated with family–work conflict, while hands-on personal care was not; they also find an indirect association between coordination and emotional exhaustion. The paper does not establish a direct association with the full set of outcomes claimed—distress, overwhelm, and burnout—and its findings concern working informal caregivers of seniors. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [25]Schulz R. Tompkins C.A. Informal Care The Role of Human Factors in Home Health Care: Workshop Summary National Academies Press Washington, DC, USA 2010 24983032

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Beauchamp Legault, M.-È., Chênevert, D., Maisonneuve, F., & Mansour, S.
Affiliations
  • HEC Montréal, Human Resources Management Department, 3000 Côte-Sainte-Catherine, Montreal, QC H3T 2A7, Canada
  • HEC Montréal (CA)
  • Université TÉLUQ (CA)
Venue
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2023-04-04
Volume
20
Issue
7
Pages
5392
ISSN
1660-4601 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4362620084
Cited by
14
References
40
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 1
FWCI
6.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Work-Family Balance Challenges
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Workplace Health and Well-being
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving
Keywords
informal care, older adults, presenteeism, absenteeism, family-work conflict, emotional exhaustion, conservation of resources theory, labor productivity, care coordination
MeSH terms
Absenteeism, Presenteeism, Aged, Canada, Cross-Sectional Studies, Humans, Surveys and Questionnaires, Caregivers

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review