Cited by 38Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and EducationEthics in medical practiceNursing education and management

Values Clarification Exercises to Prepare Nursing Students for Artificial Intelligence Integration

Open access
De Gagne, Jennie C.·2023·International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) is rapidly revolutionizing health care and education globally, including nursing practice and education. The responsible utilization of AI in a nursing context requires thoughtful consideration of its alignment with nursing values such as compassionate and patient-centered care provision, and respect for diverse perspectives. Values clarification, a vital teaching strategy in nursing education, can reinforce the foundational values and beliefs that guide nursing practice, thereby facilitating nurses’ critical evaluation of the ethical implications of AI implementation. The early introduction of values clarification into nursing education (a) provides students with a framework to prioritize and reflect on the impact of nursing values on their practice, (b) enables educators to make informed decisions and enhance teaching strategies, (c) contributes to the continual improvement of nursing education programs, and (d) fosters an ethical and values-driven approach to the integration of AI into nursing education and practice. This article examines the integration of values clarification into nursing education, offers strategies for nurse educators to integrate AI into their teaching toolkit effectively and ethically, and addresses concerns regarding potential misuses of AI.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/ijerph20146409

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • AI's ability to generate nuanced and complex case studies offers a valuable resource for educators, especially in scenarios where direct clinical experience is limited.

    “AI's ability to generate nuanced and complex case studies offers a valuable resource for educators, especially in scenarios where direct clinical experience is limited.1”

    From The Impact of Artificial Intelligence-Assisted Learning on Nursing Students' Ethical Decision-making and Clinical Reasoning in Pediatric Care (2024) · cites this paper as [1]

    Section 4.1 (Case-Based Learning Exercises; page not supplied) recommends case studies as a way for nursing educators to engage students in examining AI use. It does not say that AI generates nuanced or complex case studies, or that these are especially useful when direct clinical experience is limited. (LLM, conf=0.78)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 13

  1. [2]Davenport T. Kalakota R. The potential for artificial intelligence in health care Future Healthc. J. 2019 6 94 98 10.7861/futurehosp.6-2-94 31363513 PMC6616181 · DOI · Paper page
  2. [4]Bogina V. Hartman A. Kuflik T. Shulner-Tal A. Educating software and AI stakeholders about algorithmic fairness, accountability, transparency and ethics Int. J. Artif. Intell. Educ. 2021 32 808 833 10.1007/s40593-021-00248-0 · DOI · Paper page
  3. [5]Fritz M.R. Guthrie K.L. Values clarification: Essential for leadership learning J. Leadersh. Educ. 2017 16 47 63 10.12806/V16/I1/R4 · DOI
  4. [6]Kulich S.J. Chi R. Values clarification Encyclopedia of Quality of Life and Well-Being Research Michalos A.C. Springer Dordrecht, The Netherlands 2014 10.1007/978-94-007-0753-5_3563 · DOI
  5. [7]Kirschenbaum H. Clarifying values clarification: Some theoretical issues and a review of research Group Organ. Manag. 1976 1 99 116 10.1177/105960117600100109 · DOI
  6. [8]Gradellini C. Gómez-Cantarino S. Dominguez-Isabel P. Molina-Gallego B. Mecugni D. Ugarte-Gurrutxaga M.I. Cultural competence and cultural sensitivity education in university nursing courses. A scoping review Front. Psychol. 2021 12 682920 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.682920 34659003 PMC8514292 · DOI
  7. [9]Antoniou C. Clifton R. Wilson V. Professional values in student nurse education: An integrative literature review Nurs. Ethics 2022 29 1323 1340 10.1177/09697330221085772 35546324 · DOI
  8. [10]Day L. Ziehm S.R. Jessup M.A. Amedro P. Dawson-Rose C. Derouin A. Kennedy B.B. Manahan S. Parish A.L. Remen R.N. The power of nursing: An innovative course in values clarification and self-discovery J. Prof. Nurs. 2017 33 267 270 10.1016/j.profnurs.2017.01.005 28734485 · DOI
  9. [14]De Gagne J.C. Randall P.S. Rushton S. Park H.K. Cho E. Yamane S.S. Jung D. The use of metaverse in nursing education: An umbrella review Nurse Educ. 2023 48 E73 E78 10.1097/NNE.0000000000001327 36450277 · DOI
  10. [16]Pottle J. Virtual reality and the transformation of medical education Future Healthc. J. 2019 6 181 185 10.7861/fhj.2019-0036 31660522 PMC6798020 · DOI
  11. [17]Robert N. How artificial intelligence is changing nursing Nurs. Manag. 2019 50 30 39 10.1097/01.NUMA.0000578988.56622.21 31425440 PMC7597764 · DOI · Paper page
  12. [19]Gelmez K. Bagli H. Tracing design students’ affective journeys through reflective writing Int. J. Technol. Des. Educ. 2018 28 1061 1081 10.1007/s10798-017-9424-1 · DOI
  13. [20]Dabdoub J.P. Brief history of values clarification: Origin, development, downfall, and reflections Rev. Española Pedagog. 2021 79 289 304 10.22550/REP79-2-2021-06 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
De Gagne, J. C.
Affiliations
School of Nursing, Duke University, Durham, NC 27710, USA
Venue
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2023-07-20
Volume
20
Issue
14
Pages
6409
ISSN
1660-4601 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4384932359
Cited by
38
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 3
FWCI
1.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Ethics in medical practice
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Research and Theory › Nursing education and management
Keywords
values clarification, artificial intelligence in nursing, nursing education, nursing values, AI ethics, patient-centered care, compassionate care, nursing faculty, teaching methods, AI misuse, reflective practice
MeSH terms
Artificial Intelligence, Curriculum, Delivery of Health Care, Education, Nursing, Humans, Students, Nursing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review