Cited by 24Endometriosis Research and TreatmentPsychosomatic Disorders and Their TreatmentsMenstrual Health and Disorders

Chronic Pelvic Pain in Endometriosis: Cross-Sectional Associations with Mental Disorders, Sexual Dysfunctions and Childhood Maltreatment

Open access
Netzl, Johanna, Gusy, Burkhard, Voigt, Barbara, Sehouli, Jalid, Mechsner, Sylvia·2022·Journal of Clinical Medicine

Abstract

The aim of this cross-sectional study was to compare the rates of mental disorders, sexual dysfunctions and childhood maltreatment (CM) in women with endometriosis with either chronic pelvic pain (CPP) or minimal to no pelvic pain. Additionally, two models to predict a current mental disorder were tested, including pelvic-pain-related or psychosocial predictor variables. We examined 100 women with confirmed endometriosis (group CPP, n = 50; group NOPAIN, n = 50). Participants responded to a comprehensive questionnaire and the Childhood Trauma Questionnaire. The Diagnostic Interview for Mental Disorders was used to assess mental disorders according to DSM-5 and to screen for sexual dysfunctions. The mean age was 28.8 ± 5.6 (CPP)/2.7 ± 6.3 (NOPAIN). Participants with CPP had higher rates of current mental disorders (p = 0.019), lifetime mental disorders (p = 0.006) and sexual dysfunctions (p < 0.001), but not CM (p = 0.074). In two binary-logistic regression analyses, a greater need for pain relief (aOR = 4.08, p = 0.026) and a sexual dysfunction (aOR = 2.69, p = 0.031) were significant predictors for a current mental disorder. Our findings confirmed the crucial role of pelvic pain for mental and sexual well-being in endometriosis. They highlight the need for pain relief and interdisciplinary care in the treatment of endometriosis.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/jcm11133714

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In a study by Netzl et al., among endometriosis patients reporting severe gynaecological pain, the prevalence of reported traumatic events was 49%, versus 32% in the comparison group with none or little pain; the difference was not statistically significant.

    “In the first group, the investigators found a prevalence of 49% for reported traumatic events (as opposed to 32% in the comparison group). However, the difference was not statistically significant [10].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

1 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 37 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [1]Bulun S.E. Endometriosis Yen & Jaffe’s Reproductive Endocrinology: Physiology, Pathophysiology, and Clinical Management Elsevier, Inc. Amsterdam, The Netherlands 2018 609 642
  2. [27]Field A. Discovering Statistics Using SPSS 3rd ed. Sage Publications London, UK 2009

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Netzl, J., Gusy, B., Voigt, B., Sehouli, J., & Mechsner, S.
Affiliations
  • Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin (DE)
  • Freie Universität Berlin (DE)
Corresponding author
Mechsner, Sylvia
Venue
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2022-06-27
Volume
11
Issue
13
Pages
3714
ISSN
2077-0383 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4283655903
Cited by
24
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 1
FWCI
3.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Clinical Medicine (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
  • Refubium (Universitätsbibliothek der Freien Universität Berlin) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Universitätsbibliothek der FU Berlin Hochschulschriftenstelle u. Dokumentenserver (cc-by)
Funders
Open Access Publication Fund of Charité–Universitätsmedizin Berlin and the German Research Foundation (DFG)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Endometriosis Research and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Menstrual Health and Disorders
Keywords
endometriosis, chronic pelvic pain, mental illness, sexual dysfunction, child abuse, psychosocial predictors, women's health, multidisciplinary care

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review